Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 116 references

Asteroseismological constraints on--and hints of--dark matter interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Oscillation data for the nearby subgiant KIC 8228742 favour dark-matter-electron scattering with a 1 GeV particle at more than 4 sigma, while dark-matter heat transport can erase the star's convective core.

desk verdict A promising new asteroseismic probe of sub-GeV DM, but the headline 4-sigma hint rests on an inconsistent luminosity formula that needs fixing before the claim can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07948 v1 pith:XF7D4YC3 submitted 2025-05-12 hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.SR

Stephanie Beram , Aaron C. Vincent This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COastro-ph.SR
keywords darkmatterasteroseismologyasymmetricconvectivecorematter-electronscatteringspin-dependentstellarheattransportsubgiantstar
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stars just above the convective-core threshold are sensitive probes of asymmetric dark matter: if captured dark matter does not annihilate, it conducts heat out of the core, cools it, and can erase the convective core. The paper simulates this using Monte-Carlo-calibrated heat transport and compares the predicted oscillation-frequency ratios to measured ratios for the nearby subgiant KIC 8228742. It reports new constraints on spin-dependent dark-matter-nucleon scattering and a more than $4\sigma$ preference for dark-matter-electron interactions at $m_\chi\simeq1\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $\sigma_0\simeq3\times10^{-34}\,\mathrm{cm^2}$, visible as an improvement in the $r_{02}$ frequency-ratio fit from $\chi^2_{r02}\simeq29.16$ to $5.99$. The preference sits in strong tension with Earth-based direct-detection limits, but the paper argues it is exactly the kind of signature asteroseismology is built to find.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the calibrated heat-transport luminosity: the analytic isothermal, long-mean-free-path transport expression is rescaled by a Knudsen-number correction, $$L_{\mathrm{calib}}=0.5\left(1+(K_0/K)^2\right)L_{\mathrm{SP}},$$ with $K=\ell_\chi(0)/r_\chi$ and $K_0\simeq0.4$. This fixes how much energy the captured dark matter removes from the core and deposits in the outer layers at each radius, and therefore whether the convective core survives. The comparison observable is the frequency-separation ratio $r_{02}(n)=d_{02}(n)/\Delta_1(n)$, a combination of small and large frequency separations that is insensitive to surface effects and sensitive to the sharp sound-speed discontinuity at a convective-core boundary. The analysis also recalibrates the stellar nuisance parameters separately for every dark-matter mass and cross-section point, rather than reusing the no-dark-matter stellar model.

What would settle it

Run a direct Monte Carlo simulation of heat transport by $\sim1\,\mathrm{GeV}$ dark matter scattering on electrons in a KIC 8228742-like stellar model at $\sigma_0\simeq3\times10^{-34}\,\mathrm{cm^2}$: if the resulting temperature and sound-speed profiles do not erase the convective core, or if the predicted $r_{02}$ ratios do not match the observed trend, the reported $4\sigma$ preference disappears. A second nearby subgiant of similar mass whose $r_{02}$ ratios agree with the standard model would likewise disfavour the dark-matter-electron interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a captured population of asymmetric, non-annihilating dark matter can erase the convective core of a star near the $\sim1.25\,M_\odot$ threshold, and that this structural change shows up in asteroseismic frequency-separation ratios. Using the subgiant KIC 8228742, the paper obtains constraints on spin-dependent dark-matter-nucleon scattering and finds a best-fit dark-matter-electron model with $m_\chi=1\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $\sigma_0\simeq3\times10^{-34}\,\mathrm{cm^2}$ that is more than $4\sigma$ better than the no-dark-matter model, improving $\chi^2_{r02}$ from $29.16$ to $5.99$. The paper reads this as evidence for an extra heat-transporting component inside the star, while noting that the required cross section greatly exceeds current Earth-based direct-detection bounds, so a dark-matter interpretation would need an additional ingredient such as a local density enhancement or a velocity-dependent interaction.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the calibration factor that converts the analytic dark-matter heat-transport luminosity into the actual transported luminosity; the paper takes the value fitted for constant dark-matter-nucleon scattering and applies it to electrons without re-deriving it for the electron case.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Convective-core erasure becomes a generic, observable signature of asymmetric dark matter in stars just above $\sim1.2\,M_\odot$, and dark-matter-electron scattering can produce it even where nucleon scattering is kinematically suppressed.
  • The single-star data from KIC 8228742 tighten spin-dependent dark-matter-nucleon constraints below $m_\chi\sim3\,\mathrm{GeV}$, reaching cross sections near $10^{-37}\,\mathrm{cm^2}$, in a low-mass region where evaporation may deplete the captured population.
  • If the preference for dark-matter-electron scattering is real, the star's core is cooler and denser than the standard model predicts, and the $r_{02}$ ratios should follow the near-linear trend the best-fit model reproduces.
  • Velocity- and momentum-dependent cross sections give qualitatively similar core erasure, so the reported effects are not tied to the constant-cross-section choice.
  • With more precise observations and additional subgiants of similar mass, the $4\sigma$ preference should either be confirmed as a population-wide pattern or disappear.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sharpest test would be to compute $K_0$ for electron scattering from first principles: a direct Monte Carlo transport simulation inside a KIC 8228742-like model would show whether the $4\sigma$ best fit survives when the electron calibration is not borrowed from the nucleon case.
  • A sample of several $\sim1.25\,M_\odot$ subgiants with measured $r_{02}$ ratios could serve as a population-level check; if only one star shows the convective-core-erasure signature, a dark-matter explanation would need something local, such as a dark-matter overdensity, rather than a universal particle property.
  • The best-fit electron cross section lies orders of magnitude above terrestrial electron-recoil limits, so a viable particle model would likely require a velocity- or momentum-dependent form factor that suppresses Earth-based rates while remaining efficient inside the star; the paper mentions this route but does not compute it for this star.
  • Because the transport calibration was validated for constant cross sections, the appendix's new analytic expressions for $v^{2n}$ and $q^{2n}$ interactions invite a re-fit of the KIC 8228742 data for non-constant cross sections, where the preferred mass and cross section could shift by factors of order unity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the effects of captured asymmetric dark matter on stellar structure and evolution, using a Spergel-Press analytic heat transport formula with a Monte-Carlo-calibrated Knudsen correction developed in the authors' earlier work. It implements these effects in MESA via the Capt'n General code, first for idealized 1.1-1.5 solar-mass main-sequence stars and then for a self-consistently recalibrated model of the subgiant KIC 8228742. From the r02 frequency-separation ratios of this star, the paper derives constraints on spin-dependent DM-nucleon scattering and reports a ~4 sigma preference for DM-electron scattering with m_chi = 1 GeV and sigma_0 ~ 3e-34 cm^2, a region already in strong tension with direct-detection limits.

