Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Rotating patterns in polariton condensates in ring-shaped potentials under bichromatic pump

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two vortex laser beams with different charges and frequencies can make a ring-confined polariton condensate rotate at a rate fixed by the pump.

desk verdict A clean, well-executed theory Letter on rotating polariton states driven by a bichromatic vortex pump, with the caveat that the rotation frequency is a phase-matching identity and robustness to realistic symmetry-breaking is untested. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01195 v2 pith:X7JI7P57 submitted 2019-09-03 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.optics

Yaroslav V. Kartashov , Dmitry A. Zezyulin This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords polaritoncondensatesbichromaticpumpopticalvorticesring-shapedpotentialrotatingpatternsbistabilityresonantpumpingGross-Pitaevskiiequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that a polariton condensate confined in a ring-shaped microcavity potential can be set into steady rotation by pumping it with two coherent vortex beams that have different topological charges and different optical frequencies. The central result is a locking formula: the pattern rotates at angular frequency $\omega = (\varepsilon_1 - \varepsilon_2)/(m_1 - m_2)$, where the detunings and charges belong to the two beams, so the rotation is fixed by the pump and not by the condensate's own dynamics. The paper shows that the rotating states are resonantly excited when the pump frequencies approach the ring's eigenfrequencies, and that repulsive polariton-polariton interactions tilt the resonance curves and produce bistability, so several distinct rotating patterns can coexist for the same pump parameters. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a simple, all-optical knob for controlling persistent rotation in a macroscopic quantum system.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the rotation to a frame that co-rotates with the pump: writing the two pump terms as $h_j S_j(r)e^{im_j\varphi - i\varepsilon_j t}$, the transformation $x' = x\cos\omega t + y\sin\omega t$, $y' = y\cos\omega t - x\sin\omega t$ removes the time dependence from both beams exactly when $\omega = (\varepsilon_1 - \varepsilon_2)/(m_1 - m_2)$. In that frame the problem becomes a time-independent equation with an extra Coriolis term $i\omega(x'\partial_{y'} - y'\partial_{x'})$, and steadily rotating states are its stationary solutions $u(x',y')e^{-i\mu t}$. The ring potential $V(r)$ and the pump envelopes $S_j(r)$ must be azimuthally symmetric for this to work, and the ring's linear eigenmodes supply the resonance frequencies at which the rotating patterns are most efficiently excited.

What would settle it

Measure the angular velocity of the condensate pattern in an experiment with known $\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2, m_1, m_2$ on a carefully symmetric ring: if the observed rotation frequency deviates from $(\varepsilon_1 - \varepsilon_2)/(m_1 - m_2)$, or if the pattern does not rotate at all when both beams are on, the central claim fails. A numerical variant would be to add a small angular modulation to $V(r)$ and see whether the rotating state stops rotating.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's claim is that a two-frequency, two-charge resonant pump in a rotationally symmetric ring potential supports exact steadily rotating solutions of the dissipative Gross-Pitaevskii equation, and that these solutions are attractors: generic inputs settle into a pattern that rotates with frequency $\omega = (\varepsilon_1 - \varepsilon_2)/(m_1 - m_2)$ and has an effective energy $\mu = (m_1\varepsilon_2 - m_2\varepsilon_1)/(m_1 - m_2)$. In the rotating frame the two pump terms become a single monochromatic drive, which is the condition for a steady state. The pattern's azimuthal symmetry is set by the charge difference, giving $|m_1 - m_2|$ petals with nested vortices, and its peak amplitude grows resonantly when either detuning matches a linear eigenmode of the ring. The nonlinear resonance curves tilt with pump power and develop loops, so up to five states can coexist at the same detuning; lower and upper branches are stable while middle branches are unstable. The paper also shows numerically that unstable states either become persistent breathers or switch to the stable lower branch, while stable states rotate over many cycles without changing symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The two pump beams must stay phase-locked and the ring potential must be exactly rotationally symmetric; if either fails, the predicted steady rotation will be pinned or destroyed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotation speed becomes an externally programmable parameter: changing one laser frequency or one vortex charge changes $\omega$ without reshaping the ring.
  • At fixed charges, scanning detunings along the diagonal keeps $\omega$ constant while shifting energy, so the shape can be tuned through nested-vortex to ring-like patterns without changing speed.
  • Bistability means the same pump can produce two or more coexisting rotating patterns, offering a controllable switch between rotation states.
  • Stable rotating patterns are attractors, so a broad class of initial conditions will spontaneously evolve into the same rotating mode.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not analyze tolerance to ring anisotropy or phase diffusion between beams; one concrete extension would be to compute how much angular asymmetry in $V(r)$ or relative phase noise is needed to pin the pattern.
  • The same locking mechanism should transfer to other dissipative coherently driven systems described by a Gross-Pitaevskii-type equation, such as photonic condensates or exciton-polariton lattices, where two vortex beams are available.
  • A direct experimental test of the frequency formula at fixed charges by sweeping $\varepsilon_1 - \varepsilon_2$ would cleanly separate the pump-locking effect from intrinsic superfluid rotation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies a driven-dissipative Gross-Pitaevskii model of a polariton condensate in a ring-shaped potential under a bichromatic resonant pump whose two components carry different topological charges m1 and m2. The authors move to a rotating coordinate frame and show that time-independent solutions exist when the two pump components have equal detunings in the rotating frame, which fixes the angular rotation frequency ω=(ε1−ε2)/(m1−m2) and the effective energy μ=(m1ε2−m2ε1)/(m1−m2). They compute linear resonance surfaces showing amplitude enhancement when each pump frequency approaches an eigenfrequency of the ring potential. In the nonlinear regime, the resonance curves tilt and develop bistability, with stable and unstable branches identified by linear stability analysis and confirmed by direct numerical evolution. Examples of stable rotating patterns, persistent breathers, and branch switching are presented.

Significance. The rotating-frame construction is exact, and the predicted frequency is precisely the rotation rate of the two-beam interference pattern. If the result is robust, it offers a simple all-optical way to set the angular velocity of a polariton pattern from two laser frequencies and topological charges. The linear and nonlinear resonance calculations are standard, and the stability results are supported by both eigenvalue analysis and direct integration, which is a notable strength. The main gap is the lack of any tolerance analysis for the idealizing assumptions on which the rotating-frame ansatz rests, namely exact azimuthal symmetry of the confining potential and perfect phase locking between the two pump beams.

major comments (2)
  1. [Rotating-frame construction, Eq. (3)] The condition ε1'=ε2'=μ is a necessary consistency condition for the rotating-frame ansatz, not a dynamical derivation of the rotation frequency. Accordingly, the sentence 'This determines the rotation frequency of the pattern' is misleading; ω is the angular velocity of the pump interference pattern, and the ansatz requires the potential to be exactly azimuthally symmetric and the two beams to be perfectly phase locked. The manuscript provides no analysis of how a small anisotropy in V or a relative phase drift between the beams affects the predicted rotation (pinning, frequency shift, or destruction of the steady state). Since the abstract and the final paragraph claim that the rotation frequency is fully determined by the pump and that the findings are experimentally relevant, this robustness gap should be closed or at least explicitly qualified; a numerical test with a small symmetry-breaking perturbation would be a concrete way to quantify the tolerance.
  2. [Fig. 1 and nonlinear resonance curves] The bistability claim is central to the paper, including the coexistence of three and five states for the two pump amplitudes shown. However, the numerical method used to obtain the stationary rotating states and to perform the parameter continuation is not described. Please specify the spatial discretization, the solver, the grid convergence tests, and the way the linear stability eigenvalues are computed, so that the loop structure of the upper branch and the reported number of coexisting states can be independently verified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3) and surrounding text] The physical meaning of Eq. (3) would be clearer if the authors noted that it is the angular velocity of the relative phase front of the two pump beams, i.e., the rotation rate of the driving interference pattern.
  2. [Fig. 2] The figure caption and the main text refer to 'negative and zero' and 'large positive' values of δ, but the specific δ values used in each column are not given; please add them to the caption or panels.
  3. [References] Reference [12] contains a typo: 'Phys. Rev. A 93 93, 013837' should be 'Phys. Rev. A 93, 013837'.
  4. [Final paragraph] The sentence claiming that 'rotating vortices driven by pulsed resonant excitation have been already observed' is supported by Ref. [33], but that reference concerns a pulsed Rabi-oscillating vortex experiment; please clarify more precisely how it supports the present continuous-wave bichromatic-pump scenario.
  5. [Numerical methods] The statement that stable rotating patterns 'are attractors that can emerge from the input having very distinct shape' is asserted without a supporting example or any basin-of-attraction characterization; a brief mention of the initial conditions used would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The rotation-frequency relation is a consistency condition derived from the rotating-frame ansatz, not a fitted or self-citational input; the central claims are supported by direct GPE integration.

