Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 50 references

Simulating neural network criticality and resource dynamics with Rydberg gases

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a facilitated ultracold Rydberg gas can serve as a controlled physical simulator of neural-network criticality, reproducing power-law avalanches, universal shape collapse, and resource-driven oscillations near a non-e

desk verdict A solid Rydberg platform paper whose central criticality evidence hinges on avalanche fits that lack uncertainties and accessible data — worth refereeing, but the neural-network claims need to be softened or the fits hardened. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16368 v2 pith:WNOBHAVD submitted 2026-07-17 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Patrick Mischke , Herwig Ott , Michael Fleischhauer , Thomas Niederprüm This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords neuralcriticalityRydbergfacilitationultracoldgasesnon-equilibriumphasetransitionsavalancheself-organizeddragonkingavalanchescontactprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that an ultracold gas of rubidium atoms coupled by Rydberg facilitation is a faithful, controllable simulator of the critical dynamics believed to underlie efficient neural networks. The central move is to identify each atom with a neuron, a facilitated excitation with a synaptic spike, atom loss with metabolic resource consumption, and optical pumping with resource replenishment. Against this mapping, the experiment measures all six criteria for criticality in one platform: an absorbing-to-active phase transition with branching ratio one, power-law avalanche statistics obeying the scaling relation, and collapse of avalanche shapes onto one universal curve. It also finds that correlations peak at the critical point and that, slightly in the active phase, the system shows stochastic oscillations and dragon-king avalanches, matching predictions for systems orbiting criticality. If correct, this gives experimental access to questions about cortical criticality that biological data alone cannot answer because of undersampling and lack of control.

What carries the argument

Rydberg facilitation, the distance-selective resonance at r_fac = (C6/Delta)^(1/6) at which an excited atom switches a nearby ground-state atom into resonance, creates dynamic local synaptic connections; strong dephasing renders the resulting spreading a classical contact process, mapping the gas to the susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic model with an absorbing-state phase transition. An optical-pumping gain from a reservoir hyperfine state replenishes lost atoms and tunes the steady state, while a parameter-free mean-field branching-ratio integral over the optical Bloch equations predicts the critical density where the branching ratio equals one.

What would settle it

Measure the avalanche distributions at substantially finer time binning (e.g., 10 microseconds rather than 50 microseconds) and verify that the exponents tau_m, tau_t, and the shape collapse are independent of bin width; or directly measure the dephasing rate through coherence spectroscopy and check whether it is large enough to justify the classical contact-process mapping. If exponents shift systematically with binning, or if the branching ratio computed from independently measured two-atom facilitation probabilities deviates from 1 at the apparent critical density, the central claim would b

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The experiments demonstrate that a driven, dissipative Rydberg gas with a controlled gain channel exhibits a non-equilibrium phase transition of the same type as the neural SIS/contact-process class. Tuning the ground-state density across a predicted critical density (branching ratio = 1, derived from a parameter-free mean-field integral over the optical Bloch equations) yields a power-law order parameter with exponent beta near 0.78, avalanche magnitude and duration distributions consistent with power laws (tau_m near 1.72, tau_t near 2.31), a magnitude-duration exponent gamma near 1.77 obeying the scaling relation, and collapse of rescaled avalanche shapes. With optical pumping acting as a

