Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Photocurrent detected 2D spectroscopy via pulse shaper: insights and strategies for optimally untangling the nonlinear response

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that trimming time-domain data to an integer number of modulation cycles and applying a global phase correction make photocurrent-detected 2D spectroscopy accurate.

desk verdict A genuinely useful artifact catalog for pulse-shaper A-2DES, but the phase-correction routine is under-specified and its demonstration is partly circular, so the 'accurate spectra' claim needs revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02342 v1 pith:XAWN45CV submitted 2025-06-03 physics.chem-ph

E. Amarotti , L. Bolzonello , S.-H. Lee , D. Zigmantas , N.-G. Park , N. van Hulst , T. Pullerits This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords action-detected2DelectronicspectroscopyphotocurrentdetectionphasemodulationcogwheelcyclingFouriertransformleakagecorrectionperovskitesolarcellsultrafast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Action-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (A-2DES) reads out a sample's nonlinear optical response through an incoherent signal such as photocurrent, which makes it attractive for studying working devices like perovskite solar cells. This paper argues that pulse-shaper-based A-2DES is accurate only when the phase-modulation pattern and repetition parameters are matched to the laser repetition rate, when the time-domain data are trimmed to an exact integer number of modulation cycles before the Fourier transform, and when residual population-build-up distortion is removed by a global phase correction. The authors identify three concrete failure sources: Fourier phase leakage from improperly trimmed data, signal accumulation from slow sample discharge at high repetition rates, and pulse-shaper nonlinearities at elevated streaming power. The demonstration uses a perovskite solar cell as the model system, with simulated photocurrent signals supporting the trimming analysis. If the recipes hold, A-2DES becomes a dependable tool for extracting ultrafast charge and energy dynamics from functioning optoelectronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phase-modulated collinear pulse train produced by an acousto-optic pulse shaper, together with the Fourier transform of the photocurrent signal that converts modulation frequencies into spectral axes. The modulation uses 'cogwheel' phase cycling: each of the four pulses in the pattern advances in phase by $\Delta\Phi_i = n_i \cdot 2\pi/N$ per pattern step, with $N=36$ and divisors $n_1=0$, $n_2=4$, $n_3=6$, $n_4=9$, placing the rephasing signal at 111.11 Hz and the non-rephasing signal at 777.77 Hz at a 4 kHz repetition rate, cleanly separated from linear contributions and from 50 Hz mains harmonics. The load-bearing procedure is the trimming-and-correction sequence: select an exact integer number of modulation cycles, discard the initial loading transient, and apply global phase factors to reverse population-buildup distortion, while keeping the shaper's streaming power in the low-distortion range.

What would settle it

Take a sample with a known coherent 2DES reference spectrum, measure it with and without active discharge, and derive the phase factors from the discharged-versus-accumulated comparison; if applying those factors to a different device at a different repetition rate no longer reproduces the actively discharged spectrum, the correction is shown to be data-specific rather than general. A second, simpler check: if trimming one data point away from a supposedly correct dataset still changes the corrected 2D peak shapes, the phase leakage has not actually been eliminated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the inaccuracies inherent to photocurrent-detected 2D spectroscopy with an acousto-optic pulse shaper are identifiable, characterizable, and correctable. Using a phase-modulation pattern with $N=36$ and frequency integers $n_1=0$, $n_2=4$, $n_3=6$, $n_4=9$, the linear and nonlinear signals separate into distinct Fourier peaks; the same scheme fails if the pattern is mistimed with the laser repetition rate, if the data window is not an integer multiple of the modulation period, if the sample's photocurrent response accumulates between pulse sequences, or if the shaper is driven at excessive streaming power. The authors demonstrate post-processing cures: excluding loading-stage points and trimming to exact cycles eliminates Fourier phase leakage; multiplying rephasing and non-rephasing time-domain signals by $\exp(i\pi\phi_R)$ and $\exp(-i\pi\phi_{NR})$ removes the phase distortion from population build-up; and keeping streaming power low avoids power-related diagonal artifacts. Corrected 2D maps on the perovskite solar cell recover the expected spectral structure.

