pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.09284 · v1 · pith:XCJHUSDPnew · submitted 2019-07-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · q-bio.CB

Unraveling the vascular fate of deformable circulating tumor cells via a hierarchical computational model

Pieto Lenarda , Alessandro Coclite , Paolo Decuzzi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 20:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft q-bio.CB
keywords circulating tumor cellscell deformabilitymicrocapillariesvascular adhesionmetastasislattice Boltzmannimmersed boundary
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deformability of circulating tumor cells controls whether they adhere to vessel walls in large or small microcapillaries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a computational model of CTC transport in blood to demonstrate that cell stiffness governs vascular adhesion outcomes. In large microcapillaries, rigid CTCs are driven laterally into wall contact by flowing red blood cells and show firm adhesion, rolling or crawling, while soft CTCs remain central and avoid walls. In small microcapillaries the pattern inverts: soft CTCs become trapped between the wall and compact RBC trains and adhere firmly, whereas rigid CTCs are swept downstream without wall interaction. These size-dependent behaviors are offered as a mechanism that could explain tissue-specific patterns of metastasis formation.

Core claim

Varying CTC shear modulus relative to RBCs produces three adhesion regimes (firm adhesion, rolling, crawling) in large vessels and a reversal in small vessels where only soft CTCs rapidly establish firm adhesion while rigid ones cannot.

What carries the argument

Lattice-Boltzmann plasma solver coupled to Immersed Boundary Method for deformable cells, with CTC shear modulus set stiffer than, equal to, or softer than RBCs.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that varying only the CTC shear modulus across three discrete values captures the dominant biological differences without additional factors such as receptor expression.

