K-moduli of pure states of four qubits

Anne-Sophie Kaloghiros; Ivan Cheltsov; Kento Fujita; Maksym Fedorchuk

K-moduli of pure states of four qubits

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The K-moduli component of smooth degree-(1,1,1,1) divisors in $(P^1)^4$ is the weighted blow-up of $P(1,3,4,6)$ at one point with weights $(1,2,3)$, and its closed points are exactly the two explicit families (♥) and (♦).

desk verdict A solid, genuinely new classification of K-polystable limits for degree-(1,1,1,1) divisors in (P1)^4; the main theorem holds up, with only routine omissions to fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19972 v1 pith:WPDQ76BL submitted 2024-12-28 math.AG math-phmath.MP

Ivan Cheltsov , Maksym Fedorchuk , Kento Fujita , Anne-Sophie Kaloghiros This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AGmath-phmath.MP MSC 14J4514J1014D2014L2414M25

keywords K-modulispaceK-polystableFanothreefoldsofdegree24four-qubitpurestatesdivisorsin(P^1)^4GITquotienttoriccompleteintersectionsP^3×P^3

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper determines every K-polystable limit of a smooth Fano threefold in the deformation family of divisors of degree $(1,1,1,1)$ in $(P^1)^4$, the family that physicists identify with pure states of four qubits. It shows that the corresponding irreducible component of the K-moduli space $M^{\mathrm{Kps}}_{3,24}$ is an explicit weighted blow-up of the GIT quotient $P(1,3,4,6)$ at a single point. The closed points of this component parametrize exactly two families: the divisors given by the normal form (♥), and a new family (♦) of divisors in $P(1,1,2)\times P(1,1,2)$ that appear only as limits replacing the unique reducible GIT orbit. A sympathetic reader should care because it gives a complete, explicit description of an entire component of a K-moduli space of Fano threefolds, including all boundary limits, rather than just a generic statement about existence.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the normal form (♥) for smooth divisors in $(P^1)^4$, whose parameters $(a:b:c:d)$ live in $P^3_{a,b,c,d}$; the invariant ring $S^{\Gamma}=\mathbb{C}[H,R,S,T]$ identifies the GIT quotient with $P(1,3,4,6)$, acted on by the Weyl group $W(F_4)/\langle-1\rangle$. The crucial replacement mechanism is a reparametrization along lines approaching the reducible point $(0:0:0:1)$: embedding divisors into $P^3\times P^3$ and rescaling coordinates produces the family (♦) in $P(1,1,2)\times P(1,1,2)$ as the unique K-polystable limit. A blow-up $B\to P^3_{a,b,c,d}$ along the $W(F_4)/\langle-1\rangle$-orbit of the reducible point yields a deformation family over $B$; Proposition 5.1, which asserts unobstructed deformations for the relevant complete intersections, makes the induced finite morphism an isomorphism onto a connected component of the K-moduli space.

