Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 97 references

Interplay of superconductivity and charge-density-wave order in kagome materials

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A charge-density wave forces superconductivity to inherit its broken symmetries, including an induced pair-density wave, in kagome materials.

desk verdict A careful, honest GL catalog of CDW-SC interplay in kagome metals; the algebra holds, the scoping is explicit, and the paper deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17818 v2 pith:X4AURQMD submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Sofie Castro Holb{ae}k , Mark H. Fischer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomemetalsAV3Sb5chargedensitywavesuperconductivitypairGinzburg-Landautheorytime-reversalsymmetrybreakingextendedpointgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

What if superconductivity is not free to choose its own symmetry when it develops inside a material that already breaks symmetries? This paper argues that in the kagome superconductors $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ ($A=$K, Rb, Cs), the charge-density wave (CDW) acts as a fixed background that forces the superconducting state to mimic its broken symmetries. Concretely, a CDW with wavevector $M_i$ induces a pair-density-wave (PDW) component $\eta_i = -\gamma \rho_i/(2 a_{\mathrm{PDW}})\eta$ proportional to the CDW component, and an imaginary (time-reversal-breaking) CDW induces a PDW with a $\pi/2$ phase shift. The result matters because it predicts observable signatures—anisotropic gaps, split superconducting transitions, and induced PDW order—that could settle the disputed pairing symmetry in these materials.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the extended point group $C''_{6v}$ of the kagome plane plus a Ginzburg-Landau free energy built from its irreducible representations. The group adds four three-dimensional irreps $F_1,\dots,F_4$ to the ordinary $C_{6v}$ irreps; these $F_n$ describe orders that break translation symmetry with the $2\times2$ unit cell, including the $M$-point CDWs and the $q=M$ PDWs. The paper writes down all scalar-invariant couplings between CDW order parameters $\rho_i$ and superconducting order parameters $\eta_i$, treating the CDW as a fixed experimental input, and minimizes the free energy to find which secondary superconducting orders are induced.

What would settle it

A phase-sensitive measurement of the superconducting gap in a kagome material with a known $2\times2$ CDW would settle it: if the CDW breaks time-reversal symmetry and no PDW component with wavevector $M_i$ and a $\pm\pi/2$ phase shift appears in the superconducting state, the mimicry mechanism is ruled out. Conversely, a clean crystal whose CDW is known to be nematic should show a split superconducting transition for two-component pairing; a single sharp transition would contradict the predicted lifting of the degeneracy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the symmetry of the superconducting ground state in the presence of a $2\times2$ CDW is not an independent choice: it is inherited from the CDW. Building a Ginzburg-Landau free energy on the extended point group $C''_{6v}$ of the CDW-enlarged unit cell, the paper shows that every homogeneous superconducting order—$s$-wave, $d$-wave, or other—couples linearly to a PDW order with the same wavevector as the CDW, giving the induced component of Eq. (14). For a time-reversal-breaking (imaginary) flux CDW, the induced PDW is shifted by $\pm\pi/2$, Eq. (18), so the superconducting state becomes time-reversal-breaking even when the primary pairing channel is not. For a two-component order such as $d$-wave, an anisotropic or imaginary CDW lifts the degeneracy and can split the transition into a time-reversal-symmetric anisotropic phase followed by a time-reversal-broken phase. When a PDW itself is the leading instability, an isotropic CDW frustrates the phase relations among its components and can drive a chiral $3Q$ PDW that breaks time-reversal symmetry spontaneously.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes a single two-dimensional kagome layer with negligible spin-orbit coupling, and it treats the charge-density wave as a fixed external background rather than as an order that can respond to superconductivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An $s$-wave superconductor on a CDW background is generically accompanied by an induced PDW with the same wavevector as the CDW, so a purely isotropic gap is not the full story.
  • A nematic or structurally chiral CDW imprints its anisotropy and chirality onto the induced PDW, giving a concrete spatial structure to look for in scanning probes.
  • If the CDW breaks time-reversal symmetry (flux order), the superconducting state inherits that breaking through a $\pm\pi/2$ phase-shifted PDW component, even for a single-component pairing channel.
  • For a two-component $d$-wave order, an anisotropic CDW splits the superconducting transition: the first transition enters a time-reversal-symmetric anisotropic state and time-reversal breaking appears only at a lower temperature.
  • A dominant PDW on an isotropic CDW can be frustrated into a chiral $3Q$ PDW, spontaneously breaking time-reversal symmetry even when the CDW itself is time-reversal-symmetric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If spin-orbit coupling or interlayer coupling turns out to be substantial in real $A$V$_3$Sb$_5$ crystals, the specific irrep labels and the induced-PDW table would need re-derivation, but the qualitative mimicry mechanism—superconductivity adapting to whatever symmetries the CDW breaks—should survive.
  • The framework suggests a targeted experiment: in a crystal where the CDW is known to be nematic, specific-heat or penetration-depth measurements should resolve two separated superconducting transitions for a two-component order parameter; observing one clean transition would disfavor this mechanism.
  • Treating the CDW as fixed neglects back-action from superconductivity on the CDW; including that feedback could renormalize the CDW amplitude near $T_c$ and might change the quantitative size of the induced PDW components.
  • The same symmetry logic applies to any system where a density wave pre-exists superconductivity, not only kagome metals—for example, cuprates with stripe order—so the induced-PDW formula offers a phenomenological bridge between those families.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Ginzburg-Landau theory for the coexistence of a 2x2 commensurate CDW and superconductivity in a single kagome layer, using the extended point group C6v''' and treating the CDW as a fixed field. It classifies q=0 superconducting order parameters in one-dimensional (A1, etc.) and two-dimensional (E2) irreps, and PDW order parameters in the three-dimensional Fn irreps. For dominant homogeneous superconductivity, it derives induced PDW components proportional to CDW components (Eq. 14), a pi/2 phase shift for an imaginary CDW (Eq. 18), and couplings that can split the E2 transition and induce TRSB. For dominant PDW order, it derives a phase diagram with 1Q, 3Q TRS, 2Q TRSB, and 3Q chiral phases and shows how an isotropic CDW can frustrate phase locking and stabilize a chiral 3Q PDW. The central claim is that the superconducting state inherits, or 'mimics', the broken rotational and time-reversal symmetries of the CDW, and that this can resolve the conflicting experimental pictures for AV3Sb5.