Significance. If the transport calibration is correct, the paper demonstrates a new asteroseismological probe of light dark matter, with a genuine methodological improvement in that stellar nuisance parameters are re-calibrated for every DM model point. The inclusion of DM-electron scattering in stellar heat transport is new, and the paper makes falsifiable predictions for the r02 ratios of stars near the convective-core boundary. These strengths are substantial. However, the central detection claim rests on an unverified calibration step and a statistically fragile improvement, so the significance depends on whether those issues can be resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.20)] As printed, Eq. (2.20) is internally inconsistent with the text that follows it. For K << K0, Lcalib = 0.5 (1 + (K0/K)^2) LSP ~ 0.5 (K0/K)^2 LSP, and since K is proportional to sigma_0^{-1} while LSP is proportional to sigma_0, this gives Lcalib proportional to sigma_0^3. The text states that in this limit the correction 'suppresses the luminosity and grows as ~K^2, and so L ~ sigma_0^{-1}'; that behavior, and the Knudsen peak in Fig. 2, follows from Lcalib = 0.5 [1 + (K0/K)^2]^{-1} LSP instead. This is a load-bearing error: the claimed DM-electron preference at (m_chi, sigma_0) = (1 GeV, 3 x 10^{-34} cm^2) sits near the peak, and every derived constraint and the 4 sigma improvement pass through this luminosity calibration.
  2. [Sec. 2.4 and Refs. [28, 82]] The calibration constant K0 ~ 0.4 is imported from the authors' prior work on constant DM-nucleon interactions, yet the text explicitly says that K0 depends on interaction and target type. No Monte Carlo validation is shown for DM-electron interactions or for the subgiant model used for KIC 8228742, and Ref. [82] is an unreviewed preprint. Because the transport luminosity controls the size of the convective core and hence the r02 signal, an unvalidated K0 for electrons could shift the Knudsen peak and change the location and strength of the claimed preference; the manuscript provides no way for a reader to assess this.
  3. [Sec. 4.1.1, Table 1, Fig. 11] The reported >4 sigma preference is the difference between the no-DM chi^2_r02 of 29.16 and the best grid point's chi^2_r02 of 5.99, interpreted with 2 degrees of freedom. This significance is unreliable for two reasons. First, the best point was selected from a grid over (m_chi, sigma_0), so the look-elsewhere effect from scanning the grid is not accounted for. Second, Model B has chi^2_star = 0.396, which is worse than the no-DM value of 0.082, so the improvement is not a global improvement of the full fit; a proper model comparison must include the full likelihood and the extra parameters rather than the r02 diagnostic alone.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.3)] Equation (4.3) is garbled as printed ("22X 15 =") and should be written as a sum over the radial orders shown in Fig. 12, presumably n = 15 to 22.
  2. [Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 captions] Both captions say "1.5 M_sun (left)" for the third panel, but the panels are left, middle, and right; the last should read "(right)".
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.25)] The second integral in Eq. (A.25) is labeled "I_vchi>vT" but should be labeled "I_vchi<=vT" (or similar) to match the split defined in Eq. (A.23).
  4. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.4)] Equation (2.4) writes the differential scattering rate as dsigma/dv, but later expressions in the same section use dsigma/d(cos theta); the relationship between the two notations is not stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Transport calibration Eq. (2.20) is imported from the same group's prior Monte Carlo work rather than derived here; the asteroseismic r02 comparison itself is a genuine held-out prediction, so the paper is only partially circular.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (2.20); also Sec. 1 and Sec. 5]
    "We use the simple prescription derived and verified in Refs. [28, 82]: Lcalib = 0.5 (1 + (K0/K)^2)LSP ... We take an approximate value of K0≃0.4 which was found by Refs. [28, 82] to be a good fit for constant DM-nucleon interactions."