What would settle it

Compute $H^1(X,\Omega_X^1\otimes\omega_X)$ for a singular member $X$ of the family (♦), for instance the toric member with $(a:b:c)=(1:0:0)$ in $P(1,1,2)\times P(1,1,2)$; a non-zero value would contradict Proposition 5.1 and overturn the claimed component description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the GIT quotient picture must be corrected at exactly one point: the orbit of the reducible divisor $(x_1x_2-y_1y_2)(x_3x_4-y_3y_4)$, represented by $(0:0:0:1)\in P^3_{a,b,c,d}$. Blowing up the $W(F_4)/\langle-1\rangle$-orbit of this point in parameter space and taking the quotient gives a weighted blow-up $M$ of $P(1,3,4,6)$ at a smooth point with weights $(1,2,3)$, and the paper proves this $M$ is a connected component of the K-moduli space $M^{\mathrm{Kps}}_{3,24}$. The exceptional divisor parametrizes the family (♦), while the proper transform of the original parameter space parametrizes the family (♥), with the excluded parameters listed in the Main Theorem. Every irreducible member of (♥) and every member of (♦) is shown to be K-polystable, so these two explicit families exhaust the K-polystable limits of smooth degree-$(1,1,1,1)$ divisors.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every complete intersection of three divisors of bidegrees $(2,0)$, $(0,2)$, and $(1,1)$ in $P^3\times P^3$ with canonical Gorenstein singularities deforms without obstruction; if some boundary divisor had an obstructed deformation, the morphism from the blown-up quotient to the K-moduli component might fail to be an isomorphism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The K-moduli component has an explicit toric description, so its intersections, CM line bundles, and local structure near the exceptional divisor become computable.
Every irreducible divisor (♥), including singular ones, is K-polystable, so the stable locus of this component is larger than the smooth locus.
Every K-polystable degeneration of a smooth degree-$(1,1,1,1)$ divisor in $(P^1)^4$ is one of the two explicit families (♥) or (♦); in particular, no further boundary phenomena occur.
A K-polystable Fano threefold admitting a $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein smoothing to a smooth member of the family is a complete intersection of bidegrees $(2,0)$, $(0,2)$, and $(1,1)$ in $P^3\times P^3$.
The intermediate Jacobian of the standard resolution is a smooth elliptic curve precisely for smooth members of (♥) and for those members of (♦) whose singular locus is the union of the two curves $\{s_1=t_1=w_2=0\}$ and $\{s_2=t_2=w_1=0\}$; all other members have trivial intermediate Jacobian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Going beyond the paper, the replacement of a single reducible GIT point by a weighted exceptional divisor suggests a general pattern: for other Fano families, a K-moduli component may be obtained from the GIT quotient by a weighted blow-up along the locus of non-K-polystable polystable orbits.
Because the parameter space $P^3_{a,b,c,d}$ is linked to the SLOCC classification of four-qubit entanglement, the two explicit families give a geometric stratification of entanglement classes near the tame boundary; connecting the K-stable boundary to specific entanglement classes would be a natural follow-up.
As a testable extension, one could run a computer search over singular toric members of the family (♦), checking the vanishing of $H^1(X,\Omega_X^1\otimes\omega_X)$; a non-zero value would expose exactly where the deformation-theoretic premise of the component description fails.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Let me give you the short version: this is a serious, mostly convincing paper that completes an explicit K-moduli component for a classical Fano threefold family, and the main theorem is almost certainly right. The genuinely new content is the identification of all K-polystable limits — the (♦) family in P(1,1,2)^2 replacing the unstable reducible GIT point — and the description of the moduli component as a weighted blow-up. The K-polystability proofs for the (♥) and (♦) families use established criteria (Fujita–Zhuang, Li, Zhuang) and the beta computations are spelled out in enough detail; the toric cases are checked against the database. The deformation-theoretic step (Proposition 5.1) is the load-bearing part, and it checks out: the reduction to Ext^2 = H^1(Ω^1⊗ω) via Gorenstein duality and the subsequent Bott-type vanishings are legitimate, and unobstructedness implies normality of the image of the finite birational moduli map by standard Kuranishi/automorphism-group arguments. I don't see a hidden false claim there.

Soft spots are real but not fatal. Several key statements are asserted as 'direct computation' — Proposition 2.7, Theorem 2.8, Proposition 3.4 — and while they are consistent and in the spirit of classical invariant theory, a referee will want those computations expanded or at least made reproducible. Lemma 4.7 is literally left to the reader, which is unusual for a lemma that excludes G-invariant surface centers; as the stress-test note says, it follows from the C*-action forcing equal coefficients, but the paper would be stronger with a one-paragraph proof. There are also small typos, e.g. in Corollary 2.9 the set written as P_{2A1}^{a+b=0} is defined using P_{4A1}, which must be a copying error, and some equations have garbled symbols. These are minor and fixable.