Significance. The framework is a useful synthesis of symmetry arguments: it gathers the CDW and pairing classifications in one place, gives explicit free energies and minimizations, and produces falsifiable predictions (induced PDW with the same wave vectors as the CDW, a pi/2 phase shift for an iCDW, split superconducting transitions for anisotropic CDWs, and frustration-induced chiral PDW order). The derivation is transparent and mostly follows from standard Landau rules and published decompositions, and the limitations (two-dimensional layer, no spin-orbit coupling, fixed CDW) are stated clearly. If the conjugation issue in Eqs. (26)-(27) is corrected, the paper will be a reliable reference for future microscopic and experimental work on AV3Sb5.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section III.B, Eqs. (24)-(27)] There is a conjugation inconsistency in the induced-PDW formulas. Minimizing the free energy in Eq. (24) with respect to eta_i^* gives eta_1 proportional to rho_1(eta_E2,1^* - sqrt(3) eta_E2,2^*), not rho_1(eta_E2,1 - sqrt(3) eta_E2,2) as written in Eq. (26); the same issue affects Eq. (27), where the complex-conjugated E2 components should appear. Consequently, the phase formula for an isotropic CDW with the chiral d-wave state eta_E2 = |eta|(1,i)^T stated after Eq. (27) should have the opposite sign in the exponent (e^{+2pi i/3(j-1/2)}) if the convention for eta_E2 is kept. Because the handedness of the induced chiral PDW is a concrete prediction, this should be corrected before publication; the qualitative mimicry conclusion is not affected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV.A, after Eq. (29)] The statement that only an F1 rCDW and an F2' flux order allow a third-order coupling to the PDW is not derived in the text; please give the relevant product decomposition or a specific reference to App. A/Ref. [70] to make this point self-contained.
  2. [Eq. (30)] The notation sum_{i != j != k} is ambiguous because it does not specify whether ordered triples of pairwise distinct indices are summed; if the intended sum is over all ordered distinct triples, the term is double-counted, so please define the sum explicitly (e.g., as a cyclic sum over i, j, k).
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The parameter kappa m2 used in the caption is not defined; clarify that it is the product of the coupling kappa in Eq. (23) and the coefficient m2 in Eq. (7), or state the value of the combination kappa M_z used in the calculation.
  4. [Eq. (28)] The b3 term contains two factors of 1/2 before the bracket; this is a valid convention but should be specified once so that the reader can reproduce the phase diagram in Fig. 6 without ambiguity.
  5. [Section III.A around Eq. (17) and after Eq. (27)] The symbol rho' is used both for the full three-component flux order parameter and for the common amplitude in the isotropic example rho'=i rho'(1,1,1); please disambiguate the vector and scalar notations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the paper's predictions are symmetry-derived consequences of explicitly stated assumptions.

