Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 86 references

Evolution from Topological Dirac Metal to Flat-band-Induced Antiferromagnet in Layered KxNi4S2 (0<=x<=1)

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single layered material can be chemically tuned between two exotic electronic states: a topological Dirac metal and a flat-band antiferromagnet.

desk verdict The continuous K-tunability between Dirac-cone and flat-band regimes is real and well-supported; the 'topological' and 'flat-band-induced' labels outrun the evidence, but the paper deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09903 v1 pith:WQRB3UQP submitted 2025-09-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Hengdi Zhao , Xiuquan Zhou , Hyowon Park , Tianqi Deng , Brandon Wilfong , Alann P. Au II , Samuel E. Pate , Craig M. Brown
show 12 more authors
Hui Wu Tushar Bhowmick Tessa McNamee Ravhi Kumar Yu-Sheng Chen Zhi-Li Xiao Russell Hemley Weizhao Cai Shanti Deemyad Duck-Young Chung Stephan Rosenkranz Mercouri G. Kanatzidis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords Diracmetalflat-band-inducedmagnetismtopochemicaldeintercalationnon-Fermiliquidtopologicalbandstructurelayerednickelsulfideantiferromagnetismstronglycorrelatedelectrons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the layered compound KxNi4S2, by losing potassium through a topochemical deintercalation, continuously moves its Fermi level between two distinct electronic regimes: at x = 1 it is a non-magnetic topological Dirac metal with a nontrivial Z2 index, and at x = 0 it is a metal with a flat band near the Fermi level that develops antiferromagnetic order below about 10 K. Both Dirac cones and flat bands coexist at different energies in the same crystal, without needing a Kagome or honeycomb lattice. If true, this provides a single bulk material platform where a chemical knob—potassium content—switches between massless Dirac fermion physics and flat-band-induced correlated magnetism, and the wide-range Fermi level tuning also opens a route to in-situ control via electrochemical intercalation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Ni9 cluster formed by extensive Ni–Ni bonding inside the Ni4S2 layers. In a molecular-orbital picture, the cluster's HOMO has dz2 character at the center and dx2−y2 on surrounding nickel, while the LUMO reverses the roles, so the protruding dz2 orbitals mimic graphene's pz orbitals and give rise to Dirac cones on a square Ni net—without Kagome or honeycomb geometry. A flat band near the Fermi level arises from the dominant Ni–Ni dx2−y2 and Ni–S bonding. The chemical knob is topochemical potassium deintercalation, which shifts the Fermi level over hundreds of meV and thereby selects which electronic feature dominates.

What would settle it

Neutron powder diffraction on fully deintercalated Ni2S below 10 K: if no magnetic Bragg peaks appear with a propagation vector matching the predicted antiferromagnetic configuration, the claimed flat-band-induced antiferromagnetism collapses. Alternatively, ARPES on Ni2S showing the flat band more than roughly 100 meV below the Fermi level would falsify the Fermi-level alignment that drives the argument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery is a bulk crystalline system in which the ground state can be fine-tuned by potassium deintercalation from a non-magnetic topological Dirac metal (KNi4S2, x=1) to a flat-band-induced antiferromagnetic metal (Ni2S, x=0). First-principles calculations place Dirac cones just above the Fermi level for x=1, with a Z2 invariant of 1;(000) similar to Bi2Se3, and flat bands below the Fermi level; as potassium is removed, the Fermi level drops toward the flat bands. Experimentally, x=0.7 crystals show high Hall mobility (1471 cm2 V−1 s−1) and large magnetoresistance characteristic of Dirac electrons, while x=0 crystals show a two-fold increase in carrier density, a roughly 150-fold

