Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 64 references

Image-based physical characterization of magnetotactic bacteria from an environmental sample

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that automated measurements of cell size, swimming speed, and magnetic moment can separate coexisting magnetotactic bacterial populations in an uncultured river sample, and it demonstrates this on a newly discovered…

desk verdict A useful open-source MTB imaging workflow and a new field site, packaged inside a paper whose 'three separate species' claim outruns what AIC on a single sample can support. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04011 v1 pith:WQCHB2LB submitted 2025-06-04 physics.bio-ph

Mara Smite , Mihails Birjukovs , Mila Sirinelli-Kojadinovic , Sandrine Grosse , Agnese Kokina , Janis Liepins , Dita Gudra , Megija Lunge
show 5 more authors
Davids Fridmanis Mihaly Posfai Andrejs Cebers Damien Faivre Guntars Kitenbergs
This is my paper
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords magnetotacticbacteriamagneticmomentU-turnmethodvelocimetrypopulationidentificationenvironmentalsampleimage-basedcharacterization16SrRNA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a new magnetotactic-bacteria-rich site in Latvia's Ogre River and argues that physical measurements alone can resolve coexisting bacterial populations in a wild, uncultured sample. The authors built two open-source, microscope-based pipelines: a static-field velocimetry method that records long swimming tracks, and an automated U-turn method that extracts each cell's magnetic moment from its turning trajectory. Applying AIC-constrained Gaussian mixture fits to the measured size, speed, and moment distributions, they identify three magnetic populations plus a non-magnetic one in the same environmental sample. They interpret the three magnetic clusters as three separate species, even though genetics and TEM can only confirm broad family-level diversity. If correct, the approach offers field laboratories a fast, cultivation-free way to characterize magnetotactic bacteria diversity using little more than an optical microscope and a magnet.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the automated U-turn method, which fits each recorded turning trajectory to the theoretical shape $y = -\frac{L}{\pi}\ln(\sec(\pi x/L))$, where $L$ is the asymptotic U-turn width. From that width the cell magnetic moment follows as $m = \pi\alpha v/(HL)$, with rotational drag coefficient $\alpha = 8\pi^2\eta R^3$, field strength $H$, swimming speed $v$, and effective radius $R$. This turns a standard alternating-magnetic-field experiment into a per-cell moment measurement. On the velocimetry side, a static field is reversed to draw long swimming tracks from cells concentrated at a capillary wall, and automated multiple-hypothesis tracking reconstructs them. Population counts are then chosen by AIC-constrained multi-Gaussian fits over velocity-radius or moment-radius histograms, with only statistically significant components retained.

What would settle it

Isolate, sort, or micromanipulate individual bacteria from each of the three fitted magnetic-moment populations and sequence single-cell 16S rRNA genes; if cells within one fitted cluster do not share a consistent genotype, or if a fresh sample from the same site yields a different cluster count on the same day, the population-resolution claim would be refuted. A cheaper partial check is to compare TEM cell-size and magnetosome-presence counts against the model's predicted clusters and its critical-radius intercept.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that integrating automated velocimetry and magnetic moment analysis provides a powerful and accessible way to differentiate magnetotactic bacteria populations in complex environmental samples. On a sample from the Ogre River, the U-turn analysis of 846 individual tracks gives a most probable magnetic moment of $m = 1.5\times10^{-15}\,\mathrm{A\,m^2}$, a mean of $\langle m\rangle = 2.06\times10^{-15}\,\mathrm{A\,m^2}$, and a critical radius $r_c = 0.57\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ below which cells show no measurable moment. The same data, fit in the $(m, r)$ plane with an AIC-selected three-population Gaussian mixture, separate three magnetic groups, one of which shows a negative radius-moment correlation that the paper notes is biologically unusual. Velocimetry alone finds four populations on the first day and two on the second, and the comparison shows that one velocimetry population is non-magnetic. The paper's conclusion is that these physical fingerprints resolve MTB populations that genetic and morphological methods cannot easily separate in an uncultured mixture.

Load-bearing premise

The fitted statistical clusters in size, velocity, and magnetic moment correspond to real biological groups such as species or cell types, rather than artifacts of the Gaussian fitting, ongoing sample decay, or contamination by non-magnetic cells.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • MTB diversity in an environmental sample can be assessed with an optical microscope, a permanent magnet, and the open-source code, without cultivation, TEM, or sequencing.
  • Velocimetry and magnetic-moment analysis can be combined to flag non-magnetic bacteria that would otherwise be misread as separate magnetotactic populations.
  • Velocity distributions measured on consecutive days provide a quantitative readout of how fast distinct MTB populations decline under ex situ storage.
  • The critical radius near $0.57\,\mu\mathrm{m}$ gives a concrete size cutoff below which cells in this environment are unlikely to carry a detectable magnetosome chain.
  • Three magnetic populations with distinct $(m,r)$ correlations imply that behavioral fingerprinting can distinguish species-level groups within a mixed wild sample.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors do not map their fitted clusters onto individual genotypes; a natural extension would be single-cell sorting of the three magnetic populations followed by single-cell 16S rRNA sequencing to test whether the clusters correspond one-to-one with species.
  • The unusual population with negative $m(r)$ correlation could be a growth-stage artifact or a genuinely distinct magnetosome arrangement; imaging sorted cells from that cluster with TEM would settle which.
  • Because the static-field velocimetry needs only a permanent magnet, the pipeline could be deployed as a field-screen for MTB-rich sites, measuring population diversity on site before any enrichment is attempted.
  • Repeating the two-day measurement at more frequent intervals would let the method estimate population-specific survival half-lives, which would inform how quickly samples must be processed after collection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a new magnetotactic bacteria (MTB)-rich site in the Ogre River, Latvia, and presents two open-source image-based analysis pipelines: a static-field velocimetry method for cell velocity and effective radius, and an alternating-field U-turn method for estimating single-cell magnetic moments. Using AIC-constrained multi-Gaussian fits on velocity-radius and moment-radius data, the authors claim to resolve four velocity populations on Day 1 (two on Day 2) and three magnetic-moment populations, which they interpret as three separate MTB species, together with one non-magnetic population. The physical methods are combined with 16S rRNA metagenomics and TEM to characterize the sample, and the paper concludes that the workflows provide a powerful approach for differentiating MTB populations in complex environmental samples.

