Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 50 references

Video Demoireing using Focused-Defocused Dual-Camera System

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A defocused second camera guides video demoireing, and the paper reports that this dual-camera approach largely outperforms existing single-camera methods.

desk verdict A plausible dual-camera demoireing framework, but the abstract alone carries no experimental evidence, so the strong claim of superiority is unbacked. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03449 v1 pith:X2ARBFRR submitted 2025-08-05 cs.CV

Xuan Dong , Xiangyuan Sun , Xia Wang , Jian Song , Ya Li , Weixin Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords videodemoireingmoireartifactsdual-camerasystemdefocusedguideopticalflowalignmentmulti-scaleCNNjointbilateralfiltertonalandtemporalconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a video demoireing method that uses two synchronized cameras filming the same scene: one focused and one intentionally defocused. Because defocus smears out high-frequency detail, the defocused video contains far fewer moire artifacts, and the paper's claim is that it can serve as a reliable guide for cleaning the focused video. The pipeline aligns the two videos with optical flow, uses the aligned defocused frames to guide a multi-scale CNN that removes moire while preserving texture, and applies a joint bilateral filter to keep tonal and temporal consistency. The paper reports that this dual-camera approach largely outperforms state-of-the-art image and video demoireing methods.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the defocused video as a physically derived prior: defocus acts as a low-pass filter that removes the high-frequency interference producing moire. Around this prior the pipeline stacks optical-flow alignment, a multi-scale CNN that ingests the aligned focused and defocused frames, a multi-dimensional training loss, and a joint bilateral filter that transfers the CNN's corrections onto the original focused frame for tonal and temporal consistency.

What would settle it

A scene with a large foreground occlusion and fast motion where optical flow alignment misaligns the two cameras: if the demoireed output shows visible ghosting or color bleeding in those regions and performs worse than a single-camera baseline, the claim that the defocused guide always helps would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that moire in video can be separated from genuine texture by exploiting a second, defocused view of the same scene. The defocused stream suppresses the high frequencies that create moire while retaining the scene's color and low-frequency structure, so it provides a physical prior that tells the network which patterns are artifacts. After optical-flow alignment to handle displacement and occlusion, the defocused frame guides a multi-scale CNN that produces a demoireed frame, and a joint bilateral filter then uses that CNN output as a guide to filter the original focused frame, preserving detail and avoiding temporal flicker. The paper's experiments assert clear gains over existing single-camera image and video demoireing methods.

Load-bearing premise

The defocused video, after optical flow alignment, still matches the focused video closely enough in structure and color; if alignment fails on occluded or fast-moving regions, the defocused guide can blur the output or inject wrong colors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The defocused guide lets the network distinguish moire from real texture, which single-camera methods struggle to do because the two can look nearly identical.
  • The optical-flow alignment step makes the dual-camera idea practical for video, not just still images, by compensating for displacement and occlusion between the two streams.
  • The joint bilateral filter is what enforces tonal consistency and temporal coherence, so the output avoids the flicker and color shifts common in frame-by-frame demoireing.
  • If the reported gains hold, any camera system that can capture a slightly defocused second view could adopt this framework to improve video quality in moire-prone scenes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method is correct as claimed, one natural extension is to smartphone or cinema dual-lens rigs, where a defocused secondary sensor could be used live or in post to demoire footage with less texture loss than software-only approaches.
  • The method's dependence on optical flow alignment suggests that scenes with large parallax, heavy occlusion, or fast motion are the likely failure cases; a confidence-weighted fusion of the defocused guide might extend robustness there.
  • The defocused-view trick is a general principle: a physically altered second capture that suppresses the artifact class can serve as a prior for other removal tasks, such as glare, flicker, or sensor noise, not just moire.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a dual-camera video demoireing framework in which a synchronized defocused video is used as a guide for removing moiré from a focused video. The pipeline consists of optical-flow-based alignment between focused and defocused frames, a multi-scale CNN that uses the aligned defocused frame to guide demoireing, a multi-dimensional training loss, and a final joint bilateral filter that uses the CNN output as a guide to filter the original focused frame for tonal and temporal consistency. The abstract claims that experiments show the framework largely outperforms state-of-the-art image and video demoireing methods.

