Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 82 references

A new NASA Pioneer: the Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX)

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims GOSoX, a small satellite launching in 2030, can measure X-ray polarization across the full 0.2–0.4 keV band at $E/\Delta E \approx 100$, reaching 3–10% minimum detectable polarizations for over a dozen targets in a…

desk verdict A credible, well-documented SmallSat concept for the first sub-keV X-ray polarimetry, with performance claims that hinge on unflown LGMLs and boom alignment. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02891 v1 pith:WS473THX submitted 2026-08-03 astro-ph.IM

Herman L Marshall (1) , Sarah N T Heine (1) , Alan Garner (1) , Sean Gunderson (1) , Hans M Guenther (1) , Ralf K Heilmann (2) , Stephen Bongiorno (3) , Eric M Gullikson (4)
show 24 more authors
Andrea Santangelo (5) Chris Tenzer (5) Ruth Kelly (6 7) Silvia Zane (6) Roberto Taverna (7) Roberto Turolla (7) Michela Negro (8) Rozenn Boissay-Malaquin (9) Luigi Gallo (10) Honghui Liu (5) Swati Ravi (1) ((1) MIT Kavli Institute (2) MIT Space Nanotechnology Laboratory (3) NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (4) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (5) Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen (6) University College London (7) Universita degli Studi di Padova (8) Louisiana State University A M College (9) University of Maryland Baltimore County (10) St Mary's University Halifax)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords softX-raypolarimetryspectropolarimetrylaterallygradedmultilayermirrorscritical-angletransmissiongratingsminimumdetectablepolarizationneutronstarsblazarjetsSmallSatmission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents the design and expected performance of GOSoX, a small orbiting spectropolarimeter selected for launch in 2030. The central claim is that it can measure linear X-ray polarization across the entire 0.2–0.4 keV band, the soft X-ray region that current polarimeters cannot see, with spectral resolution $E/\Delta E \approx 100$. At that sensitivity, minimum detectable polarizations of 3–10% are predicted for more than a dozen neutron-star, magnetar, blazar, and active-galaxy targets within a one-year mission. Such measurements would extend the successes of hard X-ray polarimetry into the band where thermal emission from neutron stars, vacuum-birefringence signals from magnetars, and the soft-excess component of active galaxies are brightest. If the performance holds, GOSoX would supply the first broadband soft X-ray polarimetry capability in astrophysics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the matched dispersion-to-Bragg condition. A critical-angle transmission grating of period $P$ disperses wavelength $\lambda$ to a focal-plane position $x$, giving $\lambda = P x / F$. The multilayer mirror has a period that varies linearly along the dispersion direction, $d = Gx$, so its Bragg peak $\lambda = 2d\cos\theta$ also moves linearly with $x$; choosing the lateral gradient $G = 0.72\ \mathrm{\AA/mm}$ and mounting the mirror at 45 degrees makes the Bragg wavelength track the dispersed wavelength over the 30–60 Å band. This match is what converts a spectrometer into a broadband polarimeter: only the polarization component aligned with the mirror's Brewster-like reflection is sent to the detector, and the three channels at 120 degrees provide the Stokes parameters.

What would settle it

Take the flight-like laterally graded multilayer mirrors to a synchrotron beamline and measure the Bragg-peak position across the full 30–60 Å band; a fractional deviation from linearity above $f = 0.005$, or a 45-degree reflectivity below the model, would shrink the integrated effective area $A = 35\ \mathrm{cm^2\,\AA}$ and push the quoted 3–10% MDPs upward. Alternatively, after the boom deploys in orbit, observe a bright unpolarized white dwarf: if the count rates fall below the predicted throughput, the alignment or jitter assumptions fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a compact orbital spectropolarimeter can, for the first time, measure X-ray polarization in the soft band below 1 keV, where thermal emission from neutron stars, magnetar surface radiation, and the soft excess of active galaxies carry most of their flux. The instrument disperses light from Wolter I focusing optics through critical-angle transmission gratings; the dispersed spectrum lands on laterally graded multilayer mirrors set near 45 degrees, where reflection at the Bragg peak is polarization-selective. Three such channels sample the modulated count rates at different azimuths, and from them the Stokes parameters $I$, $Q$, and $U$ are recovered as functions of wavelength. With an integrated effective area $A = 35\ \mathrm{cm^2\,\AA}$ and a modulation factor averaging 93.6%, the paper predicts minimum detectable polarizations of 3–10% for the priority targets and shows simulated detections of polarized absorption features in neutron-star spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The performance predictions stand or fall on whether the never-flown laterally graded multilayer mirrors can be manufactured with the required period gradient and linearity, and on whether the deployed boom keeps the dispersed spectrum aligned to the mirror's reflection peak during pointing jitter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Isolated neutron star observations would discriminate between condensed-surface and atmosphere models by measuring whether the polarization fraction exceeds 30% in pulse-phase bins.
  • Spectropolarimetry of the 0.1–0.5 keV absorption features in neutron stars would tell atomic lines from proton-cyclotron lines; an atomic identification gives the gravitational redshift and the neutron star mass-to-radius ratio.
  • Blazar measurements in the 0.2–0.4 keV band would connect optical polarization near 3% to hard X-ray polarization of 10–15%, testing the stratified-shock picture of jet magnetic fields.
  • For Seyfert galaxies, an MDP near 5% in the soft excess distinguishes blurred reflection, with polarization above 10%, from warm-corona models with polarization of 3–6% or higher depending on geometry.
  • A null measurement of an unpolarized white dwarf provides an in-flight cross-calibration of the three polarimetry channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the multilayer manufacturing tolerances prove reproducible, the same matched-dispersion concept could be scaled to larger collecting area, turning the instrument from a target-class telescope into a survey-capable soft X-ray polarimeter.
  • The design also suggests a path to extend polarimetry to roughly 0.8–1.0 keV with the same gratings and a larger period gradient, covering lines such as O VII and Fe L where stellar coronae and the warm-hot intergalactic medium emit.
  • Because the three channels are fixed, channel-to-channel calibration is the main systematic risk; the planned spacecraft roll could be exploited to solve for relative gains, a strategy the paper only validates for variations up to about 10%.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper describes the GOSoX small-satellite mission concept, a NASA Astrophysics Pioneer selected for a 2030 launch, which uses the REDSoX heritage design to perform spectropolarimetry in the 0.2–0.4 keV band. The instrument combines Wolter I optics, CAT gratings, laterally graded multilayer (LGML) mirrors at 45 degrees, and sCMOS detectors to provide spectral resolution E/ΔE~100 and polarization sensitivity across the band. The core quantitative claims are that the integrated effective area A=35 cm² Å leads to minimum detectable polarizations (MDPs) of 3–10% for a dozen priority targets and 10% or better for more than 200 ROSAT Bright Source Catalog sources in 300 ks. The paper motivates these capabilities with neutron-star, AGN, and white-dwarf science cases, and details the payload design, spacecraft, operations, and development plan.

