Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 71 references

Transient Dynamics and Homogenization in Incoherent Collision Models

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Incoherent CSWAP system-environment collisions produce memoryless dynamics and suppress synchronization in collision-model homogenizers, regardless of intra-environment couplings.

desk verdict Useful PSWAP-vs-CSWAP comparison, but the 'always Markovian' claim outruns the BLP-based evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16313 v2 pith:WXQ5FJAV submitted 2025-01-27 quant-ph

Göktuğ Karpat , Bar{i}ş Çakmak This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords collisionmodelsquantumhomogenizationnon-Markovianitysynchronizationpartial-swapgatecontrolled-swapopensystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper compares two ways of building collision models for open quantum systems: the standard coherent partial-swap (PSWAP) gate and the incoherent controlled-swap (CSWAP) gate, both of which homogenize a system qubit to the state of the environment. It shows that while the two models converge to the same final state at nearly the same rate, the transient path differs sharply: PSWAP spirals through the Bloch sphere, while CSWAP travels along a straight line. The central claim is that the nature of the system-environment coupling decides the transient phenomena. When that coupling is coherent PSWAP, memory effects can emerge and two qubits sharing the bath synchronize; when it is incoherent CSWAP, the evolution appears Markovian and synchronization never appears, independent of whether the intra-environment collisions are coherent or incoherent. A sympathetic reader should care because it isolates the interference term of the gate as the mechanism controlling transient quantum effects while leaving the equilibrium state unchanged.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the two gates. The coherent PSWAP gate is $U_c(\gamma)=\cos\gamma\, I_4 + i\sin\gamma\, S$, with $S$ the swap operator; the incoherent CSWAP gate is $U_{ic}=\tfrac12(|0\rangle\langle0|\otimes I_4 + |1\rangle\langle1|\otimes S)$, controlled by a qubit in state $|c\rangle=\cos\gamma|0\rangle+\sin\gamma|1\rangle$. After one collision, the system qubit's Bloch vector update for PSWAP includes the interference term $\tfrac{\cos\gamma\sin\gamma}{4}(\vec{\beta}\times\vec{\alpha})\cdot\vec{\sigma}$, while for CSWAP this term is absent; the paper identifies this missing rotor term as the reason the CSWAP trajectory is straight rather than spiral. The argument then runs through two diagnostic tools: the BLP trace-distance measure, maximized over antipodal initial state pairs, for information backflow, and the Pearson coefficient of local $\langle\sigma_x\rangle$ expectation values for synchronization. The gates' common property as universal homogenizers ensures that both models end at the same fixed point, making the transient differences visible.