Significance. If the central claim is sustained, the paper would provide a valuable, cultivation-independent, low-equipment toolset for rapid field screening of MTB populations, and it contributes open-source code for tracking, U-turn analysis, and magnetic-moment retrieval. The new MTB-rich field site is also a useful empirical contribution. The strengths are the automated tracking pipeline, the explicit magnetic-moment statistics from 846 trajectories, and the authors' candid discussion of the biological ambiguity of the fitted populations. However, the key scientific claim that the statistically identified Gaussian components correspond to real biological populations is not independently validated, and the negative-correlation component in the (r, m) fit is presented with an inadequate plausibility check. These issues directly affect the paper's central demonstration that the methods can differentiate MTB populations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, 'MTB population identification'; Results, 'Magnetic moment-based characterization'] The central claim that three MTB populations (and by extension, 'three separate species') are resolved rests on AIC-constrained Gaussian mixture components, but AIC only selects the best model within a candidate family; it does not establish that the components correspond to real clusters. The manuscript provides no independent validation: no linkage of clusters to 16S OTUs, no single-cell isolation or staining, no replicate sampling, and no comparison to a null model. The variational Gaussian mixture check in Appendix A is not independent because it assumes the same Gaussian cluster structure on the same features. Consequently, the 'three separate species' interpretation in the Conclusions is not supported by the evidence presented.
  2. [Results, 'Magnetic moment-based characterization' (Table 3, row 2; Fig. 10)] The negative-correlation component (rho = -0.26 +/- 0.02) is described by the authors as biologically unusual and previously unreported. Their dismissal of aggregates because effective radii of 0.86-0.93 um are 'too small to accommodate multiple cells' is not convincing: a doublet of two cells with radii near 0.6 um would have an area-based effective radius of roughly 0.85 um, so aggregates are not excluded by the stated dimensions. Furthermore, the three components overlap heavily (mean radii separated by less than 0.15 um, sigma_2 between 0.03 and 0.10 um), so skewness, boundary effects, or the chosen number of components could produce an apparent negative correlation. The paper should demonstrate robustness through bootstrapped fits, skewness-aware models, or independent biophysical validation before treating this component as a real biological population.
  3. [Introduction (Section 1) vs. Methods, 'Magnetic moment calculation'] The Introduction lists 'an improved Bean model, integrated with an automated U-turn analysis framework' as a central methodological component, but the Methods section describes only the standard U-turn shape analysis from Ref. [43] (Eqs. 1 and 2) and never defines or mentions a 'Bean model' or any improvement to it. As written, the claimed novelty of this methodological component cannot be evaluated. The authors should either present the model and its validation or remove the claim from the Introduction.
  4. [Methods, 'MTB population identification'; Tables 2 and 3] The manuscript does not report sample sizes for the velocimetry datasets, the AIC values or Delta-AIC for the selected models, or a quantitative definition of the significance criterion based on 'contributions to the PDF integral volume reconstruction.' Without these details, the reader cannot assess whether the four-population (Day 1) and three-population (m) fits are meaningfully better than simpler alternatives. Please provide these values, along with a bootstrap stability analysis or equivalent, for the reported population counts.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The name 'Aikake' should be spelled 'Akaike' (Introduction and Velocimetry-based characterization).
  2. [Results, 'Morphological and genetic diversity'] The word 'coboochtoedral' appears to be a typo for 'cubooctahedral', and 'bilopotrichous' should likely be 'lophotrichous'.
  3. [Table 1 and 16S rRNA sequencing section] '16-s rRNA' and '16-s' should be written as '16S rRNA' and '16S'.
  4. [16S rRNA gene sequencing data analysis] 'Miliseq' should be 'MiSeq'.
  5. [Figure 8 caption] The caption contains the typo 'Velocitmetry'; it should be 'Velocimetry'.
  6. [Results, 'Velocimetry-based characterization'] Please report the number of cells (N) used for the velocity histograms in Figures 4 and 5, as this is essential for interpreting the fitted population fractions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: populations are fit from independent single-cell measurements; self-citations to prior U-turn methodology are reuse, not load-bearing circularity.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: (i) cell radii and velocities are direct image-analysis observables from reconstructed trajectories; (ii) magnetic moments are obtained by fitting U-turn trajectories to the theoretical shape in Eq. (1) and then computing m from Eq. (2), a physical relation developed in the authors' prior work [43]; (iii) the population split is produced by AIC-constrained multi-Gaussian fitting of the (r,v) and (r,m) data, and the negative-correlation component is explicitly not a fitting constraint; (iv) the 'three separate species' statement is an interpretation of the AIC fit, not an input to it. None of these steps sets the conclusion equal to an input: the measured trajectories, radii, velocities, and magnetic moments are independent observables, and the AIC procedure selects a model rather than imposing the claimed population count. The reuse of Eqs. (1)-(2) and the rc = 0.57 um threshold from [43] is methodological reuse of independently developed, code-released prior work, not a self-justifying premise; the threshold is an external reference from MSR-1 data and is not used to construct the fitted populations. The Appendix A variational-GMM check is a same-data internal consistency analysis and therefore is not independent validation, but that is a statistical caveat, not circularity. The paper itself acknowledges that 'AIC provides a statistically robust framework for model selection' yet 'does not impose biophysical constraints' and that different individuals may be recorded in different datasets; these are honest limitations. The skeptical concern that AIC-selected Gaussian components may not correspond to biologically real species is a validity/identifiability risk, not a reduction of the output to the input. No circular step can be quoted with a specific equation-to-equation reduction, so the analysis is self-contained against the measured data; the score reflects only minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on statistical clustering of physical measurements. The only physically motivated inputs (viscosity, field strength, drag model) are carried from prior work or standard physics. The main burden is the assumption that AIC-selected clusters are biologically meaningful, plus the undefined 'improved Bean model'.