full rationale

The paper derives a Ginzburg-Landau free energy from stated symmetry assumptions: a two-dimensional kagome layer, point group C6v, extended point group C'''6v for the 2x2 unit cell, no spin-orbit coupling, and the CDW treated as a fixed effective field informed by experiment. The central induced-PDW results (Eqs. 14, 16, 18, 26, 27) follow by direct minimization of quadratic plus lowest-order coupling terms with temperature-independent coefficients. No experimental data are fitted, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The irrep classification and product decompositions (App. A, Tabs. II–III) are mathematical group-theory facts that the paper reproduces; citations to Refs. 68–70 are pointers to prior derivations, not assumed versions of the target conclusion. The 'mimicry' statements are one-way consequences of writing down all symmetry-allowed couplings: the CDW is an input, and the superconducting response is derived from it, so there is no definitional equivalence between input and output. The stated limitations (2D layer, no SOC, fixed CDW) are scoping choices that affect which irrep table applies, not circular reductions. No circular step is identifiable by the paper's own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not fit any experimental data; its content is a symmetry-allowed Ginzburg-Landau expansion. The free parameters are the undetermined GL coefficients, used only for illustrative phase diagrams. The axioms are the standard assumptions of Landau theory plus the modeling choices: 2D layer, no spin-orbit coupling, and a frozen CDW background. No new entities, particles, or forces are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • GL coefficients for homogeneous SC sector (a0, b, beta, mu, gamma, nu, gamma') = Not fitted
    Phenomenological constants in Eqs. (8)-(19); qualitative conclusions do not depend on their values.
  • E2-sector coefficients (aE2,0, b1, b2, beta1, beta2, kappa, delta/rho) = Fig. 5: aE2,0=1, b1=1, b2=0.8, beta1=0.025, beta2=-0.5, kappa*m2=-0.5, delta/rho=2/7, |rho|=1
    Chosen to produce the illustrative transition-splitting plot; not fitted to experimental data.
  • PDW-sector coefficients (aPDW,0, b1, b2, b3, gammaPDW, beta2, beta3) = Fig. 8: aPDW,0=1, b1=1, b2=-1, b3=0 or -0.1, gammaPDW=0.5, beta2=0.2, beta3=0.1
    Chosen for the illustrative frustration phase diagram; not fit to experiment.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The kagome plane without spin-orbit coupling has C6v point-group symmetry; with a 2x2 CDW, the relevant symmetry is the extended point group C6v with three-dimensional irreps F1 to F4.
    Invoked at the start of Section II.A to classify all CDW and superconducting order parameters; relies on the character table in App. A and Refs. [68,70].
  • domain assumption The CDW is commensurate, in-plane 2x2, with wavevectors q = M_i, and only homogeneous (q=0) superconductivity and PDWs with q = M_i are considered.
    Stated in Section I: the 2x2 enlargement is consistent with X-ray studies, and other periodicities are excluded.
  • domain assumption The CDW is treated as an effective external field set by experiments, not minimized together with the superconducting order.
    Section II.B.2: 'we treat the CDW as an effective field: not as a free parameter of the GL free energy to be minimized for, but rather as an input informed by experiments'.
  • domain assumption Only the quadratic term of the dominant order parameter carries the temperature dependence; all other GL coefficients are temperature-independent.
    Standard Landau assumption stated in Section III.A before Eq. (8).
  • standard math An invariant GL term for complex superconducting order parameters requires A1 in the decomposition of (⊗nΓ)_S ⊗ (⊗nΓ*)_S, and the free energy must be invariant under C6v and time reversal.
    Construction rules in Section II.B.2; this is the group-theoretic backbone of every allowed coupling.
  • standard math The symmetrized product decompositions in Table III, including (Fn⊗Fn)_S = A1⊕E2⊕F1 and the third/fourth power decompositions, are correct.
    Appendix A, Table III; these decompositions generate the coupling terms such as Eqs. (5), (13), and (29).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Interplay of superconductivity and charge-density-wave order in kagome materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X4AURQMD

@misc{pith2026241117818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Interplay of superconductivity and charge-density-wave order in kagome materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X4AURQMD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17818}
}
abstract

In the $\textit{A}$V$_{3}$Sb$_{5}$ ($\textit{A}$ $=$ K, Rb, Cs) kagome materials, superconductivity coexists with a charge density wave (CDW), constituting a new platform to study the interplay of these two orders. Despite extensive research, the symmetry of the superconducting order parameter remains disputed, with experiments seemingly supporting different conclusions. As key aspects of the physics might lie in the intertwining of electronic orders, a better understanding of the impact of the CDW on superconductivity is crucial. In this work, we develop a phenomenological framework to study the interplay of superconductivity and CDW order. In particular, we derive a Ginzburg-Landau free energy for both superconducting and CDW order parameters. Given the unclear nature of the superconducting state, we discuss general pairing symmetries with a focus on $s$-wave, $d$-wave, and pair-density-wave order parameters. Motivated by experiments, we consider the additional breaking of time-reversal or point-group symmetries of the CDW and determine in detail the consequences for the superconducting state. Our results show how the superconducting state mimics the broken symmetries of the CDW and can guide future microscopic calculations, as well as the experimental identification of the superconducting state in the $\textit{A}$V$_{3}$Sb$_{5}$ compounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17818 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The kagome lattice and the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Effect of a charge density wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Illustration of the induced orders from a homo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The effect of CDW coupling on a two-component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Phase diagram of the pair density waves that mini [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Real-space illustration of the stable PDW phases of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase diagram showing the transition from the frus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [61]

    X. Lin, J. Huang, and T. Zhou, Impact of charge density waves on superconductivity and topological properties in kagome superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    GL free energy for charge orders The main requirement for a GL free energy is that it transforms as a scalar, in other words as A1 in C′′′ 6v, and conserves time-reversal symmetry. A quadratic term in the free energy for a given irrep Γ is thus allowed if the symmetrized product of Γ, which we denote as (Γ⊗Γ)S in the following, contains A1 in its decompos...

  3. [2]

    Since the free energy has to be invariant under the U(1) (gauge) symmetry, it cannot depend on the order parameter’s phase

    GL free energy for superconducting orders When considering superconducting order parameters, the main difference to either the purely real or imaginary order parameters considered so far is that the supercon- ducting order parameter is a complex quantity. Since the free energy has to be invariant under the U(1) (gauge) symmetry, it cannot depend on the or...

