Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 163 references

High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper computes the conservative tail-of-tail dynamics of eccentric, nonspinning compact binaries through relative 1PN order and to $O(e_t^{12})$, matching the Delaunay-averaged Hamiltonian to the effective-one-body description and…

desk verdict Solid PN/EOB calculation extending tail-of-tail eccentric dynamics to O(e^12) and p_r^12; the new 2SF predictions are plausible but await independent verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01774 v2 pith:XEVFSGSI submitted 2026-08-03 gr-qc

Geraint Pratten This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.25.Nx04.30.-w
keywords tail-of-tailconservativedynamicspost-Newtonianexpansioneccentricorbitseffective-one-bodyself-forcehereditaryinteractionsredshiftinvariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper works out the conservative dynamics of two nonspinning compact objects on eccentric orbits when gravitational-wave tails scatter again off the curved background, the 'tail-of-tail' interaction, through relative first post-Newtonian (1PN) order and up to the twelfth power of the eccentricity. From the orbit-averaged (Delaunay-averaged) Hamiltonian at 5.5PN and 6.5PN order, the author matches to the effective-one-body description and determines the non-geodesic $Q$-potential coefficients through radial momentum $p_r^{12}$, including the complete dependence on the symmetric mass ratio up to $O(\nu^2)$. Terms linear in the mass ratio reproduce the known first-order self-force results, while the quadratic terms are presented as qualitatively new eccentric second-order self-force predictions. A Fourier-Bessel spectral derivation independently confirms the averaged Hamiltonian, and the first law of binary mechanics at fixed orbital frequencies recovers the 1SF redshift through $O(e^{12})$ and gives the complete tail-of-tail contribution to the 2SF inverse redshift at 5.5PN and 6.5PN through $O(e^{10})$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-split tail-of-tail action, which expresses the hereditary interaction as a principal-value integral over products of differentiated multipole moments. Expanding the source mass quadrupole, current quadrupole, and mass octupole in 1PN harmonic-coordinate quasi-Keplerian elements and averaging over one radial period (the Delaunay average) produces the 5.5PN and 6.5PN averaged Hamiltonian. Matching this average order by order in eccentricity to the Delaunay-averaged effective-one-body Hamiltonian determines the non-geodesic $Q$ potential, the part of the effective Hamiltonian that is not fixed by geodesic motion. An independent Fourier-Bessel spectral representation computes the same hereditary kernel mode by mode, showing that it acts as a spectral norm with harmonic weight $|p|^{2q+1}$, and the first law at fixed frequencies then converts the averaged Hamiltonian into redshift invariants.

What would settle it

Compute the weak-field 2SF inverse redshift for eccentric orbits on a Schwarzschild background directly, for example with a second-order self-force code in the large-$p$, moderate-$e$ regime, and compare coefficient by coefficient with $U^{(2)}_{11/2}(e)$ and $U^{(2)}_{13/2}(e)$ in Eqs. (183)-(184); agreement would confirm the localization and first-law step, while any discrepancy at $O(q^2)$ would pinpoint where the Delaunay-averaged Hamiltonian fails as a physical 2SF observable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the conservative tail-of-tail interaction—waves that scatter back off the curvature sourced by the total mass—affects eccentric binary dynamics at 5.5PN and 6.5PN order in a way that can be fully captured, through $O(e_t^{12})$, by the Delaunay-averaged Hamiltonian built from 1PN quasi-Keplerian motion in harmonic coordinates. Matching that average to the effective-one-body Hamiltonian yields the non-geodesic $Q$-potential coefficients through radial momentum $p_r^{12}$, with the complete dependence on the symmetric mass ratio up to $O(\nu^2)$. The $O(\nu)$ terms reproduce known first-order self-force data; the $O(\nu^2)$ terms are claimed as new eccentric second-order self-force predictions. Applying the first law of binary mechanics at fixed orbital frequencies, the same averaged Hamiltonian recovers the first-order self-force redshift through $O(e^{12})$ and delivers the complete tail-of-tail contribution to the second-order inverse redshift at 5.5PN and 6.5PN through $O(e^{10})$.