free parameters (3)
  • Critical radius threshold rc = 0.57 µm
    Obtained from an error-weighted linear model fit to the magnetic moment vs radius data (Fig. 9a), used to state the size below which cells lack measurable magnetic moment.
  • Multi-Gaussian population parameters = Populations in Tables 2 and 3 (means, variances, correlations, amplitudes)
    The AIC-constrained multi-Gaussian fits determine the number and parameters of populations in velocimetry and magnetic moment data; these are descriptive fits, not independent physical constants.
  • PDF significance threshold = Not stated numerically
    Populations are selected based on 'contributions to the PDF integral volume reconstruction' (Methods, MTB population identification), a hand-set criterion that affects how many populations are reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The U-turn shape function (Eq. 1) and magnetic moment formula m = παv/(HL) from arXiv:2501.09869 are valid for cells in this environmental sample.
    Applied without re-derivation, relying on the authors' prior MSR-1 study; if the shape function is strain-specific, the m values could be biased.
  • domain assumption Effective spherical approximation for rotational drag, α = 8π²ηR³, with R from trajectory-averaged equivalent circle radius.
    Used in Eq. (2) for all cells, including irregular cocci and rods; shape anisotropy is neglected.
  • domain assumption Medium viscosity η = 0.90·10^-3 Pa·s and field B = 2.55·10^-4 T are accurate and constant.
    These inputs directly scale m; no uncertainty analysis is given for them.
  • standard math AIC-constrained Gaussian mixture modeling identifies biologically real populations.
    The number of populations is taken from the AIC minimum; this is a statistical model-selection assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper Each fitted population corresponds to a distinct species or cell type.
    The authors conclude 'three separate species' without single-cell sequencing or independent validation, and the negative-correlation population could be a fitting artifact.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Image-based physical characterization of magnetotactic bacteria from an environmental sample." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WQCHB2LB

@misc{pith2026250604011,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Image-based physical characterization of magnetotactic bacteria from an environmental sample},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WQCHB2LB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04011}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are a diverse group of microorganisms that are able to biomineralize magnetic nanoparticles. Most MTB remain uncultured, making population-level characterization from natural environments difficult. We report the discovery of a new and diverse MTB-rich site in the Ogre River, Latvia, and present an integrated approach combining 16S rRNA sequencing, transmission electron microscopy, and novel open-source, automated image-based physical methods to characterize bacteria populations within environmental samples. We introduce a pipeline for cell velocimetry using a static magnetic field and a method to classify cell populations based on their magnetic moment using a modified U-turn method where cell behavior is studied in an alternating magnetic field. This study demonstrates that our physical analysis methods provide a powerful, fast, and robust toolset for MTB population analysis in complex environmental samples.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04011 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MTB sampling locations: a) and b) map of Latvia. Expedition A sampling locations 1 (Lake Mezezers), 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. TEM images of diverse MTB found in the Ogre River: (a) a spirillum with a smaller MTB attached; (b) MTB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The relative abundance of bacteria found in Ogre River sample. MTB have been previously found in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relative frequency ρ histogram for MTB velocity magnitude ∥⃗v∥ in the log10 scale: samples from Expedition B: (a) Day 1 and (b) Day 2. Freedman–Diaconis binning used in both cases. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative frequency histograms for MTB effective radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Population outlines for both measurement days (legend at the top). Dashed green line denotes one of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of cell trajectories (red dashed lines) in an alternating MF: (a) a coccus and (b) a diplococcus. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Data obtained from magnetic moment m measurements via the modified U-turn method: (a) Velocitmetry: v and effective radius r distribution (Freedman–Diaconis binning), with significant populations marked with dashed ellipses – orange colour for the nonmagnetic populatio…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Magnetic moment m versus MTB effective radius. The measured m values depending on the cell effective radius are represented by gray dots, with the q = 0.95 quantile uncertainty region indicated as the light gray area with a green boundary. The uncertainty region is…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Magnetic moment m versus MTB effective radius r: a smooth density histogram (Sheather-Jones bandwidth estimator, Epanechnikov kernel). Dashed ellipses represent AIC-constrained multi-Gaussian fits showing 3 significant populations present in the sample. For an extende…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Population analysis in the (r, v, m) MTB parameter space using variational Gaussian mixture clustering analysis. The three populations are colored in blue, yellow and green. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Population analysis in the (r, v, m) parameter space, an additional point of view for clarity. While a correlation between cell magnetic moment and its size has been shown here, it can also be informative to examine the smooth density histograms of the two (r, v, m) d…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: A smooth density histogram for the (r, v) projection of the data in the (r, v, m) space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A smooth density histogram for the (m, v) projection of the data in the (r, v, m) space. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Explicit and fully automatic analysis of magnetotactic bacteria motion reveals the magnitude and length scaling of magnetic moments