Load-bearing premise

The antiferromagnetic order seen in susceptibility is intrinsic to the KxNi4S2 lattice and caused by the flat band, not by metallic nickel impurities or a secondary nickel sulfide phase, and the DFT-predicted flat band position (with U = 5 eV) is accurate enough to place it near the Fermi level for x = 0.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, KxNi4S2 is a rare bulk material where Dirac cone and flat band physics coexist without Kagome or honeycomb structure, providing a natural laboratory for studying the interplay of massless and heavy electrons.
  • Potassium content acts as a continuous magnetic switch: removing potassium fills the flat band and triggers antiferromagnetic order, so the same crystal can be tuned between non-magnetic and magnetic ground states by chemical means alone.
  • The linear-in-T resistivity observed across all compositions indicates persistent strange-metal behavior in both regimes, implying strong correlations that survive the transition between Dirac-dominated and flat-band-dominated states.
  • Demonstrating ex-situ topochemical control of the Fermi level establishes a concrete pathway for electrochemical in-situ tuning of quantum materials, potentially enabling reconfigurable electronics and multi-state memory devices.
  • The absence of superconductivity up to 10 GPa in KNi4S2 narrows the expected correlated phases, suggesting that pressure tuning first acts on lattice degrees of freedom before any electronic instability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension would be angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES) on both end members: if the flat band is not found near the Fermi level for x=0, or the Dirac cone is not visible for x=1, the DFT-based picture would need revision.
  • The flat-band-induced magnetism argument implicitly predicts that intermediate x values should show intermediate Néel temperatures; this could be tested with the same deintercalation method and would sharpen the Fermi-level-to-magnetism link.
  • If the canted antiferromagnetic order is intrinsic, KxNi4S2 at low K may exhibit metamagnetic transitions or spin-flop behavior under magnetic field, a regime the paper does not explore but which would clarify the magnetic ground state.
  • The coexistence of Dirac cones, flat bands, and non-Fermi liquid transport suggests that tuning x may access quantum criticality without external pressure or doping; checking whether the linear resistivity continues to lower temperatures at optimal x would extend the claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports layered nickel subsulfide KxNi4S2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) as a single bulk system whose Fermi level can be shifted by topochemical K deintercalation between a Dirac-cone-dominated regime (x = 1) and a flat-band-dominated regime (x = 0). DFT calculations show Dirac cones near the Fermi level at x = 1 and flat bands approaching the Fermi level at x = 0, and report a nontrivial Z2 index of 1;(000) for KNi4S2. Transport, heat capacity, and magnetization measurements on single crystals are presented: T-linear resistivity, large magnetoresistance, carrier mobility up to 1471 cm2/Vs at x = 0.7 decreasing to 9.4 cm2/Vs at x = 0, a Sommerfeld coefficient increasing from 32.9 to 76 mJ/mol K2, and a susceptibility kink at TN = 8.6–10.1 K attributed to canted antiferromagnetism. The paper concludes that the ground state can be fine-tuned from a non-magnetic topological Dirac metal to a flat-band-induced antiferromagnetic metal.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a valuable platform: a single crystalline material in which a simple chemical knob (K content) continuously moves the Fermi level between a Dirac-cone-dominated state and a flat-band-dominated state with an accompanying magnetic transition, without relying on kagome/honeycomb lattices or Moiré engineering. The study combines independent experimental inputs—transport, Hall effect, heat capacity, and magnetization—that are not fitted to the DFT band positions, and the topochemical deintercalation provides a reproducible compositional series. The main shortfall is that the 'topological Dirac metal' label rests on a DFT Z2 calculation, and the 'flat-band-induced antiferromagnet' endpoint currently lacks microscopic magnetic confirmation for x = 0; the AFM assignment also depends on a single Hubbard U value. These gaps are load-bearing for the headline claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Flat-Bands-Induced Magnetism, Fig. 4 and Supplemental Note S4] The intrinsic bulk antiferromagnetic order for x = 0 and x = 0.7 is not microscopically established. Neutron powder diffraction is presented only for x = 1 (Fig. S12), which shows no magnetic reflections; no NPD or other magnetic diffraction is shown for x = 0, where TN = 10.1 K is the key endpoint. The authors also state that the heat capacity shows no clear second-order phase transition across TN, and the susceptibility kink is observed after subtracting a temperature-independent Ni-impurity baseline calibrated against x = 0.7 (Supplemental Note S4). The AC susceptibility excludes a canonical spin glass, but it does not exclude an extrinsic secondary nickel-sulfide phase or a larger Ni impurity content in the x = 0 crystals. Because the flat-band-induced AFM is one of the two endpoints of the central claim, this needs direct magnetic diffraction (NPD or resonant X-ray scattering) for x
  2. [Theoretical methods and Fig. 2] The 'flat-band-induced' causality rests on the DFT position of the flat band at x = 0, computed with a single value of the Hubbard U = 5 eV on Ni d orbitals, with no sensitivity test reported. The proximity of the flat band to EF (Eflat = -82 meV for x = 0) and the stability of the AFM configuration (Fig. S15) both depend on the correlation correction. The authors should vary U over a reasonable range (e.g., 3–7 eV) or cross-check with another method (hybrid functional or DFT+DMFT) and report the resulting EF - Eflat and the AFM/FM energy difference. Without this, the flat-band-induced AFM mechanism is not robust and could be an artifact of the chosen U.