Load-bearing premise

The second-order self-force redshift extraction assumes that the Delaunay-averaged tail-of-tail Hamiltonian, treated as a localized Hamiltonian, obeys the first law of binary mechanics at fixed orbital frequencies; if the hereditary nonlocality invalidates that localization, the quadratic-in-mass-ratio redshift coefficients would not equal the physical redshift even though they follow from the matched effective-one-body Hamiltonian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Eccentric effective-one-body waveform models can now incorporate tail-of-tail corrections to the non-geodesic $Q$ potential through $p_r^{12}$ at 5.5PN and 6.5PN order.
  • The $O(\nu^2)$ coefficients provide explicit weak-field benchmarks against which direct eccentric second-order self-force computations can be tested.
  • The 1SF redshift comparison through $O(e^{12})$ validates the matching procedure and the sign conventions used to construct the averaged Hamiltonian.
  • The complete 2SF inverse-redshift coefficients through $O(e^{10})$ extend gauge-invariant eccentric self-force data to half-integer PN orders past the circular-orbit sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the localization of the hereditary Hamiltonian ever fails, the quadratic-in-mass-ratio redshift coefficients would still be correct effective-one-body predictions but would not equal the physical redshift measured by a direct self-force calculation; an eccentric 2SF computation is the cleanest test of that step.
  • The truncation at $O(e_t^{12})$ is purely computational, so the same matching pipeline can be pushed to higher eccentricity order, likely revealing compact closed forms or resummations of the eccentricity enhancement functions.
  • The higher-$p_r$ sectors of $Q$, once analytically continued to unbound orbits, could yield a tail-of-tail scattering angle for direct bound-unbound comparison, a route the paper flags but does not take.
  • The spectral-norm representation implies that odd-harmonic-weight eccentricity enhancement functions remain irreducible nonlocal sums, so resummation methods will be needed for strong-eccentricity effective-one-body models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the tail-of-tail contribution to the conservative dynamics of eccentric, non-spinning compact binaries through relative 1PN order and to O(e_t^12), extending earlier work by Bini, Damour, and Geralico. It derives the Delaunay-averaged tail-of-tail Hamiltonian at 5.5PN and 6.5PN order, matches it to the effective-one-body (EOB) Hamiltonian, and determines the non-geodesic Q potential through O(p_r^12) with complete O(nu^2) dependence. The terms linear in the mass ratio are shown to reproduce first-order self-force results, while the quadratic terms are presented as new eccentric second-order self-force predictions. The averaged Hamiltonian is independently rederived with a Fourier-Bessel spectral method, and the first law of binary mechanics is used to extract redshift invariants, recovering the known 1SF redshift through O(e^12) and obtaining new 2SF inverse-redshift coefficients at 5.5PN and 6.5PN through O(e^10).

