pith. sign in

arxiv: 1612.01140 · v1 · pith:X7F7YC4Tnew · submitted 2016-12-04 · 🧮 math.RA

Approximations and Mittag-Leffler conditions --- the applications

classification 🧮 math.RA
keywords mathcalmodulesclasscloseddirectlimitsunderapplications
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

A classic result by Bass says that the class of all projective modules is covering, if and only if it is closed under direct limits. Enochs extended the if-part by showing that every class of modules $\mathcal C$, which is precovering and closed under direct limits, is covering, and asked whether the converse is true. We employ the tools developed in [18] and give a positive answer when $\mathcal C = \mathcal A$, or $\mathcal C$ is the class of all locally $\mathcal A ^{\leq \omega}$-free modules, where $\mathcal A$ is any class of modules fitting in a cotorsion pair $(\mathcal A, \mathcal B)$ such that $\mathcal B$ is closed under direct limits. This setting includes all cotorsion pairs and classes of locally free modules arising in (infinite-dimensional) tilting theory. We also consider two particular applications: to pure-semisimple rings, and artin algebras of infinite representation type.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.