pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02473 · v1 · pith:WOC7K3XOnew · submitted 2026-01-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Boltzmann theory of the inverse Edelstein effect in a two-dimensional Rashba gas

Irene Gaiardoni , Mattia Trama , Alfonso Maiellaro , Claudio Guarcello , Francesco Romeo , Roberta Citro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords inverse Edelstein effectRashba two-dimensional electron gasBoltzmann transport theoryspin-charge conversionferromagnetic interfaceoxide heterostructuresanalytical expressionsspin-orbit coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Closed-form analytical expressions for the inverse Edelstein effect are derived in a ferromagnetic Rashba two-dimensional electron gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a semiclassical Boltzmann theory to study spin-to-charge conversion via the inverse Edelstein effect in a system where a ferromagnetic layer couples to a Rashba 2DEG. It obtains explicit formulas for charge and spin currents that depend on chemical potential and Rashba strength. These results reveal how interfacial exchange and spin-orbit couplings together determine conversion efficiency across different transport regimes. The closed expressions offer direct insight and facilitate comparisons with experiments on interfaces such as LaAlO3/SrTiO3.

Core claim

Within the semiclassical Boltzmann framework, analytical expressions for charge and spin currents are derived for the non-homogeneous FM-Rashba 2DEG, demonstrating that interfacial exchange and spin-orbit interactions jointly control the efficiency of spin-to-charge conversion and produce distinct regimes with qualitatively different transport responses.

What carries the argument

The semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation applied to the non-homogeneous ferromagnetic Rashba two-dimensional electron gas, yielding closed-form expressions for currents.

If this is right

  • The efficiency of spin-to-charge conversion depends on the chemical potential and the Rashba coupling strength.
  • Distinct regimes of transport response arise depending on the relative strengths of interfacial exchange and spin-orbit interactions.
  • Closed-form results enable quantitative benchmarking against experiments on complex oxide interfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These analytical results could be used to optimize spintronic devices based on oxide interfaces by tuning gate voltages that affect the chemical potential.
  • Similar Boltzmann approaches might apply to other hybrid systems involving ferromagnets and spin-orbit coupled layers.
  • If the semiclassical approximation holds, it suggests that microscopic details of the interface can be captured by effective parameters in the model.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical Boltzmann framework remains valid for describing the inverse Edelstein effect in this non-homogeneous FM-Rashba 2DEG system, including the treatment of interfacial exchange and spin-orbit interactions.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring the spin-to-charge conversion efficiency in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces that deviates significantly from the predicted dependence on chemical potential or Rashba strength would falsify the analytical results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02473 by Alfonso Maiellaro, Claudio Guarcello, Francesco Romeo, Irene Gaiardoni, Mattia Trama, Roberta Citro.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the setup used to study the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of Fermi surfaces in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Electric current as a function of the chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electric current as a function of the Rashba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spin current as a function of the chemical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normalized spin current as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Difference of the spin current computed using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the inverse Edelstein effect in a non-homogeneous system consisting of a ferromagnetic layer coupled to a Rashba two-dimensional electron gas. Within a semiclassical Boltzmann framework, we derive analytical expressions for the charge and spin currents and analyze their dependence on key parameters such as the chemical potential and the Rashba coupling strength. We show how interfacial exchange and spin-orbit interactions jointly control the efficiency of spin-to-charge conversion, leading to distinct regimes characterized by qualitatively different transport responses. A central outcome of our work is the availability of closed-form analytical results, which provide direct physical insight and enable a transparent and quantitative benchmarking with experiments on complex oxide interfaces, such as LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a semiclassical Boltzmann theory for the inverse Edelstein effect in a non-homogeneous system consisting of a ferromagnetic layer coupled to a Rashba two-dimensional electron gas. It derives closed-form analytical expressions for charge and spin currents, analyzes their dependence on chemical potential and Rashba coupling strength, identifies distinct transport regimes arising from the interplay of interfacial exchange and spin-orbit interactions, and positions the results for quantitative benchmarking against experiments on complex oxide interfaces such as LaAlO3/SrTiO3.