Who is this for? People working on explicit K-moduli, Fano threefolds, and GIT/K-moduli comparisons. It is a within-field result, but a significant one: it gives a concrete example where the K-moduli component is a blow-up of the GIT quotient, with an explicit universal family over the base. The connection to four-qubit entanglement is mostly motivational, though the normal forms and invariants come from that literature.

My recommendation: yes, send this to a serious referee. The central theorem is well-supported, the methods are standard in the field, and the gaps are routine rather than structural. The authors should be asked to expand the direct computations and prove Lemma 4.7, but none of this threatens the main result.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the irreducible component M of the K-moduli space M^{Kps}_{3,24} that contains smooth Fano 3-folds of degree (1,1,1,1) in (P^1)^4. It describes the GIT quotient of the parameter space by SL_2(C)^4 ⋊ S_4 as P(1,3,4,6), constructs a flat degeneration family over the blow-up of P^3_{a,b,c,d} at the W(F_4)/⟨−1⟩-orbit of the reducible divisor, proves K-polystability of the two explicitly written families (♥) and (♦), and proves unobstructedness of deformations of the relevant complete intersections. The Main Theorem identifies M as a weighted blow-up of P(1,3,4,6) at a smooth point with weights (1,2,3), and gives an explicit list of all K-polystable limits: irreducible divisors of type (♥) avoiding the listed exclusions, and divisors of type (♦) in P(1,1,2) × P(1,1,2) for every (a:b:c) ∈ P^2.

Significance. If correct, this is a complete and explicit description of an irreducible K-moduli component in a nontrivial Fano threefold family, including the full boundary. The proof is largely first-principles: invariant ring generators, explicit quotient morphisms, deformation constructions, and β-function computations, with no fitted parameters. I specifically checked the load-bearing vanishing claims in Proposition 5.1: after Serre duality they reduce to Kodaira vanishing for the ample bundles O(2,2), O(3,1), and O(1,3), so the abbreviated proof there is sound. The paper is a valuable contribution to the K-moduli literature and also gives a geometrically meaningful description of the four-qubit entanglement boundary.

minor comments (6)