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation of the observed avalanches as critical phenomena rests on strong dephasing making excitation spreading a classical Markovian contact process; if dephasing is incomplete or long-range interactions and binning distort the dynamics, the power laws and shape collapse lose their stated criticality interpretation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mapping holds, a tabletop atomic system becomes a testbed in which the neural criticality hypothesis can be examined under repeatable, tunable conditions that biological experiments cannot provide.
  • Density, laser detuning, and Rabi frequency act as independent control knobs for the microscopic spreading process, so the phase transition can be crossed in several ways and compared to parameter-free mean-field predictions.
  • The optical-pumping gain mimics metabolic resource replenishment, implying that resource dynamics alone can stabilize quasi-critical operation and generate long-time oscillations in an excitable medium.
  • Peak g(2)(0) near the transition offers a correlation-based estimator of criticality that could be applied to spiking data from real neural networks.
  • Reproduction of dragon-king avalanches in a physical system suggests these extreme events are generic features of resource-limited systems orbiting criticality, not peculiar to biological wiring.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the dephasing rate can be dialed down, the same platform should cross over from the classical contact-process regime to coherent quantum dynamics; a clean observation of that crossover would test the paper's load-bearing dephasing assumption and open a route to quantum neural networks.
  • Beyond the paper: because the gain rate is a continuous knob, one could search directly for self-organized criticality by tuning gain to match loss and watching whether the system tunes itself to the critical density without external parameter adjustment.
  • Beyond the paper: a spatially resolved version of the gain channel could emulate glial resource transport and test whether spatially inhomogeneous replenishment shifts or destroys the critical point, a question the current global-pump setup leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of a Rydberg gas as a simulator for neural-network criticality. Ground-state and Rydberg atoms play the roles of inactive and active neurons, Rydberg facilitation provides the synaptic coupling, and dephasing is invoked to map the system onto a classical contact process / SIS model. The authors map two-dimensional phase diagrams, compute a mean-field branching-ratio critical line from optical Bloch equations without fitting to the activity data, and identify a critical density. At that density they report power-law avalanche magnitude and duration distributions with exponents τ_m = 1.72 and τ_t = 2.31, the scaling relation γ ≈ (τ_t − 1)/(τ_m − 1) with γ = 1.77, and a collapse of averaged avalanche shapes. They then implement an optical-pumping gain mechanism to compensate atom loss, show attraction to a steady state, measure a peak in g(2)(0) near the critical point, and observe oscillations and dragon-king avalanches slightly in the active phase. The central claim is that facilitated Rydberg gases possess all necessary properties to simulate critical dynamics in realistic neural networks.

Significance. If the criticality evidence is robust, this is a significant advance: it offers a tunable, time-resolved, single-particle-resolved experimental platform for studying questions from the neural-criticality literature, with a resource-replenishment channel that goes beyond most cold-atom analogues. The manuscript has real strengths: the branching-ratio calculation is an independent, non-fit anchor for the phase boundary; the phase diagrams cover a wide parameter range; and the gain mechanism is a genuinely useful control knob. The paper also connects to a defined six-criterion framework. However, the avalanche statistics and shape collapse—the direct evidence for criteria IV–VI—are presented without uncertainties and with preprocessing choices that are not shown to be innocuous, and the underlying dataset is not yet publicly available. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's strongest claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Proximity to a Critical Point, Fig. 3; Methods] The avalanche exponents τ_m = 1.72, τ_t = 2.31, and γ = 1.77 are quoted without uncertainties, fit ranges, or goodness-of-fit measures. The fits omit points labeled 'insufficient statistics' and the first two durations, while an avalanche is defined by an empty 50-μs bin. These binning and truncation choices can generate apparent power laws and a misleading collapse even for non-critical finite-size data. Because criteria IV and V rest entirely on these fits, and because the text itself states that the avalanche exponents lie above theoretically predicted values and describes the system as quasi-critical, the evidence does not currently establish the claimed criticality. Please provide uncertainties, a specified fitting procedure (e.g., maximum likelihood with a stated range), robustness checks against bin width and truncation, and comparisons with alternative distributions or surrogate
  2. [Proximity to a Critical Point, Fig. 3(e)] The avalanche shape collapse is presented without a quantitative measure of collapse quality. The first two durations are omitted due to temporal resolution, and the amplitude rescaling uses γ = 1.77 obtained from the same dataset. This is an internal consistency check, not an independent confirmation of universality. A quantitative collapse error, residuals, or a comparison with non-critical surrogates is needed before criterion VI can be considered resolved.
  3. [Data Availability, Ref. [50]] The Data Availability section states that the data are publicly available, but the cited entry [50] is currently listed as 'unpublished'. Given that the central avalanche claims depend on preprocessing choices and fits, independent re-analysis is essential. Please deposit the processed data, the raw bin counts, and the analysis code with a stable DOI, and ensure the reference is updated to a published dataset.
  4. [Neural Network Simulator; Methods, Eq. (1)] The branching-ratio calculation is described as having 'no free fit parameters,' but Eq. (1) depends on the calibrated values of Ω, γ, γ*, Δ, and C6, and on the assumption of a homogeneous mean-field density n. This is not a criticism of the approach—the calculation is a valuable independent anchor—but the phrase 'parameter-free' should be clarified, and a sensitivity analysis with respect to the input parameters and the mean-field assumption should be reported. Otherwise the reader cannot judge how robust the yellow critical line in Fig. 2 is.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2(b)] The fit φ = (n − n_c)^β is shown but the fitting range, background subtraction, and treatment of points far from the transition are not described. Please add these details and specify whether β is consistent with the cited directed-percolation value over the full fit range.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption says 'Data points with insufficient statistics (gray) have been omitted for fitting the exponent' and 'the first two durations have been omitted.' Please state the exact fit ranges and the number of points used in each fit.
  3. [Fig. 4(c)] The dragon-king claim rests on a visual deviation from an extrapolated power law. Please provide a statistical test (e.g., comparison of counts in the large-m interval against the fitted power-law expectation with uncertainties) and describe how the interval averaging for m > 67 is performed.
  4. [Fig. 4(b) inset] The g^(2)(0) peak is a central observation, but the inset shows points without error bars. Please add uncertainties or state that they are smaller than the symbol size.
  5. [Methods, avalanche definition] The use of a single empty 50-μs bin to terminate an avalanche should be discussed explicitly in the main text, since it sets the temporal resolution of both P(t) and the shape collapse and may bias the shortest-duration bin.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No derivational circularity: branching-ratio prediction is parameter-free and independent of the avalanche fits; only minor self-citations support the quasi-critical interpretation.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative prediction is the branching-ratio critical line, computed from optical-Bloch-equation probability Pfac with independently calibrated parameters (Rabi frequency from microwave light-shift calibration, C6 from pairinteraction, Rydberg decay/dephasing from known properties) and compared with the measured activity onset in Fig. 2. This calculation is not fitted to the avalanche data, so criteria I-III are self-contained. The avalanche power laws, scaling relation, and shape collapse in Fig. 3 are measured at a density close to the fitted critical density nc, but the power-law exponents and the collapse are not forced by that choice; they are observations from the binned ion-count signal. The collapse uses gamma from the independent magnitude-duration fit rather than being obtained by optimizing the collapse itself. The main self-referential element is interpretive: the avalanche exponents lie 'above theoretically predicted values', and the paper invokes its own earlier work (Refs. [25] and [36]) to explain this deviation and to claim compatibility with (anomalous) directed percolation. That is a supporting appeal, not the derivation of the observed distributions, so it is at most a minor non-load-bearing self-citation rather than a constructional circle. The manuscript explicitly labels the system 'quasi-critical', and it flags the data-availability entry [50] as unpublished, but missing data and fit robustness are reproducibility/correctness concerns, not circularity. Overall: no significant derivational circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The free parameters are fitted exponents and the fitted critical density used to characterize the transition; the axioms are the standard quantum-optics tools, the SIS/contact-process mapping, and the neuron/resource analogies.

