pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.24035 · v3 · pith:XFJJMNRPnew · submitted 2025-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Coercivity Landscape Characterizes Dynamic Hysteresis

Miao Chen , Xiu-Hua Zhao , Yu-Han Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 00:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords dynamic hysteresiscoercivitystochastic phi^4 modeldriving rate scalingfinite-size scalingnon-equilibrium transitionsrenormalization group
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coercivity in a driven stochastic φ⁴ model shows four sequential regimes: linear rise, a stable plateau, square-root rise, and abrupt collapse as driving rate increases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the stochastic φ⁴ model under periodic external-field driving and tracks the coercivity, defined as the field value at which average magnetization crosses zero. For large systems and weak noise, this coercivity first grows linearly with drive rate, then enters a flat plateau, then grows as the square root of rate, and finally drops sharply to zero. The plateau is traced to the fact that the order of taking the zero-noise limit and the zero-drive-rate limit matters: one order gives zero coercivity while the other recovers the static first-order transition field. After the plateau a scaling relation holds between the excess coercivity and the excess rate, and renormalization-group arguments yield how the plateau location itself scales with system size or noise strength. The result supplies a single picture for how hysteresis changes across widely separated time scales in non-equilibrium systems.

Core claim

For large systems with small noise strength σ, the coercivity H_c ≡ H(⟨φ⟩=0) sequentially exhibits distinct behaviors with increasing driving rate v_H: v_H-scaling increase, stable plateau (v_H^0), v_H^{1/2}-scaling increase, and abrupt decline to disappearance. The plateau reflects the competition between thermodynamic and quasi-static limits, namely lim_{σ→0} lim_{v_H→0} H_c = 0 and lim_{v_H→0} lim_{σ→0} H_c = H^*, where H^* is exactly the field-driven first-order phase transition point. In the post-plateau regime, (H_c - H_P) scales with (v_H - v_P)^{2/3} with v_P and H_P the reference points of the plateau. Finite-size scaling for the plateau is obtained as v_P ∼ σ² and (H^* - H_P) ∼ σ^{

What carries the argument

Coercivity H_c defined as the external field value at which the spatially averaged order parameter ⟨φ⟩ equals zero, together with its dependence on the periodic-drive rate v_H and the noise strength σ.

If this is right

  • Dynamic hysteresis acquires a universal sequence of scaling regimes separated by a plateau whose location is set by the competition of limits.
  • The post-plateau relation (H_c - H_P) ∝ (v_H - v_P)^{2/3} supplies a concrete, testable scaling law near the transition.
  • Renormalization-group analysis yields explicit finite-size scaling v_P ∼ σ² and (H^* - H_P) ∼ σ^{4/3} that predict how the plateau moves when system size or noise changes.
  • The abrupt collapse of coercivity at high drive rates marks the point where the system can no longer follow the external field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same non-commuting-limits mechanism may appear in other periodically driven systems that possess a first-order transition, such as driven colloidal suspensions or magnetic multilayers.
  • Varying temperature (which controls noise) and drive frequency in an experiment could map out the four-regime landscape directly.
  • The plateau height could serve as a practical indicator of the underlying static transition field when true quasi-static conditions are experimentally inaccessible.
  • Extending the renormalization-group treatment to other non-equilibrium transitions might reveal analogous finite-size corrections to dynamic thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The two limits of vanishing noise and vanishing drive rate do not commute in a manner that is physically realized, and the limiting field H^* exactly coincides with the static first-order transition point.