Load-bearing premise

The phase-correction recipe assumes that the distortion from population build-up can be removed by multiplying the entire time-domain signal by a single global phase factor, and the values of those phase factors are not independently derived or benchmarked in the text, so the demonstration of recovery is partly circular if the factors were optimized against the same data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A-2DES measurements on working devices can be run at high laser repetition rates without waiting for full sample discharge, because the phase-correction routine restores the 2D spectra in post-processing.
  • Data windows must be trimmed to an exact integer number of phase-modulation cycles; even a few points of mistrimming changes peak amplitudes, line shapes, and spurious features in the 2D maps.
  • Phase-modulation parameters and repetition rate must be chosen together so that nonlinear peaks do not land on electrical mains harmonics such as 50 Hz and its multiples.
  • The linear-versus-nonlinear identification via laser-power scaling is only reliable when the pulse shaper's streaming power is kept below the threshold where RF nonlinearities distort the rephasing spectrum.
  • The reported parameter set ($N=36$, $n_1=0$, $n_2=4$, $n_3=6$, $n_4=9$) at 4 kHz provides a concrete starting configuration that separates rephasing, non-rephasing, and two-quantum signals from linear features.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same trimming and phase-correction discipline likely transfers to fluorescence-detected 2DES and other action-detected variants, because the Fourier-leakage and population-buildup mechanisms are generic to phase-modulated action detection.
  • The phase factors $\exp(\pm i\pi\phi)$ could be determined independently by comparing accumulated and actively discharged datasets on the same sample, which would test whether the correction is transferable across samples and repetition rates or merely a fit to the data at hand.
  • For samples with longer-lived photocurrent responses, the optimal pattern may need to push nonlinear peaks to higher frequencies than 111 Hz to reduce accumulation artifacts; the paper's framework provides the trade-off between frequency separation and pulse-shaper constraints.
  • A practical extension would be to monitor the amplitude of the diagonal artifact while ramping streaming power, giving each sample an empirically safe operating power range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the implementation and optimization of a pulse-shaper-based photocurrent-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (A-2DES) setup, using a perovskite solar cell as a model system. The authors analyze three sources of artifacts: phase leakage arising from improper Fourier-transform trimming of the time-domain data, signal accumulation due to insufficient sample discharge at high repetition rates, and nonlinear distortions caused by operating the acousto-optic pulse shaper at elevated streaming powers. They propose post-processing strategies—precise data point selection and a phase-correction routine—and claim that these strategies retrieve accurate 2D spectra. The paper also demonstrates the power-scaling separation of linear and nonlinear signal components and discusses parameter choices for phase modulation (N, n_i, N_rep).

Significance. If the proposed methods are robust and transferable, the paper would provide useful practical guidelines for A-2DES, a technique of growing interest for studying charge dynamics in operating devices. The paper's strengths include a clear exposition of the phase-modulation parameter selection (Eq. 2, Table 1), a convincing power-scaling check of signal identity (Fig. 3), and a detailed characterization of the streaming-power distortion (Fig. 8). The central weakness is the phase-correction routine in §3.3, which is not specified or benchmarked; without that, the main claim about robust post-processing is not fully established. The paper also lacks error bars or repeated measurements, which limits the quantitative force of its claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.3, Fig. 7 caption] There is an internal inconsistency in the definition of the phase-correction factors: the text applies exp(iπφ_R) and exp(−iπφ_NR) to the rephasing and non-rephasing signals, while the Fig. 7 caption writes exp(iπφ_R) and exp(−iπφ_R) (i.e., both for the rephasing channel). This must be corrected and the definitive form should match the actual processing code.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 6] The simulation parameters (frequencies, amplitudes, noise, signal length) are not given. Provide these details or a script so that the trimming effect is reproducible.
  2. [§2.2, Table 1] The frequency values in Table 1 are rounded to two decimal places (444.44, 666.66, etc.). It would be clearer to quote exact fractions (e.g., 4000/9 Hz) or to state that values are rounded, since Eq. (2) yields repeating decimals.
  3. [§3.4, Fig. 8] The statement that the anomalous contribution is "observed exclusively in the rephasing contribution" is followed by the observation that "the non-rephasing component exhibits a nonlinear scaling with increasing intensity." Please clarify whether the non-rephasing scaling is the expected nonlinear signal growth or an additional distortion.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusions] The claim of "accurate 2D spectra" is strong, but the paper demonstrates relative improvements and only one reference comparison (the 3.3 kΩ case). Consider softening "accurate" to "distortion-reduced" or providing a quantitative benchmark.
  5. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption text mentions "the two simulated frequencies (f1 and f1)" rather than "f1 and f2." Please correct this typo.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity; the phase-correction recipe is under-specified, creating a minor, non-forced caveat.