free parameters (5)
  • Critical density n_c = 20.9(7) µm^-3
    Fitted from the power-law scaling phi=(n-n_c)^beta in Fig. 2(b); used to set the operating point 'close to the critical density' for the avalanche and correlation measurements.
  • Order-parameter exponent beta = 0.78(2)
    Fitted from the same activity-vs-density cut; compared to anomalous directed-percolation expectations, though no explicit uncertainty comparison to theory is given.
  • Avalanche magnitude exponent tau_m = 1.72
    Fitted to P(m) in Fig. 3(a); no uncertainty quoted; used to support power-law criterion IV.
  • Avalanche duration exponent tau_t = 2.31
    Fitted to P(t) in Fig. 3(b); no uncertainty quoted; used with gamma in the scaling relation criterion V.
  • Magnitude-duration exponent gamma = 1.77
    Fitted to <m>_t vs t in Fig. 3(c); used for the amplitude rescaling in the avalanche shape collapse criterion VI.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The two-level optical Bloch equations with decay and dephasing describe the test atom, and integrating P_fac over density gives the branching ratio BR (S.I. Eq. 1).
    Standard quantum-optics treatment, but the mean-field volume integration assumes no spatial correlations between Rydberg atoms.
  • domain assumption Strong dephasing reduces facilitation-based excitation spreading to a classical contact process / SIS epidemic model on a dynamic Erdős–Rényi graph.
    Invoked in the 'Neural Network Simulator' section and inherited from refs. [25,26]; this is the mechanism that assigns the transition to a directed-percolation universality class.
  • domain assumption The detected ion count rate is linearly proportional to the Rydberg density through a constant efficiency eta < 1.
    Stated in Methods: 'the activity in counts per time unit is directly proportional to the Rydberg density n_Ryd' with a constant proportionality factor.
  • domain assumption An avalanche ends whenever there is an empty 50-microsecond bin, and short-duration or low-statistics avalanches can be omitted from fits.
    Avalanche definition in Methods and the omission rules in the Fig. 3 caption directly shape P(m), P(t), and the shape collapse.
  • domain assumption Atom loss through ionization is a functional proxy for metabolic resource consumption in biological networks, and optical pumping is a proxy for resource replenishment.
    This mapping motivates the gain mechanism and the claim of relevance to neural networks; it is asserted rather than validated against a biological model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simulating neural network criticality and resource dynamics with Rydberg gases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WNOBHAVD