What would settle it

Plot coercivity versus drive rate for successively smaller noise strengths in a large but finite system; check whether a flat plateau appears whose height approaches the known static transition field H^* as noise is reduced.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.24035 by Miao Chen, Xiu-Hua Zhao, Yu-Han Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Hysteresis loops and coercivity panorama of the stochastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Finite-size scaling of the FOPT plateau. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Finite-time and finite-size scaling relations for sat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hysteresis, with rich dynamical behaviors-especially in interacting systems-has drawn broad research interest. Yet its dynamic scalings across time scales lack a unified description, and their transitions remain unclear. Here, we study the stochastic $\phi^4$ model driven periodically by an external field $H$. For large systems with small noise strength $\sigma$, we find the coercivity $H_c \equiv H(\langle\phi\rangle=0)$ sequentially exhibits distinct behaviors with increasing driving rate $v_H$: $v_H$-scaling increase, stable plateau ($v_H^0$), $v_H^{1/2}$-scaling increase, and abrupt decline to disappearance. The plateau reflects the competition between thermodynamic and quasi-static limits, namely, $\lim_{\sigma\to 0}\lim_{v_H\to 0}H_c = 0$, and $\lim_{v_H\to 0}\lim_{\sigma\to 0}H_c=H^*$. Here, $H^*$ is exactly the field-driven first-order phase transition point. In the post-plateau regime, $(H_{c} - H_{P})$ scales with $(v_{H} - v_{P})^{2/3}$ with $v_{P}$ and $H_{P}$ being the reference points of the plateau. Moreover, we reveal a finite-size scaling for the coercivity plateau as $v_{P}\sim\sigma^{2}$ and $(H^*-H_P)\sim\sigma^{4/3}$ by utilizing renormalization-group theory. Our work provides a panoramic view of finite-time scalings of the hysteresis and offers new insights into finite-time/finite-size effect interplay in non-equilibrium systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies dynamic hysteresis in the periodically driven stochastic φ⁴ model. For large systems and small noise strength σ, it reports that coercivity H_c ≡ H(⟨φ⟩=0) exhibits four sequential regimes with increasing driving rate v_H: v_H-scaling increase, a stable v_H^0 plateau, v_H^{1/2}-scaling increase, and abrupt decline to disappearance. The plateau is attributed to non-commuting limits lim_{σ→0} lim_{v_H→0} H_c = 0 and lim_{v_H→0} lim_{σ→0} H_c = H*, where H* is the field-driven first-order phase transition point. It further reports the post-plateau scaling (H_c − H_P) ∼ (v_H − v_P)^{2/3} and renormalization-group finite-size scalings v_P ∼ σ² and (H* − H_P) ∼ σ^{4/3}.