    Every stellar-structure constraint and the claimed 4σ DM-electron preference is computed with this luminosity prescription, but the prescription is not re-derived or validated here: it is imported from the same group's earlier Monte Carlo papers (Refs. [28, 82]), with K0 fitted there for constant DM-nucleon interactions and then applied to DM-electron scattering and to the KIC 8228742 models. In this paper the chain of support ends at 'derived and verified in Refs. [28, 82]' and 'we demonstrated by direct Monte Carlo simulation'—a self-citation rather than an independent, in-paper derivation. This is load-bearing because changing K0 or the functional form changes every result, including the location of the Knudsen peak on which the best-fit Model B sits.

full rationale

The paper's main asteroseismic test is not circular by construction: each DM model is calibrated to L, Teff, log g, and Δν, while the frequency-separation ratios r02 (Eq. 2.21) enter only afterwards via χ2_r02 (Eq. 4.3), so the 29.16→5.99 improvement is a genuine held-out observable. The circularity concern is the transport bridge: Eq. (2.20) with K0≃0.4 is the single input that maps DM cross sections to heat transport, and it is adopted from the same authors' Refs. [28, 82] rather than demonstrated in this manuscript. Since K0 is admitted to depend on target and interaction type, reusing the DM-nucleon value for electrons is an extrapolation that is not independently supported here. This warrants a 4 on the self-citation/load-bearing scale, not a 6-10: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the final statistical comparison is independent. Separately, Eq. (2.20) as printed looks internally inconsistent (K<<K0 gives L∝σ0^3, not the stated σ0^-1), which is a reproducibility/correctness risk but not, by itself, circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. The free parameters are the Knudsen correction constant K0, the stellar nuisance parameters, and the local dark matter density. The main unverified ingredient is the extrapolation of the K0 calibration to DM-electron interactions and to KIC 8228742's evolutionary state.

free parameters (3)
  • K0 in Knudsen correction = 0.4
    K0 in Eq. (2.20) is taken from fits to Monte Carlo simulations in prior work by the same group; the paper states 'an approximate value of K0 about 0.4 which was found by Refs. [28,82] to be a good fit for constant DM-nucleon interactions', and applies it also to DM-electron interactions without a dedicated fit.
  • Stellar nuisance parameters (M, Yi, [Fe/H]i, alphaMLT, fov) = Calibrated per grid point, not quoted
    The stellar calibration in Sec. 4.1 fits effective temperature, luminosity, log g, and large frequency separation for each dark matter model. These are legitimate nuisance parameters, but the choice to calibrate them independently per dark matter model is a modeling freedom that reduces constraining power if the data are weak.
  • Local dark matter density rho_chi = 0.4 GeV/cm3
    Assumed equal to the solar neighborhood value for KIC 8228742. The paper acknowledges that changing this density rescales all capture rates and the 4 sigma region requires a much larger density to be compatible with direct detection.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The calibrated Spergel and Press heat transport formula with K0 about 0.4 reproduces the true heat transport for DM-electron interactions and for the stellar models used here.
    Eq. (2.20) is asserted to be valid based on prior Monte Carlo work on DM-nucleon interactions; the paper applies it to electrons and to subgiant evolution without an explicit validation.
  • domain assumption The dark matter is asymmetric and does not self-annihilate, and it forms a stable captured population described by a single isothermal temperature T_chi.
    This is the standard ADM assumption used throughout Sec. 2.4, derived from prior literature.
  • domain assumption Capture is dominated by elastic scattering on hydrogen for DM-nucleon and on free ionized electrons for DM-electron interactions, with constant cross sections and no form factors.
    The paper explicitly limits itself to these channels in Sec. 2.1, citing prior work for the subdominance of heavier elements.
  • domain assumption The MESA stellar evolution code and the Capt'n General capture code correctly implement the derived capture rates and heat transport.
    The entire simulation pipeline relies on these codes; no independent verification is provided in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asteroseismological constraints on--and hints of--dark matter interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XF7D4YC3

