Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

The bilinear fermionic form for KP and BKP hierarchies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a lifting operator, a specially chosen Kac–Schwarz operator, determines the fermionic two-point function of a KP or BKP tau-function from its easier one-point functions.

desk verdict A clean KP identity with an unproven uniqueness step and a real BKP involution error: worth a referee, but not in present form. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09302 v1 pith:XEPZ7W5T submitted 2025-02-13 math-ph math.AGmath.MPnlin.SI

Shuai Guo , Ce Ji , Chenglang Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.AGmath.MPnlin.SI MSC 37K1017B69
keywords KPhierarchyBKPfermionictwo-pointfunctionliftingoperatorKac–Schwarztau-functionr-spinmodelBrézin–Gross–Witten
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fermionic two-point functions of KP and BKP tau-functions are generating series for all affine coordinates of the Sato Grassmannian point, so they encode the whole tau-function. This paper introduces a lifting operator, a distinguished Kac–Schwarz operator that generates the admissible basis, and proves bilinear identities relating the two-point function to the one-point functions. The authors apply these identities to produce closed formulas for the generalized Kontsevich model, the r-spin model, and the Brézin–Gross–Witten model, and they check the pattern on several Hurwitz and Gromov–Witten examples. The result matters because it turns the usually hard problem of computing the full two-point function into a routine verification once a lifting operator and one-point functions are known.

What carries the argument

The lifting operator is the central object. For KP, it is a Kac–Schwarz operator $l_z\in w_{1+\infty}$ with leading term $z$ such that, after conjugation by $z^{1/2}$, powers of it shift the first admissible-basis vector $\phi_0$ to a whole basis: $(z^{1/2}l_z z^{-1/2})^k\phi_0(z)=a_k\phi_k(z)$. For BKP the same notion is used with the anti-symmetrization $\tilde{l} = (l-\iota(l))/2$, where $\iota$ is the involution of equation (3.7). The machine that powers the theorem is the combination of the scalar action $\hat{l}|V\rangle = c_l|V\rangle$, the adjoint-vacuum identity $\langle 0|\hat{l}=\langle 0|\psi^*_{1/2}\psi_{-1/2}$, and the commutation relations $[\hat{a},\psi(z)]=-a\psi(z)$ and $[\hat{a},\psi^*(z)]=a^*\psi^*(z)$, which convert the two-point and one-point data into a Wick-theorem computation.

What would settle it

Examine the homogeneous equation $(l^*_u-l_v)g=0$ in $u^{-1}v^{-1}\mathbb{C}[[u^{-1},v^{-1}]]$: if a nonzero solution $g$ exists, then the same leading term admits many solutions and the proposed formulas are not forced by the theorem. Alternatively, expand the proposed $\Psi(u,v)$ as $1/(u-v)+\sum_{i,j\ge 0}b_{i,j}u^{-i-1}v^{-j-1}$ and compare the $b_{i,j}$ with affine coordinates computed directly from the tau-function for a model such as monotone Hurwitz numbers; any mismatch would refute the formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is Theorem 4.4, stated as Theorem 1.1 in the introduction: for a KP tau-function with lifting operator $l$, the fermionic two-point function satisfies $$(l^*_u - l_v)\Psi(u,v) = \Psi^*(u)\Psi(v).$$ The proof combines the $W_{1+\infty}$ representation of differential operators, the vacuum identity $\langle 0|\hat{l} = \langle 0|\psi^*_{1/2}\psi_{-1/2}$, and Wick's theorem, so that the surviving contractions produce exactly the one-point product on the right-hand side. For BKP the paper proves the analogous identity (Theorem 4.9) using the anti-symmetrization $\tilde{l} = (l - \iota(l))/2$ and neutral-fermion one-point functions $\Psi_B(u)$ and $\tilde{\Psi}_B(v)$. The paper then uses these equations as the method of solution: for the generalized Kontsevich model it obtains $$\Psi(u,v) = \frac{W(l_V^*(u), l_V(v))}{x(u)-x(v)}\Psi^*(u)\Psi(v),$$ with $W$ the divided difference of $x$, and derives the r-spin formula as the special case $V(z)=z^{r+1}/(r(r+1))$. For the Brézin–Gross–Witten model it obtains $$\Psi_B(u,v) = -\frac{2(-2l_u+2l_v+u-v)\Psi_B(u)\Psi_B(v)}{\hbar(u+v)}.$$

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the linear equation $(l^*_u-l_v)f=\Psi^*(u)\Psi(v)$ has only one formal power-series solution with leading term $1/(u-v)$ plus a regular part; the paper verifies its proposed formula satisfies the equation but never proves uniqueness.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any KP tau-function admitting a lifting operator has its two-point function constrained by $(l^*_u-l_v)\Psi(u,v)=\Psi^*(u)\Psi(v)$, so one-point data plus the operator determine all affine coordinates.
  • For the generalized Kontsevich model with polynomial potential, Proposition 5.2 gives the closed divided-difference formula; the r-spin model follows as the monomial case with $\Psi(u,v)=\frac{(\sum_{a=0}^{r-1}(l^*_u)^a(l_v)^{r-1-a})\Psi^*(u)\Psi(v)}{u^r-v^r}$.
  • In the BKP setting, the Brézin–Gross–Witten tau-function satisfies the explicit formula (5.13), compactly re-deriving the two-point function previously obtained by other methods.
  • The same theorem is verified on simple Hurwitz numbers, the framed one-leg vertex, monotone Hurwitz numbers, Grothendieck's dessins, spin Hurwitz numbers, and the Gromov–Witten theory of $\mathbb{P}[r]$, so the method is not limited to the two featured models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Closing the uniqueness gap would turn the bilinear equation into a complete characterization: the two-point function would be the unique formal solution with the specified leading singularity, making the method a definition of $\Psi(u,v)$ rather than a verification scheme.
  • The lifting operator appears to carry the spectral-curve data of the model, since in every example it is a quantized curve operator; this suggests a direct bridge between the bilinear fermionic form and quantum spectral curves, a connection the paper only mentions in passing for BGW.
  • The BKP proof structure should extend to other involutive reductions of the neutral-fermion formalism, such as CKP-type hierarchies, by choosing the appropriate involution $\iota$; the paper does not state this extension.
  • One concrete testable extension is to apply the method to other tau-functions with known lifting operators but no closed two-point formula, and to compare the resulting coefficients with independently computed affine coordinates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the notion of a lifting operator for KP and BKP tau-functions and derives equations relating the fermionic two-point function to fermionic one-point functions: (l_u^* - l_v)Ψ(u,v) = Ψ^*(u)Ψ(v) for KP (Theorem 4.4) and (̃l_u + ̃l_v)Ψ_B(u,v) = Ψ_B(u)̃Ψ_B(v) - Ψ_B(v)̃Ψ_B(u) for BKP (Theorem 4.9). The authors then apply these equations to propose closed formulas for the fermionic two-point functions of the generalized Kontsevich model (and the r-spin model as a special case) and of the Brézin–Gross–Witten model, and they list further examples in a table. The core KP theorem is proven from first principles, but the applications rely on an unproved uniqueness statement, and the BKP section contains several concrete inconsistencies with the paper's own definitions.