[Section 2] In the list of generators of the group G, τ3 is written twice; the second occurrence should be the sign-change involution τ4, as is used immediately afterward and as is required for G ≃ (Z/2Z)^4.
[Corollary 2.9] The displayed definition of P2A1_{a+b=0} repeats the formula for P4A1_{a+b=0}; it should read P2A1 ∩ {a+b=0}.
[Lemma 4.7] Since Lemma 4.7 is used to exclude G-invariant surface centers in the proof of Theorem 4.4, the one-line proof "Left to the reader" should be expanded; the C*-action argument is short and would make the proof self-contained.
[Proposition 2.7 and Theorem 2.8] The proofs of Proposition 2.7 and Theorem 2.8 are asserted as direct computations; a brief derivation of the stratum equations or a pointer to the explicit normal forms in the cited references would improve verifiability, although the statements are consistent with the literature.
[Appendix A, formula (A.7)] In the displayed formula for d, the second summand appears to be missing a square; the term should be (c0^2 − c1^2 − c2^2 + c3^2)^2 for the expression to be homogeneous of degree 4.
[Proof of Lemma 4.8] There is a typo: "ut is pointwise fixed" should read "it is pointwise fixed."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorem is derived from external moduli/K-stability theorems and explicit computations, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a comparison between a GIT quotient and a K-moduli component. The GIT quotient is computed from invariant theory with an in-text proof (Proposition 2.5), and the normal forms and strata are cited from independent external sources ([11, 16, 17, 25, 29]) or proved by direct computation. K-polystability of the two model families is proved using the standard criteria of Fujita, Li, and Zhuang ([15, 22, 31]), with the required beta-invariant computations carried out in the text; the citation to [4] for smooth members is external. The replacement family over the blow-up is constructed explicitly by a reparametrization limit in Section 3, not assumed from prior work. Proposition 5.1, the main load-bearing premise for the moduli-theoretic step, is proved in the paper: it reduces unobstructedness to a cohomology vanishing statement and verifies the vanishing using the Euler sequence, with [28] and [26] supplying standard deformation-theory facts. The citation to [6] is used only as a proof template for an analogous statement, not as the authority for the specific conclusion. The self-citations that occur, such as [2] and [8], are either standard results with independent proofs or lemmas whose proof is reproduced in outline in the text; none of them is the target theorem of the paper. Lemma 4.7 is left to the reader, but that is a rigor gap rather than circularity, and the claimed statement is a routine C*-action argument. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is imported to force the choice of model. The derivation is therefore self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities, physical or mathematical beyond standard divisors and varieties. The free parameters (a:b:c:d) and (a:b:c) are coordinates on the moduli space, not fitted constants. The axiomatic backbone consists of established results in K-stability and GIT.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Smooth members of family No. 4.1 are K-polystable ([4]).
Used to know that the moduli component M contains the smooth locus and is nonempty.
standard math The GIT quotient P(V)^ss//Gamma is P(1,3,4,6) (Proposition 2.5, citing [27,11,16]).
Serves as the base space for the subsequent blow-up construction.
standard math K-polystability can be checked via the beta-invariant criterion for G-invariant divisors ([15,22,31]).
Used repeatedly in Section 4 to prove K-polystability of specific divisors.
standard math Nemuro Lemma (Lemma 26 in [8]) is valid as stated.
Applied in the proof of Lemma 4.3 to bound the delta-invariant.
standard math The classification of toric Fano threefolds in the Graded Rings Database ([14]) is correct.
Used to identify the toric K-polystable Fano threefolds arising in the boundary.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of K-moduli of pure states of four qubits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WPDQ76BL

@misc{pith2026241219972,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: K-moduli of pure states of four qubits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WPDQ76BL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19972}
}

abstract

We find all K-polystable limits of divisors in $(\mathbb{P}^1)^4$ of degree $(1,1,1,1)$ and explicitly describe the associated irreducible component of the K-moduli space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Smooth Fano 3-folds satisfying Condition (A)
math.AG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Smooth Fano 3-folds are classified by Condition (A): all members of 35 families satisfy it, no members of 32 families satisfy it, and the remaining 38 families contain members that fail it.
K-stability of Fano 3-folds in the World of Null-A
math.AG 2025-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Every smooth Fano 3-fold that fails Condition (A), meaning it has a finite abelian automorphism group with no fixed point, is K-polystable except for eight explicit deformation families.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Abban, Z

H. Abban, Z. Zhuang, K-stability of Fano varieties via admissible ﬂags , Forum of Mathematics Pi 10 (2022), 1–43

work page 2022
[2]

Araujo, A.-M

C. Araujo, A.-M. Castravet, I. Cheltsov, K. Fujita, A.-S. Kalog hiros, J. Martinez-Garcia, C. Shramov, H. S¨ uß, N. Viswanathan, The Calabi problem for Fano threefolds , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2023

work page 2023
[3]

Ascher, K

K. Ascher, K. DeVleming, Yu. Liu, Wall crossing for K-moduli spaces of plane curves , to appear in Proc. of LMS

work page
[4]

Belousov, K

G. Belousov, K. Loginov, K-stability of Fano threefolds of rank 4 and degree 24 , Eur. J. Math. 90 (2023), 80

work page 2023
[5]

Boozer, The moduli space of stable rank 2 parabolic bundles over an el liptic curve with 3 marked points, Proc

D. Boozer, The moduli space of stable rank 2 parabolic bundles over an el liptic curve with 3 marked points, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 4645–4653

work page 2022
[6]

Cheltsov, T

I. Cheltsov, T. Duarte Guerreiro, K. Fujita, I. Krylov, J. Mart inez-Garcia, K-stability of Casagrande- Druel varieties , to appear in Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik

work page
[7]

Cheltsov, A

I. Cheltsov, A. Dubouloz, T. Kishimoto, Toric G-solid Fano threefolds , Selecta Mathematica 29 (2023), paper 22, 45 pages

work page 2023
[8]

Cheltsov, K

I. Cheltsov, K. Fujita, T. Kishimoto, T. Okada, K-stable divisors in P1 × P1 × P2 of degree (1,1,2), Nagoya Math. J. 251 (2023), 686–714

work page 2023

Show all 32 references

[9]

Cheltsov, L

I. Cheltsov, L. Marquand, Y. Tschinkel, Z. Zhang, Equivariant geometry of singular cubic threefolds, II, arXiv:2405.02744, 2024

2024
[10]

Cheltsov, Y

I. Cheltsov, Y. Tschinkel, Z. Zhang, Equivariant geometry of singular cubic threefolds , to apper in Forum of Mathematics, Sigma
[11]

Chterental, D

O. Chterental, D. Djokovic, Normal forms and tensor ranks of pure states of four qubits , Linear Algebra Research Advancee, G. D. Ling (Ed.), Chapter 4, pp. 133– 167, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007

2007
[12]

Collino, The fundamental group of the Fano surface, I , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 947 (1982), 209–218

A. Collino, The fundamental group of the Fano surface, I , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 947 (1982), 209–218

1982
[13]

Dietrich, W

H. Dietrich, W. de Graaf, A. Marrani, M. Origlia, Classiﬁcation of four qubit states and their sta- bilisers under SLOCC operations , J. of Physics A: Math. Theor. 55 (2022), 095302

2022
[14]

Kasprzyk, Canonical toric Fano threefolds , Canadian Journal of Mathematics 62 (2010), 1293– 1309

A. Kasprzyk, Canonical toric Fano threefolds , Canadian Journal of Mathematics 62 (2010), 1293– 1309

2010
[15]

Fujita, A valuative criterion for uniform K-stability of Q-Fano varieties, J

K. Fujita, A valuative criterion for uniform K-stability of Q-Fano varieties, J. Reine Angew. Math. 751 (2019), 309–338

2019
[16]

G. Gour, N. Wallach, On symmetric SL-invariant polynomials in four qubits , Symmetry: represec- tation theory and its applications, 259–267, Progr. Math., 257, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, New York, 2014

2014
[17]

Holweck, J.-G

F. Holweck, J.-G. Luque, M. Planat, Singularity of type D4 arising from four-qubit systems , J. Physics A 47 (2014), 135301

2014
[18]

Holweck, J.-G

F. Holweck, J.-G. Luque, J.-Y. Thibon, Entanglement of four-qubit systems: a geometric atlas with polynomial compass II (the tame world) , J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), 022201

2017
[19]

Kuznetsov, Yu

A. Kuznetsov, Yu. Prokhorov, Rationality over non-closed ﬁelds of Fano threefolds with h igher geo- metric Picard rank , Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu 23 (2024), 207–247

2024
[20]

Koll´ ar, R

J. Koll´ ar, R. Laza, G. Sacca, C. Voisin, Remarks on degenerations of hyper-K¨ ahler manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier 68 (2018), 2837–2882

2018
[21]

Koll´ ar, S

J. Koll´ ar, S. Mori, Classiﬁcation of three-dimensional ﬂips , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 (1992), no.3, 533–703

1992
[22]

Li, K-semistability is equivariant volume minimization , Duke Math

C. Li, K-semistability is equivariant volume minimization , Duke Math. Journal 166 (2017), 3147– 3218

2017
[23]

Liu, Algebraic geometry and arithmetic curves , Oxf

Q. Liu, Algebraic geometry and arithmetic curves , Oxf. Grad. Texts Math. 6, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

2002
[24]