  3. [Topological Dirac Metal, Fig. 3 and Fig. S3] The paper repeatedly labels KNi4S2 a 'topological Dirac metal' and emphasizes the nontrivial Z2 index in the abstract. The Z2 calculation is a valid theoretical result, but the experimental evidence (high mobility, large MR, T-linear resistivity) is consistent with a Dirac metal and does not probe the topological invariant. No ARPES, surface-state transport, or quantum-oscillation experiment is presented. Since the topological classification is a headline claim, the authors should either temper the wording to 'Dirac metal with a predicted nontrivial Z2 index' or provide an experimental probe of the topological surface state; they should also report the stability of the Z2 index with respect to U and to the magnetic configurations considered.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods] There is a typo in the Methods section: 'heat capacuty measurements' should be 'heat capacity measurements.'
  2. [Photoemission Yield Spectroscopy] The notation is inconsistent: 'K0Ni4S2 (x = 0)' is used, while the compound is referred to as Ni2S elsewhere. Please use one convention throughout.
  3. [Fig. 4 and x = 1] The magnetism section mentions a TN ~ 10 K feature in the x = 1 specimen but attributes it to a minor K-deintercalated phase, labeling the sample x = 1-δ. However, transport and heat capacity for x = 1 are reported without this caveat. The possible δ in nominally x = 1 crystals should be stated in the main text when presenting those data, since it affects the interpretation of the x = 1 endpoint.
  4. [Fig. 4h and Curie-Weiss analysis] The Curie-Weiss fits are described only briefly in the main text, with no fit residuals or uncertainty estimates. Given the impurity subtraction and the limited fitting range (above 200 K), the fitted θCW and μeff should be reported with errors and the fit range justified.
  5. [Supplemental Note S4] The impurity subtraction procedure is described only in the Supplemental Information but is central to the AFM claim. A concise description of the baseline removal should be included in the main text or at least summarized with the key figure (Fig. S11) referenced in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT predictions and the transport/thermodynamic/magnetic measurements are independent; the few self-citations are structural/methodological and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: DFT band-structure calculations for KxNi4S2 at x = 1, 0.5, and 0 predict Dirac cones above the Fermi level and flat bands below it, with K-deintercalation moving the Fermi level toward the flat bands (Fig. 2). The experimental evidence—high mobility (1471 cm2/Vs for x = 0.7 vs 9.4 cm2/Vs for x = 0), enhanced Hall carrier density, increased Sommerfeld coefficient γ (32.9 to 75.99 mJ/mol/K2), and the magnetic susceptibility/AC susceptibility signatures—are independently measured quantities, not fitted to the DFT band positions. The Z2 index is computed from the first-principles Hamiltonian via Wannier charge centers, so it is not imported from the experiments or from a fitted model. The AFM assignment for x = 0 rests on a susceptibility kink, FC/ZFC splitting, AC susceptibility with no frequency shift, Curie-Weiss θCW, and DFT total-energy comparison of FM/AFM configurations; these are separate lines of evidence. The paper itself notes evidentiary limitations, e.g., 'the heat capacity reveals no clear 2nd order phase transition across the TN' and NPD was collected only for x = 1 (Fig. S12), not for x = 0. These are completeness/robustness concerns—especially given the metallic-Ni impurity subtraction and the fixed U = 5 eV—but they are not circularity: the observed AFM is not forced by the DFT flat-band position, and the causality claim could be wrong without making the derivation circular. The self-citations (refs 53, 55, 72, 73) supply prior synthesis, structure, and compound-discovery context; the present paper performs new DFT and new measurements that are externally falsifiable and do not reduce to those citations. Therefore no circular step meeting the quoted-equation/fitted-input standard is present; the score reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. Its explanatory entities (Ni9 clusters, molecular orbitals) are analysis constructs, not postulates needing independent evidence.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U for Ni d orbitals = 5 eV
    Used in DFT electronic structure and topological analysis; chosen without sensitivity analysis shown in the main text.
  • Impurity baseline chi0 = not specified (constant per sample)
    Subtracted from susceptibility to remove ferromagnetic Ni impurity; x=0.7 chosen as baseline having least impurity, a post-hoc data treatment.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE-sol and U=5 eV accurately places the Dirac cones and flat bands relative to the Fermi level for all x.
    The entire interpretation of which regime is active at each x rests on the computed band offsets (Fig.2d).
  • domain assumption The topochemical deintercalation preserves the Ni4S2 framework, so the calculated relaxed structures for x=0.5 and x=0 represent the measured samples.
    Required for comparing DFT to experiment; the paper states the process is topotactic but does not show in-situ structural evolution.
  • domain assumption The observed antiferromagnetic transition is intrinsic and not from impurity phases.
    Susceptibility and AC susceptibility are used, but no neutron magnetic structure is reported for x=0, so the magnetic order is not microscopically confirmed.
  • domain assumption The molecular orbital analogy (Ni dz2 playing the role of graphene pz) explains the Dirac cone origin.
    Bonding analysis is suggestive; the symmetry-based argument from ref 54 is used as external support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolution from Topological Dirac Metal to Flat-band-Induced Antiferromagnet in Layered KxNi4S2 (0<=x<=1)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WQRB3UQP

