Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 26 references

Demonstration of an LLO CV-QKD system over 12 km of optical fiber

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A complete LLO CV-QKD chain over 12 km fiber yields positive finite-size secret keys.

desk verdict Solid LLO CV-QKD engineering demonstration, but the finite-size key rate is not supported by the parameter-estimation method; fix or soften before believing 4.67 Mbit/s. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07277 v1 pith:WOQRFGFW submitted 2026-08-07 quant-ph physics.optics

Christiano M. S. Nascimento , Artur A. Matoso , Gustavo C. Amaral , Guilherme P. Temporão This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords continuous-variablequantumkeydistributionCV-QKDlocaloscillatorLLOcoherentstatesfinite-sizesecuritysecretrateopticalfiber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a locally generated local oscillator—two independent lasers, no reference beam transmitted with the signal—can be a complete working system rather than just a parameter-estimation exercise. It reports an end-to-end implementation over a 12 km single-mode fiber spool that includes coherent detection, digital signal processing, error correction, parameter estimation, and privacy amplification, yielding 5.11 Mbit/s in the asymptotic regime and 4.67 Mbit/s in the finite-size regime under a trusted-device model. If the claimed result holds, metropolitan links using independent lasers can produce positive finite-size secret keys while avoiding the local-oscillator attack that threatens transmitted-reference CV-QKD.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the local-local-oscillator (LLO) architecture: Alice's and Bob's independent 1 kHz-linewidth continuous-wave lasers at 1550 nm are set approximately 800 MHz apart, and Bob performs heterodyne detection with his own laser as the reference, so no strong local oscillator travels through the quantum channel. Pilot tones multiplexed with the quantum signal let the receiver estimate and correct carrier-frequency offset, sampling-clock mismatch, and slowly varying phase, after which a matched filter and sampling stage recover the Gaussian-modulated symbols. The secret-key rate is then computed from the standard formula $\mathrm{SKR} = R_s(1-\mathrm{FER})[\beta I_{AB} - \chi_{BE} - \Delta_{\mathrm{fin}}(n_{\mathrm{acc}})]$, using multidimensional reconciliation with multiedge-type LDPC codes, the Holevo bound for Eve's information, and finite-size confidence bounds on $T$ and $\xi_B$ before Toeplitz-matrix privacy amplification.