Significance. If the reported regimes, non-commutativity argument, and scalings are rigorously supported by derivations and independent checks, the work would supply a unified description of finite-time hysteresis scalings and useful insights into the interplay of finite-time and finite-size effects in non-equilibrium systems. The explicit use of renormalization-group theory to obtain the finite-size scalings for the plateau boundaries is a constructive element that could yield testable predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and sections discussing the limits and plateau interpretation] The identification of the plateau height with the deterministic spinodal field H* (the field at which the metastable minimum disappears in the σ=0 limit) is load-bearing for both the non-commutativity explanation and the subsequent (v_H − v_P)^{2/3} scaling. The manuscript supplies no independent computation of this spinodal field—e.g., by solving the deterministic ODE, locating the inflection point of the effective potential, or numerically extrapolating the zero-noise, zero-rate limit—and no direct comparison between that value and the observed plateau H_P. Without this anchor the regime boundaries remain unverified.
  2. [Section presenting the renormalization-group finite-size analysis] The finite-size scalings v_P ∼ σ² and (H* − H_P) ∼ σ^{4/3} are derived via renormalization-group theory, yet the manuscript does not detail the specific RG flow equations, the relevant fixed point, or the matching procedure used to extract the exponents from the model. These steps are necessary to confirm that the reported powers are not the result of fitting choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the scalings but omits any mention of simulation details (system sizes, number of noise realizations, integration method). Adding a concise statement on numerical protocol would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Main text near the plateau discussion] Notation for the plateau reference points (H_P, v_P) is introduced without an explicit definition at first appearance; a short sentence clarifying how they are operationally extracted from the H_c(v_H) curves would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight areas where additional verification and elaboration will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and sections discussing the limits and plateau interpretation] The identification of the plateau height with the deterministic spinodal field H* (the field at which the metastable minimum disappears in the σ=0 limit) is load-bearing for both the non-commutativity explanation and the subsequent (v_H − v_P)^{2/3} scaling. The manuscript supplies no independent computation of this spinodal field—e.g., by solving the deterministic ODE, locating the inflection point of the effective potential, or numerically extrapolating the zero-noise, zero-rate limit—and no direct comparison between that value and the observed plateau H_P. Without this anchor the regime boundaries remain unverified.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, independent computation of the spinodal field H* and a direct numerical comparison to the observed plateau height H_P would provide a stronger anchor for the non-commutativity argument and the regime boundaries. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that computes H* from the deterministic (σ = 0) dynamics—either by integrating the ODE until the metastable minimum disappears or by locating the inflection point of the effective potential—and overlays this value on the simulated H_c(v_H) curves to confirm that the plateau sits at H*. This addition will also allow us to verify the subsequent (v_H − v_P)^{2/3} scaling more rigorously. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section presenting the renormalization-group finite-size analysis] The finite-size scalings v_P ∼ σ² and (H* − H_P) ∼ σ^{4/3} are derived via renormalization-group theory, yet the manuscript does not detail the specific RG flow equations, the relevant fixed point, or the matching procedure used to extract the exponents from the model. These steps are necessary to confirm that the reported powers are not the result of fitting choices.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the renormalization-group derivation was presented too concisely. In the revised version we will expand the finite-size scaling section to include (i) the explicit RG flow equations for the stochastic φ⁴ model under periodic driving, (ii) the identification of the relevant fixed point that controls the plateau boundaries, and (iii) the matching procedure that yields the exponents v_P ∼ σ² and (H* − H_P) ∼ σ^{4/3}. These additions will make the origin of the reported powers transparent and eliminate any ambiguity about fitting versus derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper analyzes the stochastic φ⁴ model under periodic driving and reports observed regimes in coercivity H_c versus driving rate v_H, including a plateau whose height is interpreted via non-commuting limits on σ and v_H with H* identified as the deterministic first-order transition point. The post-plateau scaling (H_c - H_P) ~ (v_H - v_P)^{2/3} and the finite-size scalings v_P ~ σ², (H* - H_P) ~ σ^{4/3} are obtained by applying renormalization-group theory to the model. These steps rely on independent theoretical input and model analysis rather than redefining inputs as outputs or reducing predictions to fitted quantities by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard stochastic φ⁴ model, the validity of renormalization-group scaling for the plateau, and the physical relevance of the two non-commuting limits; no additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Renormalization-group theory applies directly to the finite-size scaling of the coercivity plateau in the driven stochastic φ⁴ model
    Invoked to obtain v_P ~ σ² and (H* - H_P) ~ σ^{4/3}

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5836 in / 1517 out tokens · 67305 ms · 2026-05-22T00:30:07.994118+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We study the stochastic ϕ⁴ model under periodic driving... coercivity H_c ≡ H(⟨ϕ⟩=0) sequentially exhibits distinct behaviors... lim_{σ→0} lim_{v_H→0} H_c = 0 and lim_{v_H→0} lim_{σ→0} H_c = H^* ... (H_c − H_P) scales with (v_H − v_P)^{2/3} ... finite-size scaling ... v_P ∼ σ² and (H^*−H_P)∼σ^{4/3} by utilizing renormalization-group theory.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the free energy density ... f4(ϕ,H)=½a2ϕ²+¼a4ϕ⁴−Hϕ ... Langevin equation ∂ϕ/∂t=−λ∂f4/∂ϕ + ζ(t)

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finite-time and Finite-size scalings of coercivity in dynamic hysteresis

