Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 91 references

Multi-Omics Analysis for Cancer Subtype Inference via Unrolling Graph Smoothness Priors

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read GTMancer claims that unrolling a multiplex graph optimization problem with contrastive learning and dual attention lets a graph transformer integrate multi-omics data better than current methods, improving cancer subtype classification.

desk verdict The abstract promises a multi-omics cancer classifier; the attached full text is a robotics paper — nothing to referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06257 v1 pith:XDXV7UT3 submitted 2025-08-08 cs.LG

Jielong Lu , Zhihao Wu , Jiajun Yu , Jiajun Bu , Haishuai Wang This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords multi-omicsintegrationcancersubtypeclassificationgraphtransformerunrolledoptimizationcontrastivelearningneuralnetworksattentionprecisiononcology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes GTMancer, a graph-transformer architecture for cancer subtype classification from multi-omics data. Its central claim is that existing GNN-based integrators underuse the coupling between different molecular views, and that explicitly modeling within-omics and cross-omics structure through an unrolled optimization objective improves subtype prediction. The method uses contrastive learning to embed all omics into a unified semantic space, unrolls a multiplex graph optimization problem in that space, and uses dual attention coefficients so global omics information can refine each individual omics representation. On seven real-world cancer datasets, the authors report that GTMancer outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms. If correct, the work provides a general design for integrating few but tightly coupled data views.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the unrolled multiplex graph optimization problem in a unified semantic space. 'Unrolling' turns the iterations of a graph-regularized optimization into the forward pass of the network, so the model explicitly computes smoothness updates. The dual attention coefficients select which structural priors to trust, both inside a single omics graph and between different omics graphs; this is how global omics information guides the refinement of individual omics representations.

What would settle it

Compare GTMancer against itself with the multiplex graph edges replaced by random connections (or with sample labels shuffled across patients within each omics type). If accuracy does not drop substantially, the unrolled graph smoothness prior is not the source of the reported gains. Also, a simpler check: swap the unrolled layers for ordinary transformer blocks of the same size; the paper's claim implies the unrolled version should win by a clear margin on the seven datasets.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that GTMancer—a graph transformer built by unrolling a multiplex graph optimization problem—delivers better cancer subtype classification than existing multi-omics integration methods. The authors first use contrastive learning to map each omics type into a shared semantic space, then define a multiplex graph optimization problem over that space and unroll its iterative updates as transformer layers. Two sets of attention coefficients are learned, one for graph-smoothness priors within each omics view and one for priors coupling the views, so that information from all omics can guide the refinement of each single omics representation. The empirical claim is that this arc

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the multiplex graph optimization problem, as unrolled in the unified semantic space, faithfully captures the real biological coupling between different omics types; if the graph priors do not correspond to genuine biological relationships, the claimed gains would not transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cancer subtype classifiers can be improved without new data modalities: the gains come from modeling cross-omics coupling rather than adding assays.
  • The unrolled-optimization design gives a reusable layer recipe for other multi-view biomedical integration tasks, such as combining methylation, expression, and mutation profiles.
  • If global information genuinely refines weak views, datasets with noisy or incomplete omics channels should benefit most, which is a testable pattern in the reported per-dataset results.
  • The approach may extend to disease subtyping beyond cancer wherever multiple molecular views are available.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The full text supplied with this submission is actually a different manuscript (a robotic-manipulation diffusion-policy paper); the summary above is grounded in the abstract and reader notes only, so the body's experimental details could not be checked.
  • A clean way to test whether the unrolling matters is to replace the unrolled layers with standard transformer blocks at equal parameter count and measure the accuracy drop; the abstract does not report this comparison.
  • The unified contrastive embedding is a strong modeling choice: if one omics type has much higher dimensionality or noise than the others, the shared space may compress its signal; sensitivity to embedding dimension and contrastive temperature would clarify the operating range.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper as described by its title and abstract proposes GTMancer, a graph transformer for multi-omics cancer subtype classification. The abstract claims that GTMancer unrolls a multiplex graph optimization problem in a unified semantic space using contrastive learning and dual attention, and that it outperforms existing state-of-the-art algorithms on seven real-world cancer datasets. The full text provided, however, is a robotics paper, ADPro, about test-time adaptive diffusion policies for robotic manipulation. The body contains no GTMancer, no multiplex graph optimization, no contrastive or dual-attention formulation, no cancer datasets, and no subtype classification experiments. Consequently, the central claim of the paper cannot be checked, reproduced, or assessed from the submitted manuscript.