Y. Liu, C. Xu and Z. Zhuang, Finite generation for valuations computing stability thre sholds and applications to K-stability , Ann.of Math. 196 (2022), 507–566

2022
[25]

Luque, J

J.-G. Luque, J. Thibon, Polynomial invariants of four qubits , Phys. Rev. A 67, 043203. 28 IV AN CHELTSOV, MAKSYM FEDORCHUK, KENTO FUJITA, ANNE-SOP HIE KALOGHIROS
[26]

Sano, On deformations of Q-Fano 3-folds, Algebraic Geom

T. Sano, On deformations of Q-Fano 3-folds, Algebraic Geom. 25 (2016), 141–176

2016
[27]

Schlaﬂi, ¨Uber die Resultante eines Systemes mehrerer algebraischer Gleichungen

L. Schlaﬂi, ¨Uber die Resultante eines Systemes mehrerer algebraischer Gleichungen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Elimination , Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften/ Mathematisch–Naturwissenschaftliche Classe 4 (1852), 1–74
[28]

Sernesi, Deformations of algebraic schemes , Grundlehren Math

E. Sernesi, Deformations of algebraic schemes , Grundlehren Math. Wiss., 334, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006

2006
[29]

Verstraete, J

F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, B. De Moor, H. Verschelde, Four qubits can be entangled in nine diﬀerent ways, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002), 052112

2002
[30]

Zhuang, Product theorem for K-stability , Adv

Z. Zhuang, Product theorem for K-stability , Adv. Math. 371 (2020), 107250, 18 pp

2020
[31]

Zhuang, Optimal destabilizing centers and equivariant K-stabilit y, Invent

Z. Zhuang, Optimal destabilizing centers and equivariant K-stabilit y, Invent. Math. 226 (2021), 195– 223

2021
[32]

Xu, K-stability of Fano varieties: an algebro-geometric appro ach, EMS Surv

C. Xu, K-stability of Fano varieties: an algebro-geometric appro ach, EMS Surv. Math. Sci. 8 (2021), 265–354. Ivan Cheltsov University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland i.cheltsov@ed.ac.uk Maksym Fedorchuk Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts maksym.fedorchuk@bc.edu Ke...

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Abban, Z

H. Abban, Z. Zhuang, K-stability of Fano varieties via admissible ﬂags , Forum of Mathematics Pi 10 (2022), 1–43

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Araujo, A.-M

C. Araujo, A.-M. Castravet, I. Cheltsov, K. Fujita, A.-S. Kalog hiros, J. Martinez-Garcia, C. Shramov, H. S¨ uß, N. Viswanathan, The Calabi problem for Fano threefolds , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2023

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Ascher, K

K. Ascher, K. DeVleming, Yu. Liu, Wall crossing for K-moduli spaces of plane curves , to appear in Proc. of LMS

work page

[4] [4]

Belousov, K

G. Belousov, K. Loginov, K-stability of Fano threefolds of rank 4 and degree 24 , Eur. J. Math. 90 (2023), 80

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Boozer, The moduli space of stable rank 2 parabolic bundles over an el liptic curve with 3 marked points, Proc

D. Boozer, The moduli space of stable rank 2 parabolic bundles over an el liptic curve with 3 marked points, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 4645–4653

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Cheltsov, T

I. Cheltsov, T. Duarte Guerreiro, K. Fujita, I. Krylov, J. Mart inez-Garcia, K-stability of Casagrande- Druel varieties , to appear in Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik

work page

[7] [7]

Cheltsov, A

I. Cheltsov, A. Dubouloz, T. Kishimoto, Toric G-solid Fano threefolds , Selecta Mathematica 29 (2023), paper 22, 45 pages

work page 2023

[8] [8]

Cheltsov, K

I. Cheltsov, K. Fujita, T. Kishimoto, T. Okada, K-stable divisors in P1 × P1 × P2 of degree (1,1,2), Nagoya Math. J. 251 (2023), 686–714

work page 2023