Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 82 references

Sterile-active resonance: A global qualitative picture

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that near the sterile-active resonance the (3+1) model reduces to an effective theory with only the sterile mixing angles and $\Delta m^2_{41}$, with the resonance effect concentrated in three cascade paths.

desk verdict A genuinely new analytic framework for the SA resonance, honest about its main limitation: the cascade recommendation rests on an untested sequential-diagonalization approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19022 v2 pith:XJMSRQSL submitted 2024-11-28 hep-ph

Mark Brettell , Ivan Martinez-Soler , Hisakazu Minakata This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 14.60.Pq
keywords sterile-activeresonance(3+1)modelMSWeffectivetheoryneutrinotelescopescascadeeventsflavoroscillationprobabilitiesmattereffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in the (3+1) model with an eV-scale sterile neutrino, the sterile-active resonance at energies around 1–10 TeV in the Earth can be captured by an effective theory that depends only on the sterile mixing angles and $\Delta m^2_{41}$, because the large matter potential freezes the standard three-flavor oscillations. Working in that effective theory, the authors derive a perturbative expansion whose “texture zeros” in the flavor-space $S$ matrix organize the resonance effect into a clear hierarchy: at on-peak, the resonance is unsuppressed in $P(\nu_e\to\nu_e)$, $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\mu)$, and $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau)$, while muon-neutrino track channels in the neutrino channel are suppressed by the small sterile mixing angles. The paper concludes that cascade events at neutrino telescopes would dominantly come from three paths with different resonance signatures, and proposes a three-component fit to separate them. If this picture is right, it tells the experimental program precisely which channels carry the sterile-resonance signal and which are nearly blind to it.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a limiting procedure that freezes the $\nu$SM oscillations and a perturbative diagonalization of the resulting effective theory. In the SA region the matter potential makes the matter-affected angles $\tilde\theta_{13}$ and $\tilde\theta_{12}$ collapse to $\pi/2$ (neutrino channel) or $0$ (anti-neutrino channel), turning the active 3-flavor rotations into discrete permutations and leaving an effective Hamiltonian built only from the sterile mixing angles and $\Delta m^2_{41}$. The argument then runs on the “texture zeros” of the flavor-basis $S$ matrix — entries that vanish at zeroth or first order and dictate how many powers of $\sin\theta_{j4}$ multiply each probability — together with a smallness assumption $\sin\theta_{j4}\sim 0.1$. In the anti-neutrino channel the two resonances (2-4 then 3-4) are diagonalized one by one, the “local resonance approximation,” which is the step that carries the unsuppressed on-peak results.

