REVIEW 2 cited by
Meta-learning and data augmentation for mass-generalised jet taggers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Deep neural networks trained for jet tagging are typically specific to a narrow range of transverse momenta or jet masses. Given the large phase space that the LHC is able to probe, the potential benefit of classifiers that are effective over a wide range of masses or transverse momenta is significant. In this work we benchmark the performance of a number of methods for achieving accurate classification at masses distant from those used in training, with a focus on algorithms that leverage meta-learning. We study the discrimination of jets from boosted $Z'$ bosons against a QCD background. We find that a simple data augmentation strategy that standardises the angular scale of jets with different masses is sufficient to produce strong generalisation. The meta-learning algorithms provide only a small improvement in generalisation when combined with this augmentation. We also comment on the relationship between mass generalisation and mass decorrelation, demonstrating that those models which generalise better than the baseline also sculpt the background to a smaller degree.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Generative Amplification with Surrogate Monte Carlo
An amplitude surrogate trained on a few thousand exact LHC amplitude points statistically outperforms the training data, with largest amplification in sparsely populated kinematic tails of Z+g and Z+4g production.
-
Improving the performance of weak supervision searches using data augmentation
Physics-inspired data augmentation halves the signal data requirement for CWoLa weak supervision searches, cutting the practical sensitivity threshold from roughly 6 sigma to roughly 3 sigma.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.