REVIEW 4 cited by
Higgs production and decay: Analytic results at next-to-leading order QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The virtual two-loop corrections for Higgs production in gluon fusion are calculated analytically in QCD for arbitrary Higgs and quark masses. Both scalar and pseudo-scalar Higgs bosons are considered. The results are obtained by expanding the known one-dimensional integral representation in terms of m_H/m_q, and matching it with a suitably chosen ansatz of Harmonic Polylogarithms. This ansatz is motivated by the known analytic result for the Higgs decay rate into two photons. The method also allows us to check this result and to extend it to the pseudo-scalar decay rate.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Region analysis of $H\to \gamma \gamma $ via a bottom quark loop
A two-loop region analysis of H to gamma gamma via a bottom quark loop shows that with a Delta regulator and a transverse momentum cut, the leading and next-to-leading logarithms come entirely from the soft sector.
-
Three-loop form factors for Higgs boson pair production in the large top mass limit
New 1/m_t^2 expansion terms, up to 1/m_t^8 for the box form factors and 1/m_t^14 for the triangle form factor, are computed for the three-loop gg to HH amplitude.
-
Two-loop QCD corrections to $ H \rightarrow b + \bar{b} + g $ at higher powers in the dimensional regulator
Two-loop QCD corrections to H → b b-bar g amplitude computed at higher orders in ε via Lorentz projection.
-
{\tt ggxy}: a flexible library to compute gluon-induced cross sections
A new software library, ggxy, computes NLO QCD cross sections for gg to HH and reproduces previous exact results with much shorter runtimes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.