    Mara Smite et al. “Explicit and fully automatic analysis of magnetotactic bacteria motion reveals the magnitude and length scaling of magnetic moments”. In: (2025). arXiv: 2501.09869 [physics.bio-ph].URL: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2501.09869

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Magnetotactic Bacteria

    Richard Blakemore. “Magnetotactic Bacteria”. In:Science190.4212 (1975), pp. 377–379.DOI: 10.1126/ science . 170679. eprint: https : / / www . science . org / doi / pdf / 10 . 1126 / science . 170679.URL: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.170679

    work page doi:10.1126/science.170679 1975

  3. [2]

    Ecology, Diversity, and Evolution of Magnetotactic Bacteria

    Christopher T. Lefèvre and Dennis A. Bazylinski. “Ecology, Diversity, and Evolution of Magnetotactic Bacteria”. en. In:Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews77.3 (Sept. 2013), pp. 497–526.ISSN: 1092-2172, 1098- 5557.DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00021-13 .URL: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/MMBR.00021- 13(visited on 03/31/2023)

    work page doi:10.1128/mmbr.00021-13 2013

  4. [3]

    Swimming with magnets: From biological organisms to synthetic devices

    Stefan Klumpp et al. “Swimming with magnets: From biological organisms to synthetic devices”. en. In: Physics Reports789 (Jan. 2019), pp. 1–54.ISSN: 03701573.DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.007.URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0370157318302862(visited on 08/10/2023)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.007.url: 2019

  5. [4]

    Multicellular magnetotactic bacteria are genetically heterogeneous consortia with metabolically differentiated cells

    George A. Schaible et al. “Multicellular magnetotactic bacteria are genetically heterogeneous consortia with metabolically differentiated cells”. In:PLOS Biology22.7 (July 2024), pp. 1–26.DOI: 10.1371/journal. pbio.3002638.URL:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002638

    doi:10.1371/journal 2024

  6. [5]

    Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes

    Dennis A. Bazylinski and Richard B. Frankel. “Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes”. en. In:Nature Reviews Microbiology2.3 (Mar. 2004), pp. 217–230.ISSN: 1740-1526, 1740-1534.DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro842.URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrmicro842(visited on 01/10/2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/nrmicro842.url: 2004

  7. [6]

    A Compass To Boost Navigation: Cell Biology of Bacterial Magnetotaxis

    Frank D. Müller, Dirk Schüler, and Daniel Pfeiffer. “A Compass To Boost Navigation: Cell Biology of Bacterial Magnetotaxis”. en. In:Journal of Bacteriology202.21 (Oct. 2020). Ed. by William Margolin.ISSN: 0021-9193, 1098-5530.DOI: 10.1128/JB.00398-20 .URL: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JB.00398- 20(visited on 09/03/2024)

    work page doi:10.1128/jb.00398-20 2020

  8. [7]

    Spatial arrangement of chains of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria

    Marianne Hanzlik, Michael Winklhofer, and Nikolai Petersen. “Spatial arrangement of chains of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria”. en. In:Earth and Planetary Science Letters145.1-4 (Dec. 1996), pp. 125–134. ISSN: 0012821X.DOI: 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00191-4 .URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0012821X96001914(visited on 06/04/2024)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(96)00191-4 1996

Show all 64 references
  1. [8]

    Biomineralization and Magnetism of Uncultured Magnetotactic Coccus Strain THC-1 With Non-chained Magnetosomal Magnetite Nanoparticles

    Jinhua Li et al. “Biomineralization and Magnetism of Uncultured Magnetotactic Coccus Strain THC-1 With Non-chained Magnetosomal Magnetite Nanoparticles”. In:Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth125.12 (2020). e2020JB020853 2020JB020853, e2020JB020853.DOI: https://doi.or...