@misc{pith2026250507948,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asteroseismological constraints on--and hints of--dark matter interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XF7D4YC3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07948}
}
abstract

If dark matter interacts with nuclei or electrons, then elastic collisions with constituents of stars will cause some of the galactic dark matter to fall below the escape velocity and become gravitationally bound. For asymmetric dark matter (which does not self-annihilate), the large accumulated population of dark matter can act as an additional source of heat transport, altering stellar structure and evolution. These effects can be probed by the use of asteroseismology. Here, we demonstrate this effect via numerical simulations. We use Monte Carlo-calibrated heat transport calculations, with a focus on the erasure of the convective core in stars that are slightly more massive than the Sun. We find limits on spin-dependent dark matter-nucleon and dark matter-electron interactions using asteroseismological data from a nearby sub-giant star. More tantalizingly, we find a $\gtrsim 4 \sigma$ preference for dark matter-electron interactions for dark matter masses $\lesssim 3.5$ GeV and cross sections $\sigma_{\chi-e} \sim 10^{-34.5}$ cm$^2$, albeit in strong tension with limits from Earth-based direct detection experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [82]

    Banks, S

    H. Banks, S. Beram, R. Reid, and A. C. Vincent, Simulation of thermal conduction by asymmetric dark matter in realistic stars and planets , arXiv:2412.14342

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Planck: P. A. R. Ade et. al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13, [ arXiv:1502.01589]

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of certain dark-matter candidates , Physical Review D 31 (1985) 3059

    1985

  4. [3]

    Aalbers et

    LZ: J. Aalbers et. al., Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , arXiv:2410.17036

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone, and D. Gaggero, Detecting dark matter around black holes with gravitational waves: Effects of dark-matter dynamics on the gravitational waveform, Physical Review D 102 (2020) 083006, [ arXiv:2002.12811]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [5]

    K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, A new probe of dark matter properties: gravitational waves from an intermediate mass black hole embedded in a dark matter mini-spike, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.5971 (2013) [arXiv:1301.5971]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [6]

    Kazunari, I

    E. Kazunari, I. Yousuke, and K. Sachiko, Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter minispikes, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 044045, [ arXiv:1408.3534]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [7]

    S. M. Boucenna, F. K¨ uhnel, T. Ohlsson, and L. Visinelli, Novel constraints on mixed dark-matter scenarios of primordial black holes and wimps , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (2018) 003, [ arXiv:1712.06383]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 116 references
  1. [8]

    C. F. Macedo, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, and L. C. Crispino, Into the lair: gravitational-wave signatures of dark matter , The Astrophysical Journal 774 (2013) 48, [ arXiv:1302.2646]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Yue and W.-B

    X.-J. Yue and W.-B. Han, Gravitational waves with dark matter minispikes: the combined effect, Physical Review D 97 (2018) 064003, [ arXiv:1711.09706]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov, Weakly interacting massive particles and neutron stars , Physical Review D 40 (1989) 3221

    1989

  4. [11]

    Bramante, T

    J. Bramante, T. Linden, and Y.-D. Tsai, Searching for dark matter with neutron star mergers and quiet kilonovae , Physical Review D 97 (2018) 055016, [ arXiv:1706.00001]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bramante and T

    J. Bramante and T. Linden, Detecting dark matter with imploding pulsars in the galactic center, Physical Review Letters 113 (2014) 191301, [ arXiv:1405.1031]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [13]

    de Lavallaz and M

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn, Neutron stars as dark matter probes , Physical Review D 81 (2010) 123521, [ arXiv:1004.0629]

    2010 arXiv

  7. [14]

    S. D. McDermott, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Constraints on scalar asymmetric dark matter from black hole formation in neutron stars , Physical Review D 85 (2012) 023519, [arXiv:1103.5472]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Constraining asymmetric dark matter through observations of compact stars, Physical Review D 83 (2011) 083512, [ arXiv:1012.2039]. – 24 –

    2011 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Growth of black holes in the interior of rotating neutron stars , Physical Review D 90 (2014) 043512, [ arXiv:1312.3764]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Renzini, Effects of cosmions in the sun and in globular cluster stars , Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    A. Renzini, Effects of cosmions in the sun and in globular cluster stars , Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 171, no. 1-2, Jan. 1987, p. 121, 122. 171 (1987) 121

    1987

  11. [18]

    Lopes and I

    J. Lopes and I. Lopes, Asymmetric dark matter imprint on low-mass main-sequence stars in the milky way nuclear star cluster , The Astrophysical Journal 879 (2019) 50, [arXiv:1907.05785]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Iocco, M

    F. Iocco, M. Taoso, F. Leclercq, and G. Meynet, Main sequence stars with asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 061301, [ arXiv:1201.5387]

    2012 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Taoso, F

    M. Taoso, F. Iocco, G. Meynet, G. Bertone, and P. Eggenberger, Effect of low mass dark matter particles on the sun , Physical Review D 82 (2010) 083509, [ arXiv:1005.5711]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [21]