  4. [3]

    Chang, E

    J. Chang, E. Blackburn, A. T. Holmes, N. B. Chris- tensen, J. Larsen, J. Mesot, R. Liang, D. A. Bonn, W. N. Hardy, A. Watenphul, M. v. Zimmermann, E. M. Forgan, and S. M. Hayden, Direct observation of competition be- tween superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67, Nature Physics 8, 871 (2012)

    2012

  5. [4]

    K. Cho, M. Ko´ nczykowski, S. Teknowijoyo, M. A. Tanatar, J. Guss, P. B. Gartin, J. M. Wilde, A. Kreyssig, R. J. McQueeney, A. I. Goldman, V. Mishra, P. J. Hirschfeld, and R. Prozorov, Using controlled disorder to probe the interplay between charge order and super- conductivity in NbSe 2, Nature Communications 9, 2796 (2018)

    2018

  6. [5]

    A. F. Kusmartseva, B. Sipos, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, and E. Tutiˇ s, Pressure Induced Superconductivity in Pristine 1T−TiSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 236401 (2009)

    2009

  7. [6]

    D. C. Freitas, P. Rodi` ere, M. R. Osorio, E. Navarro- Moratalla, N. M. Nemes, V. G. Tissen, L. Cario, 13 Irrep Components Symmetric superposition F1 F1,1 F1,2 F1,3 F3 F3,1 F3,2 F3,3 F4 F4,1 F4,2 F4,3 TABLE IV. Real space illustrations of on-site pairing states on the kagome lattice which break translational symmetry. The color (red/blue) denotes the sign...

    2016

  8. [7]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Collo- quium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457 (2015)

    2015

Show all 97 references
  1. [8]

    M. H. Hamidian, S. D. Edkins, S. H. Joo, A. Kostin, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. J. Lawler, E. A. Kim, A. P. Mackenzie, K. Fujita, J. Lee, and J. C. S. Davis, Detec- tion of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x, Nature 532, 343 (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    Z. Du, H. Li, S. H. Joo, E. P. Donoway, J. Lee, J. C. S. Davis, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, and K. Fujita, Imaging the Energy Gap Modulations of the Cuprate Pair-Density- Wave State, Nature 580, 65 (2020)

    2020

  3. [10]

    X. Liu, Y. X. Chong, R. Sharma, and J. C. S. Davis, Discovery of a Cooper-pair Density Wave State in a Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide, Science 372, 1447 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Q. Gu, J. P. Carroll, S. Wang, S. Ran, C. Broyles, H. Sid- diquee, N. P. Butch, S. R. Saha, J. Paglione, J. C. S. Davis, and X. Liu, Detection of a pair density wave state in UTe2, Nature 618, 921 (2023)

    2023

  5. [12]

    Y. Liu, T. Wei, G. He, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, Pair Density Wave State in a Monolayer High-Tc Iron- Based Superconductor, Nature 618, 934 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    H. Zhao, R. Blackwell, M. Thinel, T. Handa, S. Ishida, X. Zhu, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, A. N. Pasupathy, and K. Fu- jita, Smectic Pair-Density-Wave Order in EuRbFe 4As4, Nature 618, 940 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski, M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wil- son, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. To- berer, New kagome prototype materials: discovery of KV3Sb5, RbV3Sb5, and CsV 3Sb5, P...

    2019

  8. [15]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, Y. Hu, J. L. Zuo, P. M. Sarte, E. C. Schueller, A. M. M. Abeykoon, M. J. Krogstad, S. Rosenkranz, R. Osborn, R. Seshadri, L. Ba- lents, J. He, and S. D. Wilson, CsV 3Sb5: A Z2 Topologi- cal Kagome Metal with a Superconducting Ground State, Phys. ...

    2020

  9. [16]

    Uykur, B

    E. Uykur, B. R. Ortiz, O. Iakutkina, M. Wenzel, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, and A. A. Tsirlin, Low-energy optical properties of the nonmagnetic kagome metal CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045130 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Uykur, B

    E. Uykur, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, and A. A. Tsirlin, Optical detection of the density-wave in- stability in the kagome metal KV3Sb5, npj Quantum Ma- terials 7, 16 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    Wenzel, B

    M. Wenzel, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, A. A. Tsirlin, and E. Uykur, Optical study of RbV3Sb5: Multi- ple density-wave gaps and phonon anomalies, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245123 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    Jiang, J.-X

    Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, M. M. Denner, N. Shumiya, B. R. Ortiz, G. Xu, Z. Guguchia, J. He, M. S. Hossain, X. Liu, J. Ruff, L. Kautzsch, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, I. Belopol- ski, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Thomale, T. Ne...

    2021

  13. [20]

    Kautzsch, B

    L. Kautzsch, B. R. Ortiz, K. Mallayya, J. Plumb, G. Pokharel, J. P. C. Ruff, Z. Islam, E.-A. Kim, R. Se- shadri, and S. D. Wilson, Structural evolution of the kagome superconductors AV3Sb5 (A = K, Rb, and Cs) through charge density wave order, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 024806 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Frassineti, P

    J. Frassineti, P. Bonf` a, G. Allodi, E. Garcia, R. Cong, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, R. De Renzi, V. F. Mitrovi´ c, and S. Sanna, Microscopic nature of the charge-density wave in the kagome superconductor RbV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012017 (2023)

    2023

  15. [22]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, J. Yoo, B. R. Ortiz, Y. M. Oey, J. Choi, S. H. Ryu, J. Kim, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, S. D. Wil- son, J.-H. Park, and R. Comin, Charge order landscape and competition with superconductivity in kagome met- als, Nature...