Significance. If the predicted performance is realized, GOSoX would be the first broadband soft X-ray spectropolarimeter, opening a genuinely new observational window: the 0.2–0.4 keV band contains the thermal peaks of isolated neutron stars, the soft excess of Seyferts, and the synchrotron peak of high-frequency-peaked blazars, so the science return is high. The paper is grounded in real component work: measured CAT grating efficiency of 15.4%, REDSoX LGML proof-of-concept measurements, sCMOS QE>90%, and MARXS raytracing of the off-axis background rejection. The authors are explicit about the principal risk—LGMLs have never flown and are the critical polarizing element—and the Phase A plan is sensible. The main shortcoming is that the central performance numbers rest on component models without propagated uncertainties and on two unverified hardware parameters (LGML gradient G=0.72 Å/mm and linearity f<0.005), so the headline MDPs should be presented as conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, §3.5.5, Tables 1–2] All tabulated MDP values and the '>200 sources' claim scale as A^{-1/2} with the integrated effective area A=35 cm² Å, which in §3.5.5 is a product of component models (grating efficiency, LGML reflectivity, QE, and the fitted attitude-loss factor) rather than an end-to-end measurement. The two largest unverified inputs are the LGML period gradient G=0.72 Å/mm and the linearity goal f<0.005; the paper reports REDSoX LGMLs with f<0.01 (§3.3) and no data showing that the stricter GOSoX goal is achieved. Because a factor-of-two reduction in A raises every MDP by 41% and would move several entries in Tables 1–2 above the 10% headline, the manuscript should add a sensitivity table (e.g., for f=0.01, and for a 10% loss from boom misalignment) and state the resulting MDPs under those conservative assumptions.
  2. [§3.5.5] The attitude-loss function used to compute A is introduced as ηλ ≈ 1 − exp(−(λ+λ̃)^2/Λ^2) with λ̃=37 Å (27 Å) and Λ^2=2800 Å^2 (2000 Å^2) for the low (high) grating spectra, but the paper does not show how these parameters follow from the analytical loss formula η=σ_LGML(δ^2+σ_1D^2+σ_LGML^2)^{-1/2} in §3.5.2 or from the LGML reflectivity curves. Since A depends directly on this function, the authors should display the underlying reflectivity-loss curves, demonstrate that the fitted ηλ matches the component prediction and raytrace, and provide an uncertainty estimate for A and hence for the MDPs.
  3. [§4.3, §3.5.2] The 11 arcsec jitter requirement is met in the paper by an 8.0 arcsec combined attitude error, but that error budget is carried over from SFL bus flight experience and does not include the 1.6 m deployable boom's structural modes, thermal distortion, or deployment repeatability. A fixed post-deployment offset of the grating dispersion relative to the LGML Bragg peak larger than the allowed tolerance would directly reduce A and would not be recoverable by the in-flight fixed-offset calibration described in §4.3; the paper should add a boom deployment accuracy allocation to the error budget and describe how deployment accuracy will be verified on the ground.
  4. [§2.4] The claim that more than 200 ROSAT BSC sources can be observed with MDP<10% in 300 ks uses the conversion factor 0.0077 R_s from ROSAT soft count rate to GOSoX count rate, stated to be based on 'detailed modeling of a few sources and confirmed by computing area ratios.' The authors should show the assumed spectral shapes and demonstrate that the conversion is robust across the BSC hardness-ratio distribution, since a harder spectrum would lower the GOSoX band count rate and increase the required exposure; the MDP formula used (including the background term) should also be stated for this population estimate.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.2] The 'L1 and L2 support structures' of the CAT gratings are not defined; please name or diagram them.
  2. [§3.5.5] The equation A=∫Aλdλ=A∫ελ ηλ rλ Qλ dλ uses A for both the integrated area and a normalization factor; use distinct symbols.
  3. [§3.5.2, §3.5.5] The sentence in §3.5.2 that η drops 15% at 31 Å refers to a different quantity than the ηλ in §3.5.5; unify the notation.
  4. [Table 1 caption] MDPR is introduced but never used in the text; either define it in the caption or remove it.
  5. [§2.3.1, Table 1] The text alternates between 'Mk 421' and 'Mrk 421'; use the standard 'Mrk' consistently.
  6. [Figure 3 caption, §3.5.1] The phrase 'The boom design is under review' should be echoed in §3.5.1, where the boom is first described.
  7. [§3.5.1] The sentence 'Figs. 3 and 7 shows a notional boom' should be 'show a notional boom.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: MDP predictions are composed from lab-measured component efficiencies and standard radiometric formulas, not fitted to the target result.

full rationale

The central performance claim is the tabulated MDP, computed from the standard formula MDP = 4.29/(mu sqrt(R T)) with R driven by the integrated effective area A = integral(epsilon_lambda eta_lambda r_lambda Q_lambda d_lambda) (Sec. 3.5.5). Each factor rests on independent evidence: grating efficiency from measured REDSoX CAT gratings (15.4% in first order, Sec. 3.2), LGML reflectivity and linearity from synchrotron-tested Cr/Sc multilayers (Sec. 3.3), detector quantum efficiency from published sCMOS measurements (Sec. 3.4), and mirror effective area from MSFC Wolter-I shell heritage (Sec. 3.1). The value A = 35 cm^2 Angstrom is the integral of these component models, cross-checked by the product of the average effective area and bandwidth; it is not adjusted to make any particular MDP come out. The science requirements (e.g., MDP <= 10% for neutron-star phase-averaged observations) are motivations drawn from simulations [21], but the achievable MDP values are then computed from A, mu, source fluxes, and exposure times; the requirements are not fed back into the performance model. The citations to the same group's prior work provide lab measurements and ray-trace validation rather than a chain that assumes the target MDPs. The unverified LGML period gradient and linearity (G = 0.72 Angstrom/mm, f < 0.005) and the deployed boom alignment are genuine technical risks, explicitly flagged in Sec. 6 and Fig. 3, but unresolved hardware dependence is a correctness risk, not circularity. The derivation chain is self-contained against external measurements and standard statistical formulas, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central performance estimates rest on measured component efficiencies, standard polarimetry formulas, and several unverified domain assumptions (Suzaku background extrapolation, LGML manufacturability at f<0.005, ray-traced sky background). The two explicit free parameters (LGML gradient and the attitude-loss function parameters) enter the effective area that drives every MDP prediction.