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Coercivity landscape in driven stochastic φ⁴ and Curie-Weiss models shows a plateau at v_P with H_P; scalings are H_c ~ v_H below, H_c ~ v_H^{1/2} in fast driving, and H_c - H_P ~ (v_H - v_P)^{2/3} post-plateau, with ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism: For Physicists, Materials Scientists, and Engineers (Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1998)

    G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism: For Physicists, Materials Scientists, and Engineers (Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    K. A. Morris, What is hysteresis?, Appl. Mech. Rev. 64, 050801 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    T. Wang, M. Noori, W. A. Altabey, Z. Wu, R. Ghiasi, S.-C. Kuok, A. Silik, N. S. D. Farhan, V. Sarhosis, and E. N. Farsangi, From model-driven to data-driven: A re- view of hysteresis modeling in structural and mechanical systems, Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 204, 110785 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bertotti and I

    G. Bertotti and I. D. Mayergoyz, The Science of Hystere- sis: 3-Volume Set (Elsevier, 2005)

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    H. Wang, Y. Wu, C. Cong, J. Shang, and T. Yu, Hystere- sis of electronic transport in graphene transistors, ACS Nano 4, 7221 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    S. R. K. Rodriguez, W. Casteels, F. Storme, N. Car- lon Zambon, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Probing a dissipative phase transition via dynamical optical hys- teresis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 247402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Fan and J

    Z. Fan and J. Zhang, Scaling of thermal hysteresis with temperature scanning rate, Phys. Rev. E51, 2898 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Yildiz, O

    S. Yildiz, O. Pekcan, A. N. Berker, and H. Ozbek, Scaling of thermal hysteresis at nematic-smectic-a phase transi- tion in a binary mixture, Phys. Rev. E69, 031705 (2004)

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    Kuang, J

    Z. Kuang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, K. Liang, and P. Fung, Scaling behaviours in the thermoelastic martensitic transformation of Co, Solid State Commun. 114, 231 6 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    H. R. Noori, Hysteresis Phenomena in Biology (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg s.l, 2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    T. B. Flanagan, C. N. Park, and W. A. Oates, Hysteresis in solid state reactions, Prog. Solid State Chem. 23, 291 (1995)

    work page 1995

  12. [12]

    G¨ ocke, Various concepts of hysteresis applied in eco- nomics, J

    M. G¨ ocke, Various concepts of hysteresis applied in eco- nomics, J. Econ. Surv. 16, 167 (2002)

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    J. A. Ewing, Experimental researches in magnetism, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 176, 523 (1885)

    work page

  14. [14]

    Brokate and J

    M. Brokate and J. Sprekels, Hysteresis and Phase Tran- sitions, 1st ed. (Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1996)

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and their Applications (Elsevier, 2003)

    I. Mayergoyz, Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and their Applications (Elsevier, 2003)

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    C. Tang, P. Sellappan, Y. Liu, Y. Xu, J. E. Garay, and J. Shi, Anomalous Hall Hysteresis in Tm3Fe5O12/Pt with Strain-Induced Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 94, 140403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    C. A. P. Goodwin, F. Ortu, D. Reta, N. F. Chilton, and D. P. Mills, Molecular magnetic hysteresis at 60 kelvin in dysprosocenium, Nature 548, 439 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    M¨ or´ ee and M

    G. M¨ or´ ee and M. Leijon, Review of hysteresis models for magnetic materials, Entropy 16, 3908 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    E. P. Furlani, Permanent magnet and electromechanical devices: Materials, analysis, and applications (Academic Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    Brataas, A

    A. Brataas, A. D. Kent, and H. Ohno, Current-induced torques in magnetic materials, Nat. Mater. 11, 372 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    R. V. Lapshin, Analytical model for the approximation of hysteresis loop and its application to the scanning tun- neling microscope, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 4718 (1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    J. M. D. Coey, Hard magnetic materials: A perspective, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 4671 (2011)

    work page 2011

  23. [23]