full rationale

The paper's main derivations are self-contained. Frequency assignments follow from the phase-modulation definition (Eqs. 1-2) and are independently validated by the power-scaling check of Fig. 3, so they are not circular. The FT-trimming analysis is an illustration of the well-known periodic-boundary condition of the discrete Fourier transform: the simulated data are generated with integer modulation cycles, so recovering them when an integer number of cycles is selected is a property of the transform, not a fitted prediction. The 3.3 kOhm discharged measurement provides an external experimental reference for the population-buildup distortion. The only caveat is in Sec. 3.3: the phase-correction factors exp(i pi phi_R) and exp(-i pi phi_NR) are introduced without stating how phi_R and phi_NR are determined. As written, the correction is an unparameterized assertion; if those phases were optimized against the very 3.3 kOhm spectra used for comparison, the 'restoration' would be partly circular, but the text provides no evidence of such fitting. This is an under-specification/evidence gap rather than a demonstrated reduction of the result to its inputs. The self-citation to Bolzonello et al. [13] for the setup design is not load-bearing for the methodological claims. Overall, no step in the claimed derivation chain is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central claims rest on design choices (N, ni), a standard Fourier-transform property, and an empirically applied phase correction whose parameters are not independently benchmarked.

free parameters (3)
  • Phase-modulation pattern N = 36
    Design choice in §2.2, chosen to separate signals from 50 Hz electrical noise and satisfy FIFO limits; not fitted to data but central to the demonstrated scheme.
  • Modulation indices n1..n4 = 0, 4, 6, 9
    Chosen in §2.2 to place linear and nonlinear signals at distinct frequencies (Table 1). An alternative N=40, ni=0,4,5,8 is discussed; selection is by hand, not derived.
  • Phase-correction factors phi_R and phi_NR = not stated
    Used in §3.3 to remove buildup distortion; how they are determined is not specified and they are best interpreted as empirical/fitted parameters.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The action-detected signal is a sum of sinusoidal components oscillating at frequencies fi = RepRate/N * ni (Eq. 2).
    Assumed in §2.2 and used for all frequency assignments in Table 1 and Fig. 3.
  • standard math The DFT of a finite time-domain record requires exactly an integer number of modulation cycles to avoid phase leakage.
    Used in §3.1-3.2 to justify data trimming; standard property of finite Fourier transforms.
  • domain assumption The phase factors exp(i pi phi_R) and exp(-i pi phi_NR) remove the buildup distortion without distorting true spectral features.
    Invoked in §3.3; no independent validation or explicit derivation of phi values is provided.
  • domain assumption The elongated diagonal background at high streaming power is caused by radio-frequency nonlinearities inside the pulse shaper.
    Argued in §3.4 based on power dependence; alternative sources are not directly excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photocurrent detected 2D spectroscopy via pulse shaper: insights and strategies for optimally untangling the nonlinear response." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XAWN45CV

@misc{pith2026250602342,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photocurrent detected 2D spectroscopy via pulse shaper: insights and strategies for optimally untangling the nonlinear response},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XAWN45CV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02342}
}
abstract

Action-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (A-2DES) provides valuable insights into ultrafast dynamics within functional materials and devices by measuring incoherent signals like photocurrent. This work details the implementation and optimization of a pulse-shaper-based A-2DES setup, focusing on methodological strategies crucial for acquiring high-fidelity data. We present a comprehensive analysis of phase modulation routines, elucidating the critical interplay between pattern parameters (N, $\mathrm{n}_\mathrm{i}$), pattern repetitions ($\mathrm{N}_\mathrm{rep}$), laser repetition rate, and acousto-optic pulse shaper constraints (e.g., streaming rate, RF generator nonlinearities). Utilizing a perovskite solar cell as a model system, we systematically identify and characterize significant inaccuracies inherent to A-2DES measurements. These include distortions originating from Fourier transform processing of improperly trimmed time-domain data (phase leakage), signal accumulation effects due to insufficient sample response discharge between pulse sequences at high repetition rates, and shortcomings induced by pulse shaper operation at elevated streaming powers. Crucially, we demonstrate robust data post-processing strategies, including precise data point selection for Fourier analysis and phase correction routine, to effectively mitigate these imperfections and retrieve accurate 2D spectra. This rigorous methodological investigation and anomalous features characterization provides essential guidelines for optimizing pulse-shaper-based A-2DES experiments, ensuring data integrity and enabling reliable extraction of complex photophysical information in complex systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02342 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Setup schematic: M = flat mirror; P = prism; SM = spherical mirror. After [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representation of phase modulation routine (left) and cogwheel phase cycling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. On the left side, we assign the values from Table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Phase modulation schematic for N = 36 with parameters n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Post-processing procedure. Given the exact number of collected data points, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase distortion and data handling. a) Simulated photocurrent signals. Each colour bar covers the amount of data points that are considered for FT: the purple bar refers to the optimal number of points to be considered (Δ0); the green bars refer to under-sampled data p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of population response accumulation on action-detected signal and its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 2D data at population time t2 = 100 fs. Each column refers to an experiment operating under different streaming power of the Dazzler, highlighting distortion due to nonlinearities of the pulse shaper. The upper panel visualizes the rephasing (R) and non-rephasing (NR) …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Multidimensional femtosecond correlation spectroscopies of electronic and vibrational excitations,

