Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Sampling random quantum circuits: a pedestrian's guide

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.07872 v1 pith:WPYHIQAP submitted 2020-07-10 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumsupremacybasisexperimentsrandomsamplingtheoreticalcircuits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent experiments completed by collaborating research groups from Google, NASA Ames, UC Santa Barbara, and others provided compelling evidence that quantum supremacy has finally been achieved on a superconducting quantum processor. The theoretical basis for these experiments depends on sampling the output distributions of random quantum circuits; unfortunately, understanding how this theoretical basis can be used to define quantum supremacy is an extremely difficult task. Anyone attempting to understand how this sampling task relates to quantum supremacy must study concepts from random matrix theory, mathematical analysis, quantum chaos, computational complexity, and probability theory. Resources connecting these concepts in the context of quantum supremacy are scattered and often difficult to find. This article is an attempt to alleviate this difficulty in those who wish to understand the theoretical basis of Google's quantum supremacy experiments, by carefully walking through a derivation of their precise mathematical definition of quantum supremacy. It's designed for advanced undergraduate or graduate students who want more information than can be provided in popular science articles, but who might not know where to begin when tackling the many research papers related to quantum supremacy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large-Scale Quantum Device Benchmarking via LXEB with Particle-Number-Conserving Random Quantum Circuits

    quant-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MLXEB estimates circuit fidelity for large quantum devices using particle-number-conserving random circuits whose ideal output distribution can be classically simulated in a reduced Hilbert space.

  2. Empowering Large Scale Quantum Circuit Development: Effective Simulation of Sycamore Circuits

    quant-ph 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A commercial SDK claims to simulate 53-qubit Sycamore circuits on 32GB RAM with an average XEB of 0.678, but the benchmark is weakly supported and partly self-referential.

Pith tools