full rationale

The paper derives ω = (ε1 − ε2)/(m1 − m2) as a necessary condition for a time-independent envelope in the rotating frame: with ε′_{1,2} = ε_{1,2} − m_{1,2}ω, requiring ε′_1 = ε′_2 = μ yields Eq. (3) algebraically. This is a mathematical consequence of the assumed rotating solution, not an empirical prediction fitted to data, and not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The existence, stability, and bistability of rotating states are demonstrated by solving Eq. (1) numerically, computing linear resonances from the potential's own eigenproblem, and confirming stability by direct evolution of perturbed states. The only self-citation (Ref. [13], Zezyulin/Kartashov et al.) appears as background on rotating solitons in radially periodic potentials and is not load-bearing for the new bichromatic-pump mechanism; it is not a uniqueness theorem nor an ansatz smuggled in via citation. The robustness concern about exact azimuthal symmetry and phase-locked pump beams is a limitation of the idealization and is not addressed with a tolerance analysis, but it is an external-condition robustness gap, not a circularity. No step reduces to its own input by construction, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The two pump beams and the rotating frame are standard mathematical constructions. The free parameters are representative model constants, not fits to data. The main assumptions are the validity of the mean-field GPE and the single-mu ansatz.

free parameters (3)
  • Ring potential parameters (V0, w, r0) = 6, 0.25, 2
    Chosen by hand so the ring supports four localized modes with the quoted eigenfrequencies; these values control the resonance positions μm but are not fitted to external data.
  • Polariton loss rate gamma = 0.02
    Stated as typical for polaritons, chosen by hand; affects the width and height of resonance peaks.
  • Pump amplitudes h1, h2 = 0.05 and 0.10
    Selected to demonstrate linear and nonlinear regimes; no external calibration.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Equation (1), the 2D dissipative Gross-Pitaevskii equation with contact interactions and linear losses, adequately models the resonantly pumped polariton condensate.
    Invoked as the starting model; ignores energy relaxation, reservoir dynamics, and polarization, which could alter quantitative predictions.
  • domain assumption Steadily rotating states are sought as psi = u(x',y') exp(-i mu t) with a single effective energy mu in the rotating frame.
    This ansatz requires both pump components to have equal detuning in the rotating frame, which defines omega via Eq. (3).
  • domain assumption The numerical schemes (continuation, linear stability analysis, direct integration) produce converged solutions for the infinite-domain PDE.
    No grid resolution or convergence data are provided; standard practice in the subfield.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rotating patterns in polariton condensates in ring-shaped potentials under bichromatic pump." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X7JI7P57

@misc{pith2026190901195,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rotating patterns in polariton condensates in ring-shaped potentials under bichromatic pump},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X7JI7P57}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01195}
}
read the original abstract