    A. R. Zentner, High-energy neutrinos from dark matter particle self-capture within the sun , Physical Review D 80 (2009) 063501, [ arXiv:0907.3448]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [22]

    A. C. Vincent and P. Scott, Thermal conduction by dark matter with velocity and momentum-dependent cross-sections, JCAP 04 (2014) 019, [ arXiv:1311.2074]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    A. C. Vincent, P. Scott, and A. Serenelli, Possible Indication of Momentum-Dependent Asymmetric Dark Matter in the Sun , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 081302, [arXiv:1411.6626]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [24]

    A. C. Vincent, A. Serenelli, and P. Scott, Generalised form factor dark matter in the sun , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (2015) 040, [ arXiv:1504.04378]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Raghuveer and P.-R

    G. Raghuveer and P.-R. Sergio, Dark matter in the sun: scattering off electrons vs nucleons , JCAP 5 (2017) [arXiv:1702.02768]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [26]

    T. J. Raen, H. Mart´ ınez-Rodr´ ıguez,et. al., The effects of asymmetric dark matter on stellar evolution–i. spin-dependent scattering, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (2021) 5611–5623, [ arXiv:2010.04184]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    I. John, R. K. Leane, and T. Linden, Dark matter scattering constraints from observations of stars surrounding Sgr A* , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 123041, [ arXiv:2311.16228]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Banks, S

    H. Banks, S. Ansari, A. C. Vincent, and P. Scott, Simulation of energy transport by dark matter scattering in stars , JCAP 04 (2022) 002, [ arXiv:2111.06895]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Croon, J

    D. Croon, J. Sakstein, J. Smirnov, and J. Streeter, Dark Dwarfs: Dark Matter-Powered Sub-Stellar Objects Awaiting Discovery at the Galactic Center , arXiv:2408.00822

    arXiv

  23. [30]

    I. John, R. K. Leane, and T. Linden, Dark Branches of Immortal Stars at the Galactic Center, arXiv:2405.12267

    arXiv

  24. [31]

    Lopes and I

    J. Lopes and I. Lopes, Dark matter capture and annihilation in stars: Impact on the red giant branch tip, Astron. Astrophys. 651 (2021) A101, [ arXiv:2107.13885]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Hong and A

    H. Hong and A. C. Vincent, Dark matter limits from the tip of the red giant branch of globular clusters, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 103011, [ arXiv:2407.08773]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    R. K. Leane and J. Smirnov, Exoplanets as Sub-GeV Dark Matter Detectors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 161101, [ arXiv:2010.00015]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Croon and J

    D. Croon and J. Smirnov, Dark matter (h)eats young planets , JCAP 11 (2024) 046, [arXiv:2309.02495]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Blanco and R

    C. Blanco and R. K. Leane, Search for Dark Matter Ionization on the Night Side of Jupiter with Cassini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 261002, [ arXiv:2312.06758]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Benito, K

    M. Benito, K. Karchev, et. al., Dark Matter halo parameters from overheated exoplanets via Bayesian hierarchical inference, JCAP 07 (2024) 038, [ arXiv:2405.09578]. – 25 –

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Blanco, R

    C. Blanco, R. K. Leane, M. Moore, and J. Tong, Search for Dark Matter Induced Airglow in Planetary Atmospheres, arXiv:2408.15318

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    R. K. Leane and J. Tong, Optimal celestial bodies for dark matter detection , JCAP 12 (2024) 031, [arXiv:2405.05312]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    J. F. Acevedo, R. K. Leane, and A. J. Reilly, Dark Kinetic Heating of Exoplanets and Brown Dwarfs, arXiv:2405.02393

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    Robles and S

    S. Robles and S. A. Meighen-Berger, Extending the Dark Matter Reach of Water Cherenkov Detectors using Jupiter , arXiv:2411.04435

  34. [41]

    W. H. Press and D. N. Spergel, Capture by the sun of a galactic population of weakly interacting massive particles, Astrophys. J. 296 (1985) 679–684

    1985

  35. [42]

    Gould, WIMP Distribution in and Evaporation From the Sun , Astrophys

    A. Gould, WIMP Distribution in and Evaporation From the Sun , Astrophys. J. 321 (1987) 560

    1987

  36. [43]

    Gould, Resonant Enhancements in WIMP Capture by the Earth , Astrophys

    A. Gould, Resonant Enhancements in WIMP Capture by the Earth , Astrophys. J. 321 (1987) 571

    1987

  37. [44]

    J. S. Hagelin, K. W. Ng, and K. A. Olive, A High-energy Neutrino Signature From Supersymmetric Relics, Phys. Lett. B 180 (1986) 375–380

    1986

  38. [45]

    Srednicki, K

    M. Srednicki, K. A. Olive, and J. Silk, High-Energy Neutrinos from the Sun and Cold Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 279 (1987) 804–823