What would settle it

Recompute the finite-size secret-key rate for the same raw data while treating the detector's electronic noise and efficiency as untrusted, and check whether the rate stays positive at 12 km; if it falls below zero, the trusted-device assumption is what produces the reported key.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that an LLO CV-QKD system using fully independent transmitter and receiver lasers at 1550 nm can extract positive secret keys over 12 km of standard single-mode fiber. Using frames of about $10^7$ coherent states split into ten subframes, with channel transmittance $T=0.6$, excess noise $\xi_B = 15.99$ mSNU, detection efficiency 0.80, and electronic noise 43.18 mSNU, the full post-processing chain produced a secret-key rate of 5.11 Mbit/s asymptotically and 4.67 Mbit/s with finite-size corrections. The authors are explicit that this is a proof of concept with security against collective attacks under a trusted-device model, and that the analysis is not yet a universally composable security proof.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the receiver's internal loss and noise—detection efficiency 0.80 and electronic noise 43.18 mSNU—are hidden from the eavesdropper; if Eve can access or control that noise, the reported Holevo bounds and key rates do not establish security.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positive finite-size keys over 12 km mean the LLO approach can be deployed as a complete metropolitan QKD link without a transmitted local oscillator.
  • The extrapolated channel-loss cutoff near 125 km for the same noise parameters suggests the demonstrated setup has substantial distance headroom under the trusted-device model.
  • Because the pseudo-random encoding is a placeholder, substituting a quantum random number generator would upgrade the demonstrated processing chain into one that produces genuine secret key material with no optical change.
  • The finite-size confidence bounds ($T^{\min}=0.596$, $\xi_B^{\max}=18.37$ mSNU) stayed close to the asymptotic point estimates, so statistical uncertainty in parameter estimation is not the dominant rate limiter at this block size.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trusted-device assumption were removed and the 43.18 mSNU electronic noise plus 0.80 detection efficiency were attributed to Eve, the Holevo bound would grow and the reported positive rates would likely be reduced or lost; that consequence is an inference, not demonstrated in the paper.
  • The 125 km cutoff extrapolation assumes excess noise remains near the measured level over longer fibers; phase-noise accumulation at greater distances would raise $\xi_B$ and shorten the actual reach.
  • A direct next experiment is running this same optical and processing chain over a deployed metropolitan fiber with coexisting classical WDM channels, which would test whether the frequency-agile LLO design retains its rates outside the laboratory.
  • Under the composable security framework the authors reference, larger blocks (order $10^8$ symbols or more) may be needed for positive practical rates, so the 4.67 Mbit/s figure should not be read as a composable key rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental locally-generated-local-oscillator (LLO) continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) system over a 12 km single-mode fiber spool. Alice and Bob use independent 1550 nm lasers with approximately 800 MHz frequency offset, RF heterodyne detection, and a complete offline classical post-processing chain including DSP, reconciliation, parameter estimation, and privacy amplification. For logical frames of approximately 10^7 coherent states (ten subframes of 10^6 states), the authors report an asymptotic secret key rate of 5.11 Mbit/s and a finite-size rate of 4.67 Mbit/s under a trusted-device model. Table I lists the key parameters: modulation variance 0.92 SNU, detection efficiency 0.80, electronic noise 43.18 mSNU, channel transmittance 0.6, excess noise 15.99 mSNU, frame error rate 0.623, and reconciliation efficiency 95.45%. The finite-size analysis in Sec. II.A uses Student's t and chi-squared confidence bounds on the full dataset, and the paper compares its results with simulated SKR curves in Fig. 2, extrapolating a cutoff distance of about 125 km.

Significance. If correct, the work is a valuable experimental step for LLO CV-QKD: it implements the full post-processing chain, uses independent transmitter and receiver lasers (mitigating local-oscillator attacks), and reports a high asymptotic rate over a metropolitan-scale distance. The authors are transparent about the trusted-device model and the lack of universal composability. However, the finite-size security claim is the main quantitative headline, and the parameter-estimation method used for that claim deviates from standard security proofs. The simulation agreement in Fig. 2 is a consistency check rather than an independent validation, and the extrapolated distance rests on unverified constant-noise assumptions. The paper currently overstates the strength of its finite-size security result.