@misc{pith2026260716368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simulating neural network criticality and resource dynamics with Rydberg gases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WNOBHAVD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16368}
}
read the original abstract

Efficient operation of neural networks has been linked to criticality in their underlying non-equilibrium excitation dynamics. However, obtaining experimental evidence of this conjecture remains challenging due to limited control and undersampling in biological systems. Here, we experimentally explore neural network criticality using an ultracold Rydberg gas as a highly controllable simulator. We highlight the similarity of the excitation spreading via Rydberg facilitation and the synaptic connection of spiking activity of neurons, giving rise to distinct absorbing and active phases. We systematically explore and resolve criticality criteria, including power-law scaling of excitation avalanches and the emergence of universal avalanche shape collapse. Crucially, we implement a controlled gain mechanism to compensate for atom loss, mimicking metabolic resource replenishment and stabilizing the system in a controlled non-equilibrium steady state. We find peak temporal correlations at the critical point and stochastic oscillations with dragon king avalanches in the active phase, consistent with predictions for systems orbiting criticality. Our work establishes facilitated Rydberg gases as a platform for investigating criticality, resource dynamics, and emergent oscillations in neural networks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16368 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. 2D phase diagrams of the system for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Top Row: Power-law behavior in the avalanche distributions close to the critical point: distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [50]

    Mischke, T

    P. Mischke, T. Niederpr¨ um, and H. Ott, Simulating neu- ral network criticality and resource dynamics with ultra- cold rydberg gases [dataset] (unpublished) (2026). Supplementary Information for Simulating neural network criticality and resource dynamics with Rydberg gases Patrick Mischke ,1, 2,∗ Herwig Ott ,1 Michael Fleischhauer ,1 and Thomas Niederpr¨...

    2026

  2. [1]

    C. G. Langton, Computation at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation, Physica D: Non- linear Phenomena42, 12 (1990)

    1990

  3. [2]

    J. M. Beggs and D. Plenz, Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits, Journal of Neuroscience23, 11167 (2003)

    2003

  4. [3]

    J. M. Beggs, The criticality hypothesis: How local cor- tical networks might optimize information processing, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences366, 329 (2007)

    2007

  5. [4]

    de Arcangelis and H

    L. de Arcangelis and H. J. Herrmann, Learning as a phe- nomenon occurring in a critical state, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 3977 (2010)

    2010

  6. [5]

    Klaus, S

    A. Klaus, S. Yu, and D. Plenz, Statistical Analyses Support Power Law Distributions Found in Neuronal Avalanches, PLOS ONE6, e19779 (2011)

    2011

  7. [6]

    Friedman, S

    N. Friedman, S. Ito, B. A. W. Brinkman, M. Shimono, R. E. L. DeVille, K. A. Dahmen, J. M. Beggs, and T. C. Butler, Universal Critical Dynamics in High Resolution Neuronal Avalanche Data, Physical Review Letters108, 208102 (2012)

    2012

  8. [7]

    W. L. Shew and D. Plenz, The Functional Benefits of Criticality in the Cortex, The Neuroscientist19, 88 (2013)

    2013

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    E. D. Fagerholm, R. Lorenz, G. Scott, M. Dinov, P. J. Hellyer, N. Mirzaei, C. Leeson, D. W. Carmichael, D. J. Sharp, W. L. Shew, and R. Leech, Cascades and Cogni- tive State: Focused Attention Incurs Subcritical Dynam- ics, Journal of Neuroscience35, 4626 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Kinouchi and M

    O. Kinouchi and M. Copelli, Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality, Nature Physics2, 348 (2006)

    2006

  3. [10]

    W. L. Shew, H. Yang, T. Petermann, R. Roy, and D. Plenz, Neuronal avalanches imply maximum dynamic range in cortical networks at criticality, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience29, 15595 (2009)

    2009

  4. [11]