    J. M. Silveyra, E. Ferrara, D. L. Huber, and T. C. Mon- son, Soft magnetic materials for a sustainable and elec- trified world, Science 362, eaao0195 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    P. Jung, G. Gray, R. Roy, and P. Mandel, Scaling law for dynamical hysteresis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1873 (1990)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    G. H. Goldsztein, F. Broner, and S. H. Strogatz, Dynam- ical hysteresis without static hysteresis: Scaling laws and asymptotic expansions, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 57, 1163 (1997)

    work page 1997

  26. [26]

    B. K. Chakrabarti and M. Acharyya, Dynamic transi- tions and hysteresis, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 847 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [27]

    Punya, R

    A. Punya, R. Yimnirun, P. Laoratanakul, and Y. Laosir- itaworn, Frequency dependence of the ising–hysteresis phase–diagram: Mean field analysis, Physica B 405, 3482 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Wongdamnern, A

    N. Wongdamnern, A. Ngamjarurojana, Y. Laosiritaworn, S. Ananta, and R. Yimnirun, Dynamic ferroelectric hys- teresis scaling of BaTiO 3 single crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 044109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    B. Pan, H. Yu, D. Wu, X. H. Zhou, and J. M. Liu, Dy- namic response and hysteresis dispersion scaling of fer- roelectric SrBi 2Ta2O9 thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1406 (2003)

    work page 2003

  30. [30]

    B. Pan, Y. Yang, L.-C. Yu, J.-M. Liu, K. Li, Z. Liu, and H. Chan, Low frequency dispersion of ferroelectric hysteresis in 1-3 Pb 0.95La0.05TiO3/polymer ferroelectric composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 99, 179 (2003)

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Tom´ e and M

    T. Tom´ e and M. J. de Oliveira, Dynamic phase transi- tion in the kinetic ising model under a time-dependent oscillating field, Phys. Rev. A 41, 4251 (1990)

    work page 1990

  32. [32]

    Jang and M

    H. Jang and M. J. Grimson, Hysteresis and the dynamic phase transition in thin ferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066119 (2001)

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    Riego, P

    P. Riego, P. Vavassori, and A. Berger, Towards an under- standing of dynamic phase transitions, Physica B549, 13 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Venkataraman, D

    G. Venkataraman, D. Sahoo, and V. Balakrishnan, Be- yond the Crystalline State: An Emerging Perspective (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1989)

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    M. C. Mahato and S. R. Shenoy, Hysteresis as rate com- petition: A landau model example, Physica A 186, 220 (1992)

    work page 1992

  36. [36]

    P. A. Rikvold, H. Tomita, S. Miyashita, and S. W. Sides, Metastable lifetimes in a kinetic ising model: Dependence on field and system size, Phys. Rev. E 49, 5080 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    T. Mori, S. Miyashita, and P. A. Rikvold, Asymptotic forms and scaling properties of the relaxation time near threshold points in spinodal-type dynamical phase tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. E 81, 011135 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    C. N. Luse, Discontinuous scaling of hysteresis losses, Phys. Rev. E 50, 224 (1994)

    work page 1994

  39. [39]

    Y. L. He and G. C. Wang, Observation of dynamic scaling of magnetic hysteresis in ultrathin ferromagnetic Fe/Au (001) films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2336 (1993)

    work page 1993

  40. [40]

    Acharyya and B

    M. Acharyya and B. K. Chakrabarti, Response of ising systems to oscillating and pulsed fields: Hysteresis, ac, and pulse susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6550 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Zhong Fan, Zhang Jinxiu, and Liu Xiao, Scaling of hys- teresis in the ising model and cell-dynamical systems in a linearly varying external field, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1399 (1995)

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    Acharyya, Comparison of mean-field and monte carlo approaches to dynamic hysteresis in ising ferromagnets, Physica A 253, 199 (1998)