major comments (2)
  1. [II.A, paragraph beginning 'After error correction', and Eqs. (1)-(2)] The finite-size key rate is not established by the presented analysis because all available symbols, including the raw-key symbols from successfully reconciled frames, are used for parameter estimation. The text explicitly states that for successfully reconciled frames, the verified bits are 'retained and concatenated to form the raw key without requiring the corresponding data to be publicly disclosed or sacrificed for parameter estimation,' and that 'all available symbols are used' for the covariance estimation. Standard composable finite-size security proofs for CV-QKD (e.g., Leverrier et al., and Jain et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 4740 (2022), cited as [23]) require parameter estimation to be performed on a random, publicly disclosed subset disjoint from the key, because the estimates must be independent of the key material and of Eve's side information. Applying Student's t and chi-squared confidence bounds to the full dataset, including key-generating symbols, can bias the worst-case transmittance and excess noise in a direction that overstates the secret key rate. Therefore, the finite-size rate of 4.67 Mbit/s reported in Sec. II.A and Fig. 2 is not supported. Please recompute the finite-size rate using a random disclosed parameter-estimation subset, or provide a rigorous security proof that justifies the reuse of key-generating symbols for estimation.
  2. [II.A, last paragraphs, and Sec. III] The security analysis is non-composable and relies on a trusted-device model in which part of the receiver's loss and noise (detection efficiency eta_Bob = 0.80 and electronic noise v_el = 43.18 mSNU) is assumed to be inaccessible to Eve. The authors state this limitation clearly in the body, but the abstract's 'strict security constraints' and the framing of the rates as secret-key rates overstate the proven result. Because universal composability is the standard security notion in QKD, the reported rates should be consistently qualified as trusted-device, collective-attack, non-composable values. Please adjust the abstract, conclusion, and any other summary statements to match the actual security level, and discuss how the rates are expected to change under a composable finite-size analysis (e.g., the larger block sizes mentioned in Sec. III).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II.A, Table I and abstract] The text contains several typographical issues: 'approximately 107 coherent states' and '10 6' should read '10^7' and '10^6'; 'The average modulation varianceV mod' is missing a space; and 'in theRede Rio' should be 'in the Rede Rio'. Please fix these formatting issues throughout.
  2. [Sec. II.A, 'Results' and Eqs. (1)-(2)] The verification leakage is reported as leak_ver = 3136 bits with a 64-bit hash for each successfully reconciled frame, implying 49 successful hashes; please specify the number of LDPC frames per subframe or logical frame so that this quantity is traceable, especially given the reported frame error rate of 0.623.
  3. [Fig. 2 and Sec. II.A] The agreement between the simulated curves and experimental points is not an independent validation, because the simulation uses the measured values of T, xi_B, eta, and v_el from the same experiment. Please describe this agreement as a consistency check, and clearly label the extrapolated 125 km cutoff as based on the assumption that the noise and efficiency parameters remain constant with distance.
  4. [Sec. II.A and III] The paper does not state how many independent logical frames or acquisitions were used to obtain the reported values, nor does it give error bars or confidence intervals for T, xi_B, or the secret key rates. Adding this information would strengthen the reproducibility of the demonstration.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Partial circularity: Fig. 2's 'theoretical predictions' use the experiment's own measured parameters as inputs, and the finite-size key rate reuses key-generating symbols for parameter estimation; the central experimental SKR itself is a standard formula application.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. II A, Fig. 2 discussion]
    "Under the measured-noise and fixed-device assumptions, the numerical model predicts values of 5.09 and 4.64 Mbit/s for the respective regimes. The excellent agreement between simulation and experiment is a consequence of diligent evaluation of the experimental conditions in the laboratory and accurate implementation of the parameter estimation routine."

    The 'prediction' is not parameter-free: the numerical model takes as inputs the same measured values reported in the paper (T=0.6, xi_B=15.99 mSNU, eta=0.80, vel=43.18 mSNU, beta=95.45%, FER=0.623). Running the standard SKR formula with these measured inputs returns 5.09/4.64 Mbit/s, nearly identical to the reported 5.11/4.67 Mbit/s. The agreement is therefore forced by construction and provides no independent confirmation of the model.

  2. other [Sec. II A, classical post-processing / finite-size parameter estimation paragraph]
    "For successfully reconciled frames, Alice recovers Bob's discretized bit sequence through information reconciliation, and the correctness of the resulting shared bit strings is confirmed by hash verification. These verified bits are therefore retained and concatenated to form the raw key without requiring the corresponding data to be publicly disclosed or sacrificed for parameter estimation."

    The finite-size key rate is computed from worst-case T and xi bounds obtained using all symbols, including the symbols that are retained as raw key. The cited finite-size security framework requires parameter estimation on a random, publicly disclosed subset disjoint from the key; here the same data both set the Holevo bound and contribute to n_acc. The reported 4.67 Mbit/s finite-size rate is thus not derived from an independent security estimate, making the security claim self-referential with respect to its own input data.

full rationale

The central experimental SKR calculation is a standard application of Eq. (1) and is not circular by itself: it is a measured result using an accepted CV-QKD rate formula. However, two steps do reduce partly to their own inputs. First, the 'excellent agreement' with numerical simulation in Fig. 2 is not an independent test, because the simulation inputs are the same measured channel and reconciliation parameters from Table I and Sec. II A. Second, the finite-size security claim reuses the key-generating symbols for parameter estimation, which is not covered by the composable finite-size proof the paper cites; the resulting rate is not supported by an independent worst-case estimate. The several self-citations in the reference list ([6], [15], [20], [22]) are not load-bearing for the central derivation, so no higher circularity score is warranted. Overall: partial circularity in the predictive/agreement claim and in the finite-size security argument, while the basic asymptotic-rate demonstration retains independent experimental content.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration relies on measured system parameters and on standard CV-QKD security assumptions; it introduces no new free theoretical parameters or entities beyond the measured experimental quantities.