    S. Mukamel, “Multidimensional femtosecond correlation spectroscopies of electronic and vibrational excitations,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.51, 691–729 (2000)

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Two-dimensional femtosecond spectroscopy,

    D. M. Jonas, “Two-dimensional femtosecond spectroscopy,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.54, 425–463 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Hamm and M

    P. Hamm and M. Zanni,Concepts and methods of 2D infrared spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of the B800–B820 light-harvesting complex,

    D. Zigmantas, E. L. Read, T. Mančal,et al., “Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of the B800–B820 light-harvesting complex,” Proc. National Acad. Sci.103, 12672–12677 (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, Oxford series in optical and imaging sciences (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    S. Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, Oxford series in optical and imaging sciences (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    1995

  6. [6]

    Coherently and fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy: direct comparison on squaraine dimers,

    P. Malý, J. Lüttig, S. Mueller,et al., “Coherently and fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy: direct comparison on squaraine dimers,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.22, 21222–21237 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Fluorescence-detected two-quantum and one-quantum–two-quantum 2D electronic spectroscopy,

    S. Mueller, S. Draeger, X. Ma,et al., “Fluorescence-detected two-quantum and one-quantum–two-quantum 2D electronic spectroscopy,” The J. Phys. Chem. Lett.9, 1964–1969 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic coherence spectroscopy by acousto-optic phase modulation,

    P. F. Tekavec, G. A. Lott, and A. H. Marcus, “Fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic coherence spectroscopy by acousto-optic phase modulation,” The J. Chem. Phys.127, 214307 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Spatially-resolved fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy probes varying excitonic structure in photosynthetic bacteria,

    V. Tiwari, Y. A. Matutes, A. T. Gardiner,et al., “Spatially-resolved fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy probes varying excitonic structure in photosynthetic bacteria,” Nat. Commun.9, 4219 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Rapid phase-cycled two-dimensional optical spectroscopy in fluorescence and transmission mode,

    W. Wagner, C. Li, J. Semmlow, and W. S. Warren, “Rapid phase-cycled two-dimensional optical spectroscopy in fluorescence and transmission mode,” Opt. Express13, 3697–3706 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Before Förster. Initial excitation in photosynthetic light harvesting,

    K. J. Karki, J. Chen, A. Sakurai,et al., “Before Förster. Initial excitation in photosynthetic light harvesting,” Chem. Sci.10, 7923–7928 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Ultrafast spectroscopy with photocurrent detection: watching excitonic optoelectronic systems at work,

    A. A. Bakulin, C. Silva, and E. Vella, “Ultrafast spectroscopy with photocurrent detection: watching excitonic optoelectronic systems at work,” The J. Phys. Chem. Lett.7, 250–258 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Photocurrent-detected 2D electronic spectroscopy reveals ultrafast hole transfer in operating PM6/Y6 organic solar cells,

    L. Bolzonello, F. Bernal-Texca, L. G. Gerling,et al., “Photocurrent-detected 2D electronic spectroscopy reveals ultrafast hole transfer in operating PM6/Y6 organic solar cells,” The J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 3983–3988 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Coherent two-dimensional photocurrent spectroscopy in a PbS quantum dot photocell,

    K. J. Karki, J. R. Widom, J. Seibt,et al., “Coherent two-dimensional photocurrent spectroscopy in a PbS quantum dot photocell,” Nat. Commun.5, 5869 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Multidimensional coherent photocurrent spectroscopy of a semiconductor nanostructure,