Significance. If the derivations hold and the semiclassical framework is applicable, the closed-form analytical results would constitute a useful contribution by providing transparent physical insight into spin-to-charge conversion efficiency and enabling direct comparison with transport data on Rashba systems. The emphasis on parameter dependence and regime identification strengthens the potential utility for experimental interpretation. However, the overall significance is limited by the need to substantiate the core approximation in a spatially inhomogeneous setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Boltzmann framework and derivation] The derivation of the analytical expressions for charge and spin currents (as outlined in the Boltzmann framework section) rests on applying the local relaxation-time approximation to a system with position-dependent exchange field and Rashba term. This requires the mean-free-path to greatly exceed the interface thickness and scattering to remain intra-region, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification or boundary-condition analysis for these conditions in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 regime where interfacial disorder is typically strong; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed closed-form results and regime distinctions.
  2. [Regime analysis and parameter dependence] The identification of qualitatively different transport responses in distinct regimes (parameterized by chemical potential and Rashba strength) is presented without reported checks against limiting cases, such as vanishing Rashba coupling or uniform magnetization; such benchmarks would be necessary to confirm the expressions reduce correctly and to rule out post-hoc assumptions in the non-homogeneous treatment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to a 'non-homogeneous system' without a concise statement of the model geometry or the form of the interfacial coupling; adding one sentence on the spatial profile would improve immediate clarity.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the spin and charge current operators should be defined explicitly at first use to avoid ambiguity when comparing the derived expressions to experimental spin-to-charge conversion efficiencies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have prompted us to strengthen the presentation of our approximations and validations. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Boltzmann framework and derivation] The derivation of the analytical expressions for charge and spin currents (as outlined in the Boltzmann framework section) rests on applying the local relaxation-time approximation to a system with position-dependent exchange field and Rashba term. This requires the mean-free-path to greatly exceed the interface thickness and scattering to remain intra-region, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification or boundary-condition analysis for these conditions in the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 regime where interfacial disorder is typically strong; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed closed-form results and regime distinctions.

    Authors: We agree that the local relaxation-time approximation in a spatially inhomogeneous system requires explicit justification to support the closed-form results. The original manuscript relied on the standard semiclassical assumption that scattering remains local when the mean free path exceeds the characteristic length scale of inhomogeneity (here, the interface thickness). In the revised manuscript we have added a new paragraph in the Boltzmann framework section that states the validity conditions explicitly, provides order-of-magnitude estimates for LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (interface thickness ~1 nm, typical mean free paths 10–100 nm), and specifies the boundary conditions used: continuity of the distribution function and conservation of charge and spin currents across the interface. These additions directly address the load-bearing character of the approximation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Regime analysis and parameter dependence] The identification of qualitatively different transport responses in distinct regimes (parameterized by chemical potential and Rashba strength) is presented without reported checks against limiting cases, such as vanishing Rashba coupling or uniform magnetization; such benchmarks would be necessary to confirm the expressions reduce correctly and to rule out post-hoc assumptions in the non-homogeneous treatment.

    Authors: We concur that explicit reduction to known limits is necessary to validate the non-homogeneous treatment. In the revised manuscript we have inserted two new paragraphs in the results section that demonstrate the following limits analytically: (i) when the Rashba parameter is set to zero the spin current vanishes identically and the charge current recovers the conventional Drude expression; (ii) when the exchange field is made spatially uniform the expressions reduce to the standard inverse Edelstein formulas for a homogeneous Rashba 2DEG. These checks confirm that the regime distinctions arise from the interplay of the two interactions rather than from artifacts of the derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytical derivation from Boltzmann equation with independent inputs

full rationale

The paper applies the standard semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation to a FM-Rashba 2DEG system and derives closed-form expressions for charge and spin currents. Key parameters (chemical potential, Rashba strength, exchange field) enter as external inputs rather than being fitted or redefined from the output currents. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is load-bearing for the central analytical results. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated assumptions, with no reduction of predictions to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation for a non-homogeneous system and on the model of interfacial exchange plus Rashba spin-orbit coupling. No new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation applies to the non-homogeneous FM-Rashba 2DEG system
    Invoked throughout the derivation of charge and spin currents as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5664 in / 1256 out tokens · 27710 ms · 2026-05-21T15:53:48.049465+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnár, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A Spin- Based Electronics Vision for the Future, Science294, 1488 (2001)