free parameters (7)
  • channel transmittance T = 0.600 (asymptotic), 0.596 lower bound
    Estimated from the received data and used in Eq. (1) to compute the Holevo bound and SKR.
  • excess noise xi_B = 15.99 mSNU (asymptotic), 18.37 mSNU upper bound
    Estimated from the same dataset; enters the covariance matrix and Holevo bound.
  • electronic noise vel = 43.18 mSNU
    Measured at Bob's detector; used in parameter estimation.
  • detection efficiency eta_Bob = 0.80
    Assumed and measured receiver efficiency; part of the trusted-device assumptions.
  • frame error rate FER = 0.623
    Measured fraction of LDPC frames that failed reconciliation; directly reduces the key rate via (1-FER).
  • reconciliation efficiency beta = 0.954
    Achieved efficiency of the MET-LDPC code; enters the SKR via beta times I_AB.
  • modulation variance V_mod = 0.92 SNU
    Calibrated back-to-back; sets the signal level.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Trusted-device model: part of receiver loss and noise is inaccessible to Eve.
    Adopted in Sec. II A; if Eve can control Bob's detection noise or efficiency, the computed Holevo bound and key rates are invalid.
  • domain assumption Security against collective attacks, not general attacks.
    Sec. III and Sec. II A; the finite-size analysis uses confidence bounds from Student's t and chi-squared distributions and is not universally composable, as the paper concedes.
  • standard math Gaussian modulation and Gaussian channel statistics.
    Standard CV-QKD security analysis assumes Gaussian modulation; the IQM generates Gaussian-modulated coherent states in principle, but the actual random sequence is pseudo-random per Sec. II.
  • domain assumption Pilot tones used for phase recovery do not leak key information beyond the modeled noise.
    The DSP uses frequency-multiplexed pilot tones to correct phase; the paper does not analyze Eve's access to these pilots in the security model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demonstration of an LLO CV-QKD system over 12 km of optical fiber." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WOQRFGFW

@misc{pith2026260807277,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demonstration of an LLO CV-QKD system over 12 km of optical fiber},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WOQRFGFW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07277}
}
abstract

Continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) promises high rates and seamless integration with classical beams within a single optical fiber. Over the years, implementations have been performed by transmitting a local oscillator reference along with the quantum channel, opening security loopholes for eavesdroppers and limiting potential applications. Here, we report on a Gaussian CV-QKD implementation using fully independent transmitter and receiver lasers (local-oscillator sources) over a 12 km fiber spool. The system was experimentally evaluated using logical frames containing approximately $10^7$ coherent states, each composed of ten independently processed subframes of approximately $10^6$ states, and security was assessed in both asymptotic and finite-size regimes under a trusted-device model. The full-fledged classical post-processing is capable of recovering the channel parameters and extracting secret key rates of 5.11 Mbit/s in the asymptotic regime and 4.67 Mbit/s in the finite-size regime, showing good agreement with theoretical predictions. This work establishes the foundation for metropolitan fiber deployment of CV-QKD under strict security constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07277 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the experimental setup of the LLO CV-QKD laboratory link including the optical layout and the electro-optical devices necessary to perform the Gaussian-modulated coherent-state protocol. At the sender, Alice, a continuous-wave (CW) laser with a narrow linewidth of 1 kHz operating at 1550 nm was used as the optical carrier. The coherent states were prepared by driving an IQ modulator with the output from a 16-b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. presents the numerically simulated SKR curves together with the experimental results. At 12 km, the system achieved an SKR of 5.11 Mbit/s in the asymptotic regime and 4.67 Mbit/s in the finite-size regime. Under the measured-noise and fixed-device assumptions, the nu￾merical model predicts values of 5.09 and 4.64 Mbit/s for the respective regimes. The excellent agreement between simulation and experiment is a conseq… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Practical continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution with composable security,