    2023

  16. [23]

    Stahl, D

    Q. Stahl, D. Chen, T. Ritschel, C. Shekhar, E. Sadrollahi, M. C. Rahn, O. Ivashko, M. v. Zimmermann, C. Felser, and J. Geck, Temperature-driven reorganization of elec- tronic order in CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B 105, 195136 15 Irrep Components Symmetric superposition F1 F1,1 F1,2 F...

    2022

  17. [24]

    Y. Hu, X. Wu, B. R. Ortiz, X. Han, N. C. Plumb, S. D. Wilson, A. P. Schnyder, and M. Shi, Coexistence of tri- hexagonal and star-of-David pattern in the charge den- sity wave of the kagome superconductor AV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B 106, L241106 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Q. Xiao, Y. Lin, Q. Li, X. Zheng, S. Francoual, C. Plueck- thun, W. Xia, Q. Qiu, S. Zhang, Y. Guo, J. Feng, and Y. Peng, Coexistence of multiple stacking charge density waves in kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012032 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Shumiya, M

    N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, B. R. Ortiz, H. Liu, Y. Shi, Q. Yin, H. Lei, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Zhang, T. A. Cochran, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, Z. Guguchia, S. D. Wilson, and M. Z. Hasan, Intrinsic nature of chi- ral charge or...

    2021

  20. [27]

    Wang, Y.-X

    Z. Wang, Y.-X. Jiang, J.-X. Yin, Y. Li, G.-Y. Wang, H.-L. Huang, S. Shao, J. Liu, P. Zhu, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, H. Liu, Y. Shi, J. Duan, X. Li, G. Chang, P. Dai, Z. Ye, G. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Zheng, J. Jia, M. Z. Hasan, and Y. Yao, Electronic nature of chiral charge order in ...

    2021

  21. [28]

    Y. Xing, S. Bae, E. Ritz, F. Yang, T. Birol, A. N. Capa Salinas, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, Z. Wang, R. M. Fernandes, and V. Madhavan, Optical Manipula- tion of the Charge-Density-Wave State in RbV 3Sb5, Na- ture 631, 60 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    Y. Xu, Z. Ni, Y. Liu, B. R. Ortiz, Q. Deng, S. D. Wil- son, B. Yan, L. Balents, and L. Wu, Three-state nematic- ity and magneto-optical Kerr effect in the charge density waves in kagome superconductors, Nature Physics 18, 1470 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    Mielke, D

    C. Mielke, D. Das, J. X. Yin, H. Liu, R. Gupta, Y. X. Jiang, M. Medarde, X. Wu, H. C. Lei, J. Chang, P. Dai, Q. Si, H. Miao, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, Y. Shi, R. Khasanov, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Time-reversal symmetry-breaking charge order in a kagome superco...

    2022

  24. [31]

    Khasanov, D

    R. Khasanov, D. Das, R. Gupta, C. Mielke, M. Elender, Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, H. Lei, E. T. Ritz, R. M. Fer- nandes, T. Birol, Z. Guguchia, and H. Luetkens, Time- reversal symmetry broken by charge order in CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023244 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    Guguchia, C

    Z. Guguchia, C. Mielke, D. Das, R. Gupta, J. X. Yin, H. Liu, Q. Yin, M. H. Christensen, Z. Tu, C. Gong, N. Shumiya, M. S. Hossain, T. Gamsakhurdashvili, M. Elender, P. Dai, A. Amato, Y. Shi, H. C. Lei, R. M. Fernandes, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and R. Khasanov, Tunable unconve...

    2023

  26. [33]

    H. Li, H. Zhao, B. R. Ortiz, T. Park, M. Ye, L. Ba- lents, Z. Wang, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Rotation symmetry breaking in the normal state of a kagome su- perconductor KV 3Sb5, Nature Physics 18, 265 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    H. Li, S. Wan, H. Li, Q. Li, Q. Gu, H. Yang, Y. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, and H.-H. Wen, No observation of chiral flux current in the topological kagome metal CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B 105, 045102 (2022)

    2022

  28. [35]

    D. R. Saykin, C. Farhang, E. D. Kountz, D. Chen, B. R. Ortiz, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, S. D. Wilson, R. Thomale, J. Xia, and A. Kapitulnik, High Resolution Polar Kerr Effect Studies of CsV 3Sb5: Tests for Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking below the Charge-Order Transition, Phys. R...

    2023

  29. [36]

    J. Wang, C. Farhang, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, and J. Xia, Resolving the discrepancy between MOKE mea- surements at 1550-nm wavelength on kagome metal CsV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 014202 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    C. Guo, G. Wagner, C. Putzke, D. Chen, K. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, Correlated order at the tipping point in the kagome metal CsV3Sb5, Nature Physics 20, 579 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, E. M. Kenney, M. J. Graf, S. M. L. Teicher, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Super- conductivity in the Z2 kagome metal KV 3Sb5, Physical Review Materials 5, 034801 (2021)

    2021

  32. [39]

    Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, Y. Fu, S. Yan, and H. Lei, Su- perconductivity and Normal-State Properties of Kagome Metal RbV3Sb5 Single Crystals, Chinese Physics Letters 38, 037403 (2021)

    2021

  33. [40]

    W. Duan, Z. Nie, S. Luo, F. Yu, B. R. Ortiz, L. Yin, H. Su, F. Du, A. Wang, Y. Chen, X. Lu, J. Ying, S. D. Wilson, X. Chen, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Node- less superconductivity in the kagome metal CsV3Sb5, Sci- ence China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64, 107462 (2021)

    2021

  34. [41]

    Roppongi, K

    M. Roppongi, K. Ishihara, Y. Tanaka, K. Ogawa, K. Okada, S. Liu, K. Mukasa, Y. Mizukami, Y. Uwa- toko, R. Grasset, M. Konczykowski, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, K. Hashimoto, and T. Shibauchi, Bulk evidence of anisotropic s-wave pairing with no sign change in the kagome supercon...