    2020 doi

  2. [9]

    Misalignment between the magnetic dipole moment and the cell axis in the magnetotactic bacteriumMagnetospirillum magneticumAMB-1

    Lucas Le Nagard et al. “Misalignment between the magnetic dipole moment and the cell axis in the magnetotactic bacteriumMagnetospirillum magneticumAMB-1”. In:Physical Biology16.6 (Sept. 2019), p. 066008.ISSN: 1478-3975.DOI: 10.1088/1478- 3975/ab2858 .URL: https://iopscience.io...

    2019 doi

  3. [10]

    Configuration of the magnetosome chain: a natural magnetic nanoarchitecture

    Inaki Orue et al. “Configuration of the magnetosome chain: a natural magnetic nanoarchitecture”. In:Nanoscale 10 (Feb. 2018), pp. 7407–7419.DOI:10.1039/C7NR08493E

    2018 doi

  4. [11]

    Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetofossils: ecology, evolution and environmental implications

    Pranami Goswami et al. “Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetofossils: ecology, evolution and environmental implications”. en. In:npj Biofilms and Microbiomes8.1 (June 2022), p. 43.ISSN: 2055-5008.DOI: 10.1038/ s41522-022-00304-0 .URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41522-022-00...

    2022

  5. [12]

    Physiological magnetic field strengths help magnetotactic bacteria navigate in simulated sediments

    Agnese Codutti et al. “Physiological magnetic field strengths help magnetotactic bacteria navigate in simulated sediments”. In:eLife13 (May 2025).DOI:10.7554/eLife.98001.3

    2025 doi

  6. [13]

    Dynamics of Magnetotactic Bacteria in a Rotating Magnetic Field

    Kaspars ¯Erglis et al. “Dynamics of Magnetotactic Bacteria in a Rotating Magnetic Field”. en. In:Biophysical Journal93.4 (Aug. 2007), pp. 1402–1412.ISSN: 00063495.DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.107474 .URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000634950771398X(visited on 0...

    2007 doi

  7. [14]

    2024.DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2

    Mihails Birjukovs et al.Magnetic control of magnetotactic bacteria swarms. 2024.DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2. 33910.00325. arXiv:2404.18941 [physics.bio-ph].URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18941

    2024

  8. [15]

    Hydrodynamic Interactions, Hidden Order, and Emergent Collective Behavior in an Active Bacterial Suspension

    C. J. Pierce et al. “Hydrodynamic Interactions, Hidden Order, and Emergent Collective Behavior in an Active Bacterial Suspension”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (18 Nov. 2018), p. 188001.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121. 188001.URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.188001

    2018 doi

  9. [16]

    Tunable self-assembly of magnetotactic bacteria: Role of hydrodynamics and mag- netism

    Christopher Pierce et al. “Tunable self-assembly of magnetotactic bacteria: Role of hydrodynamics and mag- netism”. In:AIP Advances10 (Jan. 2020), p. 015335.DOI:10.1063/1.5129925

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    Tuning bacterial hydrodynamics with magnetic fields

    Christopher Pierce et al. “Tuning bacterial hydrodynamics with magnetic fields”. In:Physical Review E95 (June 2017), p. 062612.DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062612. 17 APREPRINT- SEPTEMBER12, 2025

    2017 doi

  11. [18]

    Applications of Magnetotactic Bacteria, Magnetosomes and Magnetosome Crystals in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Mini-Review

    Gabriele Vargas et al. “Applications of Magnetotactic Bacteria, Magnetosomes and Magnetosome Crystals in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology: Mini-Review”. en. In:Molecules23.10 (Sept. 2018), p. 2438.ISSN: 1420-3049.DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102438.URL: http://www.mdpi.com/1420-304...

    2018 doi

  12. [19]

    Biomedical applications of magnetosomes: State of the art and perspectives

    Gang Ren et al. “Biomedical applications of magnetosomes: State of the art and perspectives”. en. In:Bioactive Materials28 (Oct. 2023), pp. 27–49.ISSN: 2452199X.DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.04.025 .URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2452199X23001433(visited on...

    2023 doi

  13. [20]

    Magnetotactic bacteria for cancer therapy

    M. L. Fdez-Gubieda et al. “Magnetotactic bacteria for cancer therapy”. en. In:Journal of Applied Physics 128.7 (Aug. 2020), p. 070902.ISSN: 0021-8979, 1089-7550.DOI: 10 . 1063 / 5 . 0018036.URL: https : //pubs.aip.org/jap/article/128/7/070902/347601/Magnetotactic- bacteria- fo...

    2020

  14. [21]

    Heating Efficiency of Different Magnetotactic Bacterial Species: Influence of Mag- netosome Morphology and Chain Arrangement

    Danny Villanueva et al. “Heating Efficiency of Different Magnetotactic Bacterial Species: Influence of Mag- netosome Morphology and Chain Arrangement”. en. In:ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces16.49 (Dec. 2024), pp. 67216–67224.ISSN: 1944-8244, 1944-8252.DOI: 10 . 1021 / acsam...