@misc{pith2026250909903,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolution from Topological Dirac Metal to Flat-band-Induced Antiferromagnet in Layered KxNi4S2 (0<=x<=1)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WQRB3UQP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09903}
}
read the original abstract

Condensed matter systems with coexisting Dirac cones and flat bands, and a switchable control between them within a single system, are desirable but remarkably uncommon. Here we report a layered quantum material system, KxNi4S2 (0 <= x <= 1), that simultaneously hosts both characteristics without involving typical Kagome/honeycomb lattices. Enabled by a topochemical K-deintercalation process, the Fermi surface can be fine-tuned continuously over a wide range of energies. Consequently, a non-magnetic Dirac-metal state with a topological nontrivial Z2 index of 1;(000), supported by first-principles calculations and high mobility up to 1471 cm2V-1s-1, is observed on the K-rich x = 1 side, whereas a flat-band induced antiferromagnetic state with TN up to 10.1 K emerges as K-content approaches 0. The KxNi4S2 system offers a versatile platform for exploring emerging phenomena and underscores a viable pathway for in-situ control of quantum materials dominated by Dirac cones, flat bands, and their interplay.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09903 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Dirac-cones-dominating states revealed by the electrical transport of KxNi4S2, with (a) temperature-dependent in-plane electrical resistivity; (b) angular-dependent magnetoresistance of K0.7Ni4S2 with 9 T of magnetic field; comparisons of (c) magnetoresistance and (d) Hall effect at 1.8 K between x = 0.7 and x = 0; the extracted (e) carrier density and (f) carrier mobility as a function of temperature. (f) inset sho… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Flat-bands-dominating properties evidenced from heat capacity and magnetic susceptibility measurements of KxNi4S2, with (a) C Vs. T and (b) C/T Vs. T2 for x = 0, 0.7, and 1; (c) the extract Sommerfeld coefficient γ. (d) magnetic susceptibility with 0.1T magnetic field following Field-Cool (FC) and Zero-Field-Cool (ZFC) protocol; (e) a zoomed-in view at low￾temperature region; (f) with 1 T magnetic field; (g) isother… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cao, Y., Rodan -Legrain, D., Rubies -Bigorda, O., Park, J.M ., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., and Jarillo-Herrero, P. (2020). Tunable correlated states and spin -polarized phases in twisted bilayer– bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215-220

    2020

  2. [2]

    Cao, Y., Fatemi, V., Demir, A., Fang, S., Tomarken, S.L., Luo, J.Y., Sanchez -Yamagishi, J.D., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., and Kaxiras, E. (2018). Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80-84

    2018

  3. [3]

    Lisi, S., Lu, X., Benschop, T., de Jong, T.A., Stepanov, P., Duran, J.R., Margot , F., Cucchi, I., Cappelli, E., and Hunter, A. (2021). Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature Physics 17, 189-193

    2021

  4. [4]

    Tian, H., Gao, X., Zhang, Y., Che, S., Xu, T., Cheung, P., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Randeria, M., and Zhang, F. (2023). Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry. Nature 614, 440-444

    2023

  5. [5]

    Li, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Xu, Z., Song, Y., Tian, L., Huang, Y., Shen, D., and Abernathy, D.L. (2019). Coexistence of Ferromagnetic and S tripe Antiferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in SrCo2As2. Physical review letters 122, 117204

    2019

  6. [6]

    Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Jia, L., Cai, Y., Zhou, S., Xia, T., Büchner, B., Borisenko, S., and Wang, S. (2015). Orbital characters and electronic correlations in KCo2Se2. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 295501

    2015

  7. [7]

    Stoner, E.C. (1938). Collective electron ferromagnetism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 165, 372-414

    1938

  8. [8]

    Huang, J., Wang, Z., Pang, H., Wu, H., Cao, H., Mo, S.-K., Rustagi, A., Kemper, A.F., Wang, M., Yi, M., and Birgeneau, R.J. (2021). Flat -band-induced itinerant ferromagnetism in RbCo 2Se2. Physical Review B 103, 165105

    2021

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Kitaori, A., Kanazawa, N., Yokouchi, T., Kagawa, F ., Nagaosa, N., and Tokura, Y. (2021). Emergent electromagnetic induction beyond room temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2105422118