free parameters (2)
  • LGML lateral period gradient G = 0.72 Å/mm (target)
    Chosen in Sec. 3.3 so the grating dispersion angle can be matched to the Bragg reflectivity of the laterally graded multilayer at 45 degrees within the available focal length z<2200 mm. This is a design choice that sets the geometry but is not fitted to an external measurement.
  • Attitude-jitter loss parameters lambda_tilde and Lambda^2 = lambda_tilde=37 Å, Lambda^2=2800 Å^2 (low gratings); lambda_tilde=27 Å, Lambda^2=2000 Å^2 (high gratings)
    In Sec. 3.5.5 the loss factor eta_lambda is approximated as 1-exp(-(lambda+lambda_tilde)^2/Lambda^2) and enters directly into the integrated effective area A=35 cm^2 Å. The parameters appear to be fitted to an unspecified reflectivity model; their origin is not derived or cited.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard MDP formula MDP = 4.29/(mu R T^(1/2)) (R+B)^(1/2) with background treated as small.
    Sec. 2.1 uses the standard 99% confidence X-ray polarimetry figure of merit [18]. This is accepted background theory.
  • domain assumption Suzaku particle background rate (5e-8 cnt/s/keV/pixel) applies to GOSoX's sCMOS detectors in LEO.
    Sec. 3.5.3 extrapolates a Suzaku CCD background rate to the GOSoX sCMOS focal plane without accounting for detector type, orbit, or shielding differences. The MDP estimates use this background as small.
  • ad hoc to paper The LGML fabrication goal f<0.005 can be met (linearity of Bragg peak vs position).
    Sec. 3.3 states the REDSoX flight LGMLs have f<0.01 and sets a goal of f<0.005 for <10% loss. This is an unverified manufacturing target for the critical polarizing element; no measurement of f<0.005 is presented.
  • domain assumption The X-ray sky background in the 0.2-0.4 keV band is dominated by Galactic emission at the modeled level (2 counts/Ms).
    Sec. 3.5.3 relies on a MARXS ray-trace using a measured Galactic flux and background AGN [73]. The prediction is model-dependent and was not verified with a dedicated measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A new NASA Pioneer: the Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WS473THX

@misc{pith2026260802891,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A new NASA Pioneer: the Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WS473THX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02891}
}
abstract

The Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX) is a spectropolarimeter for the soft X-ray band. GOSoX is based on the Rocket Experiment Demonstration of a Soft X-ray Polarimeter (REDSoX), a NASA-funded sounding rocket payload. Like REDSoX, GOSoX consists of Wolter I X-ray optics from NASA/MSFC, critical-angle transmission (CAT) gratings made at MIT, and multilayer (ML) coated mirrors from LBNL that polarize the X-rays. Colleagues at U. T\"ubingen will adapt commercially available sCMOS sensors for the focal plane. The grating dispersion is matched to the lateral grading of ML mirrors set at 45\deg. GOSoX can measure polarization across the entire 0.2-0.4 keV band with a spectral resolution E/dE $\sim$100. Minimum detectable polarizations (MDPs) of 3-10\% are expected for over a dozen targets in a one-year mission. The mission was selected by NASA for launch in 2030.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02891 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Results from three models of the polarization of an isolated neutron star’s emission. Positive (negative) polar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulations of a 0.5 Ms observation of RX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Cutaway rendering of the deployed configuration for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: View of GOSoX front aperture, without the central obscuring disk so that the gratings and focal plane are visible. The imaging detector (light blue) is along the optical axis of the mirrors (cyan) in the MMA; the polarimetry detectors are edge-on and not readily …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expected GOSoX system performance. Blue: Effective area of the system based on component perfor￾mance The average effective area is 1.165 cm2 (dashed blue line). Red: Modulation factor, averaged between the values obtained for 40◦ and 50◦ graze angles. The aver￾aged mo…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation of a GOSoX observation of a hypo￾thetical NS, showing each channel’s count spectra. The continuum is unpolarized except in an absorption feature at 43˚A (290 eV) that is 5 ˚A (30 eV) wide with an equiv￾alent width of 2.5 ˚A (15 eV) and 50% polarized along a …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Renderings of the SFL Dauntless spacecraft with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Exploring the Future of Soft X-ray Polarimetry: the Capabilities of the REDSoX Instrument for XDINS and Magnetar Studies

    Kelly, R. M. E., Marshall, H. L., Zane, S., Brice, N., Ravi, S., Turolla, R., Taverna, R., and Gonz´ alez- Caniulef, D., “Exploring the Future of Soft X-ray Polarimetry: the Capabilities of the REDSoX Instrument for XDINS and Magnetar Studies,”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.11648 (Mar. 2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch,

    Weisskopf, M. C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., Ramsey, B. D., O’Dell, S. L., Romani, R. W., Matt, G., Deininger, W. D., Baumgartner, W. H., Bellazzini, R., Costa, E., Kolodziejczak, J. J., Latronico, L., Marshall, H. L., Muleri, F., Bongiorno, S. D., Tennant, A., Bucciantini, N., Dovciak, M., Marin, F., Marscher, A., Poutanen, J., Slane, P., Turolla, R., Ka...

    2022

  3. [2]

    Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry,

    Doroshenko, V., Poutanen, J., Tsygankov, S. S., Suleimanov, V. F., Bachetti, M., Caiazzo, I., Costa, E., Di Marco, A., Heyl, J., La Monaca, F., Muleri, F., Mushtukov, A. A., Pavlov, G. G., Ramsey, B. D., Rankin, J., Santangelo, A., Soffitta, P., Staubert, R., Weisskopf, M. C., Zane, S., Agudo, I., Antonelli, L. A., Baldini, L., Baumgartner, W. H., Bellazz...

    2022

  4. [3]

    Observations of 4U 1626-67 with the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer,

    Marshall, H. L., Ng, M., Rogantini, D., Heyl, J., Tsygankov, S. S., Poutanen, J., Costa, E., Zane, S., Malacaria, C., Agudo, I., Antonelli, L. A., Bachetti, M., Baldini, L., Baumgartner, W. H., Bellazzini, R., Bianchi, S., Bongiorno, S. D., Bonino, R., Brez, A., Bucciantini, N., Capitanio, F., Castellano, S., Cavazzuti, E., Ciprini, S., De Rosa, A., Del M...

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Polarized x-rays from a magnetar,

    Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Muleri, F., Heyl, J., Zane, S., Baldini, L., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Bachetti, M., Rankin, J., Caiazzo, I., Di Lalla, N., Doroshenko, V., Errando, M., Gau, E., Kırmızıbayrak, D., Krawczynski, H., Negro, M., Ng, M., Omodei, N., Possenti, A., Tamagawa, T., Uchiyama, K., Weisskopf, M. C., Agudo, I., Antonelli, L. A., Baumgartner, W...

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    A Strong X-Ray Polarization Signal from the Magnetar 1RXS J170849.0-400910,

    Zane, S., Taverna, R., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Muleri, F., Turolla, R., Heyl, J., Uchiyama, K., Ng, M., Tamagawa, T., Caiazzo, I., Di Lalla, N., Marshall, H. L., Bachetti, M., La Monaca, F., Gau, E., Di Marco, A., Baldini, L., Negro, M., Omodei, N., Rankin, J., Matt, G., Pavlov, G. G., Kitaguchi, T., Krawczynski, H., Kislat, F., Kelly, R., Agudo, I., Ant...

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Polarized blazar X-rays imply particle acceleration in shocks,

    Liodakis, I., Marscher, A. P., Agudo, I., Berdyugin, A. V., Bernardos, M. I., Bonnoli, G., Borman, G. A., Casadio, C., Casanova, V., Cavazzuti, E., Rodriguez Cavero, N., Di Gesu, L., Di Lalla, N., Donnarumma, I., Ehlert, S. R., Errando, M., Escudero, J., Garc´ ıa-Comas, M., Ag´ ıs-Gonz´ alez, B., Husillos, C., Jormanainen, J., Jorstad, S. G., Kagitani, M....

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    The X-Ray Polarization View of Mrk 421 in an Average Flux State as Observed by the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer,

    Di Gesu, L., Donnarumma, I., Tavecchio, F., Agudo, I., Barnounin, T., Cibrario, N., Di Lalla, N., Di Marco, A., Escudero, J., Errando, M., Jorstad, S. G., Kim, D. E., Kouch, P. M., Liodakis, I., Lindfors, E., Madejski, G., Marshall, H. L., Marscher, A. P., Middei, R., Muleri, F., Myserlis, I., Negro, M., Omodei, N., Pacciani, L., Paggi, A., Perri, M., Puc...

    work page 2022

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    The IXPE View of GRB 221009A,

    Negro, M., Di Lalla, N., Omodei, N., Veres, P., Silvestri, S., Manfreda, A., Burns, E., Baldini, L., Costa, E., Ehlert, S. R., Kennea, J. A., Liodakis, I., Marshall, H. L., Mereghetti, S., Middei, R., Muleri, F., O’Dell, S. L., Roberts, O. J., Romani, R. W., Sgr´ o, C., Terash...

    2023

  2. [9]

    Polarization constraints on the X-ray corona in Seyfert Galaxies: MCG-05-23-16,

    Marinucci, A., Muleri, F., Dovciak, M., Bianchi, S., Marin, F., Matt, G., Ursini, F., Middei, R., Marshall, H. L., Baldini, L., Barnouin, T., Rodriguez, N. C., De Rosa, A., Di Gesu, L., Harper, D., Ingram, A., Karas, V., Krawczynski, H., Madejski, G., Panagiotou, C., Petrucci,...

    2022

  3. [10]

    X-ray polarimetry as a tool to measure the black hole spin in microquasars: simulations of IXPE capabilities,

    Mikusincova, R., Dovciak, M., Bursa, M., Lalla, N. D., Matt, G., Svoboda, J., Taverna, R., and Zhang, W., “X-ray polarimetry as a tool to measure the black hole spin in microquasars: simulations of IXPE capabilities,”MNRAS,519, 6138–6148 (Mar. 2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Polarized x-rays constrain the disk-jet geometry in the black hole x-ray binary Cygnus X-1,

    Krawczynski, H., Muleri, F., Dovˇ ciak, M., Veledina, A., Rodriguez Cavero, N., Svoboda, J., Ingram, A., Matt, G., Garcia, J. A., Loktev, V., Negro, M., Poutanen, J., Kitaguchi, T., Podgorn´ y, J., Rankin, J., Zhang, W., Berdyugin, A., Berdyugina, S. V., Bianchi, S., Blinov, D...

    2022

  5. [12]

    Astro2020 Science White Paper: Using X-Ray Polarimetry to Probe the Physics of Black Holes and Neutron Stars,

    Krawczynski, H., Matt, G., Ingram, A. R., Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Kislat, F., Teddy Cheung, C. C., Bykov, A., Sinha, K., Zhang, H., Heyl, J., Bucciantini, N., Madejski, G., Kallman, T., Jahoda, K. M., Abarr, Q., Baring, M. G., Baldini, L., Begelman, M., Boettcher, M., Cacket...

    1904 arXiv

  6. [13]

    The X-ray Polarization Probe mission concept,

    Jahoda, K., Krawczynski, H., Kislat, F., Marshall, H., Okajima, T., Agudo, I., Angelini, L., Bachetti, M., Baldini, L., Baring, M., Baumgartner, W., Bellazzini, R., Bianchi, S., Bucciantini, N., Caiazzo, I., Capitanio, F., Coppi, P., Costa, E., De Rosa, A., Del Monte, E., Dext...

    1907 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Design of a Broad-band Soft X-ray Polarimeter,

    Marshall, H. L., G¨ unther, H. M., Heilmann, R. K., Schulz, N. S., Egan, M., Hellickson, T., Heine, S. N. T., Windt, D. L., Gullikson, E. M., Ramsey, B. D., Tagliaferri, G., and Pareschi, G., “Design of a Broad-band Soft X-ray Polarimeter,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, I...

    2018

  8. [15]

    The Rocket Experiment Demonstration of a Soft X-ray Polarimeter (REDSoX),

    Marshall, H., Heine, S., Garner, A., Masterson, R., Guenther, M., Heilmann, R., Bongiorno, S., and Gullik- son, E., “The Rocket Experiment Demonstration of a Soft X-ray Polarimeter (REDSoX),” in [Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources XIV], 76 (Apr. 2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    Mission design and development of the rocket experiment demonstration of a soft x-ray (REDSoX) polarimeter,

    T. Heine, S. N., Marshall, H. L., Garner, A., Angile, E., Baker, C. M., Bongiorno, S., G¨ unther, H. M., Heilmann, R. K., LaMarr, B., McNeil, S., Juneau, J., and Ravi, S., “Mission design and development of the rocket experiment demonstration of a soft x-ray (REDSoX) polarimet...

    2025

  10. [17]

    Design and testing progress towards the first flight of the rocket experiment demonstration of a Soft X-ray Polarimeter (REDSoX),

    Heine, S. N. T., Marshall, H. L., Garner, A., Elio Angile, F., Baker, C. M., Bongiorno, S., Drake, L., Gunther, H. M., Heilmann, R. K., LaMarr, B., McNeil, S., Juneau, J., Ravi, S., and Gullikson, E., “Design and testing progress towards the first flight of the rocket experime...

    2026 arXiv

  11. [18]

    On understanding the figures of merit for detection and measurement of x-ray polarization,

    Weisskopf, M. C., Elsner, R. F., and O’Dell, S. L., “On understanding the figures of merit for detection and measurement of x-ray polarization,” in [Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Con- ference Series], Arnaud, M., Murray, S. S., and Takahashi, T., ed...

    2010

  12. [19]

    Accretion geometry of the black-hole binary Cygnus X-1 from X-ray polarimetry,

    Chauvin, M., Flor´ en, H.-G., Friis, M., Jackson, M., Kamae, T., Kataoka, J., Kawano, T., Kiss, M., Mikhalev, V., Mizuno, T., Ohashi, N., Stana, T., Tajima, H., Takahashi, H., Uchida, N., and Pearce, M., “Accretion geometry of the black-hole binary Cygnus X-1 from X-ray polari...

    2018

  13. [20]

    Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars,

    Harding, A. K. and Lai, D., “Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars,”Reports on Progress in Physics69, 2631–2708 (Sep 2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Polarized thermal emission from X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: the case of RX J1856.5-3754,

    Gonz´ alez Caniulef, D., Zane, S., Taverna, R., Turolla, R., and Wu, K., “Polarized thermal emission from X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: the case of RX J1856.5-3754,”MNRAS,459, 3585–3595 (July 2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars,

    Staubert, R., Tr¨ umper, J., Kendziorra, E., Klochkov, D., Postnov, K., Kretschmar, P., Pottschmidt, K., Haberl, F., Rothschild, R. E., Santangelo, A., Wilms, J., Kreykenbohm, I., and F¨ urst, F., “Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars,”A&A,622, A61 (Feb 2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    QED and the high polarization of the thermal radiation from neutron stars,

    Heyl, J. S. and Shaviv, N. J., “QED and the high polarization of the thermal radiation from neutron stars,” PhysRevD,66, 023002–+ (July 2002)

    2002

  17. [25]

    The high-energy polarization-limiting radius of neutron star mag- netospheres - i. slowly rotating neutron stars,

    Heyl, J. S., Shaviv, N. J., and Lloyd, D., “The high-energy polarization-limiting radius of neutron star mag- netospheres - i. slowly rotating neutron stars,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society342(1), 134–144 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Spectral monitoring of RX J1856.5-3754 with XMM-Newton. Analysis of EPIC-pn data,

    Sartore, N., Tiengo, A., Mereghetti, S., De Luca, A., Turolla, R., and Haberl, F., “Spectral monitoring of RX J1856.5-3754 with XMM-Newton. Analysis of EPIC-pn data,”A&A,541, A66 (May 2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical-polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5-3754,

    Mignani, R. P., Testa, V., Gonz´ alez Caniulef, D., Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Zane, S., and Wu, K., “Evidence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical-polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5-3754,”MNRAS,465, 492–500 (Feb. 2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Narrow absorption features in the co-added XMM-Newton RGS spectra of isolated neutron stars,

    Hohle, M. M., Haberl, F., Vink, J., de Vries, C. P., and Neuh¨ auser, R., “Narrow absorption features in the co-added XMM-Newton RGS spectra of isolated neutron stars,”MNRAS,419, 1525–1536 (Jan. 2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    A phase-dependent absorption line in the spectrum of the X-ray pulsar RX J0720.4-3125,

    Haberl, F., Zavlin, V. E., Tr¨ umper, J., and Burwitz, V., “A phase-dependent absorption line in the spectrum of the X-ray pulsar RX J0720.4-3125,”A&A,419, 1077–1085 (June 2004)

    2004

  22. [30]

    The magnificent seven: magnetic fields and surface temperature distributions,

    Haberl, F., “The magnificent seven: magnetic fields and surface temperature distributions,”Ap&SS,308, 181–190 (Apr. 2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Narrow phase-dependent features in X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: a new detection and upper limits,

    Borghese, A., Rea, N., Coti Zelati, F., Tiengo, A., Turolla, R., and Zane, S., “Narrow phase-dependent features in X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: a new detection and upper limits,”MNRAS,468, 2975–2983 (July 2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars,

    Poutanen, J., “Relativistic rotating vector model for X-ray millisecond pulsars,”A&A,641, A166 (Sept. 2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Unbinned likelihood analysis for X-ray polarization,

    Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Caiazzo, I., and Heyl, J., “Unbinned likelihood analysis for X-ray polarization,” MNRAS,519, 5902–5912 (Mar. 2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Evidence in Support of a Rotational Model for the Pulsar PSR 0833-45,

    Radhakrishnan, V., Cooke, D. J., Komesaroff, M. M., and Morris, D., “Evidence in Support of a Rotational Model for the Pulsar PSR 0833-45,”Nature,221, 443–+ (1969)

    1969

  27. [35]

    Astrophysical implica- tions and observational prospects of X-ray polarimetry,

    Meszaros, P., Novick, R., Szentgyorgyi, A., Chanan, G. A., and Weisskopf, M. C., “Astrophysical implica- tions and observational prospects of X-ray polarimetry,”ApJ,324, 1056–1067 (Jan. 1988)

    1988

  28. [36]

    Pulse-Phase Spectroscopy of SMC X-1 with Chandra and XMM-Newton: Reprocessing by a Precessing Disk?,

    Hickox, R. C. and Vrtilek, S. D., “Pulse-Phase Spectroscopy of SMC X-1 with Chandra and XMM-Newton: Reprocessing by a Precessing Disk?,”ApJ,633, 1064–1075 (Nov. 2005)

    2005

  29. [37]

    Chandrasekhar, S., [Radiative transfer], Dover Publications Inc: New York (1960)

    1960

  30. [38]

    Polarization angle swings in blazars: The case of ¡ASTROBJ¿3C 279¡/ASTROBJ¿,

    Kiehlmann, S., Savolainen, T., Jorstad, S. G., Sokolovsky, K. V., Schinzel, F. K., Marscher, A. P., Larionov, V. M., Agudo, I., Akitaya, H., Ben´ ıtez, E., Berdyugin, A., Blinov, D. A., Bochkarev, N. G., Borman, G. A., Burenkov, A. N., Casadio, C., Doroshenko, V. T., Efimova, ...

    2016

  31. [39]

    The time-dependent distribution of optical polarization angle changes in blazars,

    Kiehlmann, S., Blinov, D., Liodakis, I., Pavlidou, V., Readhead, A. C. S., Angelakis, E., Casadio, C., Hovatta, T., Kylafis, N., Mahabal, A., Mandarakas, N., Myserlis, I., Panopoulou, G. V., Pearson, T. J., Ramaprakash, A., Reig, P., Skalidis, R., S lowikowska, A., Tassis, K.,...

    2021

  32. [40]

    Turbulent, Extreme Multi-zone Model for Simulating Flux and Polarization Variability in Blazars,

    Marscher, A. P., “Turbulent, Extreme Multi-zone Model for Simulating Flux and Polarization Variability in Blazars,”ApJ,780, 87 (Jan. 2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Limits on X-Ray Polarization at the Core of Centaurus A as Observed with the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer,

    Ehlert, S. R., Ferrazzoli, R., Marinucci, A., Marshall, H. L., Middei, R., Pacciani, L., Perri, M., Petrucci, P.- O., Puccetti, S., Barnouin, T., Bianchi, S., Liodakis, I., Madejski, G., Marin, F., Marscher, A. P., Matt, G., Poutanen, J., Wu, K., Agudo, I., Antonelli, L. A., B...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Observations of Low and Intermediate Spectral Peak Blazars with the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer,

    Marshall, H. L., Liodakis, I., Marscher, A. P., Di Lalla, N., Jorstad, S. G., Kim, D. E., Middei, R., Negro, M., Omodei, N., Peirson, A. L., Perri, M., Puccetti, S., Laurenti, M., Agudo, I., Bonnoli, G., Berdyugin, A. V., Cavazzuti, E., Rodriguez Cavero, N., Donnarumma, I., Di...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Aborted jets and the X-ray emission of radio-quiet AGNs,

    Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., and Matt, G., “Aborted jets and the X-ray emission of radio-quiet AGNs,” A&A,413, 535–545 (Jan. 2004)

    2004

  36. [44]

    X-ray reflection in the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy 1H 0707-495,

    Fabian, A. C., Miniutti, G., Gallo, L., Boller, T., Tanaka, Y., Vaughan, S., and Ross, R. R., “X-ray reflection in the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy 1H 0707-495,”MNRAS,353, 1071–1077 (Oct. 2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    A comprehensive range of X-ray ionized-reflection models,

    Ross, R. R. and Fabian, A. C., “A comprehensive range of X-ray ionized-reflection models,”MNRAS,358, 211–216 (Mar. 2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    An explanation for the soft X-ray excess in active galactic nuclei,

    Crummy, J., Fabian, A. C., Gallo, L., and Ross, R. R., “An explanation for the soft X-ray excess in active galactic nuclei,”MNRAS,365, 1067–1081 (Feb. 2006)

    2006

  39. [47]

    A spectral decomposition of the variable optical, ultraviolet and X-ray continuum of NGC 5548,

    Magdziarz, P., Blaes, O. M., Zdziarski, A. A., Johnson, W. N., and Smith, D. A., “A spectral decomposition of the variable optical, ultraviolet and X-ray continuum of NGC 5548,”MNRAS,301, 179–192 (Nov. 1998)

    1998

  40. [48]

    Testing warm Comptonization models for the origin of the soft X-ray excess in AGNs,

    Petrucci, P. O., Ursini, F., De Rosa, A., Bianchi, S., Cappi, M., Matt, G., Dadina, M., and Malzac, J., “Testing warm Comptonization models for the origin of the soft X-ray excess in AGNs,”A&A,611, A59 (Mar. 2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Spectral and polarization prop- erties of reflected X-ray emission from black hole accretion discs,

    Podgorn´ y, J., Dovˇ ciak, M., Marin, F., Goosmann, R., and R´ o˙ za´ nska, A., “Spectral and polarization prop- erties of reflected X-ray emission from black hole accretion discs,”MNRAS,510, 4723–4735 (Mar. 2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    The X-Ray Polarization of the Accretion Disk Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei,

    Beheshtipour, B., Krawczynski, H., and Malzac, J., “The X-Ray Polarization of the Accretion Disk Coronae of Active Galactic Nuclei,”ApJ,850, 14 (Nov. 2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Prospects for differentiating extended coronal geometries in AGNs with the IXPE mission,

    Ursini, F., Matt, G., Bianchi, S., Marinucci, A., Dovˇ ciak, M., and Zhang, W., “Prospects for differentiating extended coronal geometries in AGNs with the IXPE mission,”MNRAS,510, 3674–3687 (Mar. 2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    A Possible Relativistic Jetted Outburst from a Massive Black Hole Fed by a Tidally Disrupted Star,

    Bloom, J. S., Giannios, D., Metzger, B. D., Cenko, S. B., Perley, D. A., Butler, N. R., Tanvir, N. R., Levan, A. J., O’Brien, P. T., Strubbe, L. E., De Colle, F., Ramirez-Ruiz, E., Lee, W. H., Nayakshin, S., Quataert, E., King, A. R., Cucchiara, A., Guillochon, J., Bower, G. C...