    S. H. Gautam, T. T. Hoang, K. McClanahan, S. K. Grady, and W. L. Shew, Maximizing Sensory Dynamic Range by Tuning the Cortical State to Criticality, PLOS Computational Biology11, e1004576 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    J. M. Beggs,The Cortex and the Critical Point: Un- derstanding the Power of Emergence(The MIT Press, 2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Vock and C

    S. Vock and C. Meisel, Critical dynamics governs deep learning, 2507.08527

  7. [14]

    J. K.-C. Sun, C. Sipling, Y.-H. Zhang, and M. Di Ventra, Memory in neural activity: Long-range order without criticality, Physical Review E112, 064401 (2025)

    2025

  8. [15]

    Sipling, Y.-H

    C. Sipling, Y.-H. Zhang, and M. Di Ventra, A critical as- sessment of the brain criticality hypothesis, Trends Open https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treopn.2026.06.001 (2026)

    2026 doi

  9. [16]

    J. A. Roberts, K. K. Iyer, S. Vanhatalo, and M. Break- spear, Critical role for resource constraints in neural models, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience8, 10.3389/fn- sys.2014.00154 (2014)

    2014

  10. [17]

    Y. S. Virkar, W. L. Shew, J. G. Restrepo, and E. Ott, Feedback control stabilization of critical dynamics via re- source transport on multilayer networks: How glia enable learning dynamics in the brain, Physical Review E94, 042310 (2016)

    2016

  11. [18]

    Franovi´ c, S

    I. Franovi´ c, S. Eydam, S. Yanchuk, and R. Berner, Collective Activity Bursting in a Population of Excitable Units Adaptively Coupled to a Pool of Resources, Frontiers in Network Physiology2, 10.3389/fnetp.2022.841829 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    Kinouchi, L

    O. Kinouchi, L. Brochini, A. A. Costa, J. G. F. Cam- pos, and M. Copelli, Stochastic oscillations and dragon king avalanches in self-organized quasi-critical systems, Scientific Reports9, 3874 (2019)

    2019

  13. [20]

    de Arcangelis, Are dragon-king neuronal avalanches dungeons for self-organized brain activity?, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics205, 243 (2012)

    L. de Arcangelis, Are dragon-king neuronal avalanches dungeons for self-organized brain activity?, The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics205, 243 (2012)

    2012

  14. [21]

    Mishra, S

    A. Mishra, S. Saha, M. Vigneshwaran, P. Pal, T. Kapita- niak, and S. K. Dana, Dragon-king-like extreme events in coupled bursting neurons, Physical Review E97, 062311 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    C. Ates, T. Pohl, T. Pattard, and J. M. Rost, Antiblock- ade in Rydberg Excitation of an Ultracold Lattice Gas, Physical Review Letters98, 023002 (2007)

    2007

  16. [23]

    Amthor, C

    T. Amthor, C. Giese, C. S. Hofmann, and M. Wei- dem¨ uller, Evidence of Antiblockade in an Ultracold Ry- dberg Gas, Physical Review Letters104, 013001 (2010)

    2010

  17. [24]

    Rutten and J

    D. Rutten and J. Sanders, Modeling Rydberg gases using random sequential adsorption on random graphs, Physi- cal Review A103, 033302 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    Ohler, D

    S. Ohler, D. Brady, P. Mischke, J. Bender, H. Ott, T. Niederpr¨ um, W. Ripken, J. S. Otterbach, and M. Fleischhauer, Nonequilibrium universality of Rydberg-excitation spreading on a dynamic network, Physical Review Research7, 033167 (2025)

    2025

  19. [26]

    E. Levi, R. Guti´ errez, and I. Lesanovsky, Quantum non- equilibrium dynamics of Rydberg gases in the presence of dephasing noise of different strengths, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 184003 (2016)

    2016

  20. [27]

    Schempp, G

    H. Schempp, G. G¨ unter, M. Robert-de-Saint-Vincent, C. S. Hofmann, D. Breyel, A. Komnik, D. W. Sch¨ onleber, M. G¨ arttner, J. Evers, S. Whitlock, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Full Counting Statistics of Laser Excited Rydberg Aggre- gates in a One-Dimensional Geometry, Physical Revi...