What would settle it

Compute the Choi matrix of the intermediate map $\Lambda[i+1,i]$ for the CSWAP-CSWAP model at $\gamma_{se}=0.05\pi/2$, $\gamma_{ee}=0.93\pi/2$; if any such map between successive collisions is not completely positive, the process is CP-indivisible and therefore non-Markovian even though the BLP trace distance stays monotone, which would refute the paper's unconditional claim. Conversely, verifying that all intermediate maps are completely positive on a finer grid, including $\gamma_{ee}\to\pi/2$, would support the claim beyond the specific grid.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that coherence of the system-environment collision, not the intra-environment dynamics, is the switch that controls transient quantum phenomena in collision-model homogenization. With weak system-environment coupling, a single CSWAP collision leaves the system qubit in a state whose Bloch vector update lacks the cross-product term $(\vec{\beta}\times\vec{\alpha})\cdot\vec{\sigma}$ that appears for PSWAP; over many collisions this straightens the trajectory on the Bloch sphere. Using the BLP trace-distance measure for non-Markovianity over a numerical grid of couplings ($\gamma_{se}\in[0,0.10]\pi/2$, $\gamma_{ee}\in[0.90,0.98]\pi/2$, plus $\gamma_{ee}\to\pi/2$), the authors find no backflow of information whenever the system-environment gate is CSWAP, for both CSWAP-CSWAP and CSWAP-PSWAP models. For a pair of qubits interacting with a common reservoir, the Pearson coefficient of the $\langle\sigma_x\rangle$ oscillations settles to $-1$ in the PSWAP-PSWAP model but shows no phase-locking in the CSWAP-CSWAP or CSWAP-PSWAP models. Since all models homogenize to the environment state, the result is a distinction between equilibrium and transient effects: the coherent PSWAP route enables memory and synchronization, and the incoherent CSWAP route removes both.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's unconditional claim that incoherent system-environment coupling is always memoryless rests on a finite numerical scan over weak coupling strengths, and it treats a never-increasing trace distance as proof of Markovianity even though the authors note that trace distance can miss some non-Markovian processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any collision model that uses CSWAP for the system-environment interaction will homogenize to the same environment state but without BLP-detectable memory effects, so incoherent collisions can serve as a clean Markovian simulator.
  • Environment-induced spontaneous synchronization between two qubits sharing a bath requires coherent PSWAP system-environment interactions; incoherent CSWAP interactions suppress phase-locking.
  • Because the asymptotic states are nearly identical, experiments or simulations must track transient quantities such as the Bloch-vector path or coherence to determine which type of gate is at work.
  • With coherent system-environment coupling, replacing intra-environment PSWAP gates by CSWAP gates generically increases the degree of non-Markovianity, giving an independent knob for tuning memory strength.
  • The paper leaves the universality of homogenization for non-Markovian models with CSWAP components as an open question; its results point toward but do not prove such universality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test would be to compute the intermediate maps (Choi matrices) between successive collisions in the CSWAP-CSWAP model; if any is not completely positive, the evolution is CP-indivisible and thus non-Markovian despite a monotone trace distance, which would narrow the paper's claim to BLP-markovianity.
  • The missing cross-product term suggests a continuous interpolation between PSWAP and CSWAP; if the spiral path, information backflow, and synchronization all turn on only when that term is present, the coherent interference rotor is the true mechanism.
  • The synchronization suppression likely extends to any incoherent system-environment coupling that lacks the cross term, such as a dephasing-style collision, which could be tested with a controlled-phase gate.
  • The Markovianity result is established for qubit environments only; extending the collision model to qutrit or continuous-variable units would show whether the memoryless conclusion survives in higher-dimensional environments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper compares coherent and incoherent collision models, where system-environment and intra-environment couplings are realized by the partial-SWAP (PSWAP) and controlled-SWAP (CSWAP) operations. For a single qubit, it studies the transient Bloch-sphere path, coherence, entropy, fidelity, and the BLP trace-distance non-Markovianity measure for four combinations of PSWAP/CSWAP couplings. For two qubits, it analyzes environment-induced synchronization using the Pearson coefficient in fully coherent, fully incoherent, and hybrid models. The authors find that PSWAP and CSWAP models homogenize to the same asymptotic state but follow different transient paths, that memory effects diagnosed by BLP appear only when the system-environment coupling is coherent, and that synchronization is established only in the fully coherent model. They conclude that incoherent CSWAP system-environment interactions always produce Markovian, memoryless dynamics.

