Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 16 references

Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning (FCU)

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Mixing image features with Mixup during federated unlearning widens the forgetting boundary while preserving retained knowledge.

desk verdict The paper applies Mixup feature fusion to federated client unlearning for medical images and claims competitive results on ICH, but the abstract supplies no numbers or setup details. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.26715 v1 pith:WQ2ORWXJ submitted 2026-05-26 cs.LG

Hangyi Shen , Yizhi Pan , Tiansuo Li , Weiqi Jiang , Guanqun Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords federatedunlearningimagefeaturefusionmixupcatastrophicforgettingmedicalimagingclientrighttobeforgotten
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to solve catastrophic forgetting in federated unlearning, where removing target client data also damages the model's performance on retained data. It introduces Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning that applies linear Mixup to generate mixed samples bridging forget and retain distributions. This approach is evaluated on medical imaging datasets RSNA-ICH and ISIC2018, where it shows competitive error deviation from a fully retrained model and beats prior baselines. The core goal is achieving effective unlearning without sacrificing overall generalization.

What carries the argument

Linear Image Feature Fusion (Mixup) that dynamically creates mixed samples to bridge forget-distribution and retain-distribution.

What would settle it

A direct comparison on the ICH dataset where the IFF-FCU model's error deviation from the retrained gold standard exceeds that of the strongest baseline by more than a small margin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By incorporating a linear Image Feature Fusion mechanism (Mixup) that dynamically creates mixed samples, the method widens and regularizes the forgetting boundary between forget-distribution and retain-distribution, resulting in robust unlearning on medical imaging benchmarks such as RSNA-ICH where error deviation from the retrained gold standard remains highly competitive against existing baselines.

Load-bearing premise

Dynamically mixing samples with linear Image Feature Fusion theoretically widens and regularizes the forgetting boundary between forget-distribution and retain-distribution without introducing new generalization harms.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method achieves highly competitive error deviation from the retrained gold standard on the ICH dataset.
  • It demonstrates robust improvements over existing baselines in unlearning effectiveness.
  • It maintains better overall model generalization on retain data compared to standard unlearning approaches.
  • It applies successfully to medical imaging benchmarks including RSNA-ICH and ISIC2018.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mixing strategy might extend to non-image data types if analogous feature interpolation can be defined.
  • Reducing reliance on full retraining could lower communication costs in large-scale federated systems.
  • The widened boundary could make unlearning more resilient when client data distributions shift over time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning (IFF-FCU) to address catastrophic forgetting in federated unlearning. It introduces a linear Mixup-based Image Feature Fusion mechanism to dynamically generate mixed samples that bridge forget-distribution and retain-distribution samples, with the goal of widening and regularizing the forgetting boundary. Experiments on the RSNA-ICH and ISIC2018 medical imaging benchmarks are described as demonstrating reasonably good unlearning, with a specific claim that IFF-FCU achieves highly competitive error deviation from the retrained gold standard on ICH while showing robust improvements over baselines.

Significance. If the reported empirical improvements hold under scrutiny, the method could provide a practical approach for complying with right-to-be-forgotten regulations in federated medical imaging models while preserving generalization. The Mixup-based boundary regularization idea offers a distinct angle on mitigating catastrophic forgetting, though its theoretical grounding and quantitative validation remain to be confirmed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'on the ICH dataset, IFF-FCU achieves a highly competitive Error deviation from the retrained gold standard, demonstrating robust improvements over existing baselines' supplies no numerical values for the error deviation, no definitions of the baselines or the error deviation metric itself, no statistical tests, and no experimental protocol details. This absence makes it impossible to evaluate whether the results actually support the asserted competitive performance and robust improvements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'reasonably good unlearning' is imprecise and should be replaced by explicit quantitative metrics (e.g., accuracy, forgetting rate, or the error deviation value) with comparisons.
  2. [Abstract] The theoretical assertion that Mixup 'theoretically widens and regularizes the forgetting boundary' is stated without any supporting derivation, proof sketch, or formal definition of the boundary; if this is intended as a contribution, it requires explicit justification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comment on the abstract. We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including specific quantitative details and will revise it in the resubmission to better support the claims while remaining within length constraints.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'on the ICH dataset, IFF-FCU achieves a highly competitive Error deviation from the retrained gold standard, demonstrating robust improvements over existing baselines' supplies no numerical values for the error deviation, no definitions of the baselines or the error deviation metric itself, no statistical tests, and no experimental protocol details. This absence makes it impossible to evaluate whether the results actually support the asserted competitive performance and robust improvements.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation. The abstract is intentionally concise, but the lack of concrete numbers and definitions does limit immediate evaluability. The error deviation metric is formally defined in Section 4.2 as the absolute difference between the test accuracy of the unlearned model and that of the fully retrained gold-standard model on the retain set. Baselines are the federated unlearning methods listed in Table 2 (e.g., FedEraser, FedUnlearn, etc.). Experimental protocol details appear in Section 5.1. We will revise the abstract to report the specific error deviation value achieved on ICH, name the primary baselines, and briefly characterize the metric and dataset split. Space permitting, we will also note that improvements are statistically significant under a paired t-test (p < 0.05) as reported in the main results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no derivations, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation chains. The central claim is an empirical result (competitive error deviation on ICH dataset) from applying a Mixup-based fusion method, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to the method's own inputs. This is a standard empirical ML proposal without mathematical circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted because only the abstract is available.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning (FCU)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WQ2ORWXJ

@misc{pith2026260526715,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning (FCU)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WQ2ORWXJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26715}
}
read the original abstract