We consider a polariton condensate in a microcavity driven by a bichromatic resonant pump formed by two vortical laser beams carrying different topological charges. The system is additionally confined in a ring-shaped potential. We show that in this system steadily rotating nonlinear localized modes can be excited, whose angular rotation frequency is determined by optical frequencies and topological charges of the pump beams. When pump frequencies approach eigenfrequencies of the modes of the ring potential, resonant growth of peak amplitude of the excited states occurs. Repulsive polariton-polariton interactions lead to tilting of the resonance curves and appearance of bistability of rotating patterns.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01195 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 2D surface plots illustrate linear resonance dependencies ψmax(ε1 , ε2) at h1,2 = 0.02 for different combinations of topological charges of the pump m1,2. Insets show corresponding pump modulus and phase distributions at t = 0. Lines above surface plots show nonlinear resonance curves ψmax(δ) calculated along the diagonal in the (ε1 , ε2) plane passing through linear resonance point for selected topological charges … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of modulus distributions of polariton wave￾function ψ at h1,2 = 0.1 for different values of detuning δ and different combinations of topological charges of the pump components: (a) m2 = −1, (b) m2 = 0, (c) m2 = +1, (d) m2 = +2, (e) m2 = +3, while m1 = −2 in all cases. All states are taken from the “upper” branch that smoothly continues to large negative δ values. Third column shows phase distribu￾tions arg … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of stable evolution of the rotating states at δ = −0.1, m2 = −1 (a) and δ = 0, m2 = +1 (c). (b) Instability development at δ = +0.1, m2 = 0 leading to formation of persistent breather with the period ≈ 22.6π/ω. (d) Instability development leading to switching …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y . Y amamoto, Exciton-polariton Bose -Einstein condensation Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1489 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    A. Amo, S. Pigeon, D. Sunvitto, V . G. Sala, R. Hivet, I. Caru sotto, F . Pisanello, G. Lemenager, R. Houdre, E. Giacobino, C. Ciuti, and A. Bramati, Polariton superfluids reveal quantum hydrodynami c solitons, Science 332, 1167 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    A. V . Y ulin, O. A. Egorov, F . Lederer, and D. V . Skryabin, Da rk polariton solitons in semiconductor microcavities, Phys. Rev. A 78, 061801(R) (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Xue and M

    Y . Xue and M. Matuszewski, Creation and abrupt decay of a qu asis- tationary dark soliton in a polariton condensate, Phys. Rev . Lett. 112, 216401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Goblot, H

    V . Goblot, H. S. Nguyen, I. Carusotto, E. Galopin, A. Lemaî tre, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, Phase-controlled bistability of a dark soliton train in a polariton fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    L. A. Smirnov, D. A. Smirnova, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y u. S. Kivshar, Dynamics and stability of dark solitons in exciton-polarit on conden- sates, Phys. Rev. B 89, 235310 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    M. Sich, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, A. V . Gorbach , R. Hartley, D. V . Skryabin, E. A. Cerda-Mendez, K. Biermann, R. Hey, and P . V . Santos, Observation of bright solitons in a semiconductor m icrocavity, Nat. Photon. 6, 50 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod . Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    A. Amo, J. Lefrére, S. Pigeon, C. Adrados, C. Ciuti, I. Caru sotto, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, Superfluidity of polar itons in semiconductor microcavities, Nat. Phys. 5, 805–810 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Sanvitto, F

    D. Sanvitto, F . M. Marchetti, M. H. Szyma ´nska, G. T osi, M. Baudisch, F . P . Laussy, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, L. Marrucci,A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, C. T ejedor, and L. Viña, Persistent currents and qu antized vortices in a polariton superfluid, Nat. Phys. 6, 527–533 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Kohnle, Y

    V . Kohnle, Y . Léger, M. Wouters, M. Richard, M. T . Portella-Oberli, and B. Deveaud-Plédran, From Single Particle to Superfluid Exci tations in a Dissipative Polariton Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 255302 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Li, Azimuthons and pattern formation in annularly con fined exciton- polariton Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys

    G. Li, Azimuthons and pattern formation in annularly con fined exciton- polariton Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 93 93, 013837 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    D. A. Zezyulin, Y . V . Kartashov, D. V . Skryabin, and I. A. S helykh, Spin- Orbit Coupled Polariton Condensates in a Radially Periodic Potential: Multiring Vortices and Rotating Solitons, ACS Photonics 5, 3634–3642 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    C. E. Whittaker, B. Dzurnak, O. A. Egorov, G. Buonaiuto, P . M. Walker, E. Cancellieri, D. M. Whittaker, E. Clarke, S. S. Gavrilov, M . S. Skol- nick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Polariton pattern formation and photon statistics of the associated emission, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031033 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    K. G. Lagoudakis, M. Wouters, M. Richard, A. Baas, I. Caru sotto, R. André, L. S. Dang, and B. Deveaud Plédran, Quantized vortice s in an exciton–polariton condensate, Nat. Phys. 4, 706 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    K. G. Lagoudakis, T . Ostatnický, A. V . Kavokin, Y . G. Rubo , R. An- dré, B. Deveaud-Plédran, Observation of Half-Quantum Vort ices in an Exciton-Polariton Condensate, Science 326, 974–976 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    M. D. Fraser, G. Roumpos, and Y Y amamoto, Vortex–antivor tex pair dynamics in an exciton–polariton condensate, New J. Ph ys. 11, 113048 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Nardin, G