    M. Acharyya, Comparison of mean-field and monte carlo approaches to dynamic hysteresis in ising ferromagnets, Physica A 253, 199 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    J.-M. Liu, W. Wang, Z. Liu, H. Chan, and C. Choy, Dynamic hysteresis in ferroelectric systems: Experiment and monte carlo simulation, Appl. Phys. A 75, 507 (2002)

    work page 2002

  44. [44]

    T. Bar, S. K. Choudhary, M. A. Ashraf, K. Sujith, S. Puri, S. Raj, and B. Bansal, Kinetic spinodal insta- bilities in the mott transition in V2O3: Evidence from hysteresis scaling and dissipative phase ordering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 045701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Shukla, Hysteresis in the ising model with glauber dy- namics, Phys

    P. Shukla, Hysteresis in the ising model with glauber dy- namics, Phys. Rev. E 97, 062127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Kundu, R

    S. Kundu, R. K. Patel, S. Middey, and B. Bansal, Dy- namic hysteresis at a noisy saddle node shows power-law scaling but nonuniversal exponent, Phys. Rev. E 108, 024101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Bar, Finite-dimensional signature of spinodal instability in an athermal hysteretic transition, Phys. Rev. B 107, 024103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    M. Rao, H. R. Krishnamurthy, and R. Pandit, Magnetic hysteresis in two model spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 42, 856 (1990)

    work page 1990

  49. [49]

    Zhong, Complete universal scaling in first-order phase transitions, Chin

    F. Zhong, Complete universal scaling in first-order phase transitions, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 100502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Wu, J.-F

    Y.-X. Wu, J.-F. Chen, and H. T. Quan, Ergodicity break- ing and scaling relations for finite-time first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 177101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 61, 48 (1986)

    work page 1986

  52. [52]

    D. C. Jiles, J. B. Thoelke, and M. K. Devine, Numerical determination of hysteresis parameters for the modeling 7 of magnetic properties using the theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 27 (1992)

    work page 1992

  53. [53]

    Preisach, ¨Uber die magnetische nachwirkung, Z

    F. Preisach, ¨Uber die magnetische nachwirkung, Z. Physik 94, 277 (1935)

    work page 1935

  54. [54]

    M¨ or´ ee and M

    G. M¨ or´ ee and M. Leijon, Review of Play and Preisach models for hysteresis in magnetic materials, Materials16, 2422 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    E. C. Stoner and E. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 240, 599 (1948)

    work page 1948

  56. [56]

    Harrison, A physical model of spin ferromagnetism, IEEE Trans

    R. Harrison, A physical model of spin ferromagnetism, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 950 (2003)

    work page 2003

  57. [57]

    Lee, J.-H

    W. Lee, J.-H. Kim, J. G. Hwang, H.-R. Noh, and W. Jhe, Scaling of thermal hysteretic behavior in a parametrically modulated cold atomic system, Phys. Rev. E 94, 032141 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    L. E. Reichl, A Modern Course in Statistical Physics , 4th ed. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    J. R. Tucker and B. I. Halperin, Onset of superconduc- tivity in one-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. B 3, 3768 (1971)

    work page 1971

  60. [60]

    It’s worth mentioning that, while noise strength generally depends on both system size and temperature, our focus here is specifically on the influence of system size at a fixed temperature

    work page

  61. [61]

    Chen and C

    Z. Chen and C. C. Yu, Measurement-noise maximum as a signature of a phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 057204 (2007)

    work page 2007

  62. [62]

    Finite-time and Finite-size scalings of coercivity in dynamic hysteresis

    M. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, and Y.-H. Ma, Finite-time and finite-size scalings of coercivity in dynamic hysteresis (2025), arXiv:2507.07933

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    However, in the fast-driving dynamic phase transition regime, these two intersection points can differ