What would settle it

High-resolution imaging of labeled CTCs flowing through artificial or in-vivo microcapillaries of two distinct diameters that fails to reproduce the predicted reversal in adhesion location with stiffness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.09284 by Alessandro Coclite, Paolo Decuzzi, Pieto Lenarda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the Immersed Boundary method. a. Interpolation step: the velocity of node xi(t) is interpolated from the lattice nodes inside the interpolation stencil. b. Spreading forces: the force density acting on the fluid node X is obtained from the Lagrangian nodes inside the square region. biological and mechanical behavior of the immersed object. Second, spread forces from the Lagrangi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of a CTC in whole blood flow. A spherical, deformable circulating tumor cell (CTC) is transported downstream in a whole blood flow. The CTC interaction with the vessel wall is mediated by the formation of receptor-ligand bonds. low abundance of CTCs in blood, this condition is indeed physiologically sound. Other blood cells, such as leukocytes, platelets, monocytes and so on, are n… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A deformable spherical capsule in a linear shear flow. a. Schematic representation of the problem and computational domain. b. Normalized velocity field at steady state (Ca = 0.075). c. Steady state configurations of spherical capsules for Ca = 0, 0.075, and 0.15. d. Variation of the Taylor number D with time, for Ca = 0.0375, 0075, 0.15, and 0.3 (dashed line: low resolution; solid line: high resolution; s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The stretching of a red blood cell under uniaxial loading. a. Schematic representation of the problem. Pulling force F is applied at two opposite sides of the RBC membrane. b. The variation of the axial and transverse diameters (Da, Dt) at steady state, for different pulling forces F. (solid dots: experimental results from Mills et al. [47]; solid lines: present hierarchical model). c. Steady state configu… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Margination dynamics of a CTC with different deformability in whole blood flow. a-c. Representative images of RBC and CTC distribution within a capillary whole blood flow (Ht = 20%, D = 25 µm) for the ‘rigid’ (a), ‘soft’ (b) and ‘equal’ (c) cases. The right columns show the velocity profile compared to the pure plasma parabolic profile. d. Trajectories of the center of mass of the CTC for kctc = {krbc/2, k… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Adhesion dynamics of a CTC in a large microcapillary (25µm case). a.Variation over the capillary length y/L of the vertical position zctc/z0 of the CTC, for different values of kctc. b. Variation over the capillary length y/L of the vertical CTC velocity v z ctc/v0 z , for different values of kctc. c. Variation of the normalized coordinate along the flow yctc/y0 of the CTC over time γt˙ , for different val… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fig9.a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Adhesion dynamics of a CTC in a large microcapillary (25µm case). a. Section of the capillary showing a CTC firmly adhering on the endothelium (kctc = 25krbc). b. Section of the capillary showing a CTC rolling on the bottom of the endothelium (kctc = 10krbc). A small portion of the boundary of the cell is labelled in magenta. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Adhesion dynamics of a CTC in a small microcapillary (15µm case). a.Variation over the capillary length y/L of the vertical position zctc/z0 of the CTC, for different values of kctc. b. Variation over the capillary length y/L of the vertical CTC velocity v z ctc/vz 0 , for different values of kctc. c. Variation of the normalized coordinate along the flow yctc/y0 of the CTC over time γt˙ , for different val… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Adhesion dynamics of a CTC in a small microcapillary (15µm case). a. Section of the channel showing the so called ‘train’ dynamics of a CTC (kctc = 25krbc). b. Section of the capillary showing a CTC progressively adhering on the top of the capillary (kctc = krbc). a combination of rolling and progressive squeezing against the wall. Soft CTCs have been observed to deform and navigate together with the RBCs … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Distant spreading of primary lesions is modulated by the vascular dynamics of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their ability to establish metastatic niches. While the mechanisms regulating CTC homing in specific tissues are yet to be elucidated, it is well documented that CTCs possess different size, biological properties and deformability. A computational model is presented to predict the vascular transport and adhesion of CTCs in whole blood. A Lattice-Boltzmann method, which is employed to solve the Navier-Stokes equation for the plasma flow, is coupled with an Immersed Boundary Method. The vascular dynamics of a CTC is assessed in large and small microcapillaries. The CTC shear modulus k ctc is varied returning CTCs that are stiffer, softer and equally deformable as compared to RBCs. In large microcapillaries, soft CTCs behave similarly to RBCs and move away from the vessel walls; whereas rigid CTCs are pushed laterally by the fast moving RBCs and interact with the vessel walls. Three adhesion behaviors are observed, firm adhesion, rolling and crawling over the vessel walls, depending on the CTC stiffness. On the contrary, in small microcapillaries, rigid CTCs are pushed downstream by a compact train of RBCs and cannot establish any firm interaction with the vessel walls; whereas soft CTCs are squeezed between the vessel wall and the RBC train and rapidly establish firm adhesion. These findings document the relevance of cell deformability in CTC vascular adhesion and provide insights on the mechanisms regulating metastasis formation in different vascular districts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a computational model coupling the Lattice-Boltzmann method for plasma flow with the Immersed Boundary Method to simulate the transport and adhesion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in large and small microcapillaries. The CTC shear modulus k_ctc is varied to produce cells stiffer than, softer than, or equal in deformability to red blood cells (RBCs). The simulations report that in large vessels rigid CTCs are pushed to the walls and exhibit firm adhesion, rolling or crawling, while soft CTCs behave like RBCs and avoid walls; in small vessels the pattern reverses, with soft CTCs squeezed into firm adhesion and rigid CTCs advected downstream without adhesion. The central claim is that these deformability-dependent behaviors document the relevance of CTC mechanical properties to vascular adhesion and metastasis in different vascular districts.

