Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A numerical variability approach to results stability tests and its application to neuroimaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.01373 v2 pith:XARB7V4Y submitted 2023-07-03 physics.med-ph cs.SE

classification physics.med-phcs.SE
keywords stabilityresultsnumericaltestsacceptableanalysesapplicationapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensuring the long-term reproducibility of data analyses requires results stability tests to verify that analysis results remain within acceptable variation bounds despite inevitable software updates and hardware evolutions. This paper introduces a numerical variability approach for results stability tests, which determines acceptable variation bounds using random rounding of floating-point calculations. By applying the resulting stability test to \fmriprep, a widely-used neuroimaging tool, we show that the test is sensitive enough to detect subtle updates in image processing methods while remaining specific enough to accept numerical variations within a reference version of the application. This result contributes to enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of data analyses by providing a robust and flexible method for stability testing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools