Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Case for Retraining of ML Models for IoT Device Identification at the Edge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.08605 v1 pith:XFDZ2DKT submitted 2020-11-17 cs.NI cs.LG

classification cs.NIcs.LG
keywords edgemodelsdevicesnetworkaccuracydataresourcesavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices are known to be the source of many security problems, and as such they would greatly benefit from automated management. This requires robustly identifying devices so that appropriate network security policies can be applied. We address this challenge by exploring how to accurately identify IoT devices based on their network behavior, using resources available at the edge of the network. In this paper, we compare the accuracy of five different machine learning models (tree-based and neural network-based) for identifying IoT devices by using packet trace data from a large IoT test-bed, showing that all models need to be updated over time to avoid significant degradation in accuracy. In order to effectively update the models, we find that it is necessary to use data gathered from the deployment environment, e.g., the household. We therefore evaluate our approach using hardware resources and data sources representative of those that would be available at the edge of the network, such as in an IoT deployment. We show that updating neural network-based models at the edge is feasible, as they require low computational and memory resources and their structure is amenable to being updated. Our results show that it is possible to achieve device identification and categorization with over 80% and 90% accuracy respectively at the edge.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. REAL-IoT: Characterizing GNN Intrusion Detection Robustness under Practical Adversarial Attack

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    GNN-based intrusion detectors show lower accuracy on REAL-IoT's merged datasets, but the paper's own tables are inconsistent and the drift protocol is not a true distribution-shift test.

Pith tools