    2011

  45. [53]

    Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole,

    Burrows, D. N., Kennea, J. A., Ghisellini, G., Mangano, V., Zhang, B., Page, K. L., Eracleous, M., Romano, P., Sakamoto, T., Falcone, A. D., Osborne, J. P., Campana, S., Beardmore, A. P., Breeveld, A. A., Chester, M. M., Corbet, R., Covino, S., Cummings, J. R., D’Avanzo, P., D...

    2011

  46. [54]

    Testing High-energy Emission Models for Blazars with X-Ray Polarimetry,

    Peirson, A. L., Liodakis, I., and Romani, R. W., “Testing High-energy Emission Models for Blazars with X-Ray Polarimetry,”ApJ,931, 59 (May 2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    ROSAT All-Sky Bright Source Catalogue (1RXS) (Voges+ 1999),

    Voges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., Braeuninger, H., Briel, U., Burkert, W., Dennerl, K., Englhauser, J., Gruber, R., Haberl, F., Hartner, G., Hasinger, G., Kuerster, M., Pfeffermann, E., Pietsch, W., Predehl, P., Rosso, C., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., Truemper, J., and Zimmerman...

    1999

  48. [56]

    X-Ray Polarimetry of Accreting White Dwarfs: A Case Study of EX Hydrae,

    Gunderson, S. J., Ravi, S., Marshall, H. L., Swarm, D. K., Ignace, R., Naz´ e, Y., Huenemoerder, D. P., and Pradhan, P., “X-Ray Polarimetry of Accreting White Dwarfs: A Case Study of EX Hydrae,”ApJ,993, 248 (Nov. 2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    X-ray polarization properties of the accretion column in magnetic CVs,

    Matt, G., “X-ray polarization properties of the accretion column in magnetic CVs,”A&A,423, 495–500 (Aug. 2004)

    2004

  50. [58]

    In-flight effective area calibration of the Chandra low-energy transmission grating spectrometer,

    Pease, D. O., Drake, J. J., Kashyap, V. L., Marshall, H. L., Raffauf, E. L., Ratzlaff, P. W., and Wargelin, B. J., “In-flight effective area calibration of the Chandra low-energy transmission grating spectrometer,” in [X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Telescopes and Instruments for Astrono...

    2003

  51. [59]

    Beuermann, K., Burwitz, V., and Rauch, T., “Establishing ¡ASTROBJ¿HZ43 A¡/ASTROBJ¿, ¡AS- TROBJ¿Sirius B¡/ASTROBJ¿, and ¡ASTROBJ¿RX J185635-3754¡/ASTROBJ¿ as soft X-ray standards: a cross-calibration between the Chandra LETG+HRC-S, the EUVE spectrometer, and the ROSAT PSPC,” A&...

    2006

  52. [60]

    X-ray optics - A technique for high resolution imaging,

    Cash, W., “X-ray optics - A technique for high resolution imaging,”Appl.Optics,26, 2915–2920 (July 1987)

    1987

  53. [61]

    FOXSI-2: Upgrades of the Focusing Optics X-ray Solar Imager for its Second Flight,

    Christe, S., Glesener, L., Buitrago-Casas, C., Ishikawa, S.-N., Ramsey, B., Gubarev, M., Kilaru, K., Kolodziejczak, J. J., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, T., Tajima, H., Turin, P., Shourt, V., Foster, N., and Krucker, S., “FOXSI-2: Upgrades of the Focusing Optics X-ray Solar Imager ...

    2016

  54. [62]

    ART-XC / SRG overview,

    Pavlinsky, M., Levin, V., Akimov, V., Krivchenko, A., Rotin, A., Kuznetsova, M., Lapshov, I., Tkachenko, A., Krivonos, R., Semena, N., Buntov, M., Glushenko, A., Arefiev, V., Yaskovich, A., Grebenev, S., Sazonov, S., Lutovinov, A., Molkov, S., Serbinov, D., Kudelin, M., Drozdo...

    2018

  55. [63]

    The Chandra High-Energy Transmission Grating: Design, Fabrication, Ground Calibration, and 5 Years in Flight,

    Canizares, C. R., Davis, J. E., Dewey, D., Flanagan, K. A., Galton, E. B., Huenemoerder, D. P., Ishibashi, K., Markert, T. H., Marshall, H. L., McGuirk, M., Schattenburg, M. L., Schulz, N. S., Smith, H. I., and Wise, M., “The Chandra High-Energy Transmission Grating: Design, F...

    2005

  56. [64]

    Development of a critical-angle transmission grating spectrometer for the International X-Ray Observatory,

    Heilmann, R. K., Ahn, M., Bautz, M. W., Foster, R., Huenemoerder, D. P., Marshall, H. L., Mukherjee, P., Schattenburg, M. L., Schulz, N. S., and Smith, M., “Development of a critical-angle transmission grating spectrometer for the International X-Ray Observatory,” in [Optics f...

    2009

  57. [65]

    High-efficiency blazed transmission gratings for high-resolution soft x-ray spectroscopy,

    Heilmann, R. K., Bruccoleri, A. R., and Schattenburg, M. L., “High-efficiency blazed transmission gratings for high-resolution soft x-ray spectroscopy,” in [Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series],SPIE Conference Series,9603, 960314 (Sept. 2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Critical-angle transmission grating technology development for high resolving power soft x-ray spectrometers on Arcus and Lynx,

    Heilmann, R. K., Bruccoleri, A. R., Song, J., Kolodziejczak, J., Gaskin, J. A., O’Dell, S. L., Cheimetz, P., Hertz, E., Smith, R. K., Burwitz, V., Hartner, G., La Caria, M.-M., and Schattenburg, M. L., “Critical-angle transmission grating technology development for high resolv...