Significance. This is a serious analytic calculation with several genuine strengths: the derivation has no fitted parameters; the Delaunay-averaged result is cross-checked by an independent Fourier-Bessel spectral computation; the 1SF limit reproduces the independent eccentric self-force result of Ref. [98] (claimed through O(e^12)); and the EOB transcription is internally consistent through O(e^2). If confirmed, the O(nu^2) Q-potential coefficients and the new 2SF redshift coefficients would provide valuable weak-field benchmarks for ongoing eccentric second-order self-force calculations and for eccentric EOB waveform models. The principal uncertainty concerns the first-law localization of the averaged tail-of-tail Hamiltonian at second order in the mass ratio; the new 2SF redshift predictions rest on this step and should be regarded as predictions of the matched Hamiltonian rather than as fully validated physical redshift invariants.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI (after Eq. 133)] The new 2SF inverse-redshift predictions in Eqs. (183)-(184) are derived by applying the first law of binary mechanics, Eq. (133), to the Delaunay-averaged tail-of-tail Hamiltonian ⟨Htt⟩ treated as a localized Hamiltonian at fixed orbital frequencies. This is the pivotal assumption for the central claim: the 1SF comparison in Sec. VIA validates the first-law route only at O(q), and the EOB cross-check in Sec. VIC uses the same matched Hamiltonian, so it cannot detect a systematic failure of the localization for hereditary dynamics at O(q^2). The caveat after Eq. (184) that the circular-orbit limit need not match the standard circular-orbit 2SF redshift underscores that the 2SF invariant is comparison-dependent. Please supply a direct justification that the Delaunay-averaged hereditary Hamiltonian satisfies the first law at O(q^2) in the sense of Ref. [97], or state explicitly that Eqs. (183)-(184) are predictions of the localized Hamiltonian rather than the physical Detweiler-Barack-Sago redshift.
  2. [Sec. VIA, Eqs. (154)-(158)] The agreement with the independent self-force result of Ref. [98] through O(e^12) is a key validation of the whole extraction chain, but it is only asserted. The text says the two results agree coefficient by coefficient, yet no table or explicit comparison of the coefficients in Eqs. (155)-(156) with Ref. [98] is included. Please provide a side-by-side table (including the stated 1/p convention of Ref. [98]) so that the reader can verify the claim; without this, the 1SF validation cannot be checked from the manuscript.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. V, after Eq. (90)] The word 'time-domian' is a typo and should read 'time-domain'.
  2. [After Eq. (44)] The statement that the overall sign typo in the I3 contribution of Ref. [87] 'does not affect the final results' is unexplained; since I3 contributes as a separate term in Eq. (44), please clarify whether the final results of Ref. [87] are unaffected due to a compensating error or because the I3 contribution was not used there.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. VI] The word 'complete' for the 2SF inverse-redshift result should be qualified, since the derivation is linear in the tail-of-tail interaction and uses a specific fixed-frequency comparison; the body after Eq. (184) already makes this clear, but the abstract should reflect it.
  4. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (70)-(79)] A summary table listing the new Q-potential coefficients, their PN order, and their validation status (reproduced 1SF versus new 2SF prediction) would improve readability, given the large number of coefficients in Eqs. (70)-(79).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained, and the 2SF redshift claims follow from a derived Hamiltonian with an independent 1SF validation.

full rationale

No circular step satisfying the stated standards is present. The paper's central derivation starts from the standard time-split tail-of-tail action (Eq. 18) and MPM multipole moments (Eq. 26), computes Delaunay-averaged Hamiltonians (Eqs. 45-46), matches to the EOB Hamiltonian (Eq. 47), and extracts Q-potential coefficients (Eqs. 70-79). The redshift invariants are then obtained by applying the first law of binary mechanics (Eq. 133) to this derived Hamiltonian at fixed frequencies (Eqs. 137-139). The 1SF sector is verified against the independent self-force calculation of Ref. [98] through O(e^12), including the all-order eccentricity expression in Eq. (158). The 2SF results are genuinely new predictions rather than fitted inputs: they follow from the same derived Hamiltonian and the first-law step, with the paper explicitly labeling the EOB cross-check in Sec. VIC as a consistency check rather than an independent derivation. The paper's own caveat that the circular-orbit limit of the 2SF invariants need not coincide with the standard circular-orbit 2SF redshift (Sec. VI, after Eq. 184) is a comparison-convention limitation, not a circularity. The author does not self-cite in a load-bearing way, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation: the time-split action and multipole expansions are standard external inputs. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation introduces no free parameters and no invented entities; all coefficients derive from standard multipole expansions and orbital dynamics. The main assumed inputs are prior literature results for the action, multipoles, coordinate maps, and the first-law localization, plus standard mathematical identities.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The time-split tail-of-tail action (Eq. 18) with the beta coefficients (Eq. 25) correctly generates the conservative tail-of-tail dynamics.
    Taken from Refs. [18,86,87,114,115]; not rederived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The MPM multipole moments at 1PN order (Eq. 26) are correct in harmonic coordinates.
    Standard results from [1,116]; the entire calculation depends on these expressions.
  • domain assumption The 1PN quasi-Keplerian parametrization (Eqs. 1-7) and the harmonic-to-EOB coordinate maps (Eqs. 63-65) are complete at the required order.
    Used in the Delaunay averaging and EOB matching; if these maps are incomplete, the extracted Q coefficients would be contaminated.
  • domain assumption The first law retains its standard form for the Delaunay-averaged hereditary Hamiltonian, as shown in Ref. [97].
    Basis for the redshift extraction in Sec. VI; the paper relies on this external result without rederiving it.
  • standard math The Fourier-Bessel spectral norm identity (Eq. 91) with the principal-value kernel (Eq. 90) is valid.
    Standard distributional identity; used in the cross-validation of the averaged Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The Darwin parameter map between (p,e) and the fixed frequency pair is invertible in the weak-field regime considered.
    Acknowledged in Sec. VI.A to fail near the separatrix; assumed valid for the weak-field expansions used here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XEVFSGSI

@misc{pith2026260801774,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Post-Newtonian-Order Dynamics Induced by Tail-of-Tail Interactions: The Non-Geodesic Terms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XEVFSGSI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01774}
}
abstract

We compute the tail-of-tail contribution to the conservative dynamics of eccentric, non-spinning compact binaries to relative 1PN order and to $\mathcal O(e_t^{12})$. Using the $1$PN quasi-Keplerian dynamics in harmonic coordinates, we derive the Delaunay-averaged Hamiltonian at $5.5$PN and $6.5$PN order and match it to the effective-one-body description, allowing us to determine the corresponding contributions to the non-geodesic EOB $Q$ potential through the $\mathcal{O}(p_r^{12})$, including the dependence on the symmetric mass ratio up to $\mathcal{O}(\nu^2)$. The terms linear in the mass ratio reproduce the available first-order self-force results, while the quadratic terms provide qualitatively new eccentric second-order self-force predictions arising from the tail-of-tail terms. We independently rederive the averaged Hamiltonian using a Fourier--Bessel decomposition of the hereditary interaction. Applying the first law at fixed orbital frequencies, we recover the known first-order self-force redshift through $\mathcal O(e^{12})$ and obtain the complete tail-of-tail contribution to the second-order inverse redshift at $5.5$PN and $6.5$PN through $\mathcal O(e^{10})$.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 131 linked inside Pith

  1. [98]

    Munna and C

    C. Munna and C. R. Evans, Phys. Rev. D106, 044004 (2022), arXiv:2203.13832 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [87]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 112, 044028 (2025), arXiv:2507.08708 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [97]

    Blanchet and A

    L. Blanchet and A. Le Tiec, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 164001 (2017), arXiv:1702.06839 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [1]

    Blanchet, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [2]

    Damour, Phys

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D94, 104015 (2016), arXiv:1609.00354 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [3]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuccia, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 171601 (2018), arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [4]

    Cheung, I

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [5]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 02, 137 (2019), arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 163 references
  1. [6]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 206 (2019), arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [8]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156

    2006 arXiv

  4. [9]

    W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D81, 124015 (2010), arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 043001 (2014), arXiv:1309.3474 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [11]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rept.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D104, 024069 (2021), arXiv:2103.03190 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Palenzuela, Front

    C. Palenzuela, Front. Astron. Space Sci.7, 58 (2020), arXiv:2008.12931 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [15]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    1999 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D62, 064015 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0001013

    2000 arXiv

  12. [17]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231104 (2019), arXiv:1909.02375 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [18]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 102, 084047 (2020), arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [19]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024061 (2020), arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [20]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D112, 044002 (2025), arXiv:2504.20204 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [21]

    Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Class

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Ya- mamoto (KAGRA), Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013), arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  19. [24]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [26]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [27]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Astrophys. J. Lett.1004, L22 (2026), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  23. [28]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), (2026), arXiv:2605.27225 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Colpiet al.(LISA), (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro- ph.CO]

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro- ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Abacet al.(ET), JCAP03, 081 (2026), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al.(ET), JCAP03, 081 (2026), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  26. [31]

    Evanset al., (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Evanset al., (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Pürrer and C.-J

    M. Pürrer and C.-J. Haster, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023151 (2020), arXiv:1912.10055 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Hu and J

    Q. Hu and J. Veitch, Phys. Rev. D106, 044042 (2022), arXiv:2205.08448 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Kapil, L

    V. Kapil, L. Reali, R. Cotesta, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. D109, 104043 (2024), arXiv:2404.00090 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [35]