Significance. If the advertised determination claim were fully established, the paper would provide a useful and elegant method for computing fermionic two-point functions from one-point functions and a Kac–Schwarz-type operator; the explicit formulas for the r-spin and BGW models would be valuable. Theorem 4.4 is a clean, self-contained derivation and is a genuine contribution. However, the current manuscript does not prove uniqueness of the solution to the bilinear equation, so the formulas in Section 5 are only candidates, not proven two-point functions. The BKP application is further undermined by errors in the identification of the anti-symmetrization of the proposed lifting operator. These issues are load-bearing for the central claim that the lifting operator determines the two-point function.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Proposition 5.2 and §5.2, Corollary 5.4] The proof of Proposition 5.2 verifies that the proposed formula ̄Ψ(u,v) satisfies equation (5.5), then invokes 'the uniqueness of solution of that equation with certain leading terms' to conclude that ̄Ψ equals the true fermionic two-point function. No uniqueness proof is supplied. Since Theorem 4.4 only establishes that the true Ψ(u,v) satisfies (4.8), one must show that the operator l_u^* - l_v is injective on the space 1/(u-v) + u^{-1}v^{-1}C[[u^{-1},v^{-1}]]; otherwise adding any nonzero kernel element to ̄Ψ would produce another solution with the same leading singularity. This gap affects Corollary 5.4 and all the examples in Section 5.4 where equations are solved by verification only.
  2. [§5.3, equation (5.10) and Theorem 5.9] The operator l = z - ℏz²∂_z is claimed to lie in w^B_{1+∞}, so that its anti-symmetrization equals itself. Under the involution (3.7), we have ι(z) = -z and, writing z²∂_z = z(z∂_z), ι(z²∂_z) = (-z∂_z)(-z) = z + z²∂_z as an operator (acting on a test function f: -z∂_z(-zf) = zf + z²f′). Therefore ι(l) = -z - ℏ(z + z²∂_z) = -(1+ℏ)z - ℏz²∂_z, which is not -l. Hence ̃l ≠ l, and the equation verified in (5.14) is not the equation required by Theorem 4.9. The BGW application as written is therefore invalid.
  3. [§5.4.6, spin Hurwitz numbers] The text states 'Since ι(l_z) = l_z, the anti-symmetrization of this lifting operator is itself, i.e., ̃l_z = l_z.' This contradicts Definition 3.10, where ̃l := (1/2)(l - ι(l)). If ι(l) = l, then ̃l = 0, not l. The verification at the end of §5.4.6 uses ̃l = l and thus checks an equation different from that in Theorem 4.9. This is a second concrete inconsistency in the BKP applications.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, page 1] The abstract contains a typo: 'fu nction' should be 'function'.
  2. [Remark 5.5] The phrase 'equations (5.2) and (5.2)' should read 'equations (5.2) and (5.3)'.
  3. [Theorem 4.9] The cross-reference 'as specified in (3.4)' is incorrect; the anti-symmetrization ̃l is defined in Definition 3.4, equation (3.10).
  4. [§5.1, Corollary 5.1] The assertion that l_V is a lifting operator in the sense of Definition 4.1 is stated without proof; either an admissible basis satisfying the raising property should be exhibited, or the authors should clarify that only the Kac–Schwarz property (4.5) is needed for the subsequent argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

The central bilinear-form identity is derived, not assumed; the applications' missing uniqueness proof and BKP anti-symmetrization issue are correctness gaps, not circularity.

