Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Controlling Effective Hamiltonians: Broadband Pulsed Dynamic Nuclear Polarization by Constrained Random Walk and Non-linear Optimization

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A constrained random walk followed by effective-Hamiltonian optimization designs pulsed DNP sequences with 100 MHz electron-spin excitation bandwidth.

desk verdict A genuinely new starting-guess generator and a clever self-truncation idea; the 100 MHz offset claim is credible for the sequence, but the broad-line radical payoff remains an extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.18101 v1 pith:XHQFEB3H submitted 2025-06-22 physics.chem-ph

Anders B. Nielsen , Jose P. Carvalho , Nino Wili , Filip V. Jensen , David L. Goodwin , Thomas S. Untidt , Zdenek Tosner , Niels Chr. Nielsen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords dynamicnuclearpolarizationpulsedDNPeffectiveHamiltoniantheoryconstrainedrandomwalknonlinearoptimizationbroadbandpulsesequencesauto-truncationspinengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to make pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) usable for broad electron-spin lines by giving a systematic two-step recipe for designing microwave pulse sequences. The first step, a constrained random walk, generates candidate sequences that automatically satisfy the resonance condition between the nuclear Larmor frequency and the electron-spin effective field. The second step optimizes a figure of merit built from exact effective Hamiltonian theory, balancing the bilinear transfer terms against the linear effective fields. The authors show that optimized sequences produce flat, near-uniform polarization transfer over an electron-spin offset range of 100 MHz using only a peak microwave amplitude of 32 MHz, and they confirm the offset profile experimentally on a trityl sample at 80 K. If the design principle transfers to real broad-line radicals, pulsed DNP could replace continuous-wave DNP in sensitivity-limited NMR experiments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is auto-truncation of the effective Hamiltonian. Exact Effective Hamiltonian Theory (EEHT) computes, for one sequence element of duration $t_m$, the full SU(4) effective Hamiltonian; projections onto one- and two-spin operators give the linear frequencies $\omega_{\mathrm{lin}}^p$ and bilinear frequencies $\omega_{\mathrm{bil}}^p$ (Eqs. (11)-(14)), which enter the FOM fidelity of Eq. (10). Repeating the element, strong effective linear fields $\omega_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(S)}$ and $\omega_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(I)}$ truncate all bilinear terms with a single transverse component, confining the dynamics to an invariant zero- or double-quantum 3D operator subspace. The constrained random walk (cRW) supplies starting guesses by fixing only the endpoint of the accumulated rotation angle $\theta_{\mathrm{DNP}} = \pm(\omega_{0I} t_m - k_I 2\pi)$, the resonance condition of Eq. (25), leaving the pulse-to-pulse path free while guaranteeing the recoupling condition.

What would settle it

On an X-band spectrometer, run the published cRW-OPT1 sequence on a sample with a broad EPR line (for example a nitroxide or BDPA radical) at 80 K and record the 1H enhancement versus electron-spin offset. If the flat polarization plateau does not extend to roughly ±50 MHz, or if the powder efficiency falls well below the predicted 60% because of multi-spin or truncation effects, the central claim fails; equivalently, a three-spin (electron-two-proton) density-operator simulation that disagrees with the FOM profile of Eq. (10) would falsify the two-spin subspace assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that broadband pulsed DNP can be designed by deliberately engineering the effective Hamiltonian rather than only the final density operator. A pulse-sequence element repeated $n$ times generates effective linear fields on both spins; when these are chosen larger than the effective pseudo-secular hyperfine coupling ($\omega_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(S)} \approx \omega_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(I)} \approx 1.5$ MHz versus $B/(2\pi)=1.3015$ MHz), the repeated element truncates its own effective Hamiltonian, leaving only a planar double-quantum (DQ) three-dimensional subspace in which $\tilde{S}_z$-to-$I_z$ transfer follows the fidelity $F_{\mathrm{FOM}}^{p}(t_M)$ of Eq. (10). Maximizing this FOM over a 100 MHz offset range with nonlinear (Nelder-Mead) optimization, starting from constrained-random-walk guesses, gives 30-pulse $\pm x$-phase sequences whose density-operator offset profiles are uniform over $\pm 50$ MHz. Experimentally, the cRW-OPT sequences reach about 100 MHz bandwidth at 80 K on OX063 trityl, with powder transfer efficiency around 60%.