    Zevin, I

    M. Zevin, I. M. Romero-Shaw, K. Kremer, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L43 (2021), arXiv:2106.09042 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [36]

    Fumagalli, I

    G. Fumagalli, I. Romero-Shaw, D. Gerosa, V. De Renzis, K. Kritos, and A. Olejak, Phys. Rev. D110, 063012 (2024), arXiv:2405.14945 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Samsing, Phys

    J. Samsing, Phys. Rev. D97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [38]

    C. L. Rodriguez, P. Amaro-Seoane, S. Chatterjee, K. Kre- mer, F. A. Rasio, J. Samsing, C. S. Ye, and M. Zevin, Phys. Rev. D98, 123005 (2018), arXiv:1811.04926 [astro- ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Zevin, J

    M. Zevin, J. Samsing, C. Rodriguez, C.-J. Haster, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Astrophys. J.871, 91 (2019), arXiv:1810.00901 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Tagawa, B

    H. Tagawa, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, I. Bartos, K. Omukai, and J. Samsing, Astrophys. J. Lett.907, L20 (2021), arXiv:2010.10526 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [41]

    Gondán and B

    L. Gondán and B. Kocsis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506, 1665 (2021), arXiv:2011.02507 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Samsing, I

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Koc- sis, N.W.C.Leigh, B.Liu, M.E.Pessah, andH.Tagawa, Nature603, 237 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [43]

    A. A. Trani, S. Rastello, U. N. Di Carlo, F. Santoliquido, A. Tanikawa, and M. Mapelli, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511, 1362 (2022), arXiv:2111.06388 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [44]

    Dall’Amico, M

    M. Dall’Amico, M. Mapelli, S. Torniamenti, and M. A. Sedda, Astron. Astrophys.683, A186 (2024), arXiv:2303.07421 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [45]

    Stegmann and J

    J. Stegmann and J. Klencki, Astrophys. J. Lett.991, L54 (2025), arXiv:2506.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  41. [46]

    Gupteet al., Phys

    N. Gupteet al., Phys. Rev. D112, 104045 (2025), arXiv:2404.14286 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [47]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, (2026), arXiv:2603.22461 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026

  43. [48]

    Pompili, A

    L. Pompili, A. Gamboa, and A. Buonanno, (2026), arXiv:2605.28716 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  44. [49]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Astrophys. J. Lett.1000, L2 (2026), arXiv:2503.15393 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026

  45. [50]

    M. d. L. Planas, S. Husa, A. Ramos-Buades, and J. Va- lencia, Astrophys. J.995, 47 (2025), arXiv:2506.01760 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  46. [51]

    Kacanja, K

    K. Kacanja, K. Soni, and A. H. Nitz, Phys. Rev. D112, 122007 (2025), arXiv:2508.00179 [gr-qc]

    2025

  47. [52]

    Jan, B.-J

    A. Jan, B.-J. Tsao, R. O’Shaughnessy, D. Shoemaker, and P. Laguna, Phys. Rev. D113, 024018 (2026), arXiv:2508.12460 [gr-qc]. 21

    2026

  48. [53]

    K. S. Phukon, P. Schmidt, G. Morras, and G. Pratten, Phys. Rev. D113, 103023 (2026), arXiv:2512.10803 [gr- qc]

    2026 arXiv

  49. [54]

    Klein, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    A. Klein, (2021), arXiv:2106.10291 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [55]

    J. N. Arredondo, A. Klein, and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D110, 044044 (2024), arXiv:2402.06804 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [56]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 111, 084052 (2025), arXiv:2502.03929 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [57]

    Morras, G

    G. Morras, G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and A. Buonanno, (2026), arXiv:2604.11903 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  53. [58]

    Chiaramello and A

    D. Chiaramello and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D101, 101501 (2020), arXiv:2001.11736 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [59]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D104, 024046 (2021), arXiv:2104.11705 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [60]

    Ramos-Buades, A

    A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, and S. Ossokine, Phys. Rev. D105, 044035 (2022), arXiv:2112.06952 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [61]

    X. Liu, Z. Cao, and L. Shao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32, 2350015 (2023), arXiv:2306.15277 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [62]