    G. Nardin, T. M. Autry, K. L. Silverman, and S. T. Cundiff, “Multidimensional coherent photocurrent spectroscopy of a semiconductor nanostructure,” Opt. Express21, 28617–28627 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    Theory and phase-cycling scheme selection principles of collinear phase coherent multi-dimensional optical spectroscopy,

    H.-S. Tan, “Theory and phase-cycling scheme selection principles of collinear phase coherent multi-dimensional optical spectroscopy,” The J. Chem. Phys.129, 124501 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Femtosecond phase-coherent two-dimensional spectroscopy,

    P. Tian, D. Keusters, Y. Suzaki, and W. S. Warren, “Femtosecond phase-coherent two-dimensional spectroscopy,” Science300, 1553–1555 (2003)

    2003

  10. [18]

    Wave packet interferometry and quantum state reconstruction by acousto-optic phase modulation,

    P. F. Tekavec, T. R. Dyke, and A. H. Marcus, “Wave packet interferometry and quantum state reconstruction by acousto-optic phase modulation,” The J. Chem. Phys.125, 194303 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    E. Fresch, F. V. A. Camargo, Q. Shen,et al., “Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 3, 84 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Acousto-optic programmable dispersive filter for adaptive compensation of group delay time dispersion in laser systems,

    P. Tournois, “Acousto-optic programmable dispersive filter for adaptive compensation of group delay time dispersion in laser systems,” Opt. Commun.140, 245–249 (1997)

    1997

  13. [21]

    Amplitude and phase control of ultrashort pulses by use of an acousto-optic programmable dispersive filter: pulse compression and shaping,

    F. Verluise, V. Laude, Z. Cheng,et al., “Amplitude and phase control of ultrashort pulses by use of an acousto-optic programmable dispersive filter: pulse compression and shaping,” Opt. Lett.25, 575–577 (2000)

    2000

  14. [22]

    Arbitrary dispersion control of ultrashort optical pulses with acoustic waves,

    F. Verluise, V. Laude, J.-P. Huignard,et al., “Arbitrary dispersion control of ultrashort optical pulses with acoustic waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B17, 138–145 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    Cogwheel phase cycling in population-detected optical coherent multidimensional spectroscopy,

    A. Jayachandran, S. Mueller, and T. Brixner, “Cogwheel phase cycling in population-detected optical coherent multidimensional spectroscopy,” The J. Chem. Phys.161, 224202 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Work function tuning of a weak adhesion homojunction for stable perovskite solar cells,

    C. Zhang, Y. Son, H. Kim,et al., “Work function tuning of a weak adhesion homojunction for stable perovskite solar cells,” Joule8, 1394–1411 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Obtaining absorptive line shapes in two-dimensional infrared vibrational correlation spectra,

    M. Khalil, N. Demirdöven, and A. Tokmakoff, “Obtaining absorptive line shapes in two-dimensional infrared vibrational correlation spectra,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 047401 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    Phase-stabilized two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    T. Brixner, T. Mančal, I. V. Stiopkin, and G. R. Fleming, “Phase-stabilized two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” The J. Chem. Phys.121, 4221–4236 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy reveals ultrafast downhill energy transfer in photosystem I trimers of the Cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus,

    J. M. Anna, E. E. Ostroumov, K. Maghlaoui,et al., “Two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy reveals ultrafast downhill energy transfer in photosystem I trimers of the Cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus elongatus,” The J. Phys. Chem. Lett.3, 3677–3684 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Phase-modulated rapid-scanning fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,

    D. Agathangelou, A. Javed, F. Sessa,et al., “Phase-modulated rapid-scanning fluorescence-detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy,” The J. Chem. Phys.155, 094201 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    High-sensitivity fluorescence-detected multidimensional electronic spectroscopy through continuous pump–probe delay scan,

    A. Sahu, V. N. Bhat, S. Patra, and V. Tiwari, “High-sensitivity fluorescence-detected multidimensional electronic spectroscopy through continuous pump–probe delay scan,” The J. Chem. Phys.158, 024201 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Photoelectrochemical two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (PEC2DES) of photosystem I: charge separation dynamics hidden in a multichromophoric landscape,

    M. López-Ortiz, L. Bolzonello, M. Bruschi,et al., “Photoelectrochemical two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy (PEC2DES) of photosystem I: charge separation dynamics hidden in a multichromophoric landscape,” ACS Appl. Mater. & Interfaces16, 43451–43461 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.