Significance. If the central claim is supported, the paper offers a useful comparative phenomenology: incoherent homogenizers reach the same fixed point as coherent ones while suppressing BLP-detectable memory effects and transient synchronization. The numerical demonstrations are clearly presented, the model definitions are explicit, and the authors correctly acknowledge that monotone trace distance is not equivalent to CP-divisibility. However, the universal negative claim about CSWAP Markovianity is an extrapolation from finite numerics and is not backed by a divisibility check. The paper is a reasonable candidate for publication after the Markovianity claim is either proven or appropriately qualified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (12)–(13) and the summary paragraph at the end of Section 3] The paper defines Markovian dynamics as CP-divisibility, but the only quantifier actually computed is the BLP trace-distance measure. The authors themselves note that ND=0 can occur for CP-indivisible evolutions, yet the summary statement that incoherent system-environment interactions 'always leads to Markovian and thus memoryless evolutions' treats monotone trace distance as sufficient for CP-divisibility. This is a logical gap. To support the headline claim, the authors should either check CP-divisibility directly (for example, by verifying complete positivity of the intermediate collision maps, as in Ref. [42]) or qualify the conclusion as 'no BLP-detectable memory effects.'
  2. [Section 3, paragraph beginning 'Lastly, we turn our attention...' and Fig. 4] The universal negative claim that CSWAP system-environment couplings are always Markovian is extrapolated from a finite numerical search: γ_se in [0,0.10]π/2, γ_ee in [0.90,0.98]π/2, plus the limiting behavior as γ_ee→π/2. No analytical argument excludes trace-distance revivals for other weak-coupling parameters, other initial-state pairs beyond the standard antipodal-pair reduction for qubit BLP measures, or longer collision numbers. Since this extrapolation is load-bearing for the central coherent-versus-incoherent contrast, it needs either a proof or a clear restriction of the claim to the numerically probed regime.
  3. [Section 4, Figs. 5–7 and the paragraph after Eq. (15)] The synchronization conclusion is demonstrated for a single parameter set (γ_se=0.03π/2, resonant qubits with ω1=ω2=1, δt=0.04, and one initial state). The conclusion that 'synchronization is also suppressed by the CSWAP gate' is presented as general, although the detuned case is only mentioned and not shown. The claim should be qualified to the investigated parameter regime, or additional parameter scans should be provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, paragraph after Eq. (6)] The sentence 'the system qubit loses its coherence at a slightly faster rate ... as compared to the incoherent case' should read 'as compared to the coherent case', otherwise the comparison is circular.
  2. [Section 3, first paragraph] There is a typo: 'anaylsis' should be 'analysis'.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. (3)] There is a duplicated article: 'the the two-qubit SWAP operation' should be 'the two-qubit SWAP operation'.
  4. [Section 4, text after Eq. (15)] The phrase 'form the viewpoint of synchronization' should be 'from the viewpoint'; later in the same section, 'whenever it is it is involved' should be 'whenever it is involved'.
  5. [Figure 3 and Section 3, parameter values] The text states 'γse = 0.00 − 0.10 and γse = 0.90 − 0.98' without units; it should read 'γ_se ∈ [0,0.10]π/2' and 'γ_ee ∈ [0.90,0.98]π/2' to match the figure axes.
  6. [Eq. (11)] The trace-distance formula is written ambiguously as '1/2 Tr[(ρ1−ρ2)†(ρ1−ρ2)]^{1/2}'; it should be D(ρ1,ρ2)= (1/2) Tr sqrt((ρ1−ρ2)†(ρ1−ρ2)), or simply (1/2)||ρ1−ρ2||_1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new CSWAP dynamics are computed from an explicit model and standard measures; the main weakness is an overbroad inference (zero BLP does not imply CP-divisibility), which is a correctness concern, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The paper defines the PSWAP and CSWAP collision rules explicitly in Eqs. (1)-(7), then numerically computes standard, independently established quantities: trace distance, the BLP measure (Eqs. 11-13), fidelity, coherence, entropy, and the Pearson coefficient (Eq. 15). No parameter is fitted to force the advertised conclusion, and no quantity labeled a prediction is constructed from the same data it is supposed to explain. The optimization over antipodal initial state pairs uses the known structure of BLP-optimal pairs from Ref. [60], which is legitimate use of an external result, not circularity. The few self-citations (Refs. 26, 47, 66, all involving the present authors) are used only to motivate the synchronization setup and to cite the authors' earlier collision-model framework; the new CSWAP results are computed independently from that framework rather than imported from those papers. The main weakness is epistemic, not circular: the paper defines Markovianity via CP-divisibility, yet asserts the CSWAP-CSWAP and CSWAP-PSWAP models are 'Markovian and thus memoryless' from a zero BLP trace-distance measure, even though it explicitly concedes that 'the monotonic decay of trace distance is not equivalent to CP-divisibility' and that ND can vanish for CP-indivisible dynamics. Treating a necessary condition as sufficient, and extrapolating a universal negative claim from a finite parameter grid, is a validity gap in the argument, but it is not a case of a result reducing by construction to its own inputs. No circular step satisfying the required standard can be quoted from the paper; the appropriate finding is a low score reflecting only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation in the model ancestry.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard open quantum system tools (BLP measure, Pearson coefficient) and on the homogenizer properties of PSWAP and CSWAP taken from prior literature. The main extra assumption is that a finite numerical scan over coupling strengths is sufficient to establish universal Markovianity for CSWAP, which is not proven analytically.