    2021

  2. [10]

    Yang, J., Chen, B., Wang, H., Mao, Q., Imai, M., Yoshimura, K., and Fang, M. (2013). Ma gnetic properties in layered ACo2Se2 (A=K, Rb, Cs) with the ThCr2Si2-type structure. Physical Review B 88, 064406. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.064406

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Stewart, G.R. (1984). Heavy -fermion systems. Reviews of Modern Physics 56, 755 -787. 10.1103/RevModPhys.56.755

    1984 doi

  4. [12]

    Checkelsky, J.G., Bernevig, B.A., Coleman, P., Si, Q., and Paschen, S. (2024). Flat bands, strange metals and the Kondo effect. Nature Reviews Materials, 1-18

    2024

  5. [13]

    Kirchner, S., Paschen, S., Chen, Q., Wirth, S., Feng, D., Thompson, J.D., and Si, Q. (2020). Colloquium: Heavy -electron quantum criticality and single -particle spectroscopy. Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 011002

    2020

  6. [14]

    Paschen, S., and Si, Q. (2021). Quantum phases driven by strong correlations. Nature Reviews Physics 3, 9-26

    2021

  7. [15]

    Teng, X., Chen, L., Ye, F., Rosenberg, E., Liu, Z., Yin, J.-X., Jiang, Y.-X., Oh, J.S., Hasan, M.Z., and Neubauer, K.J. (2022). Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet. Nature 609, 490-495

    2022

  8. [16]

    Lu, Z., Han, T., Yao, Y., Reddy, A.P., Yang, J., Seo, J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Fu, L., and Ju, L. (2024). Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759- 764

    2024

  9. [17]

    Terada, T., Uematsu, Y., Ishibe, T., Naruse, N., Sato, K., Nguyen, T.Q., Kobayashi, E., Nakano, H., and Nakamura, Y. (2022). Giant enhancement of seebeck coefficient by deformation of silicene buckled structure in calcium‐intercalated layered silicene film. Advanced Materials ...

    2022

  10. [18]

    Koshibae, W., and Maekawa, S. (2001). Effects of spin and orbital degeneracy on the thermopower of strongly correlated systems. Physical review letters 87, 236603

    2001

  11. [19]

    -H., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tan, G

    Zhao, L.-D., Lo, S. -H., Zhang, Y., Sun, H., Tan, G. , Uher, C., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V.P., and Kanatzidis, M.G. (2014). Ultralow thermal conductivity and high thermoelectric figure of merit in SnSe crystals. nature 508, 373-377

    2014

  12. [20]

    Son, D.T. (2018). The Dirac composite fermion of the fractional quantum H all effect. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9, 397-411

    2018

  13. [21]

    Du, X., Skachko, I., Duerr, F., Luican, A., and Andrei, E.Y. (2009). Fractional quantum Hall effect and insulating phase of Dirac electrons in graphene. Nature 462, 192-195

    2009

  14. [22]

    Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M.I., Grigorieva, I.V., Dubonos, S.V., and Firsov, A.A. (2005). Two -dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. nature 438, 197-200

    2005

  15. [23]

    Castro Neto, A.H., Guinea, F., Peres, N.M., Novo selov, K.S., and Geim, A.K. (2009). The electronic properties of graphene. Reviews of modern physics 81, 109-162

    2009

  16. [24]

    Geim, A.K., and Novoselov, K.S. (2007). The rise of graphene. Nature materials 6, 183-191

    2007

  17. [25]

    Vogt, P., De Padova, P., Quaresima, C., Avi la, J., Frantzeskakis, E., Asensio, M.C., Resta, A., Ealet, B., and Le Lay, G. (2012). Silicene: compelling experimental evidence for graphenelike two- dimensional silicon. Physical review letters 108, 155501

    2012

  18. [26]

    Dávila, M., Xian, L., Cahangirov, S., Rubio, A., and Le Lay, G. (2014). Germanene: a novel two- dimensional germanium allotrope akin to graphene and silicene. New Journal of Physics 16, 095002

    2014

  19. [27]

    Zhu, F.-f., Chen, W.-j., Xu, Y., Gao, C.-l., Guan, D.-d., Liu, C.-h., Qian, D., Zhang, S.-C., and Jia, J.-f. (2015). Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nature materials 14, 1020-1025

    2015

  20. [28]

    Schoop, L.M., Pielnhofer, F., and Lotsch, B.V. (2018). Chemical Principles of Topological Semimetals. Chemistry of Materials 30, 3155-3176. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05133