    2024 doi

  15. [22]

    Gwisai et al.Magnetic torque-driven living microrobots for enhanced tumor infiltration

    T. Gwisai et al.Magnetic torque-driven living microrobots for enhanced tumor infiltration. en. preprint. Bio- engineering, Jan. 2022.DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.03.473989.URL: http://biorxiv.org/lookup/doi/10. 1101/2022.01.03.473989(visited on 06/12/2023)

    2022 doi

  16. [23]

    Spatially selective delivery of living magnetic microrobots through torque-focusing

    Nima Mirkhani et al. “Spatially selective delivery of living magnetic microrobots through torque-focusing”. en. In: Nature Communications15.1 (Mar. 2024), p. 2160.ISSN: 2041-1723.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46407-4 . URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-46407-4(visited o...

    2024 doi

  17. [24]

    Engineering Magnetotactic Bacteria as Medical Microrobots

    Jiaqi Wang et al. “Engineering Magnetotactic Bacteria as Medical Microrobots”. In:Advanced Materials (2025).DOI: 10 . 1002 / adma . 202416966 .URL: https : / / www . scopus . com / inward / record . uri ? eid = 2 - s2 . 0 - 105002720634 & doi = 10 . 1002 % 2fadma . 202416966 &...

    2025

  18. [25]

    Magnetotactic bacteria: Characteristics and environmental applications

    Xinjie Wang et al. “Magnetotactic bacteria: Characteristics and environmental applications”. en. In:Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering14.4 (Aug. 2020), p. 56.ISSN: 2095-2201, 2095-221X.DOI: 10.1007/ s11783- 020- 1235- z.URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s1178...

    2020 doi

  19. [26]

    Large-Scale Cultivation of Magnetotactic Bacteria and the Optimism for Sustainable and Cheap Approaches in Nanotechnology

    Anderson de Souza Cabral et al. “Large-Scale Cultivation of Magnetotactic Bacteria and the Optimism for Sustainable and Cheap Approaches in Nanotechnology”. In:Marine Drugs21.2 (2023).DOI: 10 . 3390 / md21020060.URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148873...

    2023

  20. [27]

    Intracellular Structures of Prokaryotes: Inclusions, Compartments and Assemblages

    J.M. Shively et al. “Intracellular Structures of Prokaryotes: Inclusions, Compartments and Assemblages”. In: Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Third Edition). Ed. by Moselio Schaechter. Third Edition. Oxford: Academic Press, 2009, pp. 404–424.ISBN: 978-0-12-373944-5.DOI: https://d...

    2009 doi

  21. [28]

    Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes

    Damien Faivre and Dirk Schüler. “Magnetotactic Bacteria and Magnetosomes”. en. In:Chemical Reviews 108.11 (Nov. 2008), pp. 4875–4898.ISSN: 0009-2665, 1520-6890.DOI: 10.1021/cr078258w.URL: https: //pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr078258w(visited on 06/05/2024)

    2008 doi

  22. [29]

    Single-cell analysis reveals a novel uncultivated magnetotactic bacterium within the candidate division OP3

    Sebastian Kolinko et al. “Single-cell analysis reveals a novel uncultivated magnetotactic bacterium within the candidate division OP3”. en. In:Environmental Microbiology14.7 (July 2012), pp. 1709–1721.ISSN: 1462-2912, 1462-2920.DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02609.x.URL: https:...

    2012

  23. [30]

    Diversity of Magneto-Aerotactic Behaviors and Oxygen Sensing Mechanisms in Cultured Magnetotactic Bacteria

    Christopher. Lefèvre et al. “Diversity of Magneto-Aerotactic Behaviors and Oxygen Sensing Mechanisms in Cultured Magnetotactic Bacteria”. en. In:Biophysical Journal107.2 (July 2014), pp. 527–538.ISSN: 00063495. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . bpj . 2014 . 05 . 043.URL: https : / / linkin...

    2014

  24. [31]

    Short-term effects of temperature on the abundance and diversity of magnetotactic cocci

    Wei Lin, Yinzhao Wang, and Yongxin Pan. “Short-term effects of temperature on the abundance and diversity of magnetotactic cocci”. In:MicrobiologyOpen1.1 (2012), pp. 53–63.DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.7.URL: https: //www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2- s2.0- 84872545017&doi=10.1002%2...

    2012 doi

  25. [32]

    Growing Magnetotactic Bacteria of the Genus Magnetospirillum: Strains MSR-1, AMB-1 and MS-1

    Lucas Le Nagard et al. “Growing Magnetotactic Bacteria of the Genus Magnetospirillum: Strains MSR-1, AMB-1 and MS-1”. en. In:Journal of Visualized Experiments140 (Oct. 2018), p. 58536.ISSN: 1940-087X.DOI: 10.3791/58536 .URL: https://www.jove.com/video/58536/growing- magnetotac...

    2018 doi

  26. [33]

    Ecology and Spatial Distribution of Magnetotactic Bacteria in Araguaia River Floodplain

    Igor Taveira et al. “Ecology and Spatial Distribution of Magnetotactic Bacteria in Araguaia River Floodplain”. In:Environmental Microbiology Reports17.1 (2025).DOI: 10 . 1111 / 1758 - 2229 . 70073.URL: https : / / www . scopus . com / inward / record . uri ? eid = 2 - s2 . 0 -...