Significance. If the reported behaviors are robust, the work isolates the effect of a single mechanical parameter (k_ctc) on CTC-wall interactions in whole-blood flow and thereby supplies mechanistic insight into why metastasis patterns differ across vessel sizes. The use of an established LBM-IBM coupling is a methodological strength; the parameter variation is performed explicitly rather than fitted to the target outcome.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the stated claims rest entirely on qualitative descriptions of simulation outcomes (e.g., “move away from the vessel walls,” “rapidly establish firm adhesion”) with no accompanying quantitative metrics such as adhesion probability, contact time, force magnitudes, or statistical measures across multiple realizations. This absence directly limits the evidential support for the relevance conclusion.
  2. [Methods and Results] Methods/Results: no validation against experimental data on CTC adhesion, no error analysis or convergence checks on the LBM-IBM discretization, and no tabulated values or ranges for k_ctc, RBC parameters, or adhesion-receptor strengths are provided. These omissions are load-bearing because the central claim equates the observed qualitative differences with biological relevance.
  3. [Results] Results: the model holds all parameters except k_ctc fixed; the manuscript does not test whether the reported adhesion behaviors persist when surface-receptor density or ligand-receptor kinetics are also varied, leaving open whether deformability is sufficient to explain the claimed vascular-district differences.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: “k ctc” appears with an extraneous space in the abstract; consistent subscript formatting should be used throughout.
  2. [Abstract] The title refers to a “hierarchical computational model,” yet the abstract and provided text do not define the hierarchy or its relation to the LBM-IBM coupling; a clarifying sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond to each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated claims rest entirely on qualitative descriptions of simulation outcomes (e.g., “move away from the vessel walls,” “rapidly establish firm adhesion”) with no accompanying quantitative metrics such as adhesion probability, contact time, force magnitudes, or statistical measures across multiple realizations. This absence directly limits the evidential support for the relevance conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript, we will add adhesion probabilities, average contact times, force magnitudes, and statistical measures across multiple realizations to support the described behaviors. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods and Results] Methods/Results: no validation against experimental data on CTC adhesion, no error analysis or convergence checks on the LBM-IBM discretization, and no tabulated values or ranges for k_ctc, RBC parameters, or adhesion-receptor strengths are provided. These omissions are load-bearing because the central claim equates the observed qualitative differences with biological relevance.

    Authors: We will add tabulated parameter values and ranges for k_ctc, RBC parameters, and adhesion-receptor strengths, along with convergence checks and error analysis for the LBM-IBM discretization. Direct experimental validation of CTC adhesion is not available within this computational study, though the underlying LBM-IBM framework draws from literature-validated RBC models; we will expand the discussion of model assumptions and limitations. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results] Results: the model holds all parameters except k_ctc fixed; the manuscript does not test whether the reported adhesion behaviors persist when surface-receptor density or ligand-receptor kinetics are also varied, leaving open whether deformability is sufficient to explain the claimed vascular-district differences.

    Authors: The study deliberately isolates CTC deformability by varying only k_ctc. This demonstrates that mechanical differences alone produce the vessel-size-dependent adhesion patterns. Varying receptor density or kinetics is a natural extension but not required to establish the reported sufficiency of deformability for the observed behaviors. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper describes a computational simulation study coupling Lattice-Boltzmann flow solution with Immersed Boundary cell modeling. All reported outcomes (wall interactions, adhesion modes in large vs. small vessels) are generated by explicitly varying the input parameter k_ctc across discrete values while holding other quantities fixed; no equation or result is obtained by fitting to the target behaviors, no self-referential definition equates an output to its input, and no load-bearing premise rests on self-citation chains. The derivation chain consists of direct numerical experiments whose conclusions follow from the stated parametric choices without reduction to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of standard numerical fluid dynamics methods and the parametric variation of cell stiffness as representative of biological differences; no new entities postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • CTC shear modulus k_ctc
    Varied across values to simulate stiffer, softer, and equal deformability compared to RBCs; central to distinguishing the three adhesion behaviors.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lattice-Boltzmann method coupled with Immersed Boundary Method accurately models cell-fluid interactions and adhesion in microcapillaries
    Invoked as the core of the hierarchical computational model for solving Navier-Stokes and cell dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1234 out tokens · 22914 ms · 2026-05-24T20:42:16.433990+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. X. Nguyen, P.D. Bos, and J. Massagué. Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 9(4):274–284, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Wirtz, K

    D. Wirtz, K. Konstantopoulos, and P. C. Searson. The physics of cancer: The role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 11(7):512–522, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    J. A. Joyce and J. W. Pollard. Microenvironmental regulation of metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 9(4):239–252, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Mollica, C

    H. Mollica, C. Coclite, M.E. Miali, R.C. Pereira, L. Paleari, C. Manneschi, A. DeCensi, and P. Decuzzi. Deciphering the relative contribution of vascular inflammation and blood rheology in metastatic spreading. Biomicrofluidics, 12(4):042205, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    King, K.G