Load-bearing premise

The whole design rests on modelling the transfer as a single electron-nucleus pair with a specific hyperfine coupling and orientation, and on the assumption that the sequence's effective field (about 1.5 MHz) is strong enough to confine the dynamics to a simple three-state subspace; if real radicals with many coupled spins break that picture, the measured 100 MHz offset range may not carry over.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pulsed DNP can now be designed to cover electron-spin offset ranges as wide as 100 MHz with a peak MW amplitude of 32 MHz, matching spectral breadth that uniform CW irradiation cannot address.
  • The cRW procedure alone can produce useful recoupling sequences without any optimization, and it supplies reproducible starting points for nonlinear or optimal-control refinement.
  • Because the FOM is evaluated on a short repeated element, the same sequence can be retargeted to different hyperfine couplings simply by changing the number of repetitions, reducing the cost of redesign.
  • The resonance-condition framework maps onto MAS heteronuclear dipolar recoupling through Eq. (26), so static-DNP designs translate directly into spinning solid-state NMR experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If many-body couplings, spectral diffusion, or a spread of hyperfine couplings in real radicals breaks the two-spin subspace truncation, the 100 MHz offset profiles measured on narrow-line trityl may not transfer to broad-line radicals, the stated target application.
  • The auto-truncation principle is not specific to DNP: any bilinear recoupling problem in which a large linear effective field can isolate one ZQ or DQ 3D subspace could be designed with the same cRW-plus-FOM pipeline, including electron-electron dipolar recoupling in pulsed EPR.
  • A direct test of the intended regime is to run the published cRW-OPT sequences on a broad-line radical such as a nitroxide at X-band; the model predicts the 100 MHz bandwidth and roughly 60% powder efficiency there, and its failure would indicate that multi-spin terms must be included.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces two complementary tools for designing broadband pulsed DNP sequences: a constrained random walk (cRW) that generates candidate pulse elements satisfying a generalized resonance condition, and a figure-of-merit (FOM) optimization based on exact effective Hamiltonian theory (EEHT) that balances linear and bilinear terms in a truncated DQ/ZQ subspace. The central claim is that combining cRW starting guesses with FOM-based nonlinear optimization yields sequences with an electron-spin excitation bandwidth of about 100 MHz at a peak MW amplitude of 32 MHz, verified by density-operator simulations for a single electron-proton pair, by powder-averaged calculations, and by X-band experiments on OX063 trityl at 80 K. The paper also introduces the concept of auto-truncation, whereby repeated application of a pulse element truncates unwanted bilinear terms through deliberately chosen effective fields.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work is a valuable contribution to pulsed DNP methodology: it offers a systematic, computationally cheap route from effective-Hamiltonian insight to practical broadband sequences, and the explicit pulse listings plus experimental offset profiles provide a solid proof of concept. The auto-truncation idea is conceptually useful and the comparison with NOVEL and PLATO is informative. The main significance is limited by the narrow scope of validation: the simulations use a single electron-proton pair with one pseudo-secular coupling at one crystallite orientation, and the experiments use a narrow-line trityl radical, whereas the stated target application is broad-line radicals. The quantitative '100 MHz bandwidth' claim also lacks an explicit threshold. These issues affect the strength of the advertised conclusions but do not undermine the internal consistency of the effective-Hamiltonian formalism itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eq. (10)] The optimization objective is not fully specified. The text states that the FOM fidelity F_DQ_FOM(tM) is optimized 'with the target being 100 MHz electron-spin offset bandwidth', but it does not give the cost function used to combine F_DQ_FOM over offsets (e.g., uniform average over ±50 MHz, weighted average, or min-max), nor the exact constraints on the 30 pulse amplitudes beyond the 32 MHz bound, nor how tM and the number of repetitions n are chosen for each cRW starting guess. Without this information the design procedure cannot be reproduced and the claimed bandwidth is not a well-defined output of the optimization.
  2. [Abstract; Sec. III C; Sec. III F; Figs. 4c and 7c] The central quantitative claim of '100 MHz bandwidth' is not defined by any threshold. The reader cannot tell whether the bandwidth is the offset range over which transfer efficiency exceeds 50% of its on-resonance value, over which the profile is flat within a specified tolerance, or something else. The experimental curves 'approach' 100 MHz, but without a criterion the comparison with PLATO (80 MHz) and the abstract statement 'reaching 100 MHz' are ambiguous. This should be quantified explicitly.
  3. [Sec. III F and Conclusions] The experimental demonstration is performed on OX063 trityl, which the authors themselves describe as having a much narrower EPR line than the target broad-line radicals, and the numerical validation uses a single electron-proton pair at one crystallite orientation. The abstract and conclusions claim broadband pulsed DNP 'for static solids' and envisage 'immediate application ... from unpaired electron spins with broad EPR lines', but the demonstrated scope is a narrow-line system. Either add simulations that include a distribution of hyperfine couplings or a powder average including g anisotropy (or otherwise address spectral diffusion and multi-spin effects), or temper the claims to narrow-line radicals and present the broad-line performance as an untested prediction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III D] The sentence 'Comparing first the linear and bilinear fields in Fig. 5e with those in Fig. 5c' appears to reference the wrong panels; the comparison should presumably be between Fig. 5f and Fig. 5e (or stated more clearly).
  2. [Fig. 1 caption; Sec. III D] There are minor typographical errors: 'horizonthal' should be 'horizontal' in the Fig. 1 caption, and 'ZO/DO subspace components' in Sec. III D should be 'ZQ/DQ subspace components'.
  3. [Sec. II E] The statement that the path between the initial and final points 'does not matter in regard of achieving recoupling' is too strong; the path determines the scaling factor and the truncation properties, as the rest of the paper acknowledges. It would be more precise to say that the path does not affect the resonance condition.
  4. [Eq. (10) and Sec. III C] It would improve clarity to state explicitly that |ω_bil| and |ω_lin| are evaluated at the offset Δω_S and that the prefactor ⟨ρ(0)|S_z̃⟩ is offset-dependent; this is currently implicit in the text and figure descriptions.
  5. [Table I] The table lists seven rows but the caption does not specify the order. Please identify which row corresponds to NOVEL, PLATO, and cRW-OPT1 through cRW-OPT5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 100 MHz bandwidth is an optimization target and is verified by full density-operator simulation and experiment, not back-fitted from the claimed performance.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Eq. (10) is a FOM built from first-order EEHT effective-Hamiltonian projections; the optimization maximizes this FOM over cRW starting guesses with fixed hyperfine parameters (B/2π=1.3015 MHz at βPL=45°) and a fixed resonance condition. The claimed 100 MHz offset bandwidth is an input design goal of the optimization, not a parameter fitted to the outcome. Agreement between the FOM profile and the independently propagated density operator (Figs. 4c and 4i) is a validation of the first-order DQ-subspace approximation, not a tautology, because the density operator calculation solves the full time-dependent Hamiltonian of Eq. (1). The experimental offset profiles on OX063 trityl (Sec. III F) are measured, not predicted from the fitted FOM, and the paper explicitly states the sample has a much narrower EPR line and defers broad-line tests to future work. Self-citations (EEHT, SSV-EHT, replicated state-to-state optimal control) are prior formalisms with stated equations; they are used as tools rather than as an unverified premise that forces the result. The single-pair, single-orientation model and the auto-truncation condition are validity assumptions, so concerns about them belong to correctness/scope risk, not circularity. No prediction in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the two-spin model, first-order auto-truncation, and the resonance condition; chosen numbers are the hyperfine coupling, the effective-field/resonance settings, and an unreported offset-weighting in the FOM cost. No parameter is fitted to the final experimental offset profiles.

free parameters (4)
  • Pseudo-secular hyperfine coupling B/(2π) = 1.3015 MHz (from T/(2π)=0.8676 MHz at βPL=45°)
    The two-spin design target used in cRW generation, FOM optimization, and numerical validation (Sec. III C). It is chosen from a model electron-nuclear distance of 4.5 Å, not fitted to the experimental outcome.
  • Effective S-spin field ω_eff^(S)/(2π) = -1.467 MHz
    Set by the resonance condition Eq. (25) with kI=2, tm=150 ns, ω0I/(2π)=14.8 MHz; chosen to satisfy truncation ω_eff > B while keeping sensitivity to MW inhomogeneity low (Sec. III A).
  • Pulse element length tm and pulse count N = tm=150 ns, N=30 (5 ns pulses)
    Selected to match the DQ resonance with kI=2 and to keep pulses long enough to avoid phase transients (Sec. III B). Not fitted to the final result.
  • FOM offset weighting = unstated (assumed uniform over the 100 MHz target band)
    The paper states the target is a 100 MHz offset bandwidth but does not specify how FOM values across offsets are combined (e.g., sum, average, min-max) in the optimization (Sec. III C). This is a hand-chosen but unreported design choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The two-spin Hamiltonian in Eq. (1), with secular and pseudo-secular hyperfine coupling and no nuclear RF, captures the relevant DNP spin dynamics.
    Used throughout the theory and optimization; real samples have many protons and multiple electron-nuclear couplings, so the two-spin model is an approximation.
  • domain assumption First-order auto-truncation: for effective fields satisfying ω_eff^(I) ≈ ω_eff^(S) > B and n ≥ 3 repetitions, the effective Hamiltonian is confined to ZQ or DQ 3D subspaces with only planar bilinear terms remaining.
    Sec. II C; this is the basis for Eq. (10) and the FOM optimization. The validity is checked only through agreement with density operator simulation.
  • domain assumption The resonance condition Eq. (25) and its accumulated-angle form Eq. (27) are sufficient for efficient polarization transfer; the path of the random walk between endpoints does not matter.
    Sec. II E; central to the cRW design. Higher-order terms and offset-dependent effective fields can make the path matter in practice.
  • domain assumption The experimental MW inhomogeneity distribution (nine isochromats with power-model weights from Ref. 60) accurately describes the home-built X-band probe.
    Used for the cRW-OPT reoptimization in Sec. III E and for inhomogeneity-corrected simulations; errors in this profile would propagate into the optimized sequences.
  • standard math The EEHT matrix-log expansion (Eqs. (17)-(24)) is valid for the pulse sequences and offset ranges considered, with non-degenerate eigenvalues in all cases.
    Sec. II B; the authors note all cases were covered by the non-degenerate formula, citing Ref. 10 for degenerate cases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling Effective Hamiltonians: Broadband Pulsed Dynamic Nuclear Polarization by Constrained Random Walk and Non-linear Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHQFEB3H

@misc{pith2026250618101,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling Effective Hamiltonians: Broadband Pulsed Dynamic Nuclear Polarization by Constrained Random Walk and Non-linear Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHQFEB3H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.18101}
}
read the original abstract

We present constrained random walk (cRW) and figure of merit (FOM) based non-linear optimization procedures for systematic design and fundamental understanding of magnetic resonance experiments dressing bilinear and linear effective Hamiltonians to provide broadband polarization transfer. cRW can be used directly for fast random experiment design, or in combination with non-linear optimization or optimal control, leveraging the optimization of a FOM function for efficient control of linear and bilinear terms derived by exact effective Hamiltonian theory (EEHT). The efficacy of the combined cRW and FOM-based optimization approach is demonstrated by the design of broadband dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) pulse sequences for static solids with an electron spin excitation bandwidth reaching 100 MHz.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.18101 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dipolar recoupling ZQ (blue) and DQ (red) resonance conditions for DNP polarization transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Constrained random walk (cRW) design of DNP experiments in an e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. DNP pulse sequences derived using the cRW procedure in Eqs. (27)-(33). 250,000 cRW sequences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. DNP pulse sequence optimized using FOM-based non-linear optimization. The sequence resulted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Illustration of auto-truncation of the effective Hamiltonian for the broadband DNP pulse sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. MW inhomogeneity compensated cRW-OPT variant of the pulse sequence in Fig. 4a - obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) MW (e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author R. R. \ Ernst , author G. Bodenhausen ,\ and\ author A. Wokaun ,\ @noop title Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions \ ( publisher Oxford University Press ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    Schweiger \ and\ author G

    author author A. Schweiger \ and\ author G. Jeschke ,\ @noop title Principles of pulse electron paramagnetic resonance \ ( publisher Oxford university press ,\ year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Haeberlen \ and\ author J

    author author U. Haeberlen \ and\ author J. S. \ Waugh ,\ title title Coherent averaging effects in magnetic resonance , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.175.453 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 175 ,\ pages 453--467 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.175.453

  4. [4]

    Maricq \ and\ author J

    author author M. Maricq \ and\ author J. S. \ Waugh ,\ title title Nmr in rotating solids , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.437915 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 3300--3316 ( year 1979 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.437915 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.437915 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.437915 1979

  5. [5]

    Hohwy \ and\ author N

    author author M. Hohwy \ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Systematic design and evaluation of multiple-pulse experiments in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy using a semi-continuous baker--campbell--hausdorff expansion , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476978 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 109 ,\ pages 3780--3791 ( ye...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.476978

  6. [6]

    S rensen , author G

    author author O. S rensen , author G. Eich , author M. Levitt , author G. Bodenhausen ,\ and\ author R. Ernst ,\ title title Product operator formalism for the description of nmr pulse experiments , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(84)80005-9 journal journal Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy \ volume 16 ,\ pages 163--1...

    work page doi:10.1016/0079-6565(84)80005-9

  7. [7]

    author author J. H. \ Shirley ,\ title title Solution of the schr\"odinger equation with a hamiltonian periodic in time , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 138 ,\ pages B979--B987 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.138.b979

  8. [8]

    Weintraub \ and\ author S

    author author O. Weintraub \ and\ author S. Vega ,\ title title Floquet density matrices and effective hamiltonians in magic-angle-spinning nmr spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1993.1279 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A \ volume 105 ,\ pages 245--267 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1993

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Scholz , author J

    author author I. Scholz , author J. D. \ van Beek ,\ and\ author M. Ernst ,\ title title Operator-based floquet theory in solid-state nmr , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssnmr.2010.04.003 journal journal Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance \ volume 37 ,\ pages...

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    author author T. S. \ Untidt \ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Closed solution to the baker-campbell-hausdorff problem: Exact effective hamiltonian theory for analysis of nuclear-magnetic-resonance experiments , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.021108 journal j...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Siminovitch , author T

    author author D. Siminovitch , author T. Untidt ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Exact effective hamiltonian theory. ii. polynomial expansion of matrix functions and entangled unitary exponential operators , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1628216 journal journal The ...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Shankar , author M

    author author R. Shankar , author M. Ernst , author P. K. \ Madhu , author T. Vosegaard , author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ and\ author A. B. \ Nielsen ,\ title title A general theoretical description of the influence of isotropic chemical shift in dipolar recoupling experiments for s...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author A. B. \ Nielsen , author M. R. \ Hansen , author J. E. \ Andersen ,\ and\ author T. Vosegaard ,\ title title Single-spin vector analysis of strongly coupled nuclei in tocsy nmr experiments , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123046 journal journal The Journal of Chemi...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author A. B. \ Nielsen \ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Accurate analysis and perspectives for systematic design of magnetic resonance experiments using single-spin vector and exact effective hamiltonian theory , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j...

  7. [15]

    Bak , author J

    author author M. Bak , author J. T. \ Rasmussen ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Simpson: A general simulation program for solid-state nmr spectroscopy , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2000.2179 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance \ volum...

  8. [16]

    Veshtort \ and\ author R

    author author M. Veshtort \ and\ author R. G. \ Griffin ,\ title title Spinevolution: A powerful tool for the simulation of solid and liquid state nmr experiments , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2005.07.018 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance \ volu...

    2005 doi

  9. [17]

    Hogben , author M

    author author H. Hogben , author M. Krzystyniak , author G. Charnock , author P. Hore ,\ and\ author I. Kuprov ,\ title title Spinach -- a software library for simulation of spin dynamics in large spin systems , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2010.11.008 journ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Press , author S

    author author W. Press , author S. Teukolsky , author W. Vetterling ,\ and\ author B. Flannery ,\ @noop title Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing ,\ edition 3rd \ ed.\ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  11. [19]

    Pontryagin , author V

    author author L. Pontryagin , author V. Boltayanskii , author R. Gamkrelidze ,\ and\ author E. Mishchenko ,\ @noop title The mathematical theory of optimal processes \ ( publisher Wiley ,\ year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962

  12. [20]

    author author V. F. \ Krotov ,\ @noop title Global methods in optimal control theory \ ( publisher Marcel Dekker, New York ,\ year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996

  13. [21]

    author author O. V. \ Morzhin \ and\ author A. N. \ Pechen ,\ title title Krotov method for optimal control of closed quantum systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1070/RM9835 journal journal Russian Mathematical Surveys \ volume 74 ,\ pages 851 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Khaneja , author R

    author author N. Khaneja , author R. Brockett ,\ and\ author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ title title Time optimal control in spin systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.032308 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 63 ,\ pages 032308 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Khaneja , author T

    author author N. Khaneja , author T. Reiss , author C. Kehlet , author T. Schulte-Herbr \"u ggen ,\ and\ author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ title title Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.o...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author C. T. \ Kehlet , author A. C. \ Sivertsen , author M. Bjerring , author T. O. \ Reiss , author N. Khaneja , author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Improving solid-state nmr dipolar recoupling by optimal control , \ https://doi.org/10....

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author I. I. \ Maximov , author Z. To s ner ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Optimal control design of nmr and dynamic nuclear polarization experiments using monotonically convergent algorithms , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2903458 journal journal The Journ...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Kehlet , author M

    author author C. Kehlet , author M. Bjerring , author A. C. \ Sivertsen , author T. Kristensen , author J. J. \ Enghild , author S. J. \ Glaser , author N. Khaneja ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Optimal control based nco and nca experiments for spectral assignme...

    doi

  19. [27]

    To s ner , author T

    author author Z. To s ner , author T. Vosegaard , author C. Kehlet , author N. Khaneja , author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Optimal control in nmr spectroscopy: Numerical implementation in simpson , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.j...

    doi

  20. [28]

    author author I. I. \ Maximov , author J. Salomon , author G. Turinici ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title A smoothing monotonic convergent optimal control algorithm for nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequence design , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3328783 journal jo...

    doi

  21. [29]

    author author M. S. \ Vinding , author I. I. \ Maximov , author Z. To s ner ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Fast numerical design of spatial-selective rf pulses in mri using krotov and quasi-newton based optimal control methods , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.47397...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author D. L. \ Goodwin \ and\ author I. Kuprov ,\ title title Modified newton-raphson grape methods for optimal control of spin systems , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4949534 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 144 ,\ pages 204107 ( year 2016 ) ,\ ht...

    doi

  23. [31]

    To s ner , author R

    author author Z. To s ner , author R. Sarkar , author J. Becker-Baldus , author C. Glaubitz , author S. Wegner , author F. Engelke , author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ and\ author B. Reif ,\ title title Overcoming volume selectivity of dipolar recoupling in biological solid-state nmr sp...

    doi

  24. [32]

    To s ner , author M

    author author Z. To s ner , author M. J. \ Brandl , author J. Blahut , author S. J. \ Glaser ,\ and\ author B. Reif ,\ title title Maximizing efficiency of dipolar recoupling in solid-state nmr using optimal control sequences , \ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj5913 journal ...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Henstra , author P

    author author A. Henstra , author P. Dirksen , author J. Schmidt ,\ and\ author W. Wenckebach ,\ title title Nuclear spin orientation via electron spin locking (novel) , \ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(88)90190-4 journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonanc...

    1969 doi

  26. [34]

    author author K. O. \ Tan , author C. Yang , author R. T. \ Weber , author G. Mathies ,\ and\ author R. G. \ Griffin ,\ title title Time-optimized pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization , \ @noop journal journal Science Advances \ volume 5 ,\ pages eaav6909 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  27. [35]

    Wili , author A

    author author N. Wili , author A. B. \ Nielsen , author L. A. \ V \"o lker , author L. Schreder , author N. C. \ Nielsen , author G. Jeschke ,\ and\ author K. O. \ Tan ,\ title title Designing broadband pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization sequences in static solids , \ @noop j...

    2022

  28. [36]

    author author V. S. \ Redrouthu \ and\ author G. Mathies ,\ title title Efficient pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization with the x-inverse-x sequence , \ @noop journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 144 ,\ pages 1513--1516 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  29. [37]

    author author V. S. \ Redrouthu , author S. Vinod-Kumar ,\ and\ author G. Mathies ,\ title title Dynamic nuclear polarization by two-pulse phase modulation , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 159 ,\ pages 014201 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  30. [38]

    author author A. B. \ Nielsen , author J. P. A. \ Carvalho , author D. L. \ Goodwin , author N. Wili ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Dynamic nuclear polarization pulse sequence engineering using single-spin vector effective hamiltonians , \ @noop journal journal ...

    2024

  31. [39]

    author author M. S. \ Vinding , author C. Laustsen , author I. I. \ Maximov , author L. V. \ S gaard , author J. H. \ Ardenkj r-Larsen ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Dynamic nuclear polarization and optimal control spatial-selective 13c mri and mrs , \ @noop jou...

    2013

  32. [40]

    author author J. P. \ Carvalho , author D. L. \ Goodwin , author N. Wili , author A. B. \ Nielsen ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Optimal control design strategies for pulsed dynamic nuclear polarization , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \...

    2025

  33. [41]

    To s ner , author S

    author author Z. To s ner , author S. J. \ Glaser , author N. Khaneja ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Effective hamiltonians by optimal control: Solid-state nmr double-quantum planar and isotropic dipolar recoupling , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemic...

    2006

  34. [42]

    author author S. Vega ,\ title title Fictitious spin 1/2 operator formalism for multiple quantum NMR , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 68 ,\ pages 5518--5527 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  35. [43]

    Wokaun \ and\ author R

    author author A. Wokaun \ and\ author R. R. \ Ernst ,\ title title Selective excitation and detection in multilevel spin systems: Application of single transition operators , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 67 ,\ pages 1752--1758 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    1977

  36. [44]

    Hartmann \ and\ author E

    author author S. Hartmann \ and\ author E. Hahn ,\ title title Nuclear double resonance in the rotating frame , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 128 ,\ pages 2042 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    1962

  37. [45]

    Carvalho , author A

    author author J. Carvalho , author A. B. \ Nielsen , author E. Balig \'a cs , author N. Wili ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Bridging dynamic nuclear polarization and solid-state nmr dipolar recoupling: From static single crystal to spinning powders , \ @noop jou...

    2025

  38. [46]

    author author J. A. \ Nelder \ and\ author R. Mead ,\ title title A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , \ @noop journal journal The Computer Journal \ volume 7 ,\ pages 308--313 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    1965

  39. [47]

    ,\ address Natick, Massachusetts ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author MATLAB ,\ @noop title version 24.2.0.2773142 (R2024b) \ ( publisher The MathWorks Inc. ,\ address Natick, Massachusetts ,\ year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  40. [48]

    author author M. H. \ Levitt ,\ title title Composite pulses , \ @noop journal journal Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy \ volume 18 ,\ pages 61--122 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  41. [49]

    author author M. H. \ Levitt , author R. Freeman ,\ and\ author T. Frenkiel ,\ title title Broadband decoupling in high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , \ \ ( publisher Academic Press ,\ year 1983 )\ pp.\ pages 47--110 NoStop

    1983

  42. [50]

    author author D. P. \ Burum \ and\ author W. K. \ Rhim ,\ title title Analysis of multiple pulse nmr in solids. iii , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 71 ,\ pages 944--956 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979

  43. [51]

    Burum , author M

    author author D. Burum , author M. Linder ,\ and\ author R. Ernst ,\ title title Low-power multipulse line narrowing in solid-state nmr , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) \ volume 44 ,\ pages 173--188 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1969

  44. [52]

    Hohwy \ and\ author N

    author author M. Hohwy \ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Elimination of high order terms in multiple pulse nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Application to homonuclear decoupling in solids , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 106...

    1997

  45. [53]

    Equbal , author M

    author author A. Equbal , author M. Bjerring , author P. K. \ Madhu ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title A unified heteronuclear decoupling strategy for magic-angle-spinning solid-state nmr spectroscopy , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volum...

    2015

  46. [54]

    author author K. R. \ Mote , author V. Agarwal ,\ and\ author P. Madhu ,\ title title Five decades of homonuclear dipolar decoupling in solid-state nmr: Status and outlook , \ @noop journal journal Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy \ volume 97 ,\ pages 1--39 ...

    2016

  47. [55]

    Ed \'e n \ and\ author M

    author author M. Ed \'e n \ and\ author M. H. \ Levitt ,\ title title Pulse sequence symmetries in the nuclear magnetic resonance of spinning solids: Application to heteronuclear decoupling , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 111 ,\ pages 1511--1...

    1999

  48. [56]

    Lee , author N

    author author Y. Lee , author N. Kurur , author M. Helmle , author O. Johannessen , author N. Nielsen ,\ and\ author M. Levitt ,\ title title Efficient dipolar recoupling in the nmr of rotating solids. a sevenfold symmetric radiofrequency pulse sequence , \ @noop journal journ...

    1995

  49. [57]

    Hohwy , author H

    author author M. Hohwy , author H. J. \ Jakobsen , author M. Ed \'e n , author M. H. \ Levitt ,\ and\ author N. C. \ Nielsen ,\ title title Broadband dipolar recoupling in the nuclear magnetic resonance of rotating solids: A compensated c7 pulse sequence , \ @noop journal jour...

    1998

  50. [58]

    author author M. H. \ Levitt ,\ title title Symmetry-based pulse sequences in magic-angle spinning solid-state nmr , \ in\ @noop booktitle Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Volume 9, Advances in NMR ,\ editor edited by\ editor D. M. \ Grant \ and\ editor R. K. \ Harr...

    2002

  51. [59]

    Doll \ and\ author G

    author author A. Doll \ and\ author G. Jeschke ,\ title title Wideband frequency-swept excitation in pulsed epr spectroscopy. \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.01.004 journal journal J Magn Reson \ volume 280 ,\ pages 46--62 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    Gupta , author G

    author author R. Gupta , author G. Hou , author T. Polenova ,\ and\ author A. J. \ Vega ,\ title title Rf inhomogeneity and how it controls cpmas , \ @noop journal journal Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance \ volume 72 ,\ pages 17--26 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.