    2025

  27. [34]

    Culture-independent characterization of a novel, uncultivated magnetotactic member of theNitrospiraephylum

    Christopher T. Lefèvre et al. “Culture-independent characterization of a novel, uncultivated magnetotactic member of theNitrospiraephylum”. en. In:Environmental Microbiology13.2 (Feb. 2011), pp. 538–549.ISSN: 1462-2912, 1462-2920.DOI: 10.1111/j.1462- 2920.2010.02361.x .URL: ht...

    2011

  28. [35]

    MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOGENIC MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES WITH DISTINCT SHAPES

    Regina Kövér, Peter Pekker, and Mihály Pósfai. “MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOGENIC MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES WITH DISTINCT SHAPES”. In: Sept. 2024

    2024

  29. [36]

    Distribution and diversity of magnetotactic bacteria in sediments of the Yellow Sea continental shelf

    Cong Xu et al. “Distribution and diversity of magnetotactic bacteria in sediments of the Yellow Sea continental shelf”. en. In:Journal of Soils and Sediments18.7 (July 2018), pp. 2634–2646.ISSN: 1439-0108, 1614-7480.DOI: 10.1007/s11368- 018- 1912- 8 .URL: http://link.springer....

    2018 doi

  30. [37]

    Combined Approach for Characterization of Uncultivated Magnetotactic Bacteria from Various Aquatic Environments

    Christine B. Flies, Jörg Peplies, and Dirk Schüler. “Combined Approach for Characterization of Uncultivated Magnetotactic Bacteria from Various Aquatic Environments”. en. In:Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71.5 (May 2005), pp. 2723–2731.ISSN: 0099-2240, 1098-5336.DOI: 1...

    2005

  31. [38]

    Bazylinski et al

    Dennis A. Bazylinski et al. “Magnetococcus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine, magnetotactic bacterium that represents a novel lineage (Magnetococcaceae fam. nov., Magnetococcales ord. nov.) at the base of the Alphaproteobacteria”. en. In:International Journal of Systematic...

    2013 doi

  32. [39]

    Ecology, physiology, and phylogeny of deep subsurface Sphingomonas sp

    J K Fredrickson et al. “Ecology, physiology, and phylogeny of deep subsurface Sphingomonas sp”. en. In:Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology23.4-5 (Oct. 1999), pp. 273–283.ISSN: 1367-5435, 1476-5535. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jim.2900741 .URL: https://academic.oup.com/jim...

    1999 doi

  33. [40]

    Sphingomonas and Related Genera

    David L. Balkwill, J. K. Fredrickson, and M. F. Romine. “Sphingomonas and Related Genera”. In:The Prokary- otes: Volume 7: Proteobacteria: Delta, Epsilon Subclass. Ed. by Martin Dworkin et al. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2006, pp. 605–629.ISBN: 978-0-387-30747-3.DOI: 10 ....

    2006 doi

  34. [41]

    N 2 -dependent growth and nitrogenase activity in the metal-metabolizing bacteria, GeobacterandMagnetospirillumspecies

    Dennis A. Bazylinski et al. “N 2 -dependent growth and nitrogenase activity in the metal-metabolizing bacteria, GeobacterandMagnetospirillumspecies”. en. In:Environmental Microbiology2.3 (June 2000), pp. 266–273. ISSN: 1462-2912, 1462-2920.DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00096.x...

  35. [42]

    A New Look At The Statistical Model Identification

    Hirotugu Akaike. “A New Look At The Statistical Model Identification”. In:Automatic Control, IEEE Transac- tions on19 (Jan. 1975), pp. 716–723.DOI:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    1975

  36. [44]

    Measurement of the magnetic moment of single Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense cells by magnetic tweezers

    C. Zahn et al. “Measurement of the magnetic moment of single Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense cells by magnetic tweezers”. en. In:Scientific Reports7.1 (Dec. 2017), p. 3558.ISSN: 2045-2322.DOI: 10.1038/s41598- 017-03756-z.URL:http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03756-z(v...

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    Magnetic response of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense observed inside a microfluidic channel

    M.P. Pichel et al. “Magnetic response of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense observed inside a microfluidic channel”. In:Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials460 (2018), pp. 340–353.ISSN: 0304-8853.DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.04.004

    2018 doi

  38. [46]

    Interplay of surface interaction and magnetic torque in single-cell motion of magnetotactic bacteria in microfluidic confinement

    Agnese Codutti et al. “Interplay of surface interaction and magnetic torque in single-cell motion of magnetotactic bacteria in microfluidic confinement”. en. In:eLife11 (July 2022), e71527.ISSN: 2050-084X.DOI: 10.7554/ eLife.71527.URL:https://elifesciences.org/articles/71527(v...

    2022

  39. [47]

    U-turn trajectories of magnetotactic cocci allow the study of the correlation between their magnetic moment, volume and velocity

    Daniel Acosta-Avalos et al. “U-turn trajectories of magnetotactic cocci allow the study of the correlation between their magnetic moment, volume and velocity”. In:European Biophysics Journal48.6 (June 2019), pp. 513–521. ISSN: 1432-1017.DOI: 10.1007/s00249-019-01375-2 .URL: ht...

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    Collective magnetotaxis of microbial holobionts is optimized by the three-dimensional organization and magnetic properties of ectosymbionts

    Daniel M. Chevrier et al. “Collective magnetotaxis of microbial holobionts is optimized by the three-dimensional organization and magnetic properties of ectosymbionts”. en. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120.10 (Mar. 2023), e2216975120.ISSN: 0027-8424, 1091...