    1987

  39. [46]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel, Cosmic Asymmetry, Neutrinos and the Sun , Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 681–705. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 296, 1034–1036 (1988)]

    1987

  40. [47]

    J. Silk, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, The Photino, the Sun and High-Energy Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 257–259

    1985

  41. [48]

    L. M. Krauss, M. Srednicki, and F. Wilczek, Solar System Constraints and Signatures for Dark Matter Candidates , Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 2079–2083

    1986

  42. [49]

    Freese, Can Scalar Neutrinos Or Massive Dirac Neutrinos Be the Missing Mass? , Phys

    K. Freese, Can Scalar Neutrinos Or Massive Dirac Neutrinos Be the Missing Mass? , Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 295–300

    1986

  43. [50]

    T. K. Gaisser, G. Steigman, and S. Tilav, Limits on Cold Dark Matter Candidates from Deep Underground Detectors, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 2206

    1986

  44. [51]

    Barger, F

    V. Barger, F. Halzen, D. Hooper, and C. Kao, Indirect search for neutralino dark matter with high energy neutrinos , Physical Review D 65 (2002) 075022, [ hep-ph/0105182]

    2002 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Desai et

    Super-Kamiokande: S. Desai et. al., Search for dark matter WIMPs using upward through-going muons in Super-Kamiokande , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083523, [hep-ex/0404025]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 70, 109901 (2004)]

    2004 arXiv

  46. [54]

    C. Rott, J. Siegal-Gaskins, and J. F. Beacom, New Sensitivity to Solar WIMP Annihilation using Low-Energy Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055005, [ arXiv:1208.0827]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bernal, J

    N. Bernal, J. Mart´ ın-Albo, and S. Palomares-Ruiz, A novel way of constraining WIMPs annihilations in the Sun: MeV neutrinos , JCAP 08 (2013) 011, [ arXiv:1208.0834]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    IceCube: M. G. Aartsen et. al., Search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 131302, [ arXiv:1212.4097]

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Scott et

    IceCube: P. Scott et. al., Use of event-level neutrino telescope data in global fits for theories of new physics, JCAP 11 (2012) 057, [ arXiv:1207.0810]. – 26 –

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    IceCube: M. G. Aartsen et. al., Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry , JCAP 04 (2016) 022, [arXiv:1601.00653]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric dark matter: theories, signatures, and constraints , Physics Reports 537 (2014) 91–121, [ arXiv:1308.0338]

    2014 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Petraki and R

    K. Petraki and R. R. Volkas, Review of asymmetric dark matter , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330028, [ arXiv:1305.4939]

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    D. N. Spergel and W. H. Press, Effect of hypothetical, weakly interacting, massive particles on energy transport in the solar interior , Astrophys. J. 294 (1985) 663–673

    1985

  54. [62]

    Gould and G

    A. Gould and G. Raffelt, Thermal conduction by massive particles , Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 352, April 1, 1990, p. 654-668. Research supported by the Institute for Advanced Study and DOE. 352 (1990) 654–668

    1990

  55. [63]

    Gould and G

    A. Gould and G. Raffelt, Cosmion energy transfer in stars-the knudsen limit , Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 352, April 1, 1990, p. 669-680. Research supported by the Institute for Advanced Study and DOE. 352 (1990) 669–680

    1990

  56. [64]

    Steigman, C

    G. Steigman, C. L. Sarazin, H. Quintana, and J. Faulkner, Dynamical interactions and astrophysical effects of stable heavy neutrinos , Astron. J. 83 (1978) 1050–1061

    1978

  57. [65]

    M. T. Frandsen and S. Sarkar, Asymmetric dark matter and the sun , Physical Review Letters 105 (2010) 011301, [ arXiv:1003.4505]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    D. T. Cumberbatch, J. A. Guzik, J. Silk, L. S. Watson, and S. M. West, Light WIMPs in the Sun: Constraints from Helioseismology , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 103503, [ arXiv:1005.5102]

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Lopes, P

    I. Lopes, P. Panci, and J. Silk, Helioseismology with long-range dark matter–baryon interactions, The Astrophysical Journal 795 (2014) 162, [ arXiv:1402.0682]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    C. A. Prieto, D. L. Lambert, and M. Asplund, The forbidden abundance of oxygen in the sun , The Astrophysical Journal 556 (2001) L63, [ astro-ph/0106360]

    2001 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Allende Prieto, D

    C. Allende Prieto, D. L. Lambert, and M. Asplund, A Reappraisal of the solar photospheric C/O ratio, Astrophys. J. Lett. 573 (2002) L137–L140, [ astro-ph/0206089]

    2002 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Melendez and M

    J. Melendez and M. Asplund, Another forbidden solar oxygen abundance: the [O I] 5577 A line, Astron. Astrophys. 490 (2008) 817, [ arXiv:0808.2796]