Significance. The proposed idea behind GTMancer—unrolling a multiplex graph optimization problem with contrastive embeddings and dual attention for heterogeneous multi-omics integration—is a plausible and potentially useful direction for GNN-based cancer subtype classification. If properly developed and validated, it could contribute to precision oncology by improving integration of multi-omics data. However, the manuscript as submitted does not contain the technical content or experimental evidence for GTMancer. The robotics content in the body is a separate contribution and cannot substitute for the missing multi-omics method and results. The significance of the claimed GTMancer contribution is therefore unverifiable in this submission.

major comments (3)
  1. [Title/Abstract vs. Full Text] The central claim of the paper—stated in the abstract's final sentence—is that GTMancer outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms on seven real-world cancer datasets. The full text (Sections I–V) presents a completely different system, ADPro, for robotic manipulation: the problem statement in Section III.A defines actions as 7D poses (v,R,w), Eq. (10) uses Fast Global Registration on gripper/scene point clouds, and Section IV reports RLBench/CALVIN success rates. There is no occurrence of GTMancer, multiplex graph optimization, contrastive learning, dual attention, or cancer subtype classification anywhere in the body. The central claim is therefore entirely unsupported by the manuscript.
  2. [Section IV] The empirical evaluation is the load-bearing evidence for the abstract's performance claim. Section IV evaluates ADPro on RLBench, CALVIN, RealWP, and Acronym, reporting manipulation success rates and inference times (Tables I–IV). No cancer dataset is named, no multi-omics classification accuracy is reported, no error bars or significance tests are given, and no multi-omics baselines are compared. This does not substantiate the claimed superiority of GTMancer.
  3. [Section V] The limitation paragraph at the end of Section V states that the method relies on end-effector and scene point clouds as input. For a multi-omics cancer classifier, the relevant limitations would concern omics data types, missing data, batch effects, or sample size. The stated limitation is inconsistent with the abstract's GTMancer; it confirms that the body belongs to a different paper and that the abstract and full text are not a single coherent manuscript.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Section III.A] The notation 'Pk = (Qk i=1 Ri+Pk i=1 vi)' appears garbled; the intended group operation for SE(3) composition is unclear. This is a presentation issue that should be fixed if the robotics text is published separately.
  2. [References] There are formatting inconsistencies in the reference list, e.g., 'V . Y' in reference [18] and '[Online]. Available' in reference [90]. Please normalize these and the arXiv identifiers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established: the supplied full text is an unrelated robotics paper (ADPro), so the GTMancer derivation chain claimed in the abstract is absent and cannot be checked for circularity.

full rationale

The abstract attached to this submission claims a multi-omics cancer-subtype method, GTMancer, with an unrolled multiplex graph optimization, contrastive learning, dual attention, and superior results on seven cancer datasets. However, the full text is a different manuscript: 'ADPro: a Test-time Adaptive Diffusion Policy via Manifold-constrained Denoising and Task-aware Initialization for Robotic Manipulation,' by different authors. The full text contains no GTMancer equations, no multiplex graph optimization, no contrastive or dual-attention formulation, no cancer datasets, and no subtype classification results. Circularity analysis requires quoting a specific reduction in the paper's own derivation chain—e.g., an equation that equals its input by construction, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing conclusion resting solely on an author's self-citation. None of those can be exhibited here because the claimed derivation chain is simply not present in the available text. The abstract's unsupported empirical claim is a correctness/reproducibility concern, not a circularity finding. Per the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed with quoted evidence of a specific reduction, the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract gives no equations, so the ledger of free parameters and invented entities cannot be populated from the abstract alone. The two axioms listed are the central domain assumptions stated in the abstract. Any further ledger items require the full methods section, which was not available.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Multi-omics data can be embedded into a unified semantic space where graph smoothness priors aid classification.
    This is the core modeling assumption of GTMancer as described in the abstract: contrastive learning embeds omics into a unified space, and graph optimization is unrolled there.
  • domain assumption The multiplex graph optimization problem is a valid model for the coupling between heterogeneous omics.
    The abstract states GTMancer 'builds upon the GNN optimization problem' and 'unroll[s] the multiplex graph optimization problem'. This assumes graph smoothness is an appropriate prior for biological data. Entered from the abstract; no derivation provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Omics Analysis for Cancer Subtype Inference via Unrolling Graph Smoothness Priors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XDXV7UT3