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    M. N. Baibich, J. M. Broto, A. Fert, F. N. Van Dau, F. Petroff, P. Etienne, G. Creuzet, A. Friederich, and J.Chazelas,GiantMagnetoresistanceof(001)Fe/(001)Cr MagneticSuperlattices,Phys.Rev.Lett.61,2472(1988)

    work page 1988

  3. [3]

    Binasch, P

    G. Binasch, P. Grünberg, F. Saurenbach, and W. Zinn, Enhanced magnetoresistance in layered magnetic struc- tures with antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange, Phys. Rev. B39, 4828 (1989)

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Maekawa,Concepts in Spin Electronics(Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2006)

    S. Maekawa,Concepts in Spin Electronics(Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Soumyanarayanan, N

    A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C.Panagopoulos,Emergentphenomenainducedbyspin– orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature539, 509 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Sinova, D

    J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, andA.H.MacDonald,UniversalintrinsicspinHalleffect, Physical Review Letters92, 126603 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Gariglio, A

    S. Gariglio, A. Caviglia, J.-M. Triscone, and M. Gabay, A spin–orbit playground: Surfaces and interfaces of tran- sition metal oxides, Reports on Progress in Physics82, 012501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Trama, V

    M. Trama, V. Cataudella, C. Perroni, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Gate tunable anomalous Hall effect: Berry cur- vature probe at oxides interfaces, Physical Review B106, 075430 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Trama, V

    M. Trama, V. Cataudella, C. A. Perroni, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Tunable spin and orbital Edelstein effect at (111) LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface, Nanomaterials12, 2494 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Trier, P

    F. Trier, P. Noël, J.-V. Kim, J.-P. Attané, L. Vila, and 10 M. Bibes, Oxide spin-orbitronics: spin–charge intercon- version and topological spin textures, Nature Reviews Materials7, 258 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Maiellaro, M

    A. Maiellaro, M. Trama, J. Settino, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Engineered Josephson diode ef- fect in kinked Rashba nanochannels, SciPost Phys.17, 101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    E. I. Rashba, Spin-orbit coupling in condensed matter physics, Sov. Phys. Solid State2, 1109 (1960)

    work page 1960

  14. [14]

    Amin and M

    V. Amin and M. Stiles, Spin transport at interfaces with spin–orbit coupling: Phenomenology, Physical Review B 94, 104420 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    D. C. Vaz, P. Noël, A. Johansson, B. Göbel, F. Y. Bruno, G. Singh, S. McKeown-Walker, F. Trier, L. M. Vicente-Arche, A. Sander,et al., Mapping spin–charge conversion to the band structure in a topological oxide two-dimensional electron gas, Nature Materials18, 1187 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Inoue, G

    J.-i. Inoue, G. E. Bauer, and L. W. Molenkamp, Dif- fuse transport and spin accumulation in a Rashba two- dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B67, 033104 (2003)

    work page 2003

  17. [17]

    Vicente-Arche, J

    L. Vicente-Arche, J. Bréhin, S. Varotto, M. Cosset- Cheneau, S. Mallik, R. Salazar, P. Noël, D. C. Vaz, F. Trier, S. Bhattacharya, A. Sander, P. Le Fèvre, F. Bertran, G. Saiz, G. Ménard, N. Bergeal, A. Barthélémy, H. Li, C. Lin, D. Nikonov, I. Young, J. Rault, L. Vila, J. Attané, and M. Bibes, Spin–charge interconversion in KTaO3 2D electron gases, Advanc...