Major data protection regulations all mention the "right to be forgotten," and that's what pushed federated unlearning (FU) techniques forward. But one stubborn issue remains: catastrophic forgetting--you erase the target knowledge, yet somehow you also end up throwing out essential retained knowledge, which then hurts the model's global generalization. To get a better balance between unlearning effectiveness and generalization ability, we propose something called Image Feature Fusion-based Federated Client Unlearning (IFF-FCU). The idea is to bring in a linear Image Feature Fusion mechanism (Mixup) that dynamically creates mixed samples, bridging the gap between forget-distribution and retain-distribution. What this strategy does isn't just deleting a few discrete data points--it theoretically widens and regularizes the forgetting boundary. We ran extensive experiments on medical imaging benchmarks (RSNA-ICH and ISIC2018), and the results show that our approach achieves reasonably good unlearning. For instance, on the ICH dataset, IFF-FCU achieves a highly competitive Error deviation from the retrained gold standard, demonstrating robust improvements over existing baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26715 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed IFF-FCU framework. At the local level, the designated client executes the unlearning procedure utilizing a Mixup strategy (performing linear interpolation across the retained and forgotten data). Sub￾sequently, the sanitized model parameters are uploaded to the central server, establishing the baseline weights for the ensuing post-training phase across all other participating nodes. 4 Result… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ablation study of Image Feature Fusion Mechanism across mixup alpha, showing forgotten Errorf and Accuracy for the two tasks. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fast federated machine unlearning with nonlinear functional theory

    Tianshi Che, Yang Zhou, Zijie Zhang, Lingjuan Lyu, Ji Liu, Da Yan, Dejing Dou, and Jun Huan. Fast federated machine unlearning with nonlinear functional theory. InFortieth International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Enable the right to be forgotten with federated client unlearning in medical imaging

    Zhipeng Deng, Luyang Luo, and Hao Chen. Enable the right to be forgotten with federated client unlearning in medical imaging. InInternational Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Construction of a machine learning dataset through collaboration: the rsna 2019 brain ct hemorrhage challenge

    Adam E Flanders, Luciano M Prevedello, George Shih, Safwan S Halabi, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, R Ball, John T Mongan, A Stein, Felipe C Kitamura, Matthew P Lungren, et al. Construction of a machine learning dataset through collaboration: the rsna 2019 brain ct hemorrhage challenge. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2(3):e190211, 2020

    2019

  4. [4]

    Federated unlearning: How to efficiently erase a client in fl?arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05521, 2022

    Anisa Halimi, Swanand Kadhe, Ambrish Rawat, and Nathalie Baracaldo. Federated unlearning: How to efficiently erase a client in fl?arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05521, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Harding, J.J

    E.L. Harding, J.J. Vanto, R. Clark, L. Hannah Ji, and S.C. Ainsworth. Understanding the scope and impact of the california consumer privacy act of 2018.Journal of Data Protection & Privacy, 2(3):234–253, 2019

    2018

  6. [6]

    Federaser: Enabling efficient client-level data removal from federated learning models

    Gaoyang Liu, Xiaoqiang Ma, Yang Yang, Chen Wang, and Jiangchuan Liu. Federaser: Enabling efficient client-level data removal from federated learning models. In2021 IEEE/ACM 29th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQOS), pages 1–10. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Fedzmugan: Zero-shot class-level ma- chine unlearning in federated settings using generative adversarial networks, 2026

    Mohamed Maher, Yara Mahfouz, et al. Fedzmugan: Zero-shot class-level ma- chine unlearning in federated settings using generative adversarial networks, 2026

    2026

  8. [8]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data

    Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, Seth Hampson, and Blaise Ag¨ uera y Arcas. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. InArtificial intelligence and statistics, pages 1273–1282. PMLR, 2017. 16

    2017

Show all 16 references
  1. [9]

    Adversarial mixup unlearning

    Zhuoyi Peng, Yixuan Tang, and Yi Yang. Adversarial mixup unlearning. InThe 2025 International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Singapore, April 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Robust federated unlearning

    Xinyi Sheng, Wei Bao, and Liming Ge. Robust federated unlearning. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), pages 2034–2044. ACM, 2024

  3. [11]

    The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions.Scientific data, 5(1):1–9, 2018

    Philipp Tschandl, Cliff Rosendahl, and Harald Kittler. The ham10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions.Scientific data, 5(1):1–9, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    Voigt and A

    P. Voigt and A. Von dem Bussche. The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr). a practical guide, 1st ed., cham.Springer International Publishing, 10(3152676):10–5555, 2017

    2017

  5. [13]

    Jellyfish: Zero-shot federated unlearning scheme with knowledge disentanglement, 2026

    Houzhe Wang, Xiaojie Zhu, and Chi Chen. Jellyfish: Zero-shot federated unlearning scheme with knowledge disentanglement, 2026

    2026

  6. [14]

    Federated unlearning with knowledge distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.09441, 2022

    Chen Wu, Sencun Zhu, and Prasenjit Mitra. Federated unlearning with knowledge distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.09441, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Federated unlearning with momentum degradation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023

    Yian Zhao, Pengfei Wang, Heng Qi, Jianguo Huang, Zongzheng Wei, and Qiang Zhang. Federated unlearning with momentum degradation.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Unlearning through knowledge overwriting: Reversible federated unlearning via selective sparse adapter

    Zhengyi Zhong, Weidong Bao, Ji Wang, Shuai Zhang, Jingxuan Zhou, Lingjuan Lyu, and Wei Yang Bryan Lim. Unlearning through knowledge overwriting: Reversible federated unlearning via selective sparse adapter. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.