Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Uncertainties on the CP Phase $\bfalpha$ due to Penguin Diagrams

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv hep-ph/9506260 v1 pith:WOQ4AGGN submitted 1995-06-07 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords alphamodesdeltaangleassumingcdotscomingdiagrams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A major problem in the determination of the the CP angle $\alpha$, that should be measured through modes of the type $B_d, \bar{B}_d \to \pi \pi , \cdots ,$ is the uncertainty coming from Penguin diagrams. We consider the different ground state modes $\pi \pi$, $\pi \rho$, $\rho \rho$, and, assuming the FSI phases to be negligible, we investigate the amount of uncertainty coming from Penguins that can be parametrized by a dilution factor $D$ and an angle shift $\Delta \alpha$. The parameter $D$ is either 1 or very close to 1 in all these modes, and it can be measured independently, up to a sign ambiguity, by the $t$ dependence. Assuming factorization, we show that $\Delta \alpha$ is much smaller for the modes $\rho \pi$ and $\rho \rho$ than for $\pi \pi$, and we plot their allowed region as a function of $\alpha$ itself. Moreover, we show that most of the modes contribute to the asymmetry with the same sign, and define for their sum an effective $D_{eff}$ and an effective $\Delta \alpha_{eff}$, an average of $\Delta \alpha$ for the different modes. It turns out that $D_{eff}$ is of the order of 0.9, $\Delta \alpha_{eff}$ is between 5 $\%$ and 10 $\%$ and, relative to $\pi \pi$, the statistical gain for the sum is of about a factor 10. Finally, we compute the ratios $K\pi /\pi \pi , \cdots$ that test the strength of the Penguins and depend on the CP angles, as emphasized by Silva and Wolfenstein and by Deandrea et al.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools