Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Complete Characterization of Unitary Quantum Space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1604.01384 v2 pith:XFNLZCBE submitted 2016-04-05 quant-ph cs.CC

classification quant-phcs.CC
keywords quantumcompletecomputationresultsspaceabilityboundedcase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Motivated by understanding the power of quantum computation with restricted number of qubits, we give two complete characterizations of unitary quantum space bounded computation. First we show that approximating an element of the inverse of a well-conditioned efficiently encoded $2^{k(n)}\times 2^{k(n)}$ matrix is complete for the class of problems solvable by quantum circuits acting on $\mathcal{O}(k(n))$ qubits with all measurements at the end of the computation. Similarly, estimating the minimum eigenvalue of an efficiently encoded Hermitian $2^{k(n)}\times 2^{k(n)}$ matrix is also complete for this class. In the logspace case, our results improve on previous results of Ta-Shma [STOC '13] by giving new space-efficient quantum algorithms that avoid intermediate measurements, as well as showing matching hardness results. Additionally, as a consequence we show that PreciseQMA, the version of QMA with exponentially small completeness-soundess gap, is equal to PSPACE. Thus, the problem of estimating the minimum eigenvalue of a local Hamiltonian to inverse exponential precision is PSPACE-complete, which we show holds even in the frustration-free case. Finally, we can use this characterization to give a provable setting in which the ability to prepare the ground state of a local Hamiltonian is more powerful than the ability to prepare PEPS states. Interestingly, by suitably changing the parameterization of either of these problems we can completely characterize the power of quantum computation with simultaneously bounded time and space.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Keyl-Werner algorithm is not optimal for spectrum estimation

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Spectrum estimation of a d-dimensional quantum state is possible with o(d²) copies—specifically O(d² (log log d / log d)²)—beating Keyl–Werner and full tomography.

  2. The power of unentanglement without destructive interference

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    StoqMA(2) contains NP with Õ(√n)-qubit proofs and completeness error 2^{-polylog(n)}, is contained in EXP, and satisfies StoqMA(k)=StoqMA(2) for k≥2 when completeness error is negligible.

  3. Span Programs and Quantum Space Complexity

    quant-ph 2019-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Unitary quantum space complexity is lower bounded by log approximate span program size, and an explicit function requires (log n)^(2-o(1)) space for monotone phase estimation algorithms.

  4. A slightly improved upper bound for quantum statistical zero-knowledge

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    QSZK and its non-interactive variant NIQSZK stay inside QIP(2)∩co-QIP(2), now with an honest prover that runs in quantum linear space and single-exponential time.

Pith tools