    2014

  21. [28]

    Malossi, M

    N. Malossi, M. M. Valado, S. Scotto, P. Huillery, P. Pillet, D. Ciampini, E. Arimondo, and O. Morsch, Full Counting Statistics and Phase Diagram of a Dissipative Rydberg Gas, Physical Review Letters113, 023006 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    Marcuzzi, E

    M. Marcuzzi, E. Levi, W. Li, J. P. Garrahan, B. Olmos, and I. Lesanovsky, Non-equilibrium universality in the dynamics of dissipative cold atomic gases, New Journal of Physics17, 072003 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    Helmrich, A

    S. Helmrich, A. Arias, G. Lochead, T. M. Winterman- tel, M. Buchhold, S. Diehl, and S. Whitlock, Signatures of self-organized criticality in an ultracold atomic gas, Nature577, 481 (2020)

    2020

  24. [31]

    T. M. Wintermantel, M. Buchhold, S. Shevate, M. Mor- gado, Y. Wang, G. Lochead, S. Diehl, and S. Whitlock, Epidemic growth and Griffiths effects on an emergent network of excited atoms, Nature Communications12, 9 103 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    Klocke, T

    K. Klocke, T. M. Wintermantel, G. Lochead, S. Whit- lock, and M. Buchhold, Hydrodynamic Stabilization of Self-Organized Criticality in a Driven Rydberg Gas, Physical Review Letters126, 123401 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    Y. S. Virkar, Dynamic regulation of resource trans- port induces criticality in interdependent networks of excitable units, Physical Review E101, 10.1103/Phys- RevE.101.022303 (2020)

    2020 doi

  27. [34]

    J. P. Sethna, K. A. Dahmen, and C. R. Myers, Crackling noise, Nature410, 242 (2001)

    2001

  28. [35]

    Markovi´ c and C

    D. Markovi´ c and C. Gros, Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature, Physics Reports Power Laws and Self-Organized Criticality in Theory and Na- ture,536, 41 (2014)

    2014

  29. [36]

    Brady, S

    D. Brady, S. Ohler, J. Otterbach, and M. Fleischhauer, Anomalous Directed Percolation on a Dynamic Net- work Using Rydberg Facilitation, Physical Review Let- ters133, 173401 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    L. J. Fosque, R. V. Williams-Garc ´ ıa, J. M. Beggs, and G. Ortiz, Evidence for quasicritical brain dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 098101 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Spasojevi´ c, S

    D. Spasojevi´ c, S. Bukvi´ c, S. Miloˇ sevi´ c, and H. E. Stanley, Barkhausen noise: Elementary signals, power laws, and scaling relations, Physical Review E54, 2531 (1996)

    1996

  32. [39]

    Fries, Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence, Neuron88, 220 (2015)

    P. Fries, Rhythms for Cognition: Communication through Coherence, Neuron88, 220 (2015)

    2015

  33. [40]

    J. Zang, S. Liu, P. Helson, and A. Kumar, Structural constraints on the emergence of oscillations in multi- population neural networks, eLife12, RP88777 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    Marenduzzo, A

    D. Marenduzzo, A. T. Brown, C. W. Miller, and G. J. Ackland, Oscillation in the SIRS model, Journal of The- oretical Biology611, 112169 (2025)

    2025

  35. [42]

    Aliakbarian and S

    N. Aliakbarian and S. Moghimi-Araghi, Transition from self-organized criticality towards self-organized bistabil- ity, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 682, 131148 (2026)

    2026

  36. [43]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  37. [44]

    C. M. Kerskens and D. L´ opez P´ erez, Experimental in- dications of non-classical brain functions, Journal of Physics Communications6, 105001 (2022)

    2022

  38. [45]

    Liu, Y.-C

    Z. Liu, Y.-C. Chen, and P. Ao, Entangled biphoton gen- eration in the myelin sheath, Physical Review E110, 024402 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    Svanishvili, Exploring Consciousness: Photon Entan- glement and Neural Communication - Premier Science (2025)

    G. Svanishvili, Exploring Consciousness: Photon Entan- glement and Neural Communication - Premier Science (2025)

    2025

  40. [47]

    R. A. Bravo, K. Najafi, X. Gao, and S. F. Yelin, Quantum Reservoir Computing Using Arrays of Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum3, 030325 (2022)

    2022

  41. [51]

    Noh and W

    H.-R. Noh and W. Jhe, Analytic solutions of the opti- cal Bloch equations, Optics Communications283, 2353 (2010)

    2010

  42. [52]

    Weber, C

    S. Weber, C. Tresp, H. Menke, A. Urvoy, O. Firstenberg, H. P. B¨ uchler, and S. Hofferberth, Calculation of Ryd- berg interaction potentials, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics50, 133001 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.