Significance. If validated, the proposed idea of using a physically defocused view as a moiré-free guide is a novel and plausible approach to the texture–moiré disambiguation problem, and the joint bilateral filter is a clever mechanism for preserving tonal consistency. The concept yields a concrete, testable prediction: a defocused guide improves demoireing quality over single-camera processing. However, the manuscript as provided is abstract-only; no dataset, metrics, baselines, architecture details, or experimental results are visible, so the significance is entirely conditional. The paper does not ship reproducible code, machine-checked proofs, or any falsifiable quantitative evidence in the current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, experimental results claim] The sentence "Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework largely outperforms state-of-the-art image and video demoireing methods" is unsupported by any visible evidence. The full text of the manuscript is blank, so there is no dataset description, no evaluation metrics, no baseline comparisons, and no implementation details. Because the claimed superiority over state-of-the-art is the central claim of the paper, this missing evidence is load-bearing and must be supplied.
  2. [Abstract, optical-flow alignment step] The optical-flow-based alignment between the focused and defocused views is a correctness risk: defocus blur intentionally suppresses high-frequency spatial structure, which is exactly the information most optical-flow methods rely on for correspondence. The abstract does not state whether the two cameras share a common optical path or have a stereo baseline, leaving open the possibility of parallax, occlusion, and large-displacement errors. A concrete analysis of alignment accuracy under occlusion and large displacement, along with an ablation that removes the defocused guide, is needed to support the claim that misalignment does not inject blur, ghosting, or wrong colors into the output.
  3. [Abstract, multi-scale CNN and training loss] The proposed method is described only at a high level: a multi-scale CNN, a multi-dimensional training loss, and a joint bilateral filter are mentioned, but no loss formulation, network architecture, training data, or hyperparameters are provided. This makes the method irreproducible from the manuscript and prevents assessment of whether the defocused guide is actually the source of any improvement. At minimum, the full paper must include the loss terms and an architecture figure.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Full text] The full text of the manuscript as submitted consists almost entirely of whitespace. This appears to be a submission error; a journal submission must contain the complete paper content, not merely an abstract.
  2. [Abstract, camera setup] The abstract does not specify whether the focused and defocused videos are captured through a common optical path or through two separate lenses, nor how synchronization is achieved. These details are essential for judging the practical feasibility and the expected magnitude of parallax and misalignment.
  3. [Abstract, wording] The phrase "largely outperforms" is vague; a revised paper should replace it with concrete quantitative results, including error bars or statistical significance tests, on standard demoireing benchmarks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dual-camera demoireing pipeline is an empirical method with no fitted-parameter prediction or self-citation-based derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical performance comparison: a dual-camera framework using a defocused guide, optical-flow alignment, a multi-scale CNN, a multi-dimensional training loss, and a joint bilateral filter is asserted to outperform existing single-camera demoireing methods on benchmark tasks. No equations are provided in the available text, so there is no derivation chain in which an output is shown to equal an input by construction. The defocused video is an external sensory input, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The multi-dimensional training loss may contain reconstruction terms relating output to input, but that is standard supervised learning and does not make the claimed performance comparison circular. The method is evaluated against external state-of-the-art methods rather than against its own fitted values. No self-citation is visible in the abstract, and no uniqueness theorem or prior-work premise is invoked to force the design. The skeptical concern about optical-flow reliability is a correctness or robustness risk, not a circularity: it challenges whether the method works, not whether the claim reduces to its inputs. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no free parameters or new entities. The key assumptions are about the behavior of defocused capture and the reliability of optical flow alignment.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Defocused capture significantly reduces moire patterns while preserving enough scene structure to serve as a guide.
    The abstract states this as the motivation for using the defocused video; it is essential for the framework to work.
  • domain assumption Optical flow can align focused and defocused frames well enough across displacement and occlusion.
    The pipeline begins with an optical flow based alignment step, so accurate alignment is assumed to be achievable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Video Demoireing using Focused-Defocused Dual-Camera System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2ARBFRR