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Quantile tomography: Using quantiles with multivariate data

    Linglong Kong and Ivan Mizera. “Quantile tomography: Using quantiles with multivariate data”. In:Statistica Sinica22 (June 2008).DOI:https://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0056

    2008 arXiv

  42. [50]

    2014.URL: https : / / mathematicaforprediction

    Anton Antonov.Directional quantile envelopes. 2014.URL: https : / / mathematicaforprediction . wordpress.com/2014/11/03/directional-quantile-envelopes/

    2014

  43. [51]

    Similarity measurement using polygon curve representation and Fourier descriptors for shape-based vertebral image retrieval

    Lee Dah-Jye, Sameer Antani, and L. Long. “Similarity measurement using polygon curve representation and Fourier descriptors for shape-based vertebral image retrieval”. In:Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering5032 (Dec. 2003).DOI:10.1117/12.481912

    2003 doi

  44. [52]

    MHT-X: offline multiple hypothesis tracking with algorithm X

    P¯eteris Zvejnieks et al. “MHT-X: offline multiple hypothesis tracking with algorithm X”. In:Experiments in Fluids63 (Mar. 2022).DOI:10.1007/s00348-022-03399-5

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    Particle tracking velocimetry in liquid gallium flow around a cylindrical obstacle

    Mihails Birjukovs et al. “Particle tracking velocimetry in liquid gallium flow around a cylindrical obstacle”. In:Experiments in Fluids63 (June 2022).DOI: 10.1007/s00348- 022- 03445- 2 .URL: https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-022-03445-2

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Particle tracking velocimetry and trajectory curvature statistics for particle-laden liquid metal flow in the wake of a cylindrical obstacle

    Mihails Birjukovs et al. “Particle tracking velocimetry and trajectory curvature statistics for particle-laden liquid metal flow in the wake of a cylindrical obstacle”. In:Experiments in Fluids65 (Apr. 2024).DOI: 10.1007/ s00348-024-03793-1

    2024

  47. [55]

    Motion of Magnetotactic Microorganisms

    Darci Motta S. Esquivel and Henrique G. P. Lins De Barros. “Motion of Magnetotactic Microorganisms”. en. In:Journal of Experimental Biology121.1 (Mar. 1986), pp. 153–163.ISSN: 0022-0949, 1477-9145.DOI: 10.1242/jeb.121.1.153 .URL: https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/121...

    1986 doi

  48. [56]

    An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform

    Douglas W Fadrosh et al. “An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform”. en. In:Microbiome2.1 (Dec. 2014), p. 6.ISSN: 2049-2618.DOI: 10.1186/2049- 2618-2-6.URL: https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/1...

    2014 doi

  49. [57]

    Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data

    Anthony M. Bolger, Marc Lohse, and Bjoern Usadel. “Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data”. en. In:Bioinformatics30.15 (Aug. 2014), pp. 2114–2120.ISSN: 1367-4811, 1367-4803.DOI:10.1093/ bioinformatics / btu170.URL: https : / / academic . oup . com / bioinfo...

    2014

  50. [58]

    Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2

    Evan Bolyen et al. “Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2”. en. In:Nature Biotechnology37.8 (Aug. 2019), pp. 852–857.ISSN: 1087-0156, 1546-1696.DOI: 10.1038/ s41587- 019- 0209- 9.URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587- 01...

    2019

  51. [59]

    DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data

    Benjamin J Callahan et al. “DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data”. en. In: Nature Methods13.7 (July 2016), pp. 581–583.ISSN: 1548-7091, 1548-7105.DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 . URL:https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.3869(visited on 02/27/2024)

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics

    Torbjørn Rognes et al. “VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics”. en. In:PeerJ4 (Oct. 2016), e2584.ISSN: 2167-8359.DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2584.URL: https://peerj.com/articles/2584 (visited on 02/27/2024)

    2016 doi

  53. [61]

    MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability

    K. Katoh and D. M. Standley. “MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability”. en. In:Molecular Biology and Evolution30.4 (Apr. 2013), pp. 772–780.ISSN: 0737-4038, 1537-1719.DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst010.URL: https://academic.oup.c...

    2013 doi

  54. [62]

    FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments

    Morgan N. Price, Paramvir S. Dehal, and Adam P. Arkin. “FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments”. en. In:PLoS ONE5.3 (Mar. 2010). Ed. by Art F. Y . Poon, e9490.ISSN: 1932- 6203.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 .URL: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371...

    2010 doi

  55. [63]

    Scikit-learn

    Fabian Pedregosa. “Scikit-learn”. en. In:Machine learning in Python()

  56. [64]

    Solving Inverse Problems With Piecewise Linear Estima- tors: From Gaussian Mixture Models to Structured Sparsity

    Guoshen Yu, Guillermo Sapiro, and Stéphane Mallat. “Solving Inverse Problems With Piecewise Linear Estima- tors: From Gaussian Mixture Models to Structured Sparsity”. In:IEEE Transactions on Image Processing21 (June 2010).DOI:10.1109/TIP.2011.2176743. 20 APREPRINT- SEPTEMBER12...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.