    N. Jain, H.-M. Chin, H. Mani, C. Lupo, D. S. Nikolic, A. Kordts, S. Pirandola, T. B. Pedersen, M. Kolb, B. ¨Omer, et al., “Practical continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution with composable security,” Nature communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 4740, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Cyber secu- rity awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behaviour?,

    M. Bada, A. M. Sasse, and J. R. Nurse, “Cyber secu- rity awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behaviour?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02672, 2019

    arXiv 1901

  3. [2]

    A survey on technical threat intelligence in the age of sophisticated cyber attacks,

    W. Tounsi and H. Rais, “A survey on technical threat intelligence in the age of sophisticated cyber attacks,” Computers & security, vol. 72, pp. 212–233, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06557, 2020

    arXiv 2003

  5. [4]

    Quantum key distribution protocols,

    R. Wolf, “Quantum key distribution protocols,” in Quantum Key Distribution: An Introduction with Exercises, pp. 91–116, Springer, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states,

    F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, “Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0109084, 2001

    arXiv 2001

  7. [6]

    Towards a point-to-point cv-qkd system: Im- plementation challenges and perspectives,

    D. Juvˆ encio Gomes de Sousa, N. Alves Ferreira Neto, C. MS Nascimento, L. Q. Galv˜ ao, M. Queiroz Nooblath Neto, M. Andrade Dias, C. de Castro Silva, B. Pinheiro da Silva, A. B. Tacla, and V. Loureiro da Silva, “Towards a point-to-point cv-qkd system: Im- plementation challenges and perspectives,” Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 56, no. 3, p. 106, 2026

    work page 2026

  8. [7]

    Coexistence of continuous-variable 6 quantum key distribution and classical data over 120-km fiber,

    A. A. Hajomer, I. Derkach, V. C. Usenko, U. L. Ander- sen, and T. Gehring, “Coexistence of continuous-variable 6 quantum key distribution and classical data over 120-km fiber,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17388, 2025

    arXiv 2025

Show all 26 references
  1. [8]

    Coexistence of commercial cv-qkd and dwdm 100g/400g transmission in amplified foadm-based metro links,

    A. Melgar, M. Iqbal, J. M. Rivas-Moscoso, J. Tabares, M. S. Moreolo, B. Villanueva, S. Etcheverry, P. Armingol, and J. Folgueira, “Coexistence of commercial cv-qkd and dwdm 100g/400g transmission in amplified foadm-based metro links,” in ECOC 2024; 50th European Conference on ...

    2024

  2. [9]

    Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution over 100-km fiber with local local oscillator,

    A. A. Hajomer, I. Derkach, N. Jain, H.-M. Chin, U. L. Andersen, and T. Gehring, “Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution over 100-km fiber with local local oscillator,” Science Advances, vol. 10, no. 1, p. eadi9474, 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Quantum cryptogra- phy without switching,

    C. Weedbrook, A. M. Lance, W. P. Bowen, T. Symul, T. C. Ralph, and P. K. Lam, “Quantum cryptogra- phy without switching,” Physical review letters, vol. 93, no. 17, p. 170504, 2004

    2004

  4. [11]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribu- tion with gaussian modulation—the theory of practi- cal implementations,

    F. Laudenbach, C. Pacher, C.-H. F. Fung, A. Poppe, M. Peev, B. Schrenk, M. Hentschel, P. Walther, and H. H¨ ubel, “Continuous-variable quantum key distribu- tion with gaussian modulation—the theory of practi- cal implementations,” Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 1, no. 1, ...

