pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.02075 · v2 · pith:WPD3H663new · submitted 2024-01-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. II. Cosmological Constraints from the Abundance of Massive Halos

S. Bocquet , S. Grandis , L. E. Bleem , M. Klein , J. J. Mohr , T. Schrabback , T. M. C. Abbott , P. A. R. Ade
show 188 more authors
M. Aguena A. Alarcon S. Allam S. W. Allen O. Alves A. Amon A. J. Anderson J. Annis B. Ansarinejad J. E. Austermann S. Avila D. Bacon M. Bayliss J. A. Beall K. Bechtol M. R. Becker A. N. Bender B. A. Benson G. M. Bernstein S. Bhargava F. Bianchini M. Brodwin D. Brooks L. Bryant A. Campos R. E. A. Canning J. E. Carlstrom A. Carnero Rosell M. Carrasco Kind J. Carretero F. J. Castander R. Cawthon C. L. Chang C. Chang P. Chaubal R. Chen H. C. Chiang A. Choi T-L. Chou R. Citron C. Corbett Moran J. Cordero M. Costanzi T. M. Crawford A. T. Crites L. N. da Costa M. E. S. Pereira C. Davis T. M. Davis J. DeRose S. Desai T. de Haan H. T. Diehl M. A. Dobbs S. Dodelson C. Doux A. Drlica-Wagner K. Eckert J. Elvin-Poole S. Everett W. Everett I. Ferrero A. Fert\'e A. M. Flores J. Frieman J. Gallicchio J. Garc\'ia-Bellido M. Gatti E. M. George G. Giannini M. D. Gladders D. Gruen R. A. Gruendl N. Gupta G. Gutierrez N. W. Halverson I. Harrison W. G. Hartley K. Herner S. R. Hinton G. P. Holder D. L. Hollowood W. L. Holzapfel K. Honscheid J. D. Hrubes N. Huang J. Hubmayr E. M. Huff D. Huterer K. D. Irwin D. J. James M. Jarvis G. Khullar K. Kim L. Knox R. Kraft E. Krause K. Kuehn N. Kuropatkin F. K\'eruzor\'e O. Lahav A. T. Lee P.-F. Leget D. Li H. Lin A. Lowitz N. MacCrann G. Mahler A. Mantz J. L. Marshall J. McCullough M. McDonald J. J. McMahon J. Mena-Fern\'andez F. Menanteau S. S. Meyer R. Miquel J. Montgomery J. Myles T. Natoli A. Navarro-Alsina J. P. Nibarger G. I. Noble V. Novosad R. L. C. Ogando Y. Omori S. Padin S. Pandey P. Paschos S. Patil A. Pieres A. A. Plazas Malag\'on A. Porredon J. Prat C. Pryke M. Raveri C. L. Reichardt J. Roberson R. P. Rollins C. Romero A. Roodman J. E. Ruhl E. S. Rykoff B. R. Saliwanchik L. Salvati C. S\'anchez E. Sanchez D. Sanchez Cid A. Saro K. K. Schaffer L. F. Secco I. Sevilla-Noarbe K. Sharon E. Sheldon T. Shin C. Sievers G. Smecher M. Smith T. Somboonpanyakul M. Sommer B. Stalder A. A. Stark J. Stephen V. Strazzullo E. Suchyta G. Tarle C. To M. A. Troxel C. Tucker I. Tutusaus T. N. Varga T. Veach J. D. Vieira A. Vikhlinin A. von der Linden G. Wang N. Weaverdyck J. Weller N. Whitehorn W. L. K. Wu B. Yanny V. Yefremenko B. Yin M. Young J. A. Zebrowski Y. Zhang H. Zohren J. Zuntz
This is my paper
classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords clustersdatasigmaplanckabundancecombinationcosmologicalmathrm
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys, and comprises 1,005 confirmed clusters in the redshift range $0.25-1.78$ over a total sky area of 5,200 deg$^2$. We use DES Year 3 weak-lensing data for 688 clusters with redshifts $z<0.95$ and HST weak-lensing data for 39 clusters with $0.6<z<1.7$. The weak-lensing measurements enable robust mass measurements of sample clusters and allow us to empirically constrain the SZ observable--mass relation. For a flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, and marginalizing over the sum of massive neutrinos, we measure $\Omega_\mathrm{m}=0.286\pm0.032$, $\sigma_8=0.817\pm0.026$, and the parameter combination $\sigma_8\,(\Omega_\mathrm{m}/0.3)^{0.25}=0.805\pm0.016$. Our measurement of $S_8\equiv\sigma_8\,\sqrt{\Omega_\mathrm{m}/0.3}=0.795\pm0.029$ and the constraint from Planck CMB anisotropies (2018 TT,TE,EE+lowE) differ by $1.1\sigma$. In combination with that Planck dataset, we place a 95% upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_\nu<0.18$ eV. When additionally allowing the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to vary, we obtain $w=-1.45\pm0.31$ from our cluster-based analysis. In combination with Planck data, we measure $w=-1.34^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$, or a $2.2\sigma$ difference with a cosmological constant. We use the cluster abundance to measure $\sigma_8$ in five redshift bins between 0.25 and 1.8, and we find the results to be consistent with structure growth as predicted by the $\Lambda$CDM model fit to Planck primary CMB data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: Constraints on Ultra-light Axion Dark Matter through Galaxy Cluster Number Counts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galaxy cluster counts from eRASS1 plus weak lensing data set the tightest existing upper bounds on ultralight axion relic density Ω_a around 10^{-27} eV (Ω_a < 0.0035) and 10^{-26} eV (Ω_a < 0.0079) at 95% CL.

  2. Cosmology-dependent covariance in galaxy cluster number counts: consequences for parameter inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Fixing the covariance at an incorrect cosmology in cluster count analyses leaves Ω_c, σ_8, and w estimates unbiased but distorts their uncertainties, driven by S_8 amplitude effects; a single update at the recovered b...

  3. Validation of the Hybrid Bias Expansion model for the galaxy bispectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    First systematic validation shows Hybrid Bias Expansion model for galaxy bispectrum remains accurate up to k=0.25 h/Mpc in DESI-like mocks, outperforming tree-level EFT.

  4. Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Tomographic DR data added to Σ8 + fσ8 tightens phenomenological MG parameters (μ0, Σ0, η0) and EFT α coefficients by factors of 1.5–2.