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Varotto, A

    S. Varotto, A. Johansson, B. Göbel, L. M. Vicente-Arche, S. Mallik, J. Bréhin, R. Salazar, F. Bertran, P. L. Fèvre, N. Bergeal,et al., Direct visualization of Rashba-split bands and spin/orbital-charge interconversion at KTaO3 interfaces, Nature Communications13, 6165 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Bibes, J

    M. Bibes, J. E. Villegas, and A. Barthélémy, Ultrathin oxide films and interfaces for electronics and spintronics, Advances in Physics60, 5 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Gambardella and I

    P. Gambardella and I. M. Miron, Current-induced spin– orbit torques, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences369, 3175 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    Seibold, S

    G. Seibold, S. Caprara, M. Grilli, and R. Raimondi, The- ory of the spin galvanic effect at oxide interfaces, Physical review letters119, 256801 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    L. J. D’Onofrio, M. T. Mercaldo, W. Brzezicki, A. Kłosiński, F. Mazzola, C. Ortix, and M. Cuoco, Filter- ing spin and orbital moment in centrosymmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 085428 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Trama, V

    M. Trama, V. Cataudella, C. A. Perroni, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Effect of Confinement and Coulomb In- teractions on the Electronic Structure of the (111) LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interface,Nanomaterials13,819(2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Trama, I

    M. Trama, I. Gaiardoni, C. Guarcello, J. I. Facio, A. Maiellaro, F. Romeo, R. Citro, and J. van den Brink, NonlinearanomalousEdelsteinresponseataltermagnetic interfaces, Phys. Rev. B112, 184404 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    J. Zhai, M. Trama, H. Liu, Z. Zhu, Y. Zhu, C. A. Per- roni, R.Citro, P.He,andJ.Shen,LargeNonlinearTrans- verseConductivityandBerryCurvatureinKTaO 3 Based Two-Dimensional Electron Gas, Nano Letters23, 11892 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Guarcello, A

    C. Guarcello, A. Maiellaro, J. Settino, I. Gaiardoni, M. Trama, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Probing Topolog- ical Superconductivity of oxide nanojunctions using frac- tional Shapiro steps, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals189, 115596 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Maiellaro, J

    A. Maiellaro, J. Settino, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R.Citro,Hallmarksoforbital-flavoredMajoranastatesin Josephson junctions based on oxide nanochannels, Phys- ical Review B107, L201405 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Y. A. Bychkov and É. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP lett39, 78 (1984)

    work page 1984

  29. [29]

    Maiellaro, F

    A. Maiellaro, F. Romeo, M. Trama, I. Gaiardoni, J. Set- tino, C. Guarcello, N. Bergeal, M. Bibes, and R. Citro, Theory of charge-to-spin conversion under quantum con- finement, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043100 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    S. Ando, Y. Tanaka, M. Cuoco, L. Chirolli, and M. T. Mercaldo, Spin and orbital Edelstein effect in spin-orbit coupled noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 184503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    B. Zhao, B. Karpiak, D. Khokhriakov, A. Johans- son, A. M. Hoque, X. Xu, Y. Jiang, I. Mertig, and S. P. Dash, Unconventional Charge–Spin Conversion in Weyl-Semimetal WTe2, Advanced Materials32, 2000818 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    V. M. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction elec- trons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Communica- tions73, 233 (1990)

    work page 1990

  33. [33]

    Leiva-Montecinos, J

    S. Leiva-Montecinos, J. Henk, I. Mertig, and A. Johans- son, Spin and orbital Edelstein effect in a bilayer system with Rashba interaction, Physical Review Research5, 043294 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Aronov and Y

    A. Aronov and Y. B. Lyanda-Geller, Nuclear electric res- onanceandorientationofcarrierspinsbyanelectricfield, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters50, 431 (1989)

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    A.Johansson, B.Göbel, J.Henk, M.Bibes,andI.Mertig, Spin and orbital Edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application to SrTiO3 inter- faces, Physical Review Research3, 013275 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Johansson, J