free parameters (3)
  • gamma_se = 0.05(pi/2) for single qubit; 0.03(pi/2) for two qubits; scanned 0.00 to 0.10 in Fig. 3
    Model coupling strength chosen by hand for the simulations; the universality claims are asserted to hold over the scanned interval.
  • gamma_ee = 0.93(pi/2) for main figures; scanned 0.90 to 0.98 in Fig. 3
    Intra-environment coupling strength; chosen to display memory effects; the conclusion that CSWAP never produces memory effects is extrapolated from this scan.
  • delta_t = 0.04
    Time step for free evolution of the two system qubits in Section 4; chosen for presentation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PSWAP is the unique universal homogenizer among unitary two-qubit operations
    Basis for choosing PSWAP as the coherent homogenizer; taken from Ref. [6].
  • domain assumption CSWAP is a universal homogenizer
    Basis for choosing CSWAP as the incoherent homogenizer; taken from Ref. [12].
  • standard math Optimal initial state pairs for BLP measure are antipodal on the Bloch sphere
    Restricts the maximization in Eq. (13) to antipodal pairs, citing Ref. [60].
  • domain assumption No initial correlations between system and environment qubits
    Stated in Section 2 as a model assumption.
  • domain assumption The control qubit in the CSWAP gate is traced out after each interaction (inferred, not explicit)
    Needed to obtain Eq. (6) and to define the incoherent channel; not stated in the update rules.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transient Dynamics and Homogenization in Incoherent Collision Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WXQ5FJAV

@misc{pith2026250116313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transient Dynamics and Homogenization in Incoherent Collision Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WXQ5FJAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16313}
}
read the original abstract

Collision models have attracted significant attention in recent years due to their versatility to simulate open quantum systems in different dynamical regimes. They have been used to study various interesting phenomena such as the dynamical emergence of non-Markovian memory effects and the spontaneous establishment of synchronization in open quantum systems. In such models, the repeated pairwise interactions between the system and the environment and also the possible coupling between different environmental units are typically modeled using the coherent partial-swap (PSWAP) operation as it is known to be a universal homogenizer. In this study, we investigate the dynamical behavior of incoherent collision models, where the interactions between different units are modeled by the incoherent controlled-swap (CSWAP) operation, which is also a universal homogenizer. Even though the asymptotic dynamics of the open system in case of both coherent and incoherent swap interactions appear to be identical, its transient dynamics turns out to be significantly different. Here we present a comparative analysis of the consequences of having coherent or incoherent couplings in collision models, namely, PSWAP or CSWAP interactions respectively, for the emergence of memory effects for a single qubit system and for the onset synchronization between a pair of qubits, both of which are strictly determined by the transient dynamics of the open system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. For the coherent PSWAP interaction between the system qubit s and the environment qubits ei without intra-environment couplings, γee = 0 and γse = 0.05(π/2), (a) shows the evolution of the coherence C(ρs) in the open system, the entropy S(ρs) of the open system, and the fidelity F(ρs, ρe) between the open system and the initial state of the environment qubits ρe = |0⟩⟨0| for N = 1100 collisions. (b) displays the pat… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. While (a) shows the dynamics of the trace distance for the PSWAP-PSWAP collision model, together with the evolution of the non-Markovianity measure ND shown in the inset for N = 1200 collisions, (c) displays the same set of plots in case of the PSWAP-CSWAP collision model for same number of collisions. We take the initial system state pair as |±⟩ = (1/ √ 2)(|0⟩ ± |1⟩), and set the system-environment and the intra-en… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Non-Markovianity diagrams for (a) the PSWAP-PSWAP and (b) the PSWAP-CSWAP collision models in terms of the system-environment and the intra-environment interaction parameters, γse and γee. For both models, we simulate the dynamics for N = 12000 iterations and the state pair used in the calculation of the non-Markovianity measure ND is fixed as |±⟩ = (1/√ 2)(|0⟩ ± |1⟩). We begin our investigation studying dynamical m… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: While (a) shows the dynamics of the trace distance for the CSWAP-CSWAP collision model, together with the evolution of the non-Markovianity measure ND shown in the inset for N = 1200 collisions, (c) displays the same set of plots in case of the CSWAP-PSWAP collision mo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: System particles are initialized as ρs1s2 = |+⟩|L⟩⟨L|⟨+| and resonant such that ω1 =ω2 =1, and both interact with a common environmental unit through a coherent PSWAP having strength γse = 0.03(π/2). While (a) displays the dynamics of ⟨σ x s1 ⟩ and ⟨σ x s2 ⟩, (b) shows…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: System particles are initialized as ρs1s2 = |+⟩|L⟩⟨L|⟨+| and resonant such that ω1 =ω2 =1, and both interact with a common environmental unit through a incoherent CSWAP having strength γse = 0.03(π/2). While (a) displays the dynamics of ⟨σ x s1 ⟩ and ⟨σ x s2 ⟩, (b) dis…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: System particles are initialized as ρs1s2 = |+⟩|L⟩⟨L|⟨+| and resonant such that ω1 =ω2 =1. As the first particle interact with environmental units through incoherent CSWAP, the second one interacts with the same environment units via a coherent PSWAP interactions, with…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Divisibility of quantum dynamical maps and collision models

