Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Custodial Symmetry (Violation) in SMEFT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.10725 v2 pith:XEW3FA35 submitted 2020-09-22 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords custodialsmeftoperatorsviolatingbasismathscrsymmetricsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We investigate precision observables sensitive to custodial symmetric/violating UV physics beyond the Standard Model. We use the SMEFT framework which in general includes non-oblique corrections that requires a generalization of the Peskin-Takeuchi $T$ parameter to unambiguously detect custodial symmetry/violation. We take a first step towards constructing a SMEFT reparameterization-invariant replacement, that we call $\mathscr{T}$, valid at least for tree-level custodial violating contributions. We utilize a new custodial basis of $\nu$SMEFT (SMEFT augmented by right-handed neutrinos) which explicitly identifies the global $SU(2)_R$ symmetries of the Higgs and fermion sectors, that in turn permits easy identification of higher-dimensional operators that are custodial preserving or violating. We carefully consider equation-of-motion redundancies that cause custodial symmetric operators in one basis to be equivalent to a set of custodial symmetric and/or violating operators in another basis. Utilizing known results about tree/loop operator generation, we demonstrate that the basis-dependent appearance of custodial-violating operators does not invalidate our $\mathscr{T}$ parameter at tree-level. We illustrate our results with several UV theory examples, demonstrating that $\mathscr{T}$ faithfully identifies custodial symmetry violation, while $T$ can fail.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools