Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detecting Influence Campaigns in Social Networks Using the Ising Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.10244 v1 pith:XF7W7MLU submitted 2018-05-25 cs.SI physics.soc-phstat.AP

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-phstat.AP
keywords botsfindcampaignscoordinatedinfluencemodelalgorithmidentify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of identifying coordinated influence campaigns conducted by automated agents or bots in a social network. We study several different Twitter datasets which contain such campaigns and find that the bots exhibit heterophily - they interact more with humans than with each other. We use this observation to develop a probability model for the network structure and bot labels based on the Ising model from statistical physics. We present a method to find the maximum likelihood assignment of bot labels by solving a minimum cut problem. Our algorithm allows for the simultaneous detection of multiple bots that are potentially engaging in a coordinated influence campaign, in contrast to other methods that identify bots one at a time. We find that our algorithm is able to more accurately find bots than existing methods when compared to a human labeled ground truth. We also look at the content posted by the bots we identify and find that they seem to have a coordinated agenda.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Noncooperative dynamics in election interference

    physics.soc-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A stochastic differential game predicts that all-or-nothing election stakes escalate interference spending by both sides, and a fitted application to 2016 U.S. data matches the middle of the campaign but not its start.

Pith tools