    Filippov, S.N.; Piilo, J.; Maniscalco, S.; Ziman, M. Divisibility of quantum dynamical maps and collision models. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 032111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032111

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.96.032111 2017

  2. [1]

    Collision models in quantum optics

    Ciccarello, F. Collision models in quantum optics. Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology 2017, 4, 53–63. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/qmetro-2017-0007

    doi:10.1515/qmetro-2017-0007 2017

  3. [2]

    Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions

    Ciccarello, F.; Lorenzo, S.; Giovannetti, V .; Palma, G.M. Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions. Physics Reports 2022, 954, 1–70. Quantum collision models: Open system dynamics from repeated interactions, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.001

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.01.001 2022

  4. [3]

    Collision models in open system dynamics: A versatile tool for deeper insights? Europhysics Letters 2021, 133, 60001

    Campbell, S.; Vacchini, B. Collision models in open system dynamics: A versatile tool for deeper insights? Europhysics Letters 2021, 133, 60001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/133/60001

    doi:10.1209/0295-5075/133/60001 2021

  5. [4]

    Quantum Collision Models: A Beginner Guide

    Cusumano, S. Quantum Collision Models: A Beginner Guide. Entropy 2022, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/e2 4091258

    work page doi:10.3390/e2 2022

  6. [5]

    Relaxation Phenomena in Spin and Harmonic Oscillator Systems

    Rau, J. Relaxation Phenomena in Spin and Harmonic Oscillator Systems. Phys. Rev. 1963, 129, 1880–1888. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.129.1880

    doi:10.1103/physrev.129.1880 1963

  7. [6]

    Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions

    Ziman, M.; Štelmachoviˇ c, P .; Bužek, V .; Hillery, M.; Scarani, V .; Gisin, N. Diluting quantum information: An analysis of information transfer in system-reservoir interactions. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65, 042105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042105

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042105 2002

  8. [7]

    Thermalizing Quantum Machines: Dissipation and Entanglement

    Scarani, V .; Ziman, M.; Štelmachoviˇ c, P .; Gisin, N.; Bužek, V . Thermalizing Quantum Machines: Dissipation and Entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 097905. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.097905

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.097905 2002

Show all 71 references
  1. [8]

    Quantum homogenization for continuous variables: Realization with linear optical elements

    Nagaj, D.; Štelmachoviˇ c, P .; Bužek, V .; Kim, M. Quantum homogenization for continuous variables: Realization with linear optical elements. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 66, 062307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 66.062307

    2002 doi

  2. [9]

    Description of Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems Based on Collision-Like Models

    Ziman, M.; Štelmachoviˇ c, P .; Bužek, V . Description of Quantum Dynamics of Open Systems Based on Collision-Like Models. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 2005, 12, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11080-005-0488-0

    2005 doi

  3. [10]

    Open system dynamics of simple collision models

    Ziman, M.; Bužek, V . Open system dynamics of simple collision models. Chapter in Quantum Dynamics and Information (World Scientific). 2010, pp. 199–227. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814317443_0011

    2010 doi

  4. [11]

    Entropy production and asymptotic factorization via thermalization: A collisional model approach

    Cusumano, S.; Cavina, V .; Keck, M.; De Pasquale, A.; Giovannetti, V . Entropy production and asymptotic factorization via thermalization: A collisional model approach. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 032119. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032119

    2018 doi

  5. [12]

    Comparing coherent and incoherent models for quantum homogenization

    Beever, A.; Violaris, M.; Marletto, C.; Vedral, V . Comparing coherent and incoherent models for quantum homogenization. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 110, 012464. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012464

    2024 doi

  6. [13]

    Heat flux and quantum correlations in dissipative cascaded systems

    Lorenzo, S.; Farace, A.; Ciccarello, F.; Palma, G.M.; Giovannetti, V . Heat flux and quantum correlations in dissipative cascaded systems. Phys. Rev. A 2015, 91, 022121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.022121

    2015 doi

  7. [14]

    Landauer’s Principle in Multipartite Open Quantum System Dynamics

    Lorenzo, S.; McCloskey, R.; Ciccarello, F.; Paternostro, M.; Palma, G.M. Landauer’s Principle in Multipartite Open Quantum System Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 120403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 115.120403

    2015 doi

  8. [15]