    Gamboaet al., Phys

    A. Gamboaet al., Phys. Rev. D112, 044038 (2025), arXiv:2412.12823 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [63]

    Nagar, R

    A. Nagar, R. Gamba, P. Rettegno, V. Fantini, and S. Bernuzzi, Phys. Rev. D110, 084001 (2024), arXiv:2404.05288 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [64]

    Gamba, D

    R. Gamba, D. Chiaramello, and S. Neogi, Phys. Rev. D110, 024031 (2024), arXiv:2404.15408 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [65]

    Nagar, D

    A. Nagar, D. Chiaramello, R. Gamba, S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, V. Fantini, M. Panzeri, and P. Rettegno, Phys. Rev. D111, 064050 (2025), arXiv:2407.04762 [gr- qc]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [66]

    Albanesi, R

    S. Albanesi, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, J. Fontbuté, A. Gon- zalez, and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D112, L121503 (2025), arXiv:2503.14580 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [67]

    Gamboaet al., (2026), arXiv:2605.28715 [gr-qc]

    A. Gamboaet al., (2026), arXiv:2605.28715 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  63. [68]

    Lynch, A

    P. Lynch, A. Buonanno, A. Gamboa, and M. van de Meent, (2026), arXiv:2606.30594 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  64. [69]

    M. d. L. Planas, A. Ramos-Buades, C. García-Quirós, H. Estellés, S. Husa, and M. Haney, Phys. Rev. D113, 024006 (2026), arXiv:2503.13062 [gr-qc]

    2026

  65. [70]

    Ramos-Buades, Q

    A. Ramos-Buades, Q. Henry, and M. Haney, Phys. Rev. D113, 083044 (2026), arXiv:2601.03340 [gr-qc]

    2026

  66. [71]

    Pratten, S

    G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garcia-Quiros, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estelles, and R. Jaume, Phys. Rev. D102, 064001 (2020), arXiv:2001.11412 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [72]

    García-Quirós, M

    C. García-Quirós, M. Colleoni, S. Husa, H. Estel- lés, G. Pratten, A. Ramos-Buades, M. Mateu-Lucena, and R. Jaume, Phys. Rev. D102, 064002 (2020), arXiv:2001.10914 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [73]

    Prattenet al., Phys

    G. Prattenet al., Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [74]

    Estellés, A

    H. Estellés, A. Ramos-Buades, S. Husa, C. García- Quirós, M. Colleoni, L. Haegel, and R. Jaume, Phys. Rev. D103, 124060 (2021), arXiv:2004.08302 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [75]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379 (1986)

    1986

  71. [76]

    Blanchet, Proc

    L. Blanchet, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A409, 383 (1987)

    1987

  72. [77]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D37, 1410 (1988)

    1988

  73. [78]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Schaefer, Class. Quant. Grav.10, 2699 (1993)

    1993

  74. [79]

    Blanchet, Class

    L. Blanchet, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 113 (1998), [Er- ratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 22, 3381 (2005)], arXiv:gr- qc/9710038

    1998

  75. [80]

    Foffa and R

    S. Foffa and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D87, 044056 (2013), arXiv:1111.5488 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [81]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  77. [82]

    C. R. Galley, A. K. Leibovich, R. A. Porto, and A. Ross, Phys. Rev. D93, 124010 (2016), arXiv:1511.07379 [gr- qc]

    2016 arXiv

  78. [83]

    A. G. Shah, J. L. Friedman, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D89, 064042 (2014), arXiv:1312.1952 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  79. [84]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D89, 064063 (2014), arXiv:1312.2503 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  80. [85]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064026 (2014), arXiv:1312.2975 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  81. [86]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024062 (2020), arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [88]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D93, 104017 (2016), arXiv:1601.02988 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  83. [89]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D78, 024009 (2008), arXiv:0803.0915 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  84. [90]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qu- sailah, Phys. Rev. D77, 064034 (2008), arXiv:0711.0250 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  85. [91]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and M. S. S. Qu- sailah, Phys. Rev. D77, 064035 (2008), arXiv:0711.0302 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  86. [92]

