Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Safety2Drive: Safety-Critical Scenario Benchmark for the Evaluation of Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13872 v1 pith:WUOQXBXS submitted 2025-05-20 cs.RO cs.AI

classification cs.ROcs.AI
keywords safety2driveevaluationscenariosafetydrivingsafety-criticalsupportssystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous Driving (AD) systems demand the high levels of safety assurance. Despite significant advancements in AD demonstrated on open-source benchmarks like Longest6 and Bench2Drive, existing datasets still lack regulatory-compliant scenario libraries for closed-loop testing to comprehensively evaluate the functional safety of AD. Meanwhile, real-world AD accidents are underrepresented in current driving datasets. This scarcity leads to inadequate evaluation of AD performance, posing risks to safety validation and practical deployment. To address these challenges, we propose Safety2Drive, a safety-critical scenario library designed to evaluate AD systems. Safety2Drive offers three key contributions. (1) Safety2Drive comprehensively covers the test items required by standard regulations and contains 70 AD function test items. (2) Safety2Drive supports the safety-critical scenario generalization. It has the ability to inject safety threats such as natural environment corruptions and adversarial attacks cross camera and LiDAR sensors. (3) Safety2Drive supports multi-dimensional evaluation. In addition to the evaluation of AD systems, it also supports the evaluation of various perception tasks, such as object detection and lane detection. Safety2Drive provides a paradigm from scenario construction to validation, establishing a standardized test framework for the safe deployment of AD.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NSF-HRPT: Neural Semantic Field meets Hierarchical Risk Perception Tree for Safety-Critical Scenario Assessment

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulator-trained neural semantic field plus a hierarchical risk tree estimates per-agent collision risk and time-to-collision from monocular video, with foundation-model features used to close the sim-to-real gap w...

Pith tools