@misc{pith2026250806257,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Omics Analysis for Cancer Subtype Inference via Unrolling Graph Smoothness Priors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XDXV7UT3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06257}
}
read the original abstract

Integrating multi-omics datasets through data-driven analysis offers a comprehensive understanding of the complex biological processes underlying various diseases, particularly cancer. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently demonstrated remarkable ability to exploit relational structures in biological data, enabling advances in multi-omics integration for cancer subtype classification. Existing approaches often neglect the intricate coupling between heterogeneous omics, limiting their capacity to resolve subtle cancer subtype heterogeneity critical for precision oncology. To address these limitations, we propose a framework named Graph Transformer for Multi-omics Cancer Subtype Classification (GTMancer). This framework builds upon the GNN optimization problem and extends its application to complex multi-omics data. Specifically, our method leverages contrastive learning to embed multi-omics data into a unified semantic space. We unroll the multiplex graph optimization problem in that unified space and introduce dual sets of attention coefficients to capture structural graph priors both within and among multi-omics data. This approach enables global omics information to guide the refining of the representations of individual omics. Empirical experiments on seven real-world cancer datasets demonstrate that GTMancer outperforms existing state-of-the-art algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Graspit! a versatile simulator for robotic grasping,

    A. T. Miller and P. K. Allen, “Graspit! a versatile simulator for robotic grasping,”IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–122, 2004

    2004

  2. [2]

    Data-driven grasp synthesis using shape matching and task-based pruning,

    Y . Li, J. L. Fu, and N. S. Pollard, “Data-driven grasp synthesis using shape matching and task-based pruning,”IEEE Transactions on visualization and computer graphics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 732–747, 2007

    2007

  3. [3]

    Blind grasping: Stable robotic grasping using tactile feedback and hand kinematics,

    H. Dang, J. Weisz, and P. K. Allen, “Blind grasping: Stable robotic grasping using tactile feedback and hand kinematics,” in2011 ieee international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 5917–5922

    2011

  4. [4]

    Adaptive neural network control for full-state constrained robotic manipulator with actuator saturation and time-varying delays,

    W. Sun, Y . Wu, and X. Lv, “Adaptive neural network control for full-state constrained robotic manipulator with actuator saturation and time-varying delays,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 3331–3342, 2021. LIet al.: A TEST-TIME ADAPTIVE DIFFUSION POLICY VIA MANIFOLD-CONSTRAINED DENOISING AND TASK-AW ARE INITI...

    2021

  5. [5]

    Grasp pose detection in point clouds,

    A. Ten Pas, M. Gualtieri, K. Saenko, and R. Platt, “Grasp pose detection in point clouds,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, no. 13-14, pp. 1455–1473, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Pointnetgpd: Detecting grasp configurations from point sets,

    H. Liang, X. Ma, S. Li, M. Görner, S. Tang, B. Fang, F. Sun, and J. Zhang, “Pointnetgpd: Detecting grasp configurations from point sets,” in2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2019, pp. 3629–3635

    2019

  7. [7]

    6-dof graspnet: Variational grasp generation for object manipulation,

    A. Mousavian, C. Eppner, and D. Fox, “6-dof graspnet: Variational grasp generation for object manipulation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 2901–2910

    2019

  8. [8]

    6-dof grasping for target-driven object manipulation in clutter,

    A. Murali, A. Mousavian, C. Eppner, C. Paxton, and D. Fox, “6-dof grasping for target-driven object manipulation in clutter,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 6232–6238

    2020

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Graspnet-1billion: A large- scale benchmark for general object grasping,

