REVIEW 2 cited by
Natural language is not enough: Benchmarking multi-modal generative AI for Verilog generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Natural language interfaces have exhibited considerable potential in the automation of Verilog generation derived from high-level specifications through the utilization of large language models, garnering significant attention. Nevertheless, this paper elucidates that visual representations contribute essential contextual information critical to design intent for hardware architectures possessing spatial complexity, potentially surpassing the efficacy of natural-language-only inputs. Expanding upon this premise, our paper introduces an open-source benchmark for multi-modal generative models tailored for Verilog synthesis from visual-linguistic inputs, addressing both singular and complex modules. Additionally, we introduce an open-source visual and natural language Verilog query language framework to facilitate efficient and user-friendly multi-modal queries. To evaluate the performance of the proposed multi-modal hardware generative AI in Verilog generation tasks, we compare it with a popular method that relies solely on natural language. Our results demonstrate a significant accuracy improvement in the multi-modal generated Verilog compared to queries based solely on natural language. We hope to reveal a new approach to hardware design in the large-hardware-design-model era, thereby fostering a more diversified and productive approach to hardware design.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RealBench: Benchmarking Verilog Generation Models with Real-World IP Designs
RealBench measures LLM Verilog generation on complex open-source IP cores with formal verification, and all tested models score near zero on full system designs.
-
TD-Interpreter: Enhancing the Understanding of Timing Diagrams with Visual-Language Learning
A fine-tuned LLaVA model, trained on synthetic timing-diagram Q&A pairs generated from Verilog simulations, answers design and verification questions about timing diagrams.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.