Response to critiques on Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen

We reported the first observation of metallic hydrogen (MH) in the low temperature limit at a pressure of ~495 GPa in an article published in Science (1). This transition was first predicted by Wigner and Huntington (WE) over 80 years ago (2) at a pressure of ~25 GPa. In recent decades it became clear that the required pressure for metallization was far greater, in the 400-500 GPa range. Until now the observation of the WE transition in diamond anvil cells (DACs) has been prevented by one problem: the diamonds break before a sufficiently high pressure has been achieved. This has driven the high-pressure community to improve DACs and experimental methods to understand and overcome the conditions that limited the performance of diamonds and the pressure. In our experiment, with increasing pressure, we observed a clear transition from a transparent sample of solid molecular hydrogen to an opaque black sample to a shiny reflective sample of MH, as determined by reflectance measurements. There is no doubt that MH was produced at the highest pressures. Yet there have been criticisms concerning the pressure that was achieved, the possibility that the 50 nm alumina layer, deposited on diamonds to inhibit diffusion of hydrogen, might be transformed to a metal and be responsible for the reflectance, and analysis of the reflectance. Here we respond to the criticisms posted on the condensed matter arXiv by Loubeyre, Occelli, and Dumas (LOD)- arXiv:1702.07192, Eremets and Drozdov (ED)- arXiv:1702.05125, and Goncharov and Struzhkin (GS)- arXiv:1702.04246.