    2008 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Scott, M

    P. Scott, M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, and A. J. Sauval, On the solar nickel and oxygen abundances, Astrophys. J. Lett. 691 (2009) L119, [ arXiv:0811.0815]

    2009 arXiv

  64. [72]

    J. N. Bahcall, S. Basu, M. Pinsonneault, and A. M. Serenelli, Helioseismological implications of recent solar abundance determinations , Astrophys. J. 618 (2005) 1049–1056, [astro-ph/0407060]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Basu and H

    S. Basu and H. M. Antia, Constraining solar abundances using helioseismology , Astrophys. J. Lett. 606 (2004) L85, [ astro-ph/0403485]

    2004 arXiv

  66. [74]

    J. N. Bahcall, A. M. Serenelli, and S. Basu, 10,000 standard solar models: a Monte Carlo simulation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 165 (2006) 400–431, [ astro-ph/0511337]

    2006 arXiv

  67. [75]

    S. Bi, T. Li, L. Li, and W. Yang, Solar Models with Revised Abundance , Astrophys. J. Lett. 731 (2011) L42, [ arXiv:1104.1032]

    2011 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Casanellas and I

    J. Casanellas and I. Lopes, First asteroseismic limits on the nature of dark matter , Astrophys. J. Lett. 765 (2013) L21, [ arXiv:1212.2985]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Martins, I

    A. Martins, I. Lopes, and J. Casanellas, Asteroseismic constraints on asymmetric dark matter: Light particles with an effective spin-dependent coupling , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 023507, [arXiv:1701.03928]. – 27 –

    2017 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. a. Rato, J. Lopes, and I. Lopes, On asymmetric dark matter constraints from the asteroseismology of a subgiant star , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507 (2021) 3434–3443, [arXiv:2109.12671]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Baglin, M

    A. Baglin, M. Auvergne, et. al., Corot: Description of the mission and early results , Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 4 (2008) 71–81

    2008

  72. [80]

    W. J. Borucki, D. Koch, et. al., Kepler planet-detection mission: introduction and first results , Science 327 (2010) 977–980

    2010

  73. [81]

    Casanellas, I

    J. Casanellas, I. M. Brand˜ ao, and Y. Lebreton, Stellar convective cores as dark matter probes , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 103535, [ arXiv:1505.01362]

    2015 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Ibarra, A

    A. Ibarra, A. Ringwald, D. Tran, and C. Weniger, Cosmic Rays from Leptophilic Dark Matter Decay via Kinetic Mixing , JCAP 08 (2009) 017, [ arXiv:0903.3625]

    2009 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Essig, J

    R. Essig, J. Mardon, and T. Volansky, Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 076007, [ arXiv:1108.5383]

    2012 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Foot, Can dark matter - electron scattering explain the DAMA annual modulation signal? , Phys

    R. Foot, Can dark matter - electron scattering explain the DAMA annual modulation signal? , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 121302, [ arXiv:1407.4213]

    2014 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Diamond, C

    M. Diamond, C. V. Cappiello, A. C. Vincent, and J. Bramante, Limiting Light Dark Matter with Luminous Hadronic Loops , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 051001, [ arXiv:2307.13727]

    2024 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Catena and B

    R. Catena and B. Schwabe, Form factors for dark matter capture by the Sun in effective theories, JCAP 04 (2015) 042, [ arXiv:1501.03729]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [88]

    J. Fan, M. Reece, and L.-T. Wang, Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection, JCAP 11 (2010) 042, [ arXiv:1008.1591]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Busoni, A

    G. Busoni, A. De Simone, P. Scott, and A. C. Vincent, Evaporation and scattering of momentum- and velocity-dependent dark matter in the Sun , JCAP 10 (2017) 037, [arXiv:1703.07784]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Vinyoles, A

    N. Vinyoles, A. M. Serenelli, et. al., A new generation of standard solar models , The Astrophysical Journal 835 (2017) 202, [ arXiv:1611.09867]

    2017 arXiv

  82. [91]

    I. W. Roxburgh and S. Vorontsov, The ratio of small to large separations of acoustic oscillations as a diagnostic of the interior of solar-like stars , Astronomy & Astrophysics 411 (2003) 215–220

    2003

  83. [92]

    S. Basu, W. J. Chaplin, et. al., Solar abundances and helioseismology: Fine structure spacings and separation ratios of low-degree p modes , Astrophys. J. 655 (2007) 660–671, [astro-ph/0610052]

    2007 arXiv

  84. [93]

    W. J. Chaplin, A. M. Serenelli, et. al., Solar heavy element abundance: constraints from frequency separation ratios of low-degree p modes , Astrophys. J. 670 (2007) 872–884, [arXiv:0705.3154]

    2007 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Paxton, L

    B. Paxton, L. Bildsten, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , ApJS 192 (2011) 3, [ arXiv:1009.1622]

    2011 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Paxton, M

    B. Paxton, M. Cantiello, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , ApJS 208 (2013) 4, [ arXiv:1301.0319]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [96]