full rationale

Theorem 4.4 (= Theorem 1.1) is proved from the definitions of the fermionic fields, the W_{1+∞} representation, equation (4.5), and Wick's theorem; the target two-point function is not used as an input and no parameter is fitted to it. The lifting operator is defined from the tau-function, but the relation (l*_u - l_v)Ψ(u,v) = Ψ*(u)Ψ(v) is a derived necessary identity, not a restatement of the definition. In Proposition 5.2, the proposed formula is verified to satisfy (5.5), but the proof invokes 'the uniqueness of solution of that equation with certain leading terms' without supplying a proof. This is an omitted-support/rigor gap: if the kernel of (l*_u - l_v) were nonzero, the formula would not be forced. It is not circular because the proposed Ψ is not constructed from the true two-point function. Similarly, Section 5.3 asserts l = z - ℏz²∂z ∈ w^B_{1+∞} and hence ~l = l; with (3.7), ι(z²∂z) = z + z²∂z, so ι(l) = -(1+ℏ)z - ℏz²∂z and ~l ≠ l. This makes Theorem 5.9 verify a different equation than Theorem 4.9, an algebraic/misapplication error rather than circularity. Self-citations [WY] and [JWY] are used only as data sources for one-point functions or affine coordinates computed by other methods; they are not the uniqueness assumption and do not reduce the claim to itself. Therefore the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The free-parameter ledger is empty: no numbers are fitted to data. The paper's load-bearing content rests on standard free-fermion technology plus two unproven assumptions: (1) that the specific operators given are 'lifting operators' in the strong sense of Definition 4.1, and (2) that the bilinear equation has a unique solution with the prescribed leading term. For BKP, the additional assumption that the stated l satisfies ι(l) = -l is actually false under the paper's own involution, so the BKP applications are not justified.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Tau-functions are in the big cell, i.e., τ(0) ≠ 0.
    Used throughout to define fermionic one-point and two-point functions as ratios by <0|V>.
  • standard math Boson-fermion correspondence and Wick's theorem.
    Standard background, cited from [DJM].
  • ad hoc to paper The operators l_V from equation (5.1) are lifting operators in the sense of Definition 4.1.
    Corollary 5.1 claims this from the leading term being z, but the generating property of the basis is not proved.
  • ad hoc to paper The solution to the bilinear equation (4.8) is unique with the leading term 1/(u-v) plus regular part.
    Invoked in Proposition 5.2 to identify the proposed formula with the true two-point function; no proof is given.
  • ad hoc to paper For BKP, the operator l = z - ℏ z^2∂_z satisfies ι(l) = -l, so that ilde{l} = l.
    Assumed in Section 5.3 to apply Theorem 4.9; actually false under the paper's involution (3.7), as computed in the red flags.
invented entities (1)
  • Lifting operator independent evidence
    purpose: A Kac-Schwarz type operator that generates the admissible basis of the Sato Grassmannian and connects two-point functions to one-point functions.
    Explicit lifting operators are given for many models (r-spin, BGW, Hurwitz, etc.), and the main theorem is proven for any such operator.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The bilinear fermionic form for KP and BKP hierarchies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XEPZ7W5T

@misc{pith2026250209302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The bilinear fermionic form for KP and BKP hierarchies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XEPZ7W5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09302}
}
abstract

For a tau-function of the KP or BKP hierarchy, we introduce the notion of lifting operator and derive an equation connecting the corresponding fermionic two-point function and fermionic one-point function through the lifting operator. This provides an effective approach to determine the fermionic two-point function of the tau-function from the lifting operator and the fermionic one-point function. As practical applications, we derive concise formulas for the fermionic two-point functions of several models, like the $r$-spin model and the Br{\' e}zin--Gross--Witten model, which respectively serve as examples for KP and BKP tau-functions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adler, M

    M. Adler, M. Cafasso, P. van Moerbeke, Non-lineal PDEs for gap probabilities in random matrices and KP theory , Physica D, 241 (2012), 2265-2284

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Adler, P

    M. Adler, P. van Moerbeke, A matrix integral solution to two-dimensional W(p) gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 147, 25 (1992)

    work page 1992

  3. [3]

    Aganagic, R

    M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Mari\ n o, C. Vafa. Topological strings and integrable hierarchies. Commun. Math. Phys. 261, 451–516 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Alexandrov, Enumerative geometry, tau-functions and Heisenberg--Virasoro algebra , Commun

    A. Alexandrov, Enumerative geometry, tau-functions and Heisenberg--Virasoro algebra , Commun. Math. Phys, 338(1):195-249,2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    A.Alexandrov, KP integrability of triple Hodge integrals. II. Generalized Kontsevich matrix model , Anal.Math.Phys. 11, 24 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Alexandrov, Generalized Br\' e zin--Gross--Witten tau function as a hypergeometric solution of the BKP hierarchy , Adv

    A. Alexandrov, Generalized Br\' e zin--Gross--Witten tau function as a hypergeometric solution of the BKP hierarchy , Adv. Math. Vol 412 (2023), 108809

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Alexandrov, D

    A. Alexandrov, D. Lewanski, and S. Shadrin, Ramifications of Hurwitz theory, KP integrability and quantum curves , Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(5), 1-31

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Balogh, D

    F. Balogh, D. Yang, Geometric interpretation of Zhou's explicit formula for the Witten--Kontsevich tau function , Lett. in Math. Phy., 2017, 107(10):1837-1857

    work page 2017

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Br\' e zin and D

    E. Br\' e zin and D. Gross, The external field problem in the large N limit of QCD , Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980), no. 1, p120-124