    2017

  59. [67]

    Scanning laser reflection tool for alignment and period measurement of critical-angle transmission gratings,

    Song, J., Heilmann, R. K., Bruccoleri, A. R., Hertz, E., and Schatternburg, M. L., “Scanning laser reflection tool for alignment and period measurement of critical-angle transmission gratings,” in [Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series],S...

    2017

  60. [68]

    Proof of Concept Measurements of Laterally Graded Multilayers for Soft X-ray Spectropolarimetry,

    Heine, S., Marshall, H. L., Garner, A., Gulllikson, E., and Kothnur, N., “Proof of Concept Measurements of Laterally Graded Multilayers for Soft X-ray Spectropolarimetry,”arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2607.27664 (July 2026)

    2026 arXiv

  61. [69]

    High-exposure-durability, high-quantum-efficiency (¿90%) backside-illuminated soft-X-ray CMOS sensor,

    Harada, T., Teranishi, N., Watanabe, T., Zhou, Q., Bogaerts, J., and Wang, X., “High-exposure-durability, high-quantum-efficiency (¿90%) backside-illuminated soft-X-ray CMOS sensor,”Applied Physics Express13, 016502 (Jan. 2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    Characterization of x-ray detectors in the MIT x-ray polarimetry beamline,

    Heine, S. N. T., Marshall, H. L., Schneider, B., LaMarr, B., Kothnur, N., and Garner, A., “Characterization of x-ray detectors in the MIT x-ray polarimetry beamline,” in [X-Ray, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy XI], Holland, A. D. and Minoglou, K., eds.,Society of...

    2024

  63. [71]

    Front- and back-illuminated x-ray CCD performance in low- and high- Earth orbit: performance trends of Suzaku XIS and Chandra ACIS detectors,

    LaMarr, B., Grant, C., Kissel, S., Prigozhin, G., Bautz, M., Tsuru, T. G., Tsunemi, H., Dotani, T., Hayashida, K., and Matsumoto, H., “Front- and back-illuminated x-ray CCD performance in low- and high- Earth orbit: performance trends of Suzaku XIS and Chandra ACIS detectors,”...

    2008

  64. [72]

    MARXS: A Modular Software to Ray-trace X-Ray Instrumentation,

    G¨ unther, H. M., Frost, J., and Theriault-Shay, A., “MARXS: A Modular Software to Ray-trace X-Ray Instrumentation,”AJ,154, 243 (Dec. 2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Suzaku Observations of Abell 1795: Cluster Emission to r 200,

    Bautz, M. W., Miller, E. D., Sanders, J. S., Arnaud, K. A., Mushotzky, R. F., Porter, F. S., Hayashida, K., Henry, J. P., Hughes, J. P., Kawaharada, M., Makashima, K., Sato, M., and Tamura, T., “Suzaku Observations of Abell 1795: Cluster Emission to r 200,”PASJ,61, 1117 (Oct. 2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    X-Ray Spectro-polarimetry with Photoelectric Polarimeters,

    Strohmayer, T. E., “X-Ray Spectro-polarimetry with Photoelectric Polarimeters,”ApJ,838, 72 (Mar. 2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Aspera: the UV SmallSat telescope to detect and map the warm-hot gas phase in nearby galaxy halos,

    Chung, H., Vargas, C. J., Hamden, E., McMahon, T., Gonzales, K., Khan, A. R., Agarwal, S., Bailey, H., Behroozi, P., Brendel, T., Choi, H., Connors, T., Corlies, L., Corliss, J., Dettmar, R.-J., Dolana, D., Douglas, E. S., Guzman, J., Hamara, D., Harris, W., Harshman, K., Herg...

    2021

  68. [76]

    Arcus: exploring the formation and evolution of clusters, galaxies, and stars,

    Smith, R. K., Abraham, M., Allured, R., Bautz, M., Bookbinder, J., Bregman, J., Brenneman, L., Brick- house, N. S., Burrows, D., Burwitz, V., Cheimets, P. N., Costantini, E., Dawson, S., DeRoo, C., Falcone, A., Foster, A. R., Gallo, L., Grant, C. E., G¨ unther, H. M., Heilmann...

    2017

  69. [77]

    The Lynx X-ray Observatory: revealing the invisible universe,

    Schwartz, D. A., Vikhlinin, A., Tananbaum, H., Freeman, M., Tremblay, G., Schwartz, E. D., Gaskin, J. A., Swartz, D., Gelmis, K., McCarley, K. S., and Dominguez, A., “The Lynx X-ray Observatory: revealing the invisible universe,” in [UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentat...

    2019

  70. [78]

    The Lynx X-Ray Observatory: Science Drivers,

    Bautz, M. W., “The Lynx X-Ray Observatory: Science Drivers,” in [UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space In- strumentation for Astronomy XXI],Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series11118, 111180J (Sept. 2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    High-speed X-ray imaging spectroscopy system with Zynq SoC for solar observations,

    Ishikawa, S.-n., Takahashi, T., Watanabe, S., Narukage, N., Miyazaki, S., Orita, T., Takeda, S., Nomachi, M., Fujishiro, I., and Hodoshima, F., “High-speed X-ray imaging spectroscopy system with Zynq SoC for solar observations,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Resear...

    2018

  72. [80]

    The faintest solar coronal hard X-rays observed with FOXSI,

    Buitrago-Casas, J. C., Glesener, L., Christe, S., Krucker, S., Vievering, J., Athiray, P. S., Musset, S., Davis, L., Courtade, S., Dalton, G., Turin, P., Turin, Z., Ramsey, B., Bongiorno, S., Ryan, D., Takahashi, T., Furukawa, K., Watanabe, S., Narukage, N., Ishikawa, S.-n., M...

    2022

  73. [81]

    The Einstein Probe Mission,

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., and Ling, Z., “The Einstein Probe Mission,” in [Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics], Bambi, C. and Sangangelo, A., eds., 86, Springer (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    Optimization of the design of X-Calibur for a long-duration balloon flight and results from a one-day test flight,

    Kislat, F., Abarr, Q., Beheshtipour, B., Geronimo, G. D., Dowkontt, P., Tang, J., and Krawczynski, H., “Optimization of the design of X-Calibur for a long-duration balloon flight and results from a one-day test flight,”Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Syste...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.