@misc{pith2026250803449,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Video Demoireing using Focused-Defocused Dual-Camera System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2ARBFRR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03449}
}
read the original abstract

Moire patterns, unwanted color artifacts in images and videos, arise from the interference between spatially high-frequency scene contents and the spatial discrete sampling of digital cameras. Existing demoireing methods primarily rely on single-camera image/video processing, which faces two critical challenges: 1) distinguishing moire patterns from visually similar real textures, and 2) preserving tonal consistency and temporal coherence while removing moire artifacts. To address these issues, we propose a dual-camera framework that captures synchronized videos of the same scene: one in focus (retaining high-quality textures but may exhibit moire patterns) and one defocused (with significantly reduced moire patterns but blurred textures). We use the defocused video to help distinguish moire patterns from real texture, so as to guide the demoireing of the focused video. We propose a frame-wise demoireing pipeline, which begins with an optical flow based alignment step to address any discrepancies in displacement and occlusion between the focused and defocused frames. Then, we leverage the aligned defocused frame to guide the demoireing of the focused frame using a multi-scale CNN and a multi-dimensional training loss. To maintain tonal and temporal consistency, our final step involves a joint bilateral filter to leverage the demoireing result from the CNN as the guide to filter the input focused frame to obtain the final output. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework largely outperforms state-of-the-art image and video demoireing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nishioka, N

    K. Nishioka, N. Hasegawa, K. Ono, and Y. Tatsuno, ``Endoscope system provided with low-pass filter for moire removal,'' Feb. 15 2000, US Patent 6,025,873

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    o berl, W. Schnurrer, A. Oberd \

    M. Sch \"o berl, W. Schnurrer, A. Oberd \"o rster, S. F \"o el, and A. Kaup, ``Dimensioning of optical birefringent anti-alias filters for digital cameras,'' in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2010, pp. 4305--4308

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    P. Dai, X. Yu, L. Ma, B. Zhang, J. Li, W. Li, J. Shen, and X. Qi, ``Video demoireing with relation-based temporal consistency,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 17\,622--17\,631

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Menon and G

    D. Menon and G. Calvagno, ``Color image demosaicking: An overview,'' Signal Processing: Image Communication, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 518--533, 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Pekkucuksen and Y

    I. Pekkucuksen and Y. Altunbasak, ``Multiscale gradients-based color filter array interpolation,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 157--165, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Z. Wei, J. Wang, H. Nichol, S. Wiebe, and D. Chapman, ``A median-gaussian filtering framework for moir \'e pattern noise removal from x-ray microscopy image,'' Micron, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 170--176, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Siddiqui, M

    H. Siddiqui, M. Boutin, and C. A. Bouman, ``Hardware-friendly descreening,'' IEEE transactions on image processing, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 746--757, 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    J. Yang, X. Zhang, C. Cai, and K. Li, ``Demoir \'e ing for screen-shot images with multi-channel layer decomposition,'' in Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2017, pp. 1--4

    work page 2017

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Sun, Y. Yu, and W. Wang, ``Moiré photo restoration using multiresolution convolutional neural networks,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 4160--4172, 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    B. He, C. Wang, B. Shi, and L.-Y. Duan, ``Mop moire patterns using mopnet,'' in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019, pp. 2424--2432

    2019

  3. [11]

    Cheng, Z

    X. Cheng, Z. Fu, and J. Yang, ``Multi-scale dynamic feature encoding network for image demoir \'e ing,'' in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision(ICCV), 2019, pp. 3486--3493

    2019

  4. [12]

    T. Gao, Y. Guo, X. Zheng, Q. Wang, and X. Luo, ``Moir \'e pattern removal with multi-scale feature enhancing network,'' in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2019, pp. 240--245

    2019

  5. [13]

    Zheng, S

    B. Zheng, S. Yuan, G. Slabaugh, and A. Leonardis, ``Image demoireing with learnable bandpass filters,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 3636--3645