    Quantum and Information Thermodynamics: A Unifying Framework Based on Repeated Interactions

    Strasberg, P .; Schaller, G.; Brandes, T.; Esposito, M. Quantum and Information Thermodynamics: A Unifying Framework Based on Repeated Interactions. Phys. Rev. X 2017, 7, 021003. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.7.021003

    2017

  9. [16]

    Implications of non-Markovian quantum dynamics for the Landauer bound

    Pezzutto, M.; Paternostro, M.; Omar, Y. Implications of non-Markovian quantum dynamics for the Landauer bound. New J. Phys. 2016, 18, 123018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/12/123018

    2016 doi

  10. [17]

    Interferometric quantum cascade systems

    Cusumano, S.; Mari, A.; Giovannetti, V . Interferometric quantum cascade systems. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 053838. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.053838

    2017 doi

  11. [18]

    Interferometric modulation of quantum cascade interactions

    Cusumano, S.; Mari, A.; Giovannetti, V . Interferometric modulation of quantum cascade interactions. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 053811. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.053811

    2018 doi

  12. [19]

    Collisional picture of quantum optics with giant emitters

    Cilluffo, D.; Carollo, A.; Lorenzo, S.; Gross, J.A.; Palma, G.M.; Ciccarello, F. Collisional picture of quantum optics with giant emitters. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 043070. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.04 3070

    2020 doi

  13. [20]

    An out-of-equilibrium non-Markovian quantum heat engine

    Pezzutto, M.; Paternostro, M.; Omar, Y. An out-of-equilibrium non-Markovian quantum heat engine. Quantum Sci. Technol. 2019, 4, 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aaf5b4. 16 of 17

    2019 doi

  14. [21]

    Implications of non-Markovian dynamics on information-driven engine

    Abah, O.; Paternostro, M. Implications of non-Markovian dynamics on information-driven engine. arXiv:1902.06153 2019

    1902 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Collision-model approach to steering of an open driven qubit

    Beyer, K.; Luoma, K.; Strunz, W.T. Collision-model approach to steering of an open driven qubit. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 032113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032113

    2018 doi

  16. [23]

    Classical Limits and Contextuality in a Scenario of Multiple Observers

    Baldijao, D.R.; Cunha, T.M. Classical Limits and Contextuality in a Scenario of Multiple Observers. arXiv:1811.00615 2018

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Collisional unfolding of quantum Darwinism

    Campbell, S.; Çakmak, B.; Müstecaplı˘ glu, O.E.; Paternostro, M.; Vacchini, B. Collisional unfolding of quantum Darwinism. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 042103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042103

    2019 doi

  18. [25]

    Thermodynamics of Weakly Coherent Collisional Models

    Rodrigues, F.L.S.; De Chiara, G.; Paternostro, M.; Landi, G.T. Thermodynamics of Weakly Coherent Collisional Models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 140601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.140601

    2019 doi

  19. [26]

    Quantum synchronization in a collision model

    Karpat, G.; Yalçnkaya, I.; Çakmak, B. Quantum synchronization in a collision model. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 012133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.100.012133

    2019 doi

  20. [27]

    Non-equilibrium steady-states of memoryless quantum collision models

    Guarnieri, G.; Morrone, D.; Çakmak, B.; Plastina, F.; Campbell, S. Non-equilibrium steady-states of memoryless quantum collision models. Physics Letters A 2020, 384, 126576. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126576

    2020

  21. [28]

    Collision Models Can Efficiently Simulate Any Multipartite Markovian Quantum Dynamics

    Cattaneo, M.; De Chiara, G.; Maniscalco, S.; Zambrini, R.; Giorgi, G.L. Collision Models Can Efficiently Simulate Any Multipartite Markovian Quantum Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 130403. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.130403

    2021 doi

  22. [29]

    The Theory of Open Quantum Systems; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

    Breuer, H.P .; Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems; Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

    2002

  23. [30]

    Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987

    Alicki, R.; Lendi, K. Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987

    1987

  24. [31]

    Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems

    de Vega, I.; Alonso, D. Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 015001. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015001

    2017 doi

  25. [32]

    Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection

    Rivas, Á.; Huelga, S.F.; Plenio, M.B. Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection. Reports on Progress in Physics 2014, 77, 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001

    2014 doi

  26. [33]

    Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems

    Breuer, H.P .; Laine, E.M.; Piilo, J.; Vacchini, B. Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2016, 88, 021002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002