    Damour, P

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. D91, 084024 (2015), arXiv:1502.07245 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  87. [93]

    Loutrel and N

    N. Loutrel and N. Yunes, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 044003 (2017), arXiv:1607.05409 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  88. [94]

    Trestini, Class

    D. Trestini, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 095009 (2026), arXiv:2511.10735 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  89. [95]

    Le Tiec, L

    A. Le Tiec, L. Blanchet, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D85, 064039 (2012), arXiv:1111.5378 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [96]

    Le Tiec, Phys

    A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. D92, 084021 (2015), arXiv:1506.05648 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  91. [99]

    S. E. Gralla, Phys. Rev. D85, 124011 (2012), arXiv:1203.3189 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Pound, Phys

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D90, 084039 (2014), arXiv:1404.1543 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Pound, Phys

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D95, 104056 (2017), arXiv:1703.02836 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Warburton, A

    N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, J. Miller, and L. Durkan, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151102 (2021), arXiv:2107.01298 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Wardell, A

    B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, J. Miller, L. Durkan, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2112.12265 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Mathews, A

    J. Mathews, A. Pound, and B. Wardell, Phys. Rev. D 105, 084031 (2022), arXiv:2112.13069 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Miller, B

    J. Miller, B. Leather, A. Pound, and N. Warburton, Phys. Rev. D109, 104010 (2024), arXiv:2401.00455 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    S. D. Upton, B. Wardell, A. Pound, N. Warburton, and L. Barack, Phys. Rev. D113, 064013 (2026), arXiv:2508.00087 [gr-qc]

    2026

  99. [107]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique43, 107 (1985). 22

    1985

  100. [108]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.44, 263 (1986)

    1986

  101. [109]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, Nuovo Cim. B101, 127 (1988)

    1988

  102. [110]

    Memmesheimer, A

    R.-M. Memmesheimer, A. Gopakumar, and G. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D70, 104011 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407049

    2004 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Blanchet and T

    L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D46, 4304 (1992)

    1992

  104. [112]

    Damour and B

    T. Damour and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. D43, 3259 (1991)

    1991

  105. [113]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D 104, 084095 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 129901 (2025)], arXiv:2107.02634 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Fucito, J

    F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, Phys. Rev. D 111, 044054 (2025), arXiv:2408.07329 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  107. [115]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141401 (2025), arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Schaefer, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 239, 845 (1989), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 242, 704 (1990)]

    1989

  109. [117]

    Damour and N

    T. Damour and N. Deruelle, Phys. Lett. A87, 81 (1981)

    1981

  110. [118]

    K. G. Arun, L. Blanchet, B. R. Iyer, and S. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D80, 124018 (2009), arXiv:0908.3854 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Liu and Z

    X. Liu and Z. Cao, (2026), arXiv:2604.25536 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  112. [120]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Phys. Rev.131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  113. [121]

    Kapteyn, Ann

    W. Kapteyn, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (3)10, 91 (1893)

  114. [122]

    G. N. Watson,A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Func- tions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944)

    1944

  115. [123]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, eds.,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Applied Mathematics Series, Vol. 55 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1964) chapter 9, p. 355

    1964

  116. [124]

    P. A. Hansen, Abhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der WissenschaftenIV, 182 (1855), leipzig: Hirzel

  117. [125]

    Mikóczi, P

    B. Mikóczi, P. Forgács, and M. Vasúth, Phys. Rev. D 92, 044038 (2015), arXiv:1502.00276 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Barausse, A

    E. Barausse, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. D85, 064010 (2012), arXiv:1111.5610 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D93, 104040 (2016), arXiv:1603.09175 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  120. [128]

    S. L. Detweiler, Phys. Rev. D77, 124026 (2008), arXiv:0804.3529 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Barack, Class

    L. Barack, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 213001 (2009), arXiv:0908.1664 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  122. [130]

    N. Sago, L. Barack, and S. L. Detweiler, Phys. Rev. D 78, 124024 (2008), arXiv:0810.2530 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Blanchet, S

    L. Blanchet, S. L. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whit- ing, Phys. Rev. D81, 064004 (2010), arXiv:0910.0207 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Blanchet, S

