Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MVL-SIB: A Massively Multilingual Vision-Language Benchmark for Cross-Modal Topical Matching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12852 v1 pith:WN5IWF6R submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languageslvlmsmultilingualmvl-sibcross-modalmatchingvision-languagebenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing multilingual vision-language (VL) benchmarks often only cover a handful of languages. Consequently, evaluations of large vision-language models (LVLMs) predominantly target high-resource languages, underscoring the need for evaluation data for low-resource languages. To address this limitation, we introduce MVL-SIB, a massively multilingual vision-language benchmark that evaluates both cross-modal and text-only topical matching across 205 languages -- over 100 more than the most multilingual existing VL benchmarks encompass. We then benchmark a range of of open-weight LVLMs together with GPT-4o(-mini) on MVL-SIB. Our results reveal that LVLMs struggle in cross-modal topic matching in lower-resource languages, performing no better than chance on languages like N'Koo. Our analysis further reveals that VL support in LVLMs declines disproportionately relative to textual support for lower-resource languages, as evidenced by comparison of cross-modal and text-only topical matching performance. We further observe that open-weight LVLMs do not benefit from representing a topic with more than one image, suggesting that these models are not yet fully effective at handling multi-image tasks. By correlating performance on MVL-SIB with other multilingual VL benchmarks, we highlight that MVL-SIB serves as a comprehensive probe of multilingual VL understanding in LVLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multilingual visual question-answering benchmark across 11 languages and 5 social attributes, evaluated on 7 large multimodal models.

Pith tools