What would settle it

Numerically diagonalize the exact (3+1) Hamiltonian in the anti-neutrino channel over the parameter region where the 2-4 and 3-4 resonances overlap, and compare the exact $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\mu)$ and $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau)$ with the analytic local-resonance expressions; if the discrepancy exceeds the few-percent level or the on-peak unsuppression disappears, the central hierarchy claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a global qualitative map of where the sterile-active resonance acts. After taking the SA limit, the effective Hamiltonian reduces to a $\mathrm{diag}(0,0,0,\Delta m^2_{41})$ mass structure plus the matter potentials, with the state space reshuffled: in the neutrino channel the 1-4 rotation acts on the physical 3-4 crossing, while in the anti-neutrino channel no reshuffling occurs. Diagonalizing with the matter-affected resonance angles $\tilde\theta_{14}$ (neutrino channel) and then $\tilde\theta_{24}$, $\tilde\theta_{34}$ (anti-neutrino channel) yields explicit probabilities in which the channel-dependent suppression by $\sin\theta_{j4}$ is controlled by the positions of zeros in the $S$ matrix. The resulting hierarchy is that the unsuppressed resonance effects live in $P(\nu_e\to\nu_e)$, $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\mu)$, and $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau)$, with $\bar\nu_e$ decoupling at leading order, so the cascade events originate from three paths. A byproduct is that all computed probabilities respect $T$-invariance: the matter-affected phases equal their vacuum counterparts, so the phases cancel.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the anti-neutrino 2-4 and 3-4 level crossings can be diagonalized sequentially, one at a time, despite overlapping over a wide fraction of parameter space; the unsuppressed on-peak probabilities in the anti-neutrino channel are derived under that local resonance approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the neutrino channel, track events from $P(\nu_\mu\to\nu_\mu)$ are a weak probe of the SA resonance, while the unsuppressed $P(\nu_e\to\nu_e)$ depletion in the subdominant $\nu_e$ flux is the neutrino-side signal.
  • In the anti-neutrino channel, both the track channel $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\mu)$ and the cascade appearance channel $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau)$ carry unsuppressed resonance enhancement and are the golden observables.
  • Cascade events have three origins with distinct resonance behaviours — enhancement in $\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau$, depletion in $\nu_e\to\nu_e$, and no effect in $\bar\nu_e\to\bar\nu_e$ — so a three-component fit can separate the contributions.
  • The computed probabilities are $T$-invariant in the SA region, with all CP-like phases cancelling, so this symmetry can be used as a consistency check on the framework.
  • The effective theory reproduces the full (3+1) numerical oscillation code to about 1% accuracy over the SA resonance region, so the analytic hierarchy is quantitatively usable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A concrete testable extension would be to run a neutrino-telescope cascade simulation at 1–10 TeV with a three-component template fit; if the enhancement, depletion, and flat components do not separate cleanly, the proposed fit would need a more elaborate treatment of neutrino/anti-neutrino event separation.
  • The paper leaves open whether the local resonance approximation survives an exact treatment of the overlapping 2-4 and 3-4 crossings; comparing the analytic $P(\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\mu)$ to an exact numerical diagonalization in the overlap region would quantify the risk to the unsuppressed on-peak claim.
  • If the $T$-invariance found here is not an artifact of the sequential diagonalization, then any observed asymmetry between $\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_\tau$ and $\bar\nu_\tau\to\bar\nu_\mu$ in this energy band would be evidence for physics beyond the (3+1) model or for the breakdown of the approximation.
  • The same machinery can be adapted to inverted mass ordering by swapping the order of the 2-4 and 3-4 rotations; the qualitative prediction is that the three-path hierarchy persists with the roles of the two crossings exchanged.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the MSW resonance induced by an eV-scale sterile neutrino in the (3+1) model, the "sterile-active (SA) resonance," at E ~ 1-10 TeV in Earth matter. Starting from the (3+1) Hamiltonian in matter, the authors take the SA limit in which the large matter potential freezes the νSM oscillations; the resulting effective theory depends only on the sterile mixing angles θ14, θ24, θ34 and Δm²41. They then develop a perturbative treatment of this effective theory, using texture zeros of the S matrix and smallness of sj4 to identify a flavor/event-type hierarchy. The principal phenomenological claims are: (i) in the neutrino channel, the resonance effect is concentrated in P(νe→νe) with no sj4 suppression on resonance; (ii) in the anti-neutrino channel, P(ν̄μ→ν̄μ) and P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ) are unsuppressed on resonance; (iii) cascade events in neutrino telescopes should therefore be sought through three paths (νe→νe, ν̄e→ν̄e, ν̄μ→ν̄τ), motivating a three-component fit. A numerical comparison with the (3+1) code is presented for six channels at a benchmark point.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a useful global map of the SA resonance and makes a concrete, falsifiable recommendation for IceCube/KM3NeT searches: neutrino-channel tracks are not promising, while νe disappearance and ν̄μ→ν̄τ appearance are the key cascade signatures. Strengths include the explicit derivation of the SA limit with an estimate of sub-asymptotic corrections, the unified treatment of neutrino and anti-neutrino channels, and the self-contained analytic S-matrix computation in the appendices. The effective theory itself is shown to agree with the (3+1) numerics at about the 1% level for the tested benchmark. However, the central phenomenological recommendation rests on the anti-neutrino appearance probability P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ), which is derived under the local resonance approximation and is not included in the numerical validation. That gap, together with the absence of a universal expansion parameter, makes the hierarchy in Tables 1 and 2 conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 8.1, Eq. (9.2), Sec. 11.2] The unsuppressed on-peak formula for P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ) in Eq. (9.2) is a central element of the "three origins of the cascade events" recommendation in Sec. 9.3, but it is derived under the local resonance approximation in which the 2-4 and 3-4 level crossings are diagonalized sequentially. The authors state explicitly in Secs. 8.1 and 11.2 that this approximation "may not hold in a good accuracy" because the two resonances can overlap over a substantial fraction of parameter space. The numerical validation in Sec. 4.5 and Fig. 2 covers P(νμ→νμ), P(νμ→νe), P(νe→νe) and the corresponding anti-neutrino channels, but it does not include P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ) or any anti-neutrino appearance channel. Since a failure of the sequential diagonalization would directly affect the claimed cascade hierarchy in Tables 1 and 2, I ask the authors to add a numerical comparison of the analytic P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ) against the (3+1) code over the resonance region, and to quantify the parameter-space region where the local resonance approximation is reliable.