    2016 doi

  27. [34]

    Collision-model-based approach to non-Markovian quantum dynamics

    Ciccarello, F.; Palma, G.M.; Giovannetti, V . Collision-model-based approach to non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 87, 040103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.040103

    2013 doi

  28. [35]

    Non-Markovianity and system-environment correlations in a microscopic collision model

    McCloskey, R.; Paternostro, M. Non-Markovianity and system-environment correlations in a microscopic collision model. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 052120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.052120

    2014 doi

  29. [36]

    General structure of quantum collisional models

    Vacchini, B. General structure of quantum collisional models. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 2014, 12, 1461011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219749914610115

    2014 doi

  30. [37]

    Environmental correlations and Markovian to non-Markovian transitions in collisional models

    Bernardes, N.K.; Carvalho, A.R.R.; Monken, C.H.; Santos, M.F. Environmental correlations and Markovian to non-Markovian transitions in collisional models. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 032111. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.90.032111

    2014

  31. [38]

    Collision model for non-Markovian quantum dynamics

    Kretschmer, S.; Luoma, K.; Strunz, W.T. Collision model for non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 94, 012106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012106

    2016 doi

  32. [39]

    Non-Markovianity, coherence, and system-environment correlations in a long-range collision model

    Çakmak, B.; Pezzutto, M.; Paternostro, M.; Müstecaplıo˘ glu, O.E. Non-Markovianity, coherence, and system-environment correlations in a long-range collision model. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 022109. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022109

    2017 doi

  33. [40]

    Quantum Non-Markovian Piecewise Dynamics from Collision Models

    Lorenzo, S.; Ciccarello, F.; Palma, G.M.; Vacchini, B. Quantum Non-Markovian Piecewise Dynamics from Collision Models. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 2017, 24, 1740011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S123016121740011X

    2017 doi

  34. [41]

    Composite quantum collision models

    Lorenzo, S.; Ciccarello, F.; Palma, G.M. Composite quantum collision models. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 032107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.032107

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    System-environment correlations and Markovian embedding of quantum non-Markovian dynamics

    Campbell, S.; Ciccarello, F.; Palma, G.M.; Vacchini, B. System-environment correlations and Markovian embedding of quantum non-Markovian dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 98, 012142. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.98.012142

    2018

  36. [44]

    Non-Markovianity in the collision model with environmental block

    Jin, J.; Yu, C.S. Non-Markovianity in the collision model with environmental block. New J. Phys. 2018, 20, 053026

    2018

  37. [45]

    Precursors of non-Markovianity

    Campbell, S.; Popovic, M.; Tamascelli, D.; Vacchini, B. Precursors of non-Markovianity. arXiv:1902.03156 2019

    1902 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Quantum Darwinism in a Composite System: Objectivity versus Classicality

    Çakmak, B.; Müstecaplıo˘ glu, O.E.; Paternostro, M.; Vacchini, B.; Campbell, S. Quantum Darwinism in a Composite System: Objectivity versus Classicality. Entropy 2021, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23080995. 17 of 17

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Synchronization and non-Markovianity in open quantum systems

    Karpat, G.; Yalçinkaya, I.; Çakmak, B.; Giorgi, G.L.; Zambrini, R. Synchronization and non-Markovianity in open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 103, 062217. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.062217

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Quantum homogenization in non-Markovian collisional model

    Saha, T.; Das, A.; Ghosh, S. Quantum homogenization in non-Markovian collisional model. New Journal of Physics 2024, 26, 023011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad212f

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Correlations breaking homogenization

    Comar, N.E.; Landi, G.T. Correlations breaking homogenization. Phys. Rev. A 2021, 104, 032217. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032217

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    Multipartite Correlations in Quantum Collision Models

    Filippov, S. Multipartite Correlations in Quantum Collision Models. Entropy 2022, 24. https://doi.org/10.3 390/e24040508

    2022

  43. [51]

    Structured quantum collision models: generating coherence with thermal resources

    Cusumano, S.; De Chiara, G. Structured quantum collision models: generating coherence with thermal resources. New Journal of Physics 2024, 26, 023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ad202a

    2024 doi

  44. [52]

    Periodically refreshed baths to simulate open quantum many-body dynamics

    Purkayastha, A.; Guarnieri, G.; Campbell, S.; Prior, J.; Goold, J. Periodically refreshed baths to simulate open quantum many-body dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 045417. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.04 5417

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    Periodically refreshed quantum thermal machines