    M.R. King, K.G. Phillips, A. Mitrugno, T.R. Lee, A.M. de Guillebon, S. Chandrasekaran andM.J. McGuire, R.T. Carr, S.M. Baker-Groberg, R.A. Riggand, A. Kolatkar, M. Luttgen, K. Bethel, P. Kuhn, P. Decuzzi, and O.J. McCarty. A physical sciences network characterization of circulating tumor cell aggregate transport. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 308(10):C792–C802, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    S. J. Tan, L. Yobas, G. Y . Lee, C. N. Ong, and C. T. Lim. Microdevice for the isolation and enumeration of cancer cells from blood. Biomed Microdevices, pages 883–892, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Sollier, D

    E. Sollier, D. E. Go, J. Che, D. R. Gossett, S. O’Byrne, W. M. Weaver, N. Kummer, M. Rettig, J. Goldman, N. Nickols, S. McCloskey, R. P. Kulkarni, and D. Di Carlo. Size-selective collection of circulating tumor cells using vortex technology. Lab Chip, 14:63–77, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Riahi, P

    R. Riahi, P. Gogoi, S. Sepehri, Y . Zhou, K. Handique, J. Godsey, and Y . Wang. A novel microchannel-based device to capture and analyze circulating tumor cells (ctcs) of breast cancer. Int J Oncol, 44:1870–8, 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Lekka, P

    M. Lekka, P. Laidler, D. Gil, J. Lekki, Z. Stachura, and A. Z. Hrynkiewicz. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J, 28:312–6, 1999

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    T. W. Remmerbach, F. Wottawah, J. Dietrich, B. Lincoln, C. Wittekind, and J. Guck. Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping. Cancer ResEur Biophys J, 69:1728–32, 2009

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    S. E. Cross, Y . S. Jin, J. Rao, and J. K. Gimzewski. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.Nat Nanotechnol, 2:780–3, 2007

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Shaw Bagnall, S

    J. Shaw Bagnall, S. Byun, S. Begum, D. T. Miyamoto, V . C. Hecht, S. Maheswaran, S. L. Stott, M. Toner, R. O. Hynes, and S. R. Manalis. Deformability of tumor cells versus blood cells. Sci Rep, 5:18542, 2015

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Zhang, P.C

    J. Zhang, P.C. Johnson, and A.S. Popel. Effects of erythrocyte deformability and aggregation on the cell free layer and apparent viscosity of microscopic blood flows. Microvasc. Res., 77(3):265–272, 2009

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    R. Skalak. Strain energy function of red blood cell membranes. Biophys J, 13(3):245–264, 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Varnik T

    F. Varnik T. Krüger and D. Raabe. Efficient and accurate simulations of deformable particles immersed in a fluid using a combined immersed boundary lattice boltzmann finite element method.Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 61(12):3485–3505, 2011

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Schiller, T

    U.D. Schiller, T. Krüger, and O. Henrich. Mesoscopic modelling and simulation of soft matter. Soft Matter, 14(1):9–26, 2017

    work page 2017

  17. [18]

    Fedosov, B

    D.A. Fedosov, B. Caswell, and G.E. Karniadakis. A multiscale red blood cell model with accurate mechanics. Biophysical Journal, 98(10):2215–2225, 2010

    work page 2010

  18. [19]

    Fedosov, B

    D.A. Fedosov, B. Caswell, A.S. Popel, and G.E. Karniadakis. Blood flow and cell-free layer in microvessels. Microcirculation, 17(8):615–628, 2010. 18 Unraveling the vascular fate of deformable circulating tumor cells via a hierarchical computational modelA PREPRINT

    work page 2010

  19. [20]

    Fedosov and G

    D.A. Fedosov and G. Gompper. White blood cell margination in microcirculation. Soft Matter, 10(8):2961–70, 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [21]

    Fedosov, M

    D.A. Fedosov, M. Peltmäki, and G. Gompper. Deformation and dynamics of red blood cells in flow through cylindrical microchannels. Soft Matter, 10(24):4258–67, 2014

    work page 2014

  21. [22]

    C.S. Peskin. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica, 11(3-4):479–511, 2002

    work page 2002

  22. [23]

    Saadat, G

    A. Saadat, G. Christopher J., G. Iaccarino, and E.S.G. Shaqfeh. Immersed-finite-element method for deformable particle suspensions in viscous and viscoelastic media. Phys. Rev. E, 98:063316, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [24]

