REVIEW 1 cited by
Low Latency Conversion of Artificial Neural Network Models to Rate-encoded Spiking Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are well suited for resource-constrained applications as they do not need expensive multipliers. In a typical rate-encoded SNN, a series of binary spikes within a globally fixed time window is used to fire the neurons. The maximum number of spikes in this time window is also the latency of the network in performing a single inference, as well as determines the overall energy efficiency of the model. The aim of this paper is to reduce this while maintaining accuracy when converting ANNs to their equivalent SNNs. The state-of-the-art conversion schemes yield SNNs with accuracies comparable with ANNs only for large window sizes. In this paper, we start with understanding the information loss when converting from pre-existing ANN models to standard rate-encoded SNN models. From these insights, we propose a suite of novel techniques that together mitigate the information lost in the conversion, and achieve state-of-art SNN accuracies along with very low latency. Our method achieved a Top-1 SNN accuracy of 98.73% (1 time step) on the MNIST dataset, 76.38% (8 time steps) on the CIFAR-100 dataset, and 93.71% (8 time steps) on the CIFAR-10 dataset. On ImageNet, an SNN accuracy of 75.35%/79.16% was achieved with 100/200 time steps.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Efficient and Robust Spiking Neural Networks for sEMG-Based Muscle Fatigue Detection
3- and 4-bit quantized SNNs with SDH training match ANN F1 on two sEMG fatigue datasets, stay more stable under seven noise types, and reduce estimated energy up to 201.77×.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.