    1980

  2. [10]

    Balogh, J

    F. Balogh, J. Harnad, Tau functions and their applications , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    C. Chen, S. Guo, Quantum curve and bilinear Fermionic form for the orbifold Gromov--Witten theory of P [r] , Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 2024, Vol. 40, No. 1, p43–80

    2024

  4. [12]

    N. K. Chidambaram and E. Garcia-Failde and A. Giacchetto, Relations on M _ g,n and the negative r -spin Witten conjecture , arXiv:2205.15621

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Do and M

    N. Do and M. Karev, Monotone orbifold Hurwitz numbers , Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 226, 568-587. (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    E. Date, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, Solitons: differential equations, symmetries and infinite dimensional algebras , Cambridge University Press, (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    X.-M. Ding, Y. Li and L. Meng, From r -spin intersection numbers to Hodge integrals , J. High Energy Phys., 2016, 15

    2016

  8. [16]

    Dunin-Barkowski, M

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Mulase, P. Norbury, A. Popolitov and S. Shadrin, Quantum spectral curve for the Gromov--Witten theory of the complex projective line , J. Reine Angew. Math. 726 (2017), 267-289

    2017

  9. [17]

    Dubrovin, D

    B. Dubrovin, D. Yang and D. Zagier, On tau-functions for the KdV hierarchy , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 27 (2021), no. 12, 47pp

    2021

  10. [18]

    Deng and J

    F. Deng and J. Zhou, On fermionic representation of the framed topological vertex , J. High Energ. Phys. 2015, 1–22 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Eskin, A

    A. Eskin, A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, The theta characteristic of a branched covering , Adv. Math., 217, 3 (2008): 873-888

    2008

  12. [20]

    Faber, S

    C. Faber, S. Shadrin, D. Zvonkine, Tautological relations and the r-spin Witten conjecture , Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup\' e r. (4) 43 (2010), no. 4, 621-658

    2010

  13. [21]

    Fukuma, H

    M. Fukuma, H. Kawai, R. Nakayama, Infinite dimensional Grassmannian structure of two-dimensional quantum gravity , Comm. in Math. Phys. 143 (1992), p371-403

    1992

  14. [22]

    Giacchetto, R

    A. Giacchetto, R. Kramer, and D. Lewa\'nski, A new spin on Hurwitz theory and ELSV via theta characteristics , arXiv:2104.05697

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    I. P. Goulden, M. Guay-Paquet and J. Novak, Monotone H urwitz numbers and the HCIZ integral , Ann. Math. Blaise Pasca, 21 (2014), no. 1, 71-89

    2014

  16. [24]

    Gross and M

    D. Gross and M. Newman, Unitary and Hermitian matrices in an external field. II. The Kontsevich model and continuum Virasoro constraints , Nuclear Phys. B 380 (1992), no. 1-2, 168-180

    1992

  17. [25]

    Gross and E

    D. Gross and E. Witten, Possible third order phase transition in the large N lattice gauge theory , Phys. Rev. D 21.446 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    Grothendieck, Esquisse d'un programme , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 1997: 5-48

    A. Grothendieck, Esquisse d'un programme , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 1997: 5-48

    1997

  19. [27]

    S. Guo, C. Ji, C. Yang and Q. Zhang, In preparation

  20. [28]

    C. Ji, Z. Wang and C. Yang, Kac--Schwarz operators of type B , quantum spectral curves, and spin Hurwitz numbers , Journal of Geometry and Physics, 189 (2023): 104831

    2023

  21. [29]

    Kharchev, A

    S. Kharchev, A. Marshakov, A. Mironov, A. Morozov and A. Zabrodin, Towards unified theory of 2-d gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 380 (1992) 181

    1992

  22. [30]

    Kac and A

    V. Kac and A. Schwarz, Geometric interpretation of the partition function of 2D gravity , Physics Letters B, 1991, 257(3-4):329-334