    On the near-wall accumulation of injectable particles in the microcirculation: Smaller is not better

    Tae-Rin Lee, Myunghwan Choi, Adrian M Kopacz, Seok-Hyun Yun, Wing Liu, and Paolo Decuzzi. On the near-wall accumulation of injectable particles in the microcirculation: Smaller is not better. Scientific reports, 3:2079, 06 2013

    work page 2079

  24. [25]

    Multiscale modeling and uncertainty quantification in nanoparticle-mediated drug/gene delivery.Computational Mechanics, 53:511–537, 03 2014

    Ying Li, Wylie Stroberg, Tae-Rin Lee, Hansung Kim, Han Man, Dean Ho, Paolo Decuzzi, and Wing Liu. Multiscale modeling and uncertainty quantification in nanoparticle-mediated drug/gene delivery.Computational Mechanics, 53:511–537, 03 2014

    work page 2014

  25. [26]

    Falcucci, S

    G. Falcucci, S. Ubertini, D. Chiappini, and S. Succi. Modern lattice boltzmann methods for multiphase microflows. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 76(5):712–725, 2011

    work page 2011

  26. [27]

    S. Succi. Lattice boltzmann across scales: from turbulence to dna translocation. European Physical Journal B, 64(3-4):471–479, 2008

    work page 2008

  27. [28]

    Succi, G

    S. Succi, G. Amati, M. Bernaschi, G. Falcucci, M. Lauricella, and A. Montessori. Towards exascale lattice boltzmann computing. Computers and Fluids, 181:107–115, 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    C. Sun, C. Migliorini, and L.L. Munn. Red blood cells initiate leukocyte rolling in postcapillary expansions: a lattice boltzmann analysis. Biophys J, 85(1):208–22, 2003

    work page 2003

  29. [30]

    Coclite, H

    A. Coclite, H. Mollica, S. Ranaldo, G. Pascazio, M. D. de Tullio, and P. Decuzzi. Predicting different adhesive regimens of circulating particles at blood capillary walls. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 21(11):168, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [31]

    Yin and J

    X. Yin and J. Zhang. Cell-free layer and wall shear stress variation in microvessels. Biorheology, 49:261–70, 07 2012

    work page 2012

  31. [32]

    H. Ye, Z. Shen, and Y . Li. Shear rate dependent margination of sphere-like, oblate-like and prolate-like micro-particles within blood flow. Soft Matter, 14(36):7401–7419, 2018

    work page 2018

  32. [33]

    S. Gekle. Strongly accelerated margination of active particles in blood flow. Biophysical Journal, 110(2):514 – 520, 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [34]

    K.A. Rejniak. Circulating tumor cells: When a solid tumor meets a fluid microenvironment. Front Oncol, 2(111), 2012

    work page 2012

  34. [35]

    W.W. Yan, Y . Liu, and B.M. Fu. Effects of curvature and cell-cell interaction on cell adhesion in microvessels. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol, 9(5):629–40, 2010

    work page 2010

  35. [36]

    L.L Xiao, Y . Liu, S. Chen, and B.M. Fu. Effects of flowing rbcs on adhesion of a circulating tumor cell in microvessels. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol, 16(2):597–610, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [37]

    S. Succi. The lattice Boltzmann equation: for fluid dynamics and beyond. Oxford University Press, 2001

    work page 2001

  37. [38]

    Simulating engineering flows through complex porous media via the lattice boltzmann method

    Vesselin Krassimirov Krastev and Giacomo Falcucci. Simulating engineering flows through complex porous media via the lattice boltzmann method. Energies, 11(4), 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [39]

    D. A. Hammer and S.M. Apte. Simulation of cell rolling and adhesion on surfaces in shear flow: general results and analysis of selectin-mediated neutrophil adhesion. Biophys. J., 63(1):35–57, 1992

    work page 1992

  39. [40]

    King and D

    M.R. King and D. A. Hammer. Multiparticle adhesive dynamics: Hydrodynamic recruitment of rolling leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98(26):14919 – 14924, 2001

    work page 2001

  40. [41]