    H.-S. Fang, C. Wang, M. Gou, and C. Lu, “Graspnet-1billion: A large- scale benchmark for general object grasping,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 11 444–11 453

    2020

  2. [10]

    Robotic manipulation in dynamic scenarios via bounding-box- based hindsight goal generation,

    Z. Bing, E. Alvarez, L. Cheng, F. O. Morin, R. Li, X. Su, K. Huang, and A. Knoll, “Robotic manipulation in dynamic scenarios via bounding-box- based hindsight goal generation,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 5037–5050, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Rgb matters: Learning 7-dof grasp poses on monocular rgbd images,

    M. Gou, H.-S. Fang, Z. Zhu, S. Xu, C. Wang, and C. Lu, “Rgb matters: Learning 7-dof grasp poses on monocular rgbd images,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 13 459–13 466

    2021

  4. [12]

    Regnet: Region-based grasp network for end-to-end grasp detection in point clouds,

    B. Zhao, H. Zhang, X. Lan, H. Wang, Z. Tian, and N. Zheng, “Regnet: Region-based grasp network for end-to-end grasp detection in point clouds,” in2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 13 474–13 480

    2021

  5. [13]

    Scoring graspability based on grasp regression for better grasp prediction,

    A. Depierre, E. Dellandréa, and L. Chen, “Scoring graspability based on grasp regression for better grasp prediction,” in2021 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4370– 4376

    2021

  6. [14]

    Gpr: Grasp pose refinement network for cluttered scenes,

    W. Wei, Y . Luo, F. Li, G. Xu, J. Zhong, W. Li, and P. Wang, “Gpr: Grasp pose refinement network for cluttered scenes,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4295–4302

    2021

  7. [15]

    Towards scale balanced 6-dof grasp detection in cluttered scenes,

    H. Ma and D. Huang, “Towards scale balanced 6-dof grasp detection in cluttered scenes,” inConference on robot learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 2004–2013

    2023

  8. [16]

    Discriminative active learning for robotic grasping in cluttered scene,

    B. Wei, X. Ye, C. Long, Z. Du, B. Li, B. Yin, and X. Yang, “Discriminative active learning for robotic grasping in cluttered scene,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1858–1865, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Rgb-d grasp detection via depth guided learning with cross-modal attention,

    R. Qin, H. Ma, B. Gao, and D. Huang, “Rgb-d grasp detection via depth guided learning with cross-modal attention,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 8003–8009

    2023

  10. [18]

    Equivariant descriptor fields: Se (3)-equivariant energy-based models for end-to-end visual robotic manipulation learning,

    H. Ryu, H.-i. Lee, J.-H. Lee, and J. Choi, “Equivariant descriptor fields: Se (3)-equivariant energy-based models for end-to-end visual robotic manipulation learning,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Diverse imitation learning via self-organizing generative models,

    A. Vahabpour, T. Wang, Q. Lu, O. Pooladzandi, and V . Roychowdhury, “Diverse imitation learning via self-organizing generative models,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7145–7157, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via ac- tion diffusion,

    C. Chi, Z. Xu, S. Feng, E. Cousineau, Y . Du, B. Burchfiel, R. Tedrake, and S. Song, “Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via ac- tion diffusion,”The International Journal of Robotics Research, p. 02783649241273668, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Grasp as you say: Language-guided dexterous grasp generation,

    Y .-L. Wei, J.-J. Jiang, C. Xing, X.-T. Tan, X.-M. Wu, H. Li, M. Cutkosky, and W.-S. Zheng, “Grasp as you say: Language-guided dexterous grasp generation,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 46 881–46 907, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Learning an actionable discrete diffusion policy via large-scale actionless video pre- training,

    H. He, C. Bai, L. Pan, W. Zhang, B. Zhao, and X. Li, “Learning an actionable discrete diffusion policy via large-scale actionless video pre- training,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 31 124–31 153, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Adamanip: Adaptive articulated object manipulation environments and policy learning,

    Y . Wang, X. Zhang, R. Wu, Y . Li, Y . Shen, M. Wu, Z. He, Y . Wang, and H. Dong, “Adamanip: Adaptive articulated object manipulation environments and policy learning,” inThe Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025