    Purkayastha, A.; Guarnieri, G.; Campbell, S.; Prior, J.; Goold, J. Periodically refreshed quantum thermal machines. Quantum 2022, 6, 801. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-09-08-801

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Robust multipartite entangle- ment generation via a collision model

    Çakmak, B.; Campbell, S.; Vacchini, B.; Müstecaplıo˘ glu, Ö.E.; Paternostro, M. Robust multipartite entangle- ment generation via a collision model. Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 012319. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99 .012319

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    Quantum computation and quantum information; Cambridge University Press, 2000

    Nielsen, M.; Chuang, I. Quantum computation and quantum information; Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  48. [56]

    Quantifying Coherence

    Baumgratz, T.; Cramer, M.; Plenio, M.B. Quantifying Coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 140401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401

    2014 doi

  49. [57]

    Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource

    Streltsov, A.; Adesso, G.; Plenio, M.B. Colloquium: Quantum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 041003. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.041003

    2017 doi

  50. [58]

    Available from the following link: https://melt1.notion.site

  51. [59]

    Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems

    Breuer, H.P .; Laine, E.M.; Piilo, J. Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 210401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dynamics

    Wißmann, S.; Karlsson, A.; Laine, E.M.; Piilo, J.; Breuer, H.P . Optimal state pairs for non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 86, 062108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.062108

    2012 doi

  53. [61]

    Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes

    Laine, E.M.; Piilo, J.; Breuer, H.P . Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81, 062115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.062115

    2010 doi

  54. [62]

    Spontaneous synchronization and quantum correlation dynamics of open spin systems

    Giorgi, G.L.; Plastina, F.; Francica, G.; Zambrini, R. Spontaneous synchronization and quantum correlation dynamics of open spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 2013, 88, 042115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.04211 5

    2013 doi

  55. [63]

    Probing the spectral density of a dissipative qubit via quantum synchronization

    Giorgi, G.L.; Galve, F.; Zambrini, R. Probing the spectral density of a dissipative qubit via quantum synchronization. Phys. Rev. A 2016, 94, 052121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052121

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    Quantum synchronization as a local signature of super- and subradiance

    Bellomo, B.; Giorgi, G.L.; Palma, G.M.; Zambrini, R. Quantum synchronization as a local signature of super- and subradiance. Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 043807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.043807

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    Quantum Synchronization in Dimer Atomic Lattices

    Cabot, A.; Giorgi, G.L.; Galve, F.; Zambrini, R. Quantum Synchronization in Dimer Atomic Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 023604. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.023604

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    Quantum synchronization of few-body systems under collective dissipation

    Karpat, G.; Yalçnkaya, I.; Çakmak, B. Quantum synchronization of few-body systems under collective dissipation. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 042121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042121

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Synchronization and coalescence in a dissipative two-qubit system

    Cabot, A.; Luca Giorgi, G.; Zambrini, R. Synchronization and coalescence in a dissipative two-qubit system. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2021, 477, 20200850. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2020.0850

    2021

  60. [68]

    In Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications; Fanchini, F.F.; Soares Pinto, D.d.O.; Adesso, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; pp

    Galve, F.; Luca Giorgi, G.; Zambrini, R., Quantum Correlations and Synchronization Measures. In Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications; Fanchini, F.F.; Soares Pinto, D.d.O.; Adesso, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; pp. 393–420. ...

    2017 doi

  61. [69]

    Transient Synchronization in Open Quantum Systems

    Giorgi, G.L.; Cabot, A.; Zambrini, R. Transient Synchronization in Open Quantum Systems. In Proceedings of the Advances in Open Systems and Fundamental Tests of Quantum Mechanics; Vacchini, B.; Breuer, H.P .; Bassi, A., Eds., Cham, 2019; pp. 73–89

    2019

  62. [70]

    Quantum homogenization as a quantum steady-state protocol on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware

    Yosifov, A.; Iyer, A.; Ebler, D.; Vedral, V . Quantum homogenization as a quantum steady-state protocol on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. Phys. Rev. A 2024, 109, 032624. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.109.032624

    2024

  63. [71]

    Dissipation-induced Quantum Homogenization for Temporal Information Processing, 2024, [arXiv:quant-ph/2412.09979]

    Yosifov, A.; Iyer, A.; Vedral, V . Dissipation-induced Quantum Homogenization for Temporal Information Processing, 2024, [arXiv:quant-ph/2412.09979]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.