pith. sign in

arxiv: 1611.00843 · v1 · pith:WVCHKFOOnew · submitted 2016-11-02 · 🧮 math.ST · cs.SI· math.CO· stat.TH

Sampling and Estimation for (Sparse) Exchangeable Graphs

classification 🧮 math.ST cs.SImath.COstat.TH
keywords graphsestimatorexchangeableframeworksamplingsparseassociatedconsistent
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Sparse exchangeable graphs on $\mathbb{R}_+$, and the associated graphex framework for sparse graphs, generalize exchangeable graphs on $\mathbb{N}$, and the associated graphon framework for dense graphs. We develop the graphex framework as a tool for statistical network analysis by identifying the sampling scheme that is naturally associated with the models of the framework, and by introducing a general consistent estimator for the parameter (the graphex) underlying these models. The sampling scheme is a modification of independent vertex sampling that throws away vertices that are isolated in the sampled subgraph. The estimator is a dilation of the empirical graphon estimator, which is known to be a consistent estimator for dense exchangeable graphs; both can be understood as graph analogues to the empirical distribution in the i.i.d. sequence setting. Our results may be viewed as a generalization of consistent estimation via the empirical graphon from the dense graph regime to also include sparse graphs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Limits of Sparse Configuration Models and Beyond: Graphexes and Multi-Graphexes

    math.PR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The paper establishes sampling convergence of the configuration model, preferential attachment model, generalized random graph, and bipartite configuration model to graphexes, giving necessary and sufficient condition...

  2. A correction to Kallenberg's theorem for jointly exchangeable random measures

    math.PR 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper corrects Kallenberg's theorem by adding a missing condition for local finiteness of jointly exchangeable random measures and provides a counterexample showing the original statement is incomplete.