Pith

open record

sign in

arxiv: 2503.17144 · v2 · pith:WWGYLG72 · submitted 2025-03-21 · econ.EM

Local Projections or VARs? A Primer for Macroeconomists

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved pith:WWGYLG72record.jsonopen to challenge →

classification econ.EM
keywords biascostlocalmacroeconomistsshouldvarswhatachieve
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

What should applied macroeconomists know about local projection (LP) and vector autoregression (VAR) impulse response estimators? The two methods share the same estimand, but in finite samples lie on opposite ends of a bias-variance trade-off. While the low bias of LPs comes at a quite steep variance cost, this cost must be paid to achieve robust uncertainty assessments. Hence, when the goal is to convey what can be learned about dynamic causal effects from the data, VARs should only be used with long lag lengths, ensuring equivalence with LP. For LP estimation, we provide guidance on selection of lag length and controls, bias correction, and confidence interval construction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.