    2018

  5. [12]

    Experimental demonstration of long- distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, A. Leverrier, P. Grangier, and E. Diamanti, “Experimental demonstration of long- distance continuous-variable quantum key distribution,” Nature photonics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 378–381, 2013

    2013

  6. [13]

    Qosst: A highly-modular open source platform for experimental continuous-variable quantum key distri- bution,

    Y. Pi´ etri, M. Schiavon, V. M. Acosta, B. Gouraud, L. T. Vidarte, P. Grangier, A. Rhouni, and E. Dia- manti, “Qosst: A highly-modular open source platform for experimental continuous-variable quantum key distri- bution,” quantum, vol. 8, p. 1575, 2024

    2024

  7. [14]

    Gaus- sian quantum information,

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc ´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, “Gaus- sian quantum information,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 621–669, 2012

    2012

  8. [15]

    Side-channel attacks to qkd systems and mitigation techniques,

    C. M. Do Nascimento and G. P. Tempor˜ ao, “Side-channel attacks to qkd systems and mitigation techniques,” in 2025 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC), pp. 434–437, IEEE, 2025

    2025

  9. [16]

    Machine learning aided carrier recovery in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    H.-M. Chin, N. Jain, D. Zibar, U. L. Andersen, and T. Gehring, “Machine learning aided carrier recovery in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 20, 2021

    2021

  10. [17]

    High- speed gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a local local oscillator based on pilot-tone-assisted phase compensation,

    H. Wang, Y. Pi, W. Huang, Y. Li, Y. Shao, J. Yang, J. Liu, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and B. Xu, “High- speed gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution with a local local oscillator based on pilot-tone-assisted phase compensation,” Optics express, vol. 28, no. 2...

    2020

  11. [18]

    Pilot-assisted intradyne reception for high- speed continuous-variable quantum key distribution with true local oscillator,

    F. Laudenbach, B. Schrenk, C. Pacher, M. Hentschel, C.-H. F. Fung, F. Karinou, A. Poppe, M. Peev, and H. H¨ ubel, “Pilot-assisted intradyne reception for high- speed continuous-variable quantum key distribution with true local oscillator,” Quantum, vol. 3, p. 193, 2019

    2019

  12. [19]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution,

    V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Duˇ sek, N. L¨ utkenhaus, and M. Peev, “The security of practical quantum key distribution,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301–1350, 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    Limits of phase recovery in cv-qkd systems: an experimental anal- ysis,

    M. H. Silva, C. M. Nascimento, A. A. Matoso, D. J. Sousa, N. A. Neto, D. M. Bezerra, M. F. Anka, F. A. Bar- bosa, G. P. Tempor˜ ao, G. C. Amaral, et al., “Limits of phase recovery in cv-qkd systems: an experimental anal- ysis,” in Smart Photonic and Optoelectronic Integrated C...

    2026

  14. [21]

    Multiedge-type low- density parity-check codes for continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,

    H. Mani, T. Gehring, P. Grabenweger, B. ¨Omer, C. Pacher, and U. L. Andersen, “Multiedge-type low- density parity-check codes for continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,” Physical Review A, vol. 103, no. 6, p. 062419, 2021

    2021

  15. [22]

    Passive polarization and phase stabilization scheme for twin-field qkd,

    C. Nascimento, F. Calliari, and G. P. Tempor˜ ao, “Passive polarization and phase stabilization scheme for twin-field qkd,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01205, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Phase compensation for continuous variable quantum key dis- tribution based on convolutional neural network,

    Z. Xing, X. Li, X. Ruan, Y. Luo, and H. Zhang, “Phase compensation for continuous variable quantum key dis- tribution based on convolutional neural network,” in Photonics, vol. 9, p. 463, MDPI, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Rate-compatible multi- edge type low-density parity-check code ensembles for continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems,

    S. Jeong, H. Jung, and J. Ha, “Rate-compatible multi- edge type low-density parity-check code ensembles for continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems,” npj Quantum Information, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 6, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Rate compatible reconciliation for continuous-variable quantum key distribution using raptor-like ldpc codes,

    C. Zhou, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, S. Yu, Z. Chen, and H. Guo, “Rate compatible reconciliation for continuous-variable quantum key distribution using raptor-like ldpc codes,” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 260311, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.