    2023

  35. [42]

    Zhong, J

    Y. Zhong, J. Liu, X. Wu, Z. Guguchia, J. X. Yin, A. Mine, Y. Li, S. Najafzadeh, D. Das, C. Mielke, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, T. Suzuki, K. Liu, X. Han, T. Kondo, J. Hu, S. Shin, Z. Wang, X. Shi, Y. Yao, and K. Okazaki, Nodeless electron pairing in CsV 3Sb5- derived kagome supe...

    2023

  36. [43]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Liu, L. Wang, C. W. Tsang, Z. Wang, S. T. Lam, W. Wang, J. Xie, X. Zhou, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, J. Tallon, K. T. Lai, and S. K. Goh, Nodeless Supercon- ductivity in Kagome Metal CsV 3Sb5 with and without Time Reversal Symmetry Breaking, Nano Letters23, 872 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    M. S. Hossain, Q. Zhang, E. S. Choi, D. Ratkovski, B. L¨ uscher, Y. Li, Y.-X. Jiang, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, J.-X. Yin, T. A. Cochran, B. Casas, B. Kim, X. Yang, J. Liu, Y. Yao, A. Bangura, Z. Wang, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, L. Balicas, and M. Z. Hasan, Uncon- ventional g...

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Gupta, D

    R. Gupta, D. Das, C. H. Mielke III, Z. Guguchia, T. Shiroka, C. Baines, M. Bartkowiak, H. Luetkens, R. Khasanov, Q. Yin, Z. Tu, C. Gong, and H. Lei, Micro- scopic evidence for anisotropic multigap superconductiv- ity in the CsV 3Sb5 kagome superconductor, npj Quan- tum Materia...

    2022

  39. [46]

    Z. Shan, P. K. Biswas, S. K. Ghosh, T. Tula, A. D. Hillier, D. Adroja, S. Cottrell, G.-H. Cao, Y. Liu, X. Xu, Y. Song, H. Yuan, and M. Smidman, Muon spin relaxation study of the layered kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033145 (2022)

    2022

  40. [47]

    Xu, Y.-J

    H.-S. Xu, Y.-J. Yan, R. Yin, W. Xia, S. Fang, Z. Chen, Y. Li, W. Yang, Y. Guo, and D.-L. Feng, Multiband Su- perconductivity with Sign-Preserving Order Parameter in Kagome Superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 187004 (2021)

    2021

  41. [48]

    A. Mine, Y. Zhong, J. Liu, T. Suzuki, S. Najafzadeh, T. Uchiyama, J.-X. Yin, X. Wu, X. Shi, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, and K. Okazaki, Direct observation of anisotropic Cooper pairing in kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5 (2024), arXiv:2404.18472 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2024

  42. [49]

    H. Deng, H. Qin, G. Liu, T. Yang, R. Fu, Z. Zhang, X. Wu, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Liu, H. Liu, X.-Y. Yan, W. Song, X. Xu, Y. Zhao, M. Yi, G. Xu, H. Hohmann, S. C. Holbæk, M. D¨ urrnagel, S. Zhou, G. Chang, Y. Yao, Q. Wang, Z. Guguchia, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, M. H. Fischer, and J....

    2024

  43. [50]

    X.-Y. Yan, H. Deng, T. Yang, G. Liu, W. Song, H. Miao, Z. T. H. Lei, S. Wang, B.-C. Lin, H. Qin, and J.-X. Yin, Chiral Pair Density Waves with Residual Fermi Arcs in RbV3Sb5, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 097401 (2024). 17

    2024

  44. [51]

    Yu and J.-X

    S.-L. Yu and J.-X. Li, Chiral Superconducting Phase and Chiral Spin-Density-Wave Phase in a Hubbard Model on the Kagome Lattice, Physical Review B 85, 144402 (2012)

    2012

  45. [52]

    Wang, Z.-Z

    W.-S. Wang, Z.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Xiang, and Q.-H. Wang, Competing Electronic Orders on Kagome Lattices at van Hove Filling, Physical Review B 87, 115135 (2013)

    2013

  46. [53]

    M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, and R. Thomale, Unconven- tional Fermi Surface Instabilities in the Kagome Hubbard Model, Physical Review Letters 110, 126405 (2013)

    2013

  47. [54]

    X. Wu, T. Schwemmer, T. M¨ uller, A. Consiglio, G. San- giovanni, D. Di Sante, Y. Iqbal, W. Hanke, A. P. Schny- der, M. M. Denner, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Nature of unconventional pairing in the kagome superconductors AV 3Sb5 (A=K,Rb,Cs), Physi- cal Review L...

    2021

  48. [55]

    C. Wen, X. Zhu, Z. Xiao, N. Hao, R. Mondaini, H. Guo, and S. Feng, Superconducting pairing symmetry in the kagome-lattice Hubbard model, Physical Review B 105, 075118 (2022)

    2022

  49. [56]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, S. Onari, and H. Kontani, Mechanism of Exotic Density-Wave and beyond-Migdal Unconventional Superconductivity in Kagome Metal AV3Sb5 (A = K, Rb, Cs), Science Advances 8, eabl4108 (2022)

    2022

  50. [57]

    A. T. Rømer, S. Bhattacharyya, R. Valent´ ı, M. H. Chris- tensen, and B. M. Andersen, Superconductivity from re- pulsive interactions on the kagome lattice, Physical Re- view B 106, 174514 (2022)

    2022

  51. [58]

    E. T. Ritz, H. S. Røising, M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Superconduc- tivity from orbital-selective electron-phonon coupling in AV3Sb5, Phys. Rev. B 108, L100510 (2023)

    2023

  52. [59]

    Jiang, M.-X

    H.-M. Jiang, M.-X. Liu, and S.-L. Yu, Impact of the or- bital current order on the superconducting properties of the kagome superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 107, 064506 (2023)

    2023

  53. [60]

    Jiang, M

    H.-M. Jiang, M. Mao, Z.-Y. Miao, S.-L. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Interplay between Chiral Charge Density Wave and Superconductivity in Kagome Superconductors Studied by Self-Consistent Mean-Field Theory, Physical Review B 109, 104512 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    H.-J. Yang, H. S. Kim, M. Y. Jeong, Y. B. Kim, M. J. Han, and S. Lee, Intertwining orbital current order and superconductivity in kagome metal, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 008 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    M. Yao, Y. Wang, D. Wang, J.-X. Yin, and Q.-H. Wang, Self-consistent theory of 2 × 2 pair density waves in kagome superconductors (2024), arXiv:2408.03056 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    H. Zhao, H. Li, B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, T. Park, M. Ye, Z. Wang, L. Balents, S. D. Wilson, and I. Zeljkovic, Cascade of correlated electron states in the kagome superconductor CsV 3Sb5, Nature 599, 216 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    H. Li, D. Oh, M. Kang, H. Zhao, B. R. Ortiz, Y. Oey, S. Fang, Z. Ren, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, J. G. Checkelsky, Z. Wang, S. D. Wilson, R. Comin, and I. Zeljkovic, Small Fermi Pockets Intertwined with Charge Stripes and Pair Density Wave Order in a Kagome Superco...

    2023

  58. [66]

    H. Chen, H. Yang, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, J. Yuan, Y. Xing, G. Qian, Z. Huang, G. Li, Y. Ye, S. Ma, S. Ni, H. Zhang, Q. Yin, C. Gong, Z. Tu, H. Lei, H. Tan, S. Zhou, C. Shen, X. Dong, B. Yan, Z. Wang, and H.-J. Gao, Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconduc- tor,...

    2021

  59. [67]

    H. Li, T. T. Zhang, T. Yilmaz, Y. Y. Pai, C. E. Marvin- ney, A. Said, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, E. Vescovo, C. S. Nelson, R. G. Moore, S. Murakami, H. C. Lei, H. N. Lee, B. J. Lawrie, and H. Miao, Observation of Uncon- ventional Charge Density Wave without Acoustic Phon...

    2021

  60. [68]

    B. R. Ortiz, S. M. L. Teicher, L. Kautzsch, P. M. Sarte, N. Ratcliff, J. Harter, J. P. C. Ruff, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Fermi Surface Mapping and the Nature of Charge-Density-Wave Order in the Kagome Supercon- ductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041030 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    H. Li, G. Fabbris, A. H. Said, J. P. Sun, Y.-X. Jiang, J. X. Yin, Y.-Y. Pai, S. Yoon, A. R. Lupini, C. S. Nel- son, Q. W. Yin, C. S. Gong, Z. J. Tu, H. C. Lei, J. G. Cheng, M. Z. Hasan, Z. Wang, B. Yan, R. Thomale, H. N. Lee, and H. Miao, Discovery of conjoined charge density ...

    2022

  62. [70]

    J. W. F. Venderbos, Symmetry analysis of translational symmetry broken density waves: Application to hexago- nal lattices in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 93, 115107 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    S. C. Holbæk, M. H. Christensen, A. Kreisel, and B. M. Andersen, Unconventional superconductivity protected from disorder on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 108, 144508 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Wagner, C

    G. Wagner, C. Guo, P. J. W. Moll, T. Neupert, and M. H. Fischer, Phenomenology of bond and flux orders in kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125136 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Loop currents in AV3Sb5 kagome metals: Multipolar and toroidal magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144504 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    M. H. Christensen, T. Birol, B. M. Andersen, and R. M. Fernandes, Theory of the charge density wave inAV3Sb5 kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B 104, 214513 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    T. Park, M. Ye, and L. Balents, Electronic instabilities of kagome metals: Saddle points and Landau theory, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035142 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    The convention used for these mirrors then fixes the irreps B1,B2,F3 andF4

    Note that the assignment of mirrors σv andσd relative to the lattice is not unique. The convention used for these mirrors then fixes the irreps B1,B2,F3 andF4. Further- more, in the notation of Ref. 71, theFn irreps correspond to, respectively: F1∼ M + 1 , F2∼ M + 2 , F3∼ M− 4...