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Hasan, M.Z., and Kane, C.L. (2010). Colloquium: topological insulators. Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045-3067

    2010

  22. [30]

    -L., and Zhang, S

    Qi, X. -L., and Zhang, S. -C. (2011). Topological insulators and superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1057

    2011

  23. [31]

    Wang, Q., Lei, H., Qi, Y., and Felser, C. (2024). Topological Quantum Materials with Kagome Lattice. Accounts of Materials Research

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bernevig, B.A., Felser, C., and Beidenkopf, H. (2022). Progress and prospects in magnetic topological materials. Nature 603, 41-51

    2022

  25. [33]

    Wu, C., Bergman, D., Balents, L., and Das Sarma, S. (2007). Flat bands and Wigner crystallization in the honeycomb optical lattice. Physical review letters 99, 070401

    2007

  26. [34]

    Wu, C., and Das Sarma, S. (2008). px, y -orbital counterpart of graphene : Cold atoms in the honeycomb optical lattice. Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 77, 235107

    2008

  27. [35]

    Jacqmin, T., Carusotto, I., Sagnes, I., Abbarchi, M., Solnyshkov, D., Malpuech, G., Galopin, E., Lemaître, A., Bloch, J., and Amo, A. (2014). Direct observation of Dirac cones and a flatband in a honeycomb lattice for polaritons. Physical review letters 112, 116402

    2014

  28. [36]

    Landgraf, W., Shallcross, S., Türschmann, K., Weckbecker, D., and Pankratov, O. (2013). Electronic structure of twisted g raphene flakes. Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87, 075433

    2013

  29. [37]

    Guo, H.M., and Franz, M. (2009). Topological insulator on the kagome lattice. Physical Review B 80, 113102. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.113102

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Mazin, I., Jeschke, H.O., Lechermann, F., Lee, H., Fink, M., Thomale, R., and Valentí, R. (2014). Theoretical prediction of a strongly correlated Dirac metal. Nature communications 5, 4261

    2014

  31. [39]

    Yin, J.-X., Lian, B., and Hasan, M.Z. (2022). Topological kagome magnets and superconduct ors. Nature 612, 647-657. 22

    2022

  32. [40]

    Wang, Y., Wu, H., McCandless, G.T., Chan, J.Y., and Ali, M.N. (2023). Quantum states and intertwining phases in kagome materials. Nature Reviews Physics 5, 635-658

    2023

  33. [41]

    Huang, H., Zheng, L., Lin, Z., Guo, X., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Zhang, C., Sun, Z., Wang, Z., and Weng, H. (2022). Flat-band-induced anomalous anisotropic charge transport and orbital magnetism in kagome metal CoSn. Physical Review Letters 128, 096601

    2022

  34. [42]

    Ye, L., Kang, M., Liu, J., Von Cube, F., Wicker, C.R., Suzuki, T., Jozwiak, C., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., and Bell, D.C. (2018). Massive Dirac fermions in a ferromagnetic kagome metal. Nature 555, 638-642

    2018

  35. [43]

    Sun, K., Gu, Z., Katsura, H., and Das Sarma, S. (2011). Nearly flatbands with nontrivial topology. Physical review letters 106, 236803

    2011

  36. [44]

    Kang, M., Ye, L., Fang, S., You, J.-S., Levitan, A., Han, M., Facio, J.I., Jozwiak, C., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., et al. (2020). Dirac fermions and flat bands in the ideal kagome metal FeSn. Nature Materials 19, 163-169. 10.1038/s41563-019-0531-0

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    Yin, J.-X., Ma, W., Cochran, T.A., Xu, X., Zhang, S.S., Tien, H.-J., Shumiya, N., Cheng, G., Jiang, K., and Lian, B. (2020). Quantum -limit Chern topological magnetism in TbMn 6Sn6. Nature 583, 533-536

    2020

  38. [46]

    Kiesel, M.L., and Thomale, R. (2012). Sublat tice interference in the kagome Hubbard model. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 121105

    2012

  39. [47]

    Wilson, S.D., and Ortiz, B.R. (2024). AV3Sb5 kagome superconductors. Nature Reviews Materials, 1-13

    2024

  40. [48]

    Kiesel, M.L., Platt, C., and Thomale, R. (2013). Unconventional Fermi surface instabilities in the kagome Hubbard model. Physical review letters 110, 126405

    2013

  41. [49]

    -X., Chu, J.-H., Hashimoto, M., and Lu, D

    Teng, X., Oh, J.S., Tan, H., Chen, L., Huang, J., Gao, B., Yin, J. -X., Chu, J.-H., Hashimoto, M., and Lu, D. (2023). Magnetism and charge density wave order in kagome FeGe. Nature physics 19, 814-822

    2023

  42. [50]

    Arachchige, H.W.S., Meier, W.R., Marshall, M., Matsuoka, T., Xue, R., McGuire, M.A., Hermann, R.P., Cao, H., and Mandrus, D. (2022). Charge density wave in kagome lattice inter metallic ScV6Sn6. Physical Review Letters 129, 216402

    2022

  43. [51]

    Xing, Y., Bae, S., Ritz, E., Yang, F., Birol, T., Capa Salinas, A.N., Ortiz, B.R., Wilson, S.D., Wang, Z., and Fernandes, R.M. (2024). Optical manipulation of the charge-density-wave state in RbV3Sb5. Nature, 1-7

    2024

  44. [52]

    Ye, L., Fang, S., Kang, M., Kaufmann, J., Lee, Y., John, C., Neves, P.M., Zhao, S.F., Denlinger, J., and Jozwiak, C. (2024). Hopping frustration -induced flat band and strange metallicity in a kagome metal. Nature Physics, 1-5

    2024

  45. [53]

    Zhou, X., Mandia, D.J., Park, H., Balasubramanian, M., Yu, L., Wen, J., Yakovenko, A., Chung, D.Y., and Kanatzidis, M.G. (2021). New Compounds and Phase Selection of Nickel Sulfides via Oxidation State Control in Molten Hydroxides. Journal of the American Chem ical Society 143...

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    Van Miert, G., and Smith, C.M. (2016). Dirac cones beyond the honeycomb lattice: A symmetry - based approach. Physical Review B 93, 035401

    2016

  47. [55]

    Zhou, X., Wilfong, B., Vivanco, H., Paglione, J., Brown, C.M., and Rodriguez, E.E. (2016). Metastable layered cobalt chalcogenides from topochemical deintercalation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, 16432-16442

    2016

  48. [56]

    Ayres, J., Berben, M., Duffy, C., Hinlopen, R., Hsu, Y.-T., Cuoghi, A., Leroux, M., Gilmutdinov, I., Massoudzadegan, M., and Vignolles, D. (2024). Universal correlation between H -linear magnetoresistance and T -linear resistivity in high -temperature superconductors. Nature C...

    2024

  49. [57]

    Analytis, J.G., Kuo, H., McDonald, R.D ., Wartenbe, M., Rourke, P., Hussey, N., and Fisher, I. (2014). Transport near a quantum critical point in BaFe2(As1−xPx)2. Nature Physics 10, 194-197. 23

    2014

  50. [58]

    Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Schlottmann, P., Nandkishore, R., DeLong, L.E., and Cao, G. (2024). Transition between Heavy -Fermion-Strange-Metal and Quantum Spin Liquid in a 4 d-Electron Trimer Lattice. Physical Review Letters 132, 226503

    2024

  51. [59]

    -H., Villanova, J.W., Arachchige, H.W.S., Zheng, G., Zhu, Y., and Chen, K

    Mozaffari, S., Meier, W.R., Madhogaria, R.P., Peshcherenko, N., Kang, S. -H., Villanova, J.W., Arachchige, H.W.S., Zheng, G., Zhu, Y., and Chen, K. -W. (2024). Universal sublinear resistivity in vanadium kagome materials hosting charge density waves. Physical Review B 110, 035135

    2024

  52. [60]

    Peshcherenko, N., Mao, N., Felser, C., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Sublinear transport in kagome metals: Interplay of Dirac cones and Van Hove singularities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.11612

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Bodak, O., Gladyshevskij, E., and Pecharskij, V. (1977). Crystal structure of CeRe4Si2 compound. Kristallografiya 22, 178-181

    1977

  54. [62]

    Fu, L., and Kane, C.L. (2007). Topological insulators with inversion symmetry. Physical Review B 76, 045302. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045302

    2007 doi

  55. [63]

    Xia, Y., Qian, D., Hsieh, D., Wray, L., Pal, A., Lin, H., Bansil, A., Grauer, D., Hor, Y.S., and Cava, R.J. (2009). Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nature physics 5, 398-402

    2009

  56. [64]

    Hussey, N., Takenaka, K., and Takagi , H. (2004). Universality of the Mott –Ioffe–Regel limit in metals. Philosophical Magazine 84, 2847-2864

    2004

  57. [65]

    Cao, Y., Chowdhury, D., Rodan -Legrain, D., Rubies -Bigorda, O., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Senthil, T., and Jarillo -Herrero, P. (2020). Strange me tal in magic -angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation. Physical review letters 124, 076801

    2020

  58. [66]