    L. Blanchet, S. L. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whit- ing, Phys. Rev. D81, 084033 (2010), arXiv:1002.0726 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D83, 084023 (2011), arXiv:1101.3331 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  126. [134]

    C. G. Darwin, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences249, 180 (1959), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspa/article- pdf/249/1257/180/51425/rspa.1959.0015.pdf

    1959

  127. [135]

    Blanchet, A

    L. Blanchet, A. Buonanno, and A. Le Tiec, Phys. Rev. D87, 024030 (2013), arXiv:1211.1060 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Hopper, C

    S. Hopper, C. Kavanagh, and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D93, 044010 (2016), arXiv:1512.01556 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Le Tiec, E

    A. Le Tiec, E. Barausse, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 131103 (2012), arXiv:1111.5609 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Warburton, L

    N. Warburton, L. Barack, and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D 87, 084012 (2013), arXiv:1301.3918 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Cutler, D

    C. Cutler, D. Kennefick, and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3816 (1994)

    1994

  132. [140]

    S.Akcay, A.LeTiec, L.Barack, N.Sago, andN.Warbur- ton, Phys. Rev. D91, 124014 (2015), arXiv:1503.01374 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Forseth, C

    E. Forseth, C. R. Evans, and S. Hopper, Phys. Rev. D 93, 064058 (2016), arXiv:1512.03051 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Skoupý and V

    V. Skoupý and V. Witzany, Phys. Rev. D110, 084061 (2024), arXiv:2406.14291 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Blanchet, G

    L. Blanchet, G. Faye, and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044017 (2014), arXiv:1405.5151 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  136. [144]

    S. E. Gralla and R. M. Wald, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 205009 (2008), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 28, 159501 (2011)], arXiv:0806.3293 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Pound, Phys

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D92, 104047 (2015), arXiv:1510.05172 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Miller and A

    J. Miller and A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D103, 064048 (2021), arXiv:2006.11263 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, (2021), arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Pound, B

    A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton, and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 021101 (2020), arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Leather and N

    B. Leather and N. Warburton, Phys. Rev. D108, 084045 (2023), arXiv:2306.17221 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Wei, X.-L

    Y.-X. Wei, X.-L. Zhu, J.-d. Zhang, and J. Mei, Phys. Rev. D112, 064048 (2025), arXiv:2504.09640 [gr-qc]

    2025

  144. [152]

    Munna, Phys

    C. Munna, Phys. Rev. D108, 084012 (2023), arXiv:2307.11158 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  145. [153]

    Akcay, D

    S. Akcay, D. Dempsey, and S. R. Dolan, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 084001 (2017), arXiv:1608.04811 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Damour, Phys

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D81, 024017 (2010), arXiv:0910.5533 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. D110, 044038 (2024), arXiv:2402.12342 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Damour, A

    T. Damour, A. Nagar, A. Placidi, and P. Rettegno, Phys. Rev. D113, 024042 (2026), arXiv:2503.05487 [gr-qc]

    2026

  149. [157]

    Clark and G

    A. Clark and G. Pratten, Phys. Rev. D112, 104074 (2025), arXiv:2508.12126 [gr-qc]

    2025

  150. [158]

    Damour, F

    T. Damour, F. Guercilena, I. Hinder, S. Hopper, A. Na- gar, and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D89, 081503 (2014), arXiv:1402.7307 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Rettegno, G

    P. Rettegno, G. Pratten, L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt, and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D108, 124016 (2023), arXiv:2307.06999 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Swain, G

    S. Swain, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 111, 064048 (2025), arXiv:2411.09652 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Rashti, F. Zappa, R. Gamba, W. Cook, B. Daszuta, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and D. Radice, Phys. Rev. D111, 024069 (2025), arXiv:2405.20398 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  154. [162]

    O. Long, H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, A. Ramos-Buades, H. R. Rüter, L. E. Kidder, and M. A. Scheel, Phys. Rev. D112, 124039 (2025), arXiv:2507.08071 [gr-qc]. 23

    2025

  155. [163]

    Clark, G

    A. Clark, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, (2026), arXiv:2606.24432 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.