  69. [77]

    Ratcliff, L

    N. Ratcliff, L. Hallett, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, and J. W. Harter, Coherent phonon spectroscopy and inter- layer modulation of charge density wave order in the kagome metal CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, L111801 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Schwemmer, H

    T. Schwemmer, H. Hohmann, M. D¨ urrnagel, J. Potten, J. Beyer, S. Rachel, Y.-M. Wu, S. Raghu, T. M¨ uller, W. Hanke, and R. Thomale, Sublattice modulated super- conductivity in the kagome Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024501 (2024). 18

    2024

  71. [79]

    J. C. Tol´ edano and P. Tol´ edano,The Landau Theory of Phase Transitions (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 1987)

    1987

  72. [80]

    Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed

    K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hobo- ken, New Jersey, 1987)

    1987

  73. [81]

    If the transition is first order, the transition happens be- fore aCDW(T ) changes sign

  74. [82]

    Note that none of the orders considered break inversion, as they conserve C2 and, in three dimensions, have an additional z↦→−z mirror

  75. [83]

    Tazai, Y

    R. Tazai, Y. Yamakawa, T. Morimoto, and H. Kon- tani, Quantum-metric-induced giant and reversible non- reciprocal transport phenomena in chiral loop-current phases of kagome metals (2025), arXiv:2408.04233 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    The term ∝ρ·ρ′ is also allowed for F3 coupled with F′ 4

  77. [85]

    F. Du, S. Luo, B. R. Ortiz, Y. Chen, W. Duan, D. Zhang, X. Lu, S. D. Wilson, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Pressure- induced double superconducting domes and charge in- stability in the kagome metal KV 3Sb5, Physical Review B 103, L220504 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    N. N. Wang, K. Y. Chen, Q. W. Yin, Y. N. N. Ma, B. Y. Pan, X. Yang, X. Y. Ji, S. L. Wu, P. F. Shan, S. X. Xu, Z. J. Tu, C. S. Gong, G. T. Liu, G. Li, Y. Uwatoko, X. L. Dong, H. C. Lei, J. P. Sun, and J.-G. Cheng, Competi- tion between charge-density-wave and superconductivity ...

    2021

  79. [87]

    K. Chen, N. Wang, Q. Yin, Y. Gu, K. Jiang, Z. Tu, C. Gong, Y. Uwatoko, J. Sun, H. Lei, J. Hu, and J.-G. Cheng, Double Superconducting Dome and Triple En- hancement ofTc in the Kagome Superconductor CsV3Sb5 under High Pressure, Physical Review Letters 126, 247001 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Y. M. Oey, B. R. Ortiz, F. Kaboudvand, J. Frassineti, E. Garcia, R. Cong, S. Sanna, V. F. Mitrovi´ c, R. Se- shadri, and S. D. Wilson, Fermi level tuning and double-dome superconductivity in the kagome metal CsV3Sb5−xSnx, Physical Review Materials 6, L041801 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    Y. M. Oey, F. Kaboudvand, B. R. Ortiz, R. Seshadri, and S. D. Wilson, Tuning charge density wave order and superconductivity in the kagome metals KV 3Sb5−x Snx and RbV3Sb5−x Snx, Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 074802 (2022)

    2022

  82. [90]

    Kvashnin, D

    Y. Kvashnin, D. VanGennep, M. Mito, S. A. Medvedev, R. Thiyagarajan, O. Karis, A. N. Vasiliev, O. Eriks- son, and M. Abdel-Hafiez, Coexistence of Superconduc- tivity and Charge Density Waves in Tantalum Disulfide: Experiment and Theory, Physical Review Letters 125, 186401 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Grandi, A

    F. Grandi, A. Consiglio, M. A. Sentef, R. Thomale, and D. M. Kennes, Theory of nematic charge orders in kagome metals, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155131 (2023)

    2023

  84. [92]

    ∝ (1,− √ 3)T if |ρ1| ̸= |ρ2| = |ρ3|, or ρani

    With the amplitude of one charge-density modulation dif- ferent than the other two, three-fold rotational symmetry is broken and either ρani.∝ (1, 0)T if|ρ2|̸ =|ρ3| =|ρ1|, ρani. ∝ (1,− √ 3)T if |ρ1| ̸= |ρ2| = |ρ3|, or ρani. ∝ (1, √ 3)T if|ρ3| ̸=|ρ1| =|ρ2| [26]. Other direction...

  85. [93]

    The one-dimensional irreps B1 and B2 mix with E1 through the anisotropic order

  86. [94]

    In other words, for a CDW that is not F1, such as the flux CDW, both Fn and F1 PDWs can be induced

    This term always couples to a PDW of F1 symmetry. In other words, for a CDW that is not F1, such as the flux CDW, both Fn and F1 PDWs can be induced. This is consistent with the fact that anyFn CDW induces anF1 CDW through a cubic term

  87. [95]

    Kallin and J

    C. Kallin and J. Berlinsky, Chiral superconductors, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 79, 054502 (2016)

    2016

  88. [96]

    D. F. Agterberg, M. Geracie, and H. Tsunetsugu, Con- ventional and charge-six superfluids from melting hexag- onal Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov phases in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014513 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    Zhou and Z

    S. Zhou and Z. Wang, Chern fermi pocket, topological pair density wave, and charge-4e and charge-6e supercon- ductivity in kagom´ esuperconductors, Nature Communi- cations 13, 7288 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.