  2. [Sec. 4.5 and Fig. 2] The numerical test of the effective theory is performed for a single parameter point (Δm²41 = 1 eV², θ14 = θ24 = θ34 = 10°, ρ = 5.5 g/cm³) and compares the effective-theory Hamiltonian with the full (3+1) code. The analytic perturbative expressions developed in Secs. 6-9, including the key probabilities in Eqs. (7.1), (7.2), (9.1), and (9.2), are not directly benchmarked against either the effective-theory numerics or the (3+1) code. The paper's qualitative conclusions are based on the perturbative hierarchy, so I request either a direct comparison of the analytic probability formulas with the numerical effective theory, or an explicit statement that the quoted 1% accuracy applies only to the effective theory itself and not to the subsequent perturbative approximations.
  3. [Sec. 6.2 and Sec. 11.2] As the authors acknowledge in Sec. 6.2, the perturbative framework lacks a universal expansion parameter, and the smallness of the correction terms is not guaranteed by the Hamiltonian decomposition alone. The channel hierarchy in Tables 1 and 2 relies on the perturbative order counting in powers of sj4, with sj4 ~ 0.1 as a rough benchmark. Because the next-to-leading order terms are not parametrically suppressed by a small expansion parameter, the paper would benefit from an explicit estimate or numerical demonstration that the retained first- and second-order terms dominate the omitted higher orders for the benchmark values used in the phenomenological discussion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 9.3] The phrase "the cascade events dominantly comes from" should be "the cascade events dominantly come from".
  2. [Sec. 2.1 and throughout] The notation "ec14" for the matter-affected cosine can be misread as a product "e c14"; consider introducing an explicit symbol such as c̃14 or a parenthetical definition at first use.
  3. [Fig. 1] The labels "NMO IMO" appear below the two panels, but the individual panels are not clearly identified; labeling each panel directly would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. 4.5 and Fig. 2] The definition of F in Eq. (4.13) refers to P_eff-th, but the caption of Fig. 2 and the text in Sec. 11 describe the comparison slightly differently (effective theory versus analytic formulas); please make the object being compared unambiguous.
  5. [References] Reference [54] cites a conference talk by name only; consider replacing it with a citable proceeding or archival entry, or remove it if not essential.
  6. [Sec. 8.1] The sentence "this is the situation we never met in the νSM" would read more naturally as "this is a situation never encountered in the νSM".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained and its approximations are explicitly acknowledged rather than smuggled.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Its inputs—Δm²41, the sterile mixing angles θj4, and the matter potentials a,b—are model parameters and external data, not quantities fitted to the probabilities that the paper claims to predict. The effective theory is obtained by a well-defined SA limit (a,b ∼ Δm²41 ≫ Δm²31/a), and the paper validates the effective theory against a numerical (3+1)-model code in Sec. 4.5, finding agreement at the 1% level in the channels checked. The cited DMP perturbation theory [48], co-authored by one of the present authors, is a parameter-free perturbative framework whose assumptions do not include the SA-resonance result; moreover, Sec. 4.4 explicitly argues that the SA limit can be justified independently of DMP, so the citation is not load-bearing. The anti-neutrino channel's 'local resonance approximation' (sequential diagonalization of the 2-4 and 3-4 crossings) is a genuine limitation that the authors flag prominently in Secs. 8.1 and 11.2, and the unsuppressed on-peak expression for P(ν̄μ→ν̄τ) in Eq. (9.2) follows from that stated approximation, not from a circular re-definition of the target. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in through citation. The acknowledged overlap of the two anti-neutrino resonances is a correctness risk for the analytic hierarchy, but it is not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. The main input choices are the benchmark sterile mixing angles and the analytical approximations listed above, which are stated by the authors rather than fitted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • Benchmark sterile mixing angles s_j4 ≈ 0.1 = 0.1 (working assumption, not fitted)
    Section 6.2 and footnote 7 adopt s_j4 ≈ 0.1 for all j to make the perturbative suppression hierarchy quantitative. This is a hand-chosen guideline, not a fit result.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The (3+1) model with m4² >> mk² and an eV-scale Δm²41 describes the sterile neutrino sector.
    Section 2: the entire analysis is performed within this model, with the stated mass ordering.
  • domain assumption Uniform matter density approximation for the Earth.
    Section 2.1: a(x) and b(x) are treated as constants; the authors state this is for simplicity and that Earth shell structure is not treated.
  • domain assumption The SA limit Δm²31/a ~ 10^-3 freezes νSM oscillations, with eθ13 and eθ12 at asymptotic values π/2 in the neutrino channel and 0 in the anti-neutrino channel.
    Section 4.3-4.4: this is the central approximation; sub-asymptotic corrections of order 10^-3 are ignored.
  • domain assumption Smallness of the sterile mixing angles, s_j4 ≈ 0.1, justifies the perturbative expansion despite the absence of a universal expansion parameter.
    Section 6.2: the authors rely on s_j4 suppression for the convergence of the series; this is not guaranteed by the Hamiltonian structure.
  • ad hoc to paper In the anti-neutrino channel, the Hamiltonian can be diagonalized sequentially by 2-4 and then 3-4 rotations (the local resonance approximation).
    Section 8.1 and 11.2: the authors warn that the two resonances overlap over a wide parameter range and that this approximation may not hold accurately; it is load-bearing for the anti-neutrino probabilities.
  • standard math DMP perturbation theory is a valid embedding of the active 3x3 sector.
    Section 4.2 uses the Denton-Minakata-Parke expansion from ref. [48], which is parameter-free and externally benchmarked in the literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sterile-active resonance: A global qualitative picture." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJMSRQSL

@misc{pith2026241119022,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sterile-active resonance: A global qualitative picture},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJMSRQSL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19022}
}
abstract

In the $\nu$SM extended by adding an eV-scale sterile state, the $(3+1)$ model, the sterile-active level crossing entails the MSW resonance, here referred as the sterile-active (SA) resonance. In this paper, we construct an effective theory of SA resonance which involves only the sterile-active mixing angles and $\Delta m^2_{41}$, thanks to the given environment of high matter potential which freezes the $\nu$SM oscillations. We give our first attempt at an analytic treatment of the effective theory to illuminate the global picture of the SA resonance at a glance. We formulate a perturbative framework in which the structure of ``texture zeros'' of the $S$ matrix in the flavor space and the suppression by the small parameters $\sin \theta_{j 4}$ ($j=1,2,3$) allows us to reveal the flavor$-$event-type hierarchy of the resonance-effect strength in the probabilities. We have shown that the cascade events dominantly comes from the three paths through $P(\nu_{e} \rightarrow \nu_{e})$, $P(\bar{\nu}_{e} \rightarrow \bar{\nu}_{e})$, and $P(\bar{\nu}_{\mu} \rightarrow \bar{\nu}_{\tau})$, and a three-component fit is suggested to disentangle the SA resonance generation mechanisms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,

    T. Kajita, “Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) no.3, 030501 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030501

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.030501 2016

  2. [2]

    Nobel Lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos,

    A. B. McDonald, “Nobel Lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) no.3, 030502 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030502

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.030502 2016

  3. [3]

    Phenomenology with Massive Neutrinos,

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, “Phenomenology with Massive Neutrinos,” Phys. Rept. 460 (2008), 1-129 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.004 [arXiv:0704.1800 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Neutrino Propagation in Matter

    M. Blennow and A. Y. Smirnov, “Neutrino propagation in matter,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013 (2013), 972485 doi:10.1155/2013/972485 [arXiv:1306.2903 [hep-ph]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Solar neutrinos and neutrino physics,

    M. Maltoni and A. Y. Smirnov, “Solar neutrinos and neutrino physics,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (2016) no.4, 87 doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16087-0 [arXiv:1507.05287 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of ¯νe appearance in a ¯νµ beam,

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. [LSND], “Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of ¯νe appearance in a ¯νµ beam,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 112007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.112007 [arXiv:hep-ex/0104049 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Significant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment,

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. [MiniBooNE], “Significant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) no.22, 221801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.221801 [arXiv:1805.12028 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Updated Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillations in the – 43 – Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos,

    M. Dentler, ´A. Hern´ andez-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and T. Schwetz, “Updated Global Analysis of Neutrino Oscillations in the – 43 – Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neutrinos,” JHEP 08 (2018), 010 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)010 [arXiv:1803.10661 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Where Are We With Light Sterile Neutrinos?,

    A. Diaz, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, G. H. Collin, J. M. Conrad and M. H. Shaevitz, “Where Are We With Light Sterile Neutrinos?,” Phys. Rept. 884 (2020), 1-59 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.08.005 [arXiv:1906.00045 [hep-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Sterile Neutrinos,

    B. Dasgupta and J. Kopp, “Sterile Neutrinos,” Phys. Rept. 928 (2021), 1-63 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.06.002 [arXiv:2106.05913 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    New Clues about light sterile neutrinos: preference for models with damping effects in global fits,

    J. M. Hardin, I. Martinez-Soler, A. Diaz, M. Jin, N. W. Kamp, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. M. Conrad and M. H. Shaevitz, “New Clues about light sterile neutrinos: preference for models with damping effects in global fits,” JHEP 09 (2023), 058 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)058 [arXiv:2211.0...

