Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A full multigrid multilevel Monte Carlo method for the single phase subsurface flow with random coefficients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.04727 v1 pith:X7ATDZZT submitted 2019-10-10 math.NA cs.NA

A full multigrid multilevel Monte Carlo method for the single phase subsurface flow with random coefficients

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords carlomethodmonteporousfullmediameshmultigrid
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The subsurface flow is usually subject to uncertain porous media structures. In most cases, however, we only have partial knowledge about the porous media properties. A common approach is to model the uncertain parameters of porous media as random fields, then the statistical moments (e.g. expectation) of the Quantity of Interest(QoI) can be evaluated by the Monte Carlo method. In this study, we develop a full multigrid-multilevel Monte Carlo (FMG-MLMC) method to speed up the evaluation of random parameters effects on single-phase porous flows. In general, MLMC method applies a series of discretization with increasing resolution and computes the QoI on each of them. The effective variance reduction is the success of the method. We exploit the similar hierarchies of MLMC and multigrid methods and obtain the solution on coarse mesh $Q^c_l$ as a byproduct of the full multigrid solution on fine mesh $Q^f_l$ on each level $l$. In the cases considered in this work, the computational saving due to the coarse mesh samples saving is $20\%$ asymptotically. Besides, a comparison of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods reveals a smaller estimator variance and a faster convergence rate of the latter approach in this study.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.