    For symmetric hysteresis loops, the coercivity intersec- tions corresponding to the increasing and decreasing branches of the field are equal in magnitude. However, in the fast-driving dynamic phase transition regime, these two intersection points can differ. To account for both cases, a universal definition of coercivity is adopted in this study: Hc ≡ (|...

    work page

  64. [64]

    Binder, Time-dependent ginzburg-landau theory of nonequilibrium relaxation, Phys

    K. Binder, Time-dependent ginzburg-landau theory of nonequilibrium relaxation, Phys. Rev. B 8, 3423 (1973)

    work page 1973

  65. [65]

    Esposito, Stochastic thermodynamics under coarse graining, Phys

    M. Esposito, Stochastic thermodynamics under coarse graining, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041125 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    I. A. Mart´ ınez, ´E. Rold´ an, L. Dinis, D. Petrov, J. M. Parrondo, and R. A. Rica, Brownian carnot engine, Nat. Phys. 12, 67 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Ma, R.-X

    Y.-H. Ma, R.-X. Zhai, J. Chen, C. Sun, and H. Dong, Experimental test of the 1/ τ-scaling entropy generation in finite-time thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    Li, J.-F

    G. Li, J.-F. Chen, C. P. Sun, and H. Dong, Geodesic path for the minimal energy cost in shortcuts to isothermality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 230603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    X.-H. Zhao, Z. C. Tu, and Y.-H. Ma, Engineering ratchet-based particle separation via extended shortcuts to isothermality, Phys. Rev. E 110, 034105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Zhong, J

    F. Zhong, J. X. Zhang, and G. G. Siu, Dynamic scaling of hysteresis in a linearly driven system, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 7785 (1994)

    work page 1994

  71. [71]

    Zhang, F

    JX. Zhang, F. Zhong, and GG. Siu, The scanning-rate de- pendence of energy dissipation in first-order phase tran- sition of solids, Solid State Commun. 97, 847 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    Goldenfeld, Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group (CRC Press, 2018)

    N. Goldenfeld, Lectures On Phase Transitions And The Renormalization Group (CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    A specific operational definition for reference plateau point ( vP ) is the driving velocity at which the Hc(vH) curve exhibits a minimal logarithmic derivative with re- spect to vH in the log-log plots [62]

    work page

  74. [74]

    It is reasonable to believe that these relations are uni- versal for various systems with FOPT, For example, the Kerr model and Schlogl model studied in Ref. [50]

    work page

  75. [75]

    L. Meng, Z. Zhou, M. Xu, S. Yang, K. Si, L. Liu, X. Wang, H. Jiang, B. Li, P. Qin, P. Zhang, J. Wang, Z. Liu, P. Tang, Y. Ye, W. Zhou, L. Bao, H.-J. Gao, and Y. Gong, Anomalous thickness dependence of curie temperature in air-stable two-dimensional ferromagnetic 1t-crte2 grown by chemical vapor deposition, Nat. Com- mun. 12, 809 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    R. Yi, J. Jiang, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, S. Gao, Y. Zhao, J. Hu, X. Su, X. Xia, B. Peng, F. Dai, P. Li, Z. Guan, H. Yang, F. Zhu, J. Cao, Z. Wang, H. Fang, L. Zhang, and L. Chen, Two-dimensional anion-rich nacl2 crystal under ambient conditions, Nat. Commun.16, 464 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. P. Landau, Finite-size scaling at first- order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 30, 1477 (1984)

    work page 1984

  78. [78]

    Mille, D

    N. Mille, D. De Masi, S. Faure, J. M. Asensio, B. Chau- dret, and J. Carrey, Probing dynamics of nanoparticle chains formation during magnetic hyperthermia using time-dependent high-frequency hysteresis loops, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 022407 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    D. A. Sivak and G. E. Crooks, Thermodynamic Metrics and Optimal Paths, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 190602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [80]

    Y.-H. Ma, D. Xu, H. Dong, and C.-P. Sun, Optimal op- erating protocol to achieve efficiency at maximum power of heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 98, 022133 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.