    2020

  6. [14]

    Zheng, S

    B. Zheng, S. Yuan, C. Yan, X. Tian, J. Zhang, Y. Sun, L. Liu, A. Leonardis, and G. Slabaugh, ``Learning frequency domain priors for image demoireing,'' IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 7705--7717, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    X. Yu, P. Dai, W. Li, L. Ma, J. Shen, J. Li, and X. Qi, ``Towards efficient and scale-robust ultra-high-definition image demoir \'e ing,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022, pp. 646--662

    2022

  8. [16]

    L. Liu, S. Yuan, J. Liu, L. Bao, G. Slabaugh, and Q. Tian, ``Self-adaptively learning to demoir\' e from focused and defocused image pairs,'' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 22\,282--22\,292

    2020

  9. [17]

    H. Yue, Y. Mao, L. Liang, H. Xu, C. Hou, and J. Yang, ``Recaptured screen image demoiréing,'' IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49--60, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    B. He, C. Wang, B. Shi, and L.-Y. Duan, ``Fhde2net: Full high definition demoireing network,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020, pp. 713--729

    2020

  11. [19]

    A. G. Vien, H. Park, and C. Lee, ``Dual-domain deep convolutional neural networks for image demoireing,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 3636--3645

    2020

  12. [20]

    L. Liu, J. Liu, S. Yuan, G. Slabaugh, A. Leonardis, W. Zhou, and Q. Tian, ``Wavelet-based dual-branch network for image demoir \'e ing,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2020, pp. 86--102

    2020

  13. [21]

    H. Yue, Y. Cheng, Y. Mao, C. Cao, and J. Yang, ``Recaptured screen image demoiréing in raw domain,'' IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 5589--5600, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    S. Liu, C. Li, N. Nan, Z. Zong, and R. Song, ``Mmdm: Multi-frame and multi-scale for image demoir \'e ing,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 434--435

    2020

  15. [23]

    B. Liu, X. Shu, and X. Wu, ``Demoir \' e ing of camera-captured screen images using deep convolutional neural network,'' CoRR, vol. abs/1804.03809, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. Yuan, R. Timofte, G. Slabaugh, and A. Leonardis, ``Aim 2019 challenge on image demoireing: Dataset and study,'' in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019, pp. 3526--3533

    2019

  17. [25]

    S. Yuan, R. Timofte, A. Leonardis, and G. Slabaugh, ``Ntire 2020 challenge on image demoireing: Methods and results,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 460--461

    2020

  18. [26]

    D. Niu, R. Guo, and Y. Wang, ``Mori\' e attack (ma): A new potential risk of screen photos,'' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, 2021, pp. 26\,117--26\,129

    2021

  19. [27]

    L. Liu, S. Yuan, J. Liu, X. Guo, Y. Yan, and Q. Tian, ``Siamtrans: Zero-shot multi-frame image restoration with pre-trained siamese transformers,'' in AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 2, 2022, pp. 1747--1755

    2022

  20. [28]

    D. Jeon, S. Baek, I. Choi, and M. Kim, ``Enhancing the spatial resolution of stereo images using a parallax prior,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), 2018, pp. 1721--1730

    2018

  21. [29]

    L. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Liang, Z. Lin, J. Yang, W. An, and Y. Guo, ``Learning parallax attention for stereo image super-resolution,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019, pp. 12\,242--12\,251

    2019

  22. [30]

    X. Dong, C. Liu, X. Hu, K. Xu, and W. Li, ``Spatially consistent transformer for colorization in monochrome-color dual-lens system,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 31, pp. 6747--6760, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    X. Dong, C. Liu, W. Li, X. Hu, X. Wang, and Y. Wang, ``Self-supervised colorization towards monochrome-color camera systems using cycle cnn,'' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 30, pp. 6609--6622, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Li, C.-W

    B. Li, C.-W. Lin, B. Shi, T. Huang, W. Gao, and C.-C. J. Kuo, ``Depth-aware stereo video retargeting,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), 2018, pp. 6517--6525