    H. Ye, Z. Shen, and Y . Li. Cell stiffness governs its adhesion dynamics on substrate under shear flow. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 17(3):407–411, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [42]

    Y .H. Qian, D. Dhumieres, and P. Lallemand. Lattice bgk models for navier-stokes equation.Europhysics Letters, 17(6):479–484, 1992

    work page 1992

  42. [43]

    T. Krüger. Effect of tube diameter and capillary number on platelet margination and near-wall dynamics. Rheol. Acta., 55(6):511–526, 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    Sigüenza, S

    J. Sigüenza, S. Mendez, D. Ambard, F. Dubois, F. Jourdan, R. Mozul, and F. Nicoud. Validation of an immersed thick boundary method for simulating fluid–structure interactions of deformable membranes. Journal of Computational Physics, 322(1):723–746, 2016. 19 Unraveling the vascular fate of deformable circulating tumor cells via a hierarchical computational...

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    Mendez, E

    S. Mendez, E. Gibaud, and F. Nicoud. An unstructured solver for simulations of deformable particles in flows at arbitrary reynolds numbers. Journal of Computational Physics, 256(1):465–483, 2014

    work page 2014

  45. [46]

    J. Li, M. Dao, C. T. Lim, and S. Suresh. Spectrin-level modeling of the cytoskeleton and optical tweezers stretching of the erythrocyte. Biophysical Journal, 88(1):3707–3719, 2005

    work page 2005

  46. [47]

    Mills, L

    J.P. Mills, L. Qie, M. Dao, C.T. Lim, and S. Suresh. Nonlinear elastic and viscoelastic deformation of the human red blood cell with optical tweezers. Mech Chem Biosyst, 1(3):169–180, 2004

    work page 2004

  47. [48]

    McWhirter, H

    J.L. McWhirter, H. Noguchi, and G. Gompper. Nonlinear elastic and viscoelastic deformation of the human red blood cell with optical tweezers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(15):6039–6043, 2009

    work page 2009

  48. [49]

    N. A. Mody, O. Lomakin, T. A. Doggett, T. G. Diacovo, and M. R. King. Mechanics of transient platelet adhesion to von willebrand factor under flow. Biophys. J., 88(2):1432–1443, 2005

    work page 2005

  49. [50]

    W. Wang, N. A. Mody, and M. R. King. Multiscale model of platelet translocation and collision. J. Comput. Phys., 244:223–235, 2005

    work page 2005

  50. [51]

    E. Lac, D. Barthes-Biesel, N.A. Pelekasis, and J. Tsamopoulos. Spherical capsuls in three- dimensional unbounded stokes flow: Effect of the membrane constitutive law and onset of buckling. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 516:303–334, 2004

    work page 2004

  51. [52]

    Y . Sui, YT. Chew, P. Roy XB., Chen, HT., and Low. Transient deformation of elastic capsules in shear flow: effect of membrane bending stiffness. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 75(6), 2007

    work page 2007

  52. [53]

    Pozrikidis

    C. Pozrikidis. Numerical simulation of the flow-induced deformation of red blood cells. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 31(10):1194–1205, 2003

    work page 2003

  53. [54]

    Peer, J.M Karp, S

    D. Peer, J.M Karp, S. Hong, O.C. Farokhzad, R. Margalit, and R. Langer. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol, 2(12):751–60, 2007

    work page 2007

  54. [55]

    N. Guz, M. Dokukin, V . Kalaparthi, and I. Sokolov. If cell mechanics can be described by elastic modulus: Study of different models and probes used in indentation experiments. Biophysical Journal, 107:564–575, 2014

    work page 2014

  55. [56]

    Maeda, Y

    N. Maeda, Y . Suzuki, J. Tanaka, and N. Tateishi. Erythrocyte flow and elasticity of microvessels evaluated by marginal cell-free layer and flow resistance. Am J Physiol., 516(6):H2454–H2461, 1996

    work page 1996

  56. [57]

    Takeishi, Y

    N. Takeishi, Y . Imai, T. Yamaguchi, and T. Ishikawa. Flow of a circulating tumor cell and red blood cells in microvessels. Phys. Rev. E, 92(063011), 2015. 20

    work page 2015