    2025

  16. [24]

    Learning multimodal behaviors from scratch with diffusion policy gradient,

    S. Li, R. Krohn, T. Chen, A. Ajay, P. Agrawal, and G. Chalvatzaki, “Learning multimodal behaviors from scratch with diffusion policy gradient,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 38 456–38 479, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Diffusion transformer policy,

    Z. Hou, T. Zhang, Y . Xiong, H. Pu, C. Zhao, R. Tong, Y . Qiao, J. Dai, and Y . Chen, “Diffusion transformer policy,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15959, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations,

    Y . Ze, G. Zhang, K. Zhang, C. Hu, M. Wang, and H. Xu, “3d diffusion policy: Generalizable visuomotor policy learning via simple 3d representations,” inICRA 2024 Workshop on 3D Visual Representations for Robot Manipulation, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Equivariant diffusion policy,

    D. Wang, S. Hart, D. Surovik, T. Kelestemur, H. Huang, H. Zhao, M. Yeatman, J. Wang, R. Walters, and R. Platt, “Equivariant diffusion policy,”8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Equibot: Sim (3)-equivariant diffusion policy for generalizable and data efficient learning,

    J. Yang, Z. Cao, C. Deng, R. Antonova, S. Song, and J. Bohg, “Equibot: Sim (3)-equivariant diffusion policy for generalizable and data efficient learning,” in8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    3d diffuser actor: Policy diffusion with 3d scene representations,

    T.-W. Ke, N. Gkanatsios, and K. Fragkiadaki, “3d diffuser actor: Policy diffusion with 3d scene representations,” in8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Scaling diffusion policy in transformer to 1 billion parameters for robotic manipulation,

    M. Zhu, Y . Zhu, J. Li, J. Wen, Z. Xu, N. Liu, R. Cheng, C. Shen, Y . Peng, F. Fenget al., “Scaling diffusion policy in transformer to 1 billion parameters for robotic manipulation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14411, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Pick-and-place manipulation across grippers without retraining: A learning-optimization diffusion policy approach,

    X. Yao, Y . Zhou, Y . Meng, L. Dong, L. Hong, Z. Zhang, Z. Bing, K. Huang, F. Sun, and A. Knoll, “Pick-and-place manipulation across grippers without retraining: A learning-optimization diffusion policy approach,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15613, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Lift3d foundation policy: Lifting 2d large-scale pretrained models for robust 3d robotic manipulation,

    Y . Jia, J. Liu, S. Chen, C. Gu, Z. Wang, L. Luo, L. Lee, P. Wang, Z. Wang, R. Zhanget al., “Lift3d foundation policy: Lifting 2d large-scale pretrained models for robust 3d robotic manipulation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognit...

    2025

  25. [33]

    Mamba policy: Towards efficient 3d diffusion pol- icy with hybrid selective state models,

    J. Cao, Q. Zhang, J. Sun, J. Wang, H. Cheng, Y . Li, J. Ma, Y . Shao, W. Zhao, G. Hanet al., “Mamba policy: Towards efficient 3d diffusion pol- icy with hybrid selective state models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07163, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Diffusion model-based path follower for a salamander-like robot,

    Z. Liu, Y . Liu, and Y . Fang, “Diffusion model-based path follower for a salamander-like robot,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025

    2025

  27. [35]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 6840–6851

    2020

  28. [36]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models,

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon, “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,

    Y . Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” inInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Dpm-ot: A new diffusion probabilistic model based on optimal transport,

    Z. Li, S. Li, Z. Wang, N. Lei, Z. Luo, and X. Gu, “Dpm-ot: A new diffusion probabilistic model based on optimal transport,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    The foundation of efficient robot learning,

    L. P. Kaelbling, “The foundation of efficient robot learning,”Science, vol. 369, no. 6506, pp. 915–916, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Robotic manipulation via imitation learn- ing: Taxonomy, evolution, benchmark, and challenges,

    Z. Li, A. Chapin, E. Xiang, R. Yang, B. Machado, N. Lei, E. Dellandrea, D. Huang, and L. Chen, “Robotic manipulation via imitation learn- ing: Taxonomy, evolution, benchmark, and challenges,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17449, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Deep visual foresight for planning robot motion,