    G. Nardin, G. Grosso, Y . Léger, B. Pi ˛ etka, F . Morier-Gen oud, D. Deveaud-Plédran, Hydrodynamic nucleation of quantized vo rtex pairs in a polariton quantum fluid, Nat. Phys. 7, 635 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Pigeon, I

    S. Pigeon, I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Hydrodynamic nucl eation of vor- tices and solitons in a resonantly excited polariton superfl uid, Phys. Rev. B 83, 144513 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Grosso, G

    G. Grosso, G. Nardin, F . Morier-Genoud, Y . Léger, and B. D eveaud- Plédran, Soliton instabilities and vortex street formatio n in a polariton quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 245301 (2011)

    2011

  13. [21]

    Dominici, R

    L. Dominici, R. Carretero-González, A. Gianfrate, J. Cu evas-Maraver, A. S. Rodrigues, D. J. Frantzeskakis, G. Lerario, D. Ballari ni, M. De Letter Optics Letters 6 Giorgi, G. Gigli, P . G. Kevrekidis, and D. Sanvitto, Interac tions and scattering of quantum vortices in a pola...

    2018

  14. [22]

    R. Dall, M. D. Fraser, A. S. Desyatnikov, G. Li, S. Brodbec k, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Creation of O rbital Angular Momentum States with Chiral Polaritonic Lenses, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 113, 200404 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    T . Gao, O. A. Egorov, E. Estrecho, K. Winkler, M. Kamp, C. S chneider, S. Höfling, A. G. T ruscott, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Controlled Ordering of T opological Charges in an Exciton-Polariton Chain, Phys . Rev. Lett. 121, 225302 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Ma, and S

    X. Ma, and S. Schumacher, Vortex Multistability and Bess el Vortices in Polariton Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 227404 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    M.-S. Kwon, B. Y . Oh, S.-H. Gong, J.-H. Kim, H. K. Kang, S. K ang, J. D. Song, H. Choi, and Y .-H. Cho, Direct T ransfer of Light’s Orbital Angular Momentum onto a Nonresonantly Excited Polariton Superfluid , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 045302 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    F . M. Marchetti and M. H. Szyma ´nska, Vortices in Polariton OPO Su- perfluids, in Exciton Polaritons in Microcavities , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 172, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelb erg 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    Gallemí, M

    A. Gallemí, M. Guilleumas, M. Richard, and A. Minguzzi, I nteraction- enhanced flow of a polariton superfluid current in a ring, Phys . Rev. B 98, 104502 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    C. W. Lai, N. Y . Kim, S. Utsunomiya, G. Roumpos, H. Deng, M. D. Fraser, T . Byrnes, P . Recher, N. Kumada, T . Fujisawa, and Y . Y a- mamoto, Coherent zero-state and π -state in an exciton-polariton con- densate array, Nature 450, 529-532 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    V . G. Sala, D. D. Solnyshkov, I. Carusotto, T . Jacqmin, A. Lemaître, H. T erças, A. Nalitov, M. Abbarchi, E. Galopin, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, G. Malpuech, and A. Amo, Spin-Orbit Coupling for Photons and Po lari- tons in Microstructures, Phys. Rev. X 5, 011034 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Schneider, K

    C. Schneider, K. Winkler, M. D. K. Fraser, M. Kamp, Y . Y ama moto, E. A. Ostrovskaya, S. Hofling, Exciton-polariton trapping a nd potential landscape engineering, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016503 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Díaz-Camacho, C

    G. Díaz-Camacho, C. T ejedor, and F . M. Marchetti, Sponta neous pat- terns in coherently driven polariton microcavities, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245309 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Y ang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-Integrab le Systems (SIAM, 2010), Chap

    J. Y ang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-Integrab le Systems (SIAM, 2010), Chap. 5-6

    2010

  25. [33]

    Dominici, D

    L. Dominici, D. Colas, A. Gianfrate, A. Rahmani, C. Sánch ez Muñoz, D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, G. Gigli, F . P . Laussy, and D. Sanvitto, Ultra- fast topology shaping by a Rabi-oscillating vortex, arXiv: 1801.02580 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.