    2018

  25. [33]

    S. Zhou, J. Zhang, W. Zuo, H. Xie, J. Pan, and J. S. Ren, ``Davanet: Stereo deblurring with view aggregation,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019, pp. 10\,988--10\,997

    2019

  26. [34]

    J. Wang, T. Xue, J. T. Barron, and J. Chen, ``Stereoscopic dark flash for low-light photography,'' in IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP), 2019, pp. 1--10

    2019

  27. [35]

    L. Pan, Y. Dai, M. Liu, and F. M. Porikli, ``Simultaneous stereo video deblurring and scene flow estimation,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017, pp. 6987--6996

    2017

  28. [36]

    Huang, Q

    X. Huang, Q. Zhang, Y. Feng, H. Li, X. Wang, and Q. Wang, ``Hdr-nerf: High dynamic range neural radiance fields.'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 18\,398--18\,408

    2022

  29. [37]

    Mildenhall, P

    B. Mildenhall, P. Hedman, R. Martin-Brualla, P. Srinivasan, and J. Barron, ``Nerf in the dark: High dynamic range view synthesis from noisy raw images,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 16\,190--16\,199

    2022

  30. [38]

    Huang, X

    Z. Huang, X. Shi, C. Zhang, Q. Wang, K. C. Cheung, H. Qin, J. Dai, and H. Li, ``Flowformer: A transformer architecture for optical flow,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022, pp. 668--685

    2022

  31. [39]

    N. S. Nagaraja, P. Ochs, K. Liu, and T. Brox, ``Hierarchy of localized random forests for video annotation,'' in Pattern Recognition, A. Pinz, T. Pock, H. Bischof, and F. Leberl, Eds. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 21--30

    2012

  32. [40]

    Paris and F

    S. Paris and F. Durand, ``A fast approximation of the bilateral filter using a signal processing approach,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2006, pp. 568--580

    2006

  33. [41]

    Y. Song, C. Yang, Z. Lin, X. Liu, Q. Huang, H. Li, and C.-C. J. Kuo, ``Contextual-based image inpainting: Infer, match, and translate,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018, p. 3–18

    2018

  34. [42]

    Z. Tu, H. Talebi, H. Zhang, F. Yang, P. Milanfar, A. Bovik, and Y. Li, ``Maxim: Multi-axis mlp for image processing,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 5769--5780

    2022

  35. [43]

    Kang, J.-Y

    M. Kang, J.-Y. Zhu, R. Zhang, J. Park, E. Shechtman, S. Paris, and T. Park, ``Scaling up gans for text-to-image synthesis,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023, pp. 10\,124--10\,134

    2023

  36. [44]

    D. J. Butler, J. Wulff, G. B. Stanley, and M. J. Black, ``A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), A. Fitzgibbon, S. Lazebnik, P. Perona, Y. Sato, and C. Schmid, Eds. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em Berlin, He...

    2012

  37. [45]

    Bychkovsky, S

    V. Bychkovsky, S. Paris, E. Chan, and F. Durand, ``Learning photographic global tonal adjustment with a database of input/output image pairs,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011, pp. 97--104

    2011

  38. [46]

    D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, ``Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,'' in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015

    2015

  39. [47]

    Z. Wang, X. Cun, J. Bao, W. Zhou, J. Liu, and H. Li, ``Uformer: A general u-shaped transformer for image restoration,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022, pp. 17\,683--17\,693

    2022

  40. [48]

    Liang, J

    J. Liang, J. Cao, G. Sun, K. Zhang, L. Van Gool, and R. Timofte, ``Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer,'' in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 1833--1844

    2021

  41. [49]

    Godard, K

    C. Godard, K. Matzen, and M. Uyttendaele, ``Deep burst denoising,'' in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 538--554

    2018

  42. [50]

    Z. Xia, F. Perazzi, M. Gharbi, K. Sunkavalli, and A. Chakrabarti, ``Basis prediction networks for effective burst denoising with large kernels,'' in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 11\,844--11\,853

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.