    C. Finn and S. Levine, “Deep visual foresight for planning robot motion,” inInternational Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 2786–2793

    2017

  34. [42]

    Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large- scale data collection,

    S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, J. Ibarz, and D. Quillen, “Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large- scale data collection,”The International journal of robotics research, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 421–436, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Jacquard: A large scale dataset for robotic grasp detection,

    A. Depierre, E. Dellandréa, and L. Chen, “Jacquard: A large scale dataset for robotic grasp detection,” in2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3511–3516

    2018

  36. [44]

    Visual imitation made easy,

    S. Young, D. Gandhi, S. Tulsiani, A. Gupta, P. Abbeel, and L. Pinto, “Visual imitation made easy,” inConference on Robot Learning, 2021, pp. 1992–2005

    2021

  37. [45]

    Open-world object manipulation using pre-trained vision-language models,

    A. Stone, T. Xiao, Y . Lu, K. Gopalakrishnan, K.-H. Lee, Q. Vuong, P. Wohlhart, S. Kirmani, B. Zitkovich, F. Xiaet al., “Open-world object manipulation using pre-trained vision-language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00905, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Transformers for one-shot visual imitation,

    S. Dasari and A. Gupta, “Transformers for one-shot visual imitation,” in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 2071–2084

    2021

  39. [47]

    Bc-z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning,

    E. Jang, A. Irpan, M. Khansari, D. Kappler, F. Ebert, C. Lynch, S. Levine, and C. Finn, “Bc-z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning,” inConference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 991– 1002. 10 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEM...

    2022

  40. [48]

    Vima: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts,

    Y . Jiang, A. Gupta, Z. Zhang, G. Wang, Y . Dou, Y . Chen, L. Fei-Fei, A. Anandkumar, Y . Zhu, and L. Fan, “Vima: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts,” inNeurIPS 2022 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop, 2022

    2022

  41. [49]

    Learning language-conditioned robot behavior from offline data and crowd-sourced annotation,

    S. Nair, E. Mitchell, K. Chen, S. Savarese, C. Finnet al., “Learning language-conditioned robot behavior from offline data and crowd-sourced annotation,” inConference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 1303– 1315

    2022

  42. [50]

    Surfer: A world model-based framework for vision-language robot manipulation,

    P. Ren, K. Zhang, H. Zheng, Z. Li, Y . Wen, F. Zhu, S. Ma, and X. Liang, “Surfer: A world model-based framework for vision-language robot manipulation,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025

    2025

  43. [51]

    Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models,

    Q. Vuong, S. Levine, H. R. Walke, K. Pertsch, A. Singh, R. Doshi, C. Xu, J. Luo, L. Tan, D. Shahet al., “Open x-embodiment: Robotic learning datasets and rt-x models,” inTowards Generalist Robots: Learning Paradigms for Scalable Skill Acquisition@ CoRL2023, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Rt-2: Vision-language- action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control,

    A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y . Chebotar, X. Chen, K. Choromanski, T. Ding, D. Driess, A. Dubey, C. Finnet al., “Rt-2: Vision-language- action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators,

    X. Li, M. Liu, H. Zhang, C. Yu, J. Xu, H. Wu, C. Cheang, Y . Jing, W. Zhang, H. Liuet al., “Vision-language foundation models as effective robot imitators,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    π0: A vision-language- action flow model for general robot control, 2024,

    K. Black, N. Brown, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, L. Groom, K. Hausman, B. Ichteret al., “ π0: A vision-language- action flow model for general robot control, 2024,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24164, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Robotic control via embodied chain-of-thought reasoning,

    M. Zawalski, W. Chen, K. Pertsch, O. Mees, C. Finn, and S. Levine, “Robotic control via embodied chain-of-thought reasoning,” in8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Robouniview: Visual-language model with unified view representation for robotic manipulation,

    F. Liu, F. Yan, L. Zheng, C. Feng, Y . Huang, and L. Ma, “Robouniview: Visual-language model with unified view representation for robotic manipulation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18977, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic grasping,

    K. Bousmalis, A. Irpan, P. Wohlhart, Y . Bai, M. Kelcey, M. Kalakrishnan, L. Downs, J. Ibarz, P. Pastor, K. Konoligeet al., “Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve efficiency of deep robotic grasping,” in 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation...