    Paxton, P

    B. Paxton, P. Marchant, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , ApJS 220 (2015) 15, [ arXiv:1506.03146]

    2015 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Paxton, J

    B. Paxton, J. Schwab, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions , ApJS 234 (2018) 34, [arXiv:1710.08424]. – 28 –

    2018 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Paxton, R

    B. Paxton, R. Smolec, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation , ApJS 243 (2019) 10, [ arXiv:1903.01426]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [99]

    A. S. Jermyn, E. B. Bauer, et. al., Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Time-dependent Convection, Energy Conservation, Automatic Differentiation, and Infrastructure, ApJS 265 (2023) 15, [ arXiv:2208.03651]

    2023 arXiv

  91. [100]

    N. A. Kozar, A. Caddell, L. Fraser-Leach, P. Scott, and A. C. Vincent, Capt’n general: A generalized stellar dark matter capture and heat transport code , arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.06810 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06810]

    2021 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Townsend and S

    R. Townsend and S. Teitler, Gyre: an open-source stellar oscillation code based on a new magnus multiple shooting scheme , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (2013) 3406–3418, [ arXiv:1308.2965]

    2013 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Adipls—the aarhus adiabatic oscillation package , Astrophysics and Space Science 316 (2008) 113–120, [ arXiv:0710.3106]

    J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, Adipls—the aarhus adiabatic oscillation package , Astrophysics and Space Science 316 (2008) 113–120, [ arXiv:0710.3106]

    2008 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Ja, A simplex method for function minimization , Computer journal 7 (1965) 308–313

    N. Ja, A simplex method for function minimization , Computer journal 7 (1965) 308–313

    1965

  95. [104]

    Metcalfe, W

    T. Metcalfe, W. Chaplin, et. al., Asteroseismology of the solar analogs 16 cyg a and b from kepler observations, The Astrophysical journal letters 748 (2012) L10, [ arXiv:1201.5966]

    2012 arXiv

  96. [105]

    T. S. Metcalfe, O. Creevey, et. al., Properties of 42 solar-type kepler targets from the asteroseismic modeling portal, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 214 (2014) 27, [arXiv:1402.3614]

    2014 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Chaplin, S

    W. Chaplin, S. Basu, et. al., Asteroseismic fundamental properties of solar-type stars observed by the nasa kepler mission , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 210 (2013) 1, [arXiv:1310.4001]

    2013 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Appourchaux, W

    T. Appourchaux, W. Chaplin, et. al., Oscillation mode frequencies of 61 main-sequence and subgiant stars observed by kepler , Astronomy & Astrophysics 543 (2012) A54, [arXiv:1204.3147]

    2012 arXiv

  99. [108]

    CRESST: A. H. Abdelhameed et. al., First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 102002, [ arXiv:1904.00498]

    2019 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Arnaud et

    NEWS-G: Q. Arnaud et. al., First results from the NEWS-G direct dark matter search experiment at the LSM , Astropart. Phys. 97 (2018) 54–62, [ arXiv:1706.04934]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Archambault et

    PICASSO: S. Archambault et. al., Constraints on Low-Mass WIMP Interactions on 19F from PICASSO, Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 153–161, [ arXiv:1202.1240]

    2012 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Amole et

    PICO: C. Amole et. al., Dark Matter Search Results from the Complete Exposure of the PICO-60 C 3F8 Bubble Chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 022001, [ arXiv:1902.04031]

    2019 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Aprile, J

    E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, et. al., Light dark matter search with ionization signals in xenon1t , Physical Review Letters 123 (2019) 251801, [ arXiv:1907.11485]

    2019 arXiv

  104. [113]

    J. F. Acevedo, R. K. Leane, and J. Smirnov, Evaporation barrier for dark matter in celestial bodies, JCAP 04 (2024) 038, [ arXiv:2303.01516]

    2024 arXiv

  105. [114]

    Sigurdson, M

    K. Sigurdson, M. Doran, A. Kurylov, R. R. Caldwell, and M. Kamionkowski, Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083501, [ astro-ph/0406355]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 089903 (2006)]

    2004 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Chang, A

    S. Chang, A. Pierce, and N. Weiner, Momentum Dependent Dark Matter Scattering , JCAP 01 (2010) 006, [ arXiv:0908.3192]

    2010 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Feldstein, A

    B. Feldstein, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and E. Katz, Form Factor Dark Matter , JCAP 01 (2010) 020, [arXiv:0908.2991]. – 29 –

    2010 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Chang, N

    S. Chang, N. Weiner, and I. Yavin, Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 125011, [arXiv:1007.4200]. A Non-constant cross sections Interactions can be spin-dependent (SD) interactions which occur when DM couples to the nucleon spin, mediated by axial-vector or...

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.