REVIEW 1 cited by
Identifying Authorship Style in Malicious Binaries: Techniques, Challenges & Datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Attributing a piece of malware to its creator typically requires threat intelligence. Binary attribution increases the level of difficulty as it mostly relies upon the ability to disassemble binaries to identify authorship style. Our survey explores malicious author style and the adversarial techniques used by them to remain anonymous. We examine the adversarial impact on the state-of-the-art methods. We identify key findings and explore the open research challenges. To mitigate the lack of ground truth datasets in this domain, we publish alongside this survey the largest and most diverse meta-information dataset of 15,660 malware labeled to 164 threat actor groups.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On Technique Identification and Threat-Actor Attribution using LLMs and Embedding Models
GPT-4's TTP lists match human MITRE labels only 39% by Jaccard similarity, yet an embedding-based attribution model ranks the correct threat actor 7.55 on average out of 29, beating the random baseline of 15.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.