    A. Johansson, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Theoretical aspects of the Edelstein effect for anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas and topological insulators, Physical Review B93, 195440 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Gaiardoni, M

    I. Gaiardoni, M. Trama, A. Maiellaro, C. Guarcello, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Edelstein Effect in Isotropic and Anisotropic Rashba Models, Condensed Matter10, 15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    K. Shen, G. Vignale, and R. Raimondi, Microscopic the- ory of the inverse Edelstein effect, Physical Review Let- ters112, 096601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Y. Kato, R. Myers, A. Gossard, and D. Awschalom, Current-induced spin polarization in strained semicon- ductors, Physical Review Letters93, 176601 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    A. Y. Silov, P. Blajnov, J. Wolter, R. Hey, K. Ploog, and N. Averkiev, Current-induced spin polarization at a single heterojunction, Applied Physics Letters85, 5929 (2004)

    work page 2004

  41. [41]

    Gorini, R

    C. Gorini, R. Raimondi, and P. Schwab, Onsager rela- tions in a two-dimensional electron gas with spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review Letters109, 246604 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    J. R. Sánchez, L. Vila, G. Desfonds, S. Gambarelli, J. At- tané, J.DeTeresa, C.Magén,andA.Fert,Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface be- 11 tween non-magnetic materials, Nature Communications 4, 2944 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Vignale and I

    G. Vignale and I. Tokatly, Theory of the nonlinear Rashba–Edelstein effect: The clean electron gas limit, Physical Review B93, 035310 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Massabeau, O

    S. Massabeau, O. Paull, A. Pezo, F. Miljevic, M. Mičica, A. Grisard, P. Morfin, R. Lebrun, H. Jaf- frès, S. Dhillon,et al., Inverse Rashba Edelstein THz emission modulation induced by ferroelectricity in CoFeB/PtSe2/MoSe2//LiNbO3 systems, APL Materials 13(2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Monaco, A

    C. Monaco, A. Ferreira, and R. Raimondi, Spin Hall and inverse spin galvanic effects in graphene with strong in- terfacial spin-orbit coupling: A quasi-classical Green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Büttiker, Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides, Phys

    M. Büttiker, Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides, Phys. Rev. B46, 12485 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Büttiker, Four-Terminal Phase-Coherent Conduc- tance, Phys

    M. Büttiker, Four-Terminal Phase-Coherent Conduc- tance, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1761 (1986)

    work page 1986

  48. [48]

    H. Geng, W. Luo, W.-Y. Deng, L. Sheng, R. Shen, and D.-Y. Xing, Theory of Inverse Edelstein Effect of the Sur- face States of a Topological Insulator, Scientific Reports 7, 3755 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Brosco, L

    V. Brosco, L. Benfatto, E. Cappelluti, and C. Grimaldi, Unconventional dc Transport in Rashba Electron Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 166602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Y. Y. Ilani, A. Tylan-Tyler, P. Irvin, and J. Levy, Physics of SrTiO 3-based heterostructures and nanostructures: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 036503 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    J. Shi, P. Zhang, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Proper Definition of Spin Current in Spin-Orbit Coupled Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 076604 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Sugimoto, S

    N. Sugimoto, S. Onoda, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Spin Hall effect of a conserved current: Conditions for a nonzero spin Hall current, Phys. Rev. B73, 113305 (2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Romeo and R

    F. Romeo and R. Citro, Spin-torque generation by dc or ac voltages in quasi-one-dimensional magnetic layered structures, Phys. Rev. B81, 045307 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    P.Schwab, R.Raimondi,andC.Gorini,Spin-chargelock- ing and tunneling into a helical metal, Europhysics Let- ters93, 67004 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Sheng, D

    L. Sheng, D. Y. Xing, Z. D. Wang, and J. Dong, Qua- siclassical approach to magnetotransport in magnetic in- homogeneous systems, Phys. Rev. B55, 5908 (1997)

    work page 1997