    2018

  50. [58]

    Multi-task domain adaptation for deep learning of instance grasping from simulation,

    K. Fang, Y . Bai, S. Hinterstoisser, S. Savarese, and M. Kalakrishnan, “Multi-task domain adaptation for deep learning of instance grasping from simulation,” in2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3516–3523

    2018

  51. [59]

    Self-supervised sim-to-real adaptation for visual robotic manipulation,

    R. Jeong, Y . Aytar, D. Khosid, Y . Zhou, J. Kay, T. Lampe, K. Bousmalis, and F. Nori, “Self-supervised sim-to-real adaptation for visual robotic manipulation,” in2020 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 2718–2724

    2020

  52. [60]

    Sim-to-real grasp detection with global-to-local rgb-d adaptation,

    H. Ma, R. Qin, M. Shi, B. Gao, and D. Huang, “Sim-to-real grasp detection with global-to-local rgb-d adaptation,” in2024 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2024, pp. 13 910–13 917

    2024

  53. [61]

    Momanipvla: Transferring vision-language-action models for general mobile manipulation,

    Z. Wu, Y . Zhou, X. Xu, Z. Wang, and H. Yan, “Momanipvla: Transferring vision-language-action models for general mobile manipulation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13446, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Afforddp: Generalizable diffusion policy with transferable affordance,

    S. Wu, Y . Zhu, Y . Huang, K. Zhu, J. Gu, J. Yu, Y . Shi, and J. Wang, “Afforddp: Generalizable diffusion policy with transferable affordance,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2025

    2025

  55. [63]

    When continual learning meets robotic grasp detection: a novel benchmark on the jacquard dataset,

    R. Yang, M. Grard, E. Dellandréa, and L. Chen, “When continual learning meets robotic grasp detection: a novel benchmark on the jacquard dataset,” in18th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP). SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications, 2023

    2023

  56. [64]

    Lotus: Continual imitation learning for robot manipulation through unsupervised skill discovery,

    W. Wan, Y . Zhu, R. Shah, and Y . Zhu, “Lotus: Continual imitation learning for robot manipulation through unsupervised skill discovery,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024, pp. 537–544

    2024

  57. [65]

    Sparse diffusion policy: A sparse, reusable, and flexible policy for robot learning,

    Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, M. Huo, T. Tian, X. Zhang, Y . Xie, C. Xu, P. Ji, W. Zhan, M. Dinget al., “Sparse diffusion policy: A sparse, reusable, and flexible policy for robot learning,” in8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    Generalizing 6-dof grasp detection via domain prior knowledge,

    H. Ma, M. Shi, B. Gao, and D. Huang, “Generalizing 6-dof grasp detection via domain prior knowledge,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 18 102–18 111

    2024

  59. [67]

    Rekep: Spatio-temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation,

    W. Huang, C. Wang, Y . Li, R. Zhang, and L. Fei-Fei, “Rekep: Spatio-temporal reasoning of relational keypoint constraints for robotic manipulation,” in2nd CoRL Workshop on Learning Effective Abstractions for Planning, 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,

    P. Dhariwal and A. Nichol, “Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 8780–8794, 2021

    2021

  61. [69]

    Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,

    H. Chung, J. Kim, M. T. Mccann, M. L. Klasky, and J. C. Ye, “Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems,” inThe Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Guidance with spherical gaussian constraint for conditional diffusion,

    L. Yang, S. Ding, Y . Cai, J. Yu, J. Wang, and Y . Shi, “Guidance with spherical gaussian constraint for conditional diffusion,” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2024, pp. 56 071–56 095

    2024

  63. [71]

    Fast global registration,

    Q.-Y . Zhou, J. Park, and V . Koltun, “Fast global registration,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14. Springer, 2016, pp. 766–782

    2016

  64. [72]

    Method for registration of 3-d shapes,

    P. J. Besl and N. D. McKay, “Method for registration of 3-d shapes,” inSensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures, vol. 1611. Spie, 1992, pp. 586–606