    1991

  23. [31]

    Kazarian and P

    M. Kazarian and P. Zograf, Virasoro constraints and topological recursion for Grothendieck's dessin counting. Lett. Math. Phys. (2015) 105:1057–1084

    2015

  24. [32]

    Kazarian and S

    M. Kazarian and S. Lando, An algebro-geometric proof of Witten’s conjecture , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), no. 4, 1079–1089

    2007

  25. [33]

    Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Commun

    M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Commun. Math. Phys. 147 (1992), 1-23

    1992

  26. [34]

    Leur, The Adler-Shiota-van Moerbeke formula for the BKP hierarchy , J

    J. Leur, The Adler-Shiota-van Moerbeke formula for the BKP hierarchy , J. Math. Phys., 36 (9):4940-4951, 1995

    1995

  27. [35]

    Liu and C

    X. Liu and C. Yang, Q-polynomial expansion for Br\'ezin--Gross--Witten tau-function, Adv. Math., Vol 404 (2022) 108456

    2022

  28. [36]

    Liu and C

    X. Liu and C. Yang, Action of W- type operators on Schur functions and Schur Q-functions , to appear in J. London Math. Soc

  29. [37]

    Liu and C

    X. Liu and C. Yang, Schur Q-polynomials and Kontsevich--Witten tau function , Peking Math. J., Vol 7 (2024), 713–758

    2024

  30. [38]

    Mironov and A

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, Superintegrability of Kontsevich matrix model , Eur. Phys. J. C., 81, 270 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Norbury, A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves , Geom

    P. Norbury, A new cohomology class on the moduli space of curves , Geom. Topol. 27 (2023) 7, 2695-2761

    2023

  32. [40]

    Okounkov, Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers , Math

    A. Okounkov, Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers , Math. Res. Lett. 7, no. 4, 447–453 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Okounkov, Random matrices and random permutations , Int

    A. Okounkov, Random matrices and random permutations , Int. Math. Res. Not., 20, 2000, 1043-1095

    2000

  34. [42]

    Okounkov, Generating functions for intersection numbers on moduli spaces of curves , Int

    A. Okounkov, Generating functions for intersection numbers on moduli spaces of curves , Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002, no. 18, 933-957

    2002

  35. [43]

    Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmannian manifold , RIMS Kokyuroku, 1981, 439: 30-46

    M. Sato, Soliton equations as dynamical systems on an infinite dimensional Grassmannian manifold , RIMS Kokyuroku, 1981, 439: 30-46

    1981

  36. [44]

    C. A. Tracy, H. Widom, Level-spacing distributions and the Airy kernel , Commun. Math. Phys., 159, 1994, 151-174

    1994

  37. [45]

    Z. Wang, C. Yang, BKP hierarchy and connected bosonic N -point functions , Lett. in Math. Phy., 2022, 112:62

    2022

  38. [46]

    Z. Wang, C. Yang, Q. Zhang, BKP-affine coordinates and emergent geometry of generalized Brézin--Gross--Witten tau-functions , arXiv: 2301.01131

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space . Surveys in differential geometry (Cambridge, MA, 1990), 243-310, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 1991

    1990

  40. [48]

    Witten, Algebraic geometry associated with matrix models of two-dimensional Gravity

    E. Witten, Algebraic geometry associated with matrix models of two-dimensional Gravity . Topological methods in modern mathematics (Stony Brook, NY 1991), 235-269, Publish or Perish, Houston, TX, 1993

    1991

  41. [49]

    Zhou, Explicit formula for Witten--Kontsevich tau-function

    J. Zhou, Explicit formula for Witten--Kontsevich tau-function. arXiv:1306.5429

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zhou, Emergent geometry and mirror symmetry of a point

    J. Zhou, Emergent geometry and mirror symmetry of a point. arXiv:1507.01679

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Zhou, Grothendieck's dessins d'enfants in a web of dualities

    J. Zhou, Grothendieck's dessins d'enfants in a web of dualities. arXiv:1905.10773

    1905 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.