    Keimer, B., Kivelson, S.A., Norman, M.R., Uchida, S., and Zaanen, J. (2015). From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179-186

    2015

  59. [67]

    Balents, L. (2010). Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464, 199-208. 10.1038/nature08917

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    Chamorro, J.R., McQueen, T.M., and Tran, T.T. (2021). Chemistry of Quantum Spin Liquids. Chemical Reviews 121, 2898-2934. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00641

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    Shannon, N., Momoi, T., and Sindzingre, P. (2006). Nematic order in square lattice frustrated ferromagnets. Physical review letters 96, 027213

    2006

  62. [70]

    Si, Q., and Abrahams, E. (2008). Strong correlations and magnetic frustration in the high T c iron pnictides. Physical Review Letters 101, 076401

    2008

  63. [71]

    Zhu, Y., Gao, T., Fan, X., Han, F., and Wang, C. (2017). El ectrochemical techniques for intercalation electrode materials in rechargeable batteries. Accounts of chemical research 50, 1022- 1031

    2017

  64. [72]

    -H., et al

    Zhou, X., Malliakas, C.D., Yakovenko, A.A., Wilfong, B., Wang, S.G., Chen, Y.-S., Yu, L., Wen, J., Balasubramanian, M ., Wang, H. -H., et al. (2022). Coherent approach to two -dimensional heterolayered oxychalcogenides using molten hydroxides. Nature Synthesis 1, 729 -737. 10....

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    -S., Yu , L., Wen, J., Chan, M.K.Y., Chung, D.Y., and Kanatzidis, M.G

    Zhou, X., Kolluru, V.S.C., Xu, W., Wang, L., Chang, T., Chen, Y. -S., Yu , L., Wen, J., Chan, M.K.Y., Chung, D.Y., and Kanatzidis, M.G. (2022). Discovery of chalcogenides structures and compositions using mixed fluxes. Nature 612, 72-77. 10.1038/s41586-022-05307-7

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    Kresse, G., and Furthmüller, J. (1996). Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total -energy calculations using a plane -wave basis set. Physical Review B 54, 11169 -11186. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  67. [75]

    Kresse, G., and Joubert, D. (1999). From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented - wave method. Physical Review B 59, 1758-1775. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999 doi

  68. [76]

    Perdew, J.P., Ruzsinszky, A., Csonka, G.I., Vydrov, O.A., Scuseria, G.E., Constantin, L.A., Zhou, X., and Burke, K. (2008). Restoring the Density -Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces. Physical Review Letters 100, 136406. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406

    2008 doi

  69. [77]

    Shao, Y., Molnar, L.F., Jung, Y., Kussmann, J., Ochsenfeld, C., Brown, S.T., Gilbert, A.T., Slipchenko, L.V., Levchenko, S.V., and O’Neill, D.P. (2006). Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 8, 317...

    2006

  70. [78]

    Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Song, H.-F., Troyer, M., and Soluyanov, A.A. (2018). WannierTools: An open- source software package for novel topological materials. Computer Physics Communications 224, 405-416

    2018

  71. [79]

    Pizzi, G., Vitale, V., Arita, R., Blügel, S., Freimuth, F., Géranton, G., Gibertini, M., Gresch, D., Johnson, C., and Koretsune, T. (2020). Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 165902

    2020

  72. [80]

    Blöchl, P.E. (1994). Projector augmented -wave method. Physical Review B 50, 17953 -17979. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  73. [81]

    Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized Gradient Approxim ation Made Simple. Physical Review Letters 77, 3865-3868. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  74. [82]

    Mao, H.K., Bell, P.M., Shaner, J.W., and Steinberg, D.J. (1978). Specific volume measurements of Cu, Mo, Pd, and Ag and calibration of the rubyR1fluorescence pressure gauge from 0.06 to 1 Mbar. J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3276-3283. 10.1063/1.325277

    1978 doi

  75. [83]

    Mao, H.K., Xu, J., and Bell, P.M. (1986). Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 91, 4673−4676. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB05p04673

    1986 doi

  76. [84]

    Prescher, C., and Prakapenka, V.B. (2015). DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data explorat ion. High. Press. Res. 35, 223 -230. 10.1080/08957959.2015.1059835

    2015

  77. [85]

    Toby, B. (2001). EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 210 -213. doi:10.1107/S0021889801002242

    2001 doi

  78. [86]

    Angel, R.J., Alvaro, M., and Gonzalez-Platas, J. (2014). EosFit7c and a Fortran Module (Library) for Equation of State Calculations. Z. Kristallogr. 229, 405−419. doi:10.1515/zkri-2013-1711

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.