pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24023 · v1 · pith:WWMIM74Inew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.DM

Soft Tuy-Completeness for Robust Projection Selection in Cone-Beam CT

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.DM
keywords projectioncompletenessselectionachievableacrossbinarybudgetscertified
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This work introduces a continuous soft near-orthogonality score and a resolution-aware saturated coverage objective for projection selection in region-of-interest focused cone-beam CT, grounded in Tuy's completeness theory. Replacing the binary hit-or-miss model of classical Tuy completeness with a graded, differentiable formulation preserves a direct link to achievable feature sizes while enabling both efficient approximate and exact optimisation. We establish that the underlying discrete decision problems are NP-complete via polynomial-time reductions from Set Cover, motivating a submodular greedy algorithm with proven $(1-1/\mathrm{e})$ approximation guarantees and a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) that provides certified optimality bounds. The MILP serves as a quality certificate for the greedy solution rather than a competing optimiser. The primary empirical finding confirms this relationship: across a systematic benchmark spanning six target regions, multiple projection budgets, and four controlled occlusion conditions, the pooled median greedy-to-MILP objective ratio was 0.998, with a substantial fraction of cases certified globally optimal. A binary formulation is included as a diagnostic baseline; it strengthens hard directional completeness but is weaker on the continuous coverage scale. We additionally introduce Effective Spatial Resolution (ESR), a physically interpretable trajectory-level diagnostic that maps directional sampling gaps to achievable feature sizes. ESR correlates reliably with matched reconstruction quality across projection budgets and occlusion levels, providing a practical bridge between the selection stage and the image domain without requiring reconstruction.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.