Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How to Prompt LLMs for Text-to-SQL: A Study in Zero-shot, Single-domain, and Cross-domain Settings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.11853 v3 pith:WUYAQV3T submitted 2023-05-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords promptllmstext-to-sqlconstructionsfutureresearchsettingsstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) with in-context learning have demonstrated remarkable capability in the text-to-SQL task. Previous research has prompted LLMs with various demonstration-retrieval strategies and intermediate reasoning steps to enhance the performance of LLMs. However, those works often employ varied strategies when constructing the prompt text for text-to-SQL inputs, such as databases and demonstration examples. This leads to a lack of comparability in both the prompt constructions and their primary contributions. Furthermore, selecting an effective prompt construction has emerged as a persistent problem for future research. To address this limitation, we comprehensively investigate the impact of prompt constructions across various settings and provide insights into prompt constructions for future text-to-SQL studies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ABISS: Evaluating Text-to-SQL Systems Through Agent Interaction

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows that text-to-SQL models detect problematic questions but fail to pinpoint the exact problem type and to resolve the question after a useful clarification.

  2. SemanticAgent: A Semantics-Aware Framework for Text-to-SQL Data Synthesis

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SemanticAgent introduces a three-stage semantic analysis, synthesis, and verification process that produces higher-quality text-to-SQL training data than prior execution-only methods.

  3. Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report

    cs.CL 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Qwen2.5-Coder models claim state-of-the-art results on over 10 code benchmarks, outperforming larger models of similar size.

Pith tools