    1992

  65. [73]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clarket al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PmLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  66. [74]

    Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment,

    S. James, Z. Ma, D. R. Arrojo, and A. J. Davison, “Rlbench: The robot learning benchmark & learning environment,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3019–3026, 2020

    2020

  67. [75]

    Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks,

    O. Mees, L. Hermann, E. Rosete-Beas, and W. Burgard, “Calvin: A benchmark for language-conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 7327–7334, 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Coarse-to- fine q-attention: Efficient learning for visual robotic manipulation via discretisation,

    S. James, K. Wada, T. Laidlow, and A. J. Davison, “Coarse-to- fine q-attention: Efficient learning for visual robotic manipulation via discretisation,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 13 739–13 748

    2022

  69. [77]

    Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation,

    M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, “Perceiver-actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipulation,” inConference on Robot Learning, 2023

    2023

  70. [78]

    Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations,

    P.-L. Guhur, S. Chen, R. G. Pinel, M. Tapaswi, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid, “Instruction-driven history-aware policies for robotic manipulations,” in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 175–187

    2023

  71. [79]

    Polarnet: 3d point clouds for language-guided robotic manipulation,

    S. Chen, R. G. Pinel, C. Schmid, and I. Laptev, “Polarnet: 3d point clouds for language-guided robotic manipulation,” inConference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 1761–1781

    2023

  72. [80]

    Rvt: Robotic view transformer for 3d object manipulation,

    A. Goyal, J. Xu, Y . Guo, V . Blukis, Y .-W. Chao, and D. Fox, “Rvt: Robotic view transformer for 3d object manipulation,” inConference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 694–710

    2023

  73. [81]

    Act3d: Infinite resolution action detection transformer for robotic manipulation,

    T. Gervet, Z. Xian, N. Gkanatsios, and K. Fragkiadaki, “Act3d: Infinite resolution action detection transformer for robotic manipulation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.17817, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  74. [82]

    What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data,

    O. Mees, L. Hermann, and W. Burgard, “What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 205–11 212, 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Zero-shot robotic manipulation with pre-trained image- editing diffusion models,

    K. Black, M. Nakamoto, P. Atreya, H. R. Walke, C. Finn, A. Kumar, and S. Levine, “Zero-shot robotic manipulation with pre-trained image- editing diffusion models,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  76. [84]

    Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation,

    H. Wu, Y . Jing, C. Cheang, G. Chen, J. Xu, X. Li, M. Liu, H. Li, and T. Kong, “Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Rrt-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,

    J. J. Kuffner and S. M. LaValle, “Rrt-connect: An efficient approach to single-query path planning,” inProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation., vol. 2. IEEE, 2000, pp. 995–1001

    2000

  78. [86]

    Pybullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning,

    E. Coumans and Y . Bai, “Pybullet, a python module for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning,” 2016

    2016

  79. [87]

    Grounding language with visual affordances over unstructured data,

    O. Mees, J. Borja-Diaz, and W. Burgard, “Grounding language with visual affordances over unstructured data,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, UK, 2023

    2023

  80. [88]

    Se(3)-diffusionfields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusion,

    J. Urain, N. Funk, J. Peters, and G. Chalvatzaki, “Se(3)-diffusionfields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusion,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2023, pp. 5923–5930

    2023

  81. [89]

    Acronym: A large-scale grasp dataset based on simulation,

    C. Eppner, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, “Acronym: A large-scale grasp dataset based on simulation,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 6222–6227. LIet al.: A TEST-TIME ADAPTIVE DIFFUSION POLICY VIA MANIFOLD-CONSTRAINED DENOISIN...

    2021

  82. [90]

    Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository,

    A. X. Chang, T. Funkhouser, L. Guibas, P. Hanrahan, Q. Huang, Z. Li, S. Savarese, M. Savva, S. Song, H. Su, J. Xiao, L. Yi, and F. Yu, “Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03012

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Isaac gym: High performance gpu based physics simulation for robot learning,

    V . Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y . Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Macklin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handaet al., “Isaac gym: High performance gpu based physics simulation for robot learning,” inThirty- fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.