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Pseudoscalar—sterile neutrino interactions: reconciling the cosmos with neutrino oscillations,

    M. Archidiacono, S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, S. Hannestad, R. Hansen, M. Laveder and T. Tram, “Pseudoscalar—sterile neutrino interactions: reconciling the cosmos with neutrino oscillations,” JCAP 08 (2016), 067 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/067 [arXiv:1606.07673 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Cosmological constraints with self-interacting sterile neutrinos,

    N. Song, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. Salvado, “Cosmological constraints with self-interacting sterile neutrinos,” JCAP 10 (2018), 055 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/055 [arXiv:1805.08218 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly,

    G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cribier and A. Letourneau, “The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011), 073006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.073006 [arXiv:1101.2755 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Improved Predictions of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra,

    T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Fallot, A. Letourneau, S. Cormon, M. Fechner, L. Giot, T. Lasserre, J. Martino and G. Mention, et al. “Improved Predictions of Reactor Antineutrino Spectra,” Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011), 054615 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054615 [arXiv:1101.2663 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  8. [16]

    On the determination of anti-neutrino spectra from nuclear reactors,

    P. Huber, “On the determination of anti-neutrino spectra from nuclear reactors,” Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011), 024617 [erratum: Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012), 029901] doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.029901 [arXiv:1106.0687 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Reevaluating reactor antineutrino spectra with new measurements of the ratio between U235 and Pu239 β spectra,

    V. Kopeikin, M. Skorokhvatov and O. Titov, “Reevaluating reactor antineutrino spectra with new measurements of the ratio between U235 and Pu239 β spectra,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.7, L071301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L071301 [arXiv:2103.01684 [nucl-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Reactor antineutrino anomaly in light of recent flux model refinements,

    C. Giunti, Y. F. Li, C. A. Ternes and Z. Xin, “Reactor antineutrino anomaly in light of recent flux model refinements,” Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022), 137054 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137054 [arXiv:2110.06820 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  11. [19]

    Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment,

    V. V. Barinov, S. N. Danshin, V. N. Gavrin, V. V. Gorbachev, D. S. Gorbunov, T. V. Ibragimova, Y. P. Kozlova, L. V. Kravchuk, V. V. Kuzminov and B. K. Lubsandorzhiev, et al. “Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment,” Phys. Rev. C 105 (...

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology,

    M. A. Acero, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, M. Hostert, D. Kalra, G. Karagiorgi, K. J. Kelly, B. R. Littlejohn, P. Machado, W. Pettus and M. Toups, et al. “White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology,” J. Phys. G 51 (2024) no.12, 120501 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/a...

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    The JSNS2 detector,

    S. Ajimura et al. [JSNS2], “The JSNS2 detector,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1014 (2021), 165742 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165742 [arXiv:2104.13169 [physics.ins-det]]

    2021

  14. [22]

    The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab,

    P. A. Machado, O. Palamara and D. W. Schmitz, “The Short-Baseline Neutrino Program at Fermilab,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019), 363-387 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-020949 [arXiv:1903.04608 [hep-ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Neutrino oscillations with four generations,

    O. Yasuda, “Neutrino oscillations with four generations,” doi:10.1142/9789812777003 0017 [arXiv:hep-ph/0102166 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Probing the LSND mass scale and four neutrino scenarios with a neutrino telescope,

    H. Nunokawa, O. L. G. Peres and R. Zukanovich Funchal, “Probing the LSND mass scale and four neutrino scenarios with a neutrino telescope,” Phys. Lett. B 562 (2003), 279-290 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00603-8 [arXiv:hep-ph/0302039 [hep-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,

    L. Wolfenstein, “Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978), 2369-2374 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2369

    1978 doi

  18. [26]

    Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,

    S. P. Mikheyev and A. Y. Smirnov, “Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1985), 913-917

    1985

  19. [27]

    Matter Effects on Three-Neutrino Oscillations,

    V. D. Barger, K. Whisnant, S. Pakvasa and R. J. N. Phillips, “Matter Effects on Three-Neutrino Oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980), 2718 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2718

    1980 doi

  20. [28]

    IceCube-Gen2: A Vision for the Future of Neutrino Astronomy in Antarctica,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “IceCube-Gen2: A Vision for the Future of Neutrino Astronomy in Antarctica,” [arXiv:1412.5106 [astro-ph.HE]]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0,

    S. Adrian-Martinez et al. [KM3Net], “Letter of intent for KM3NeT 2.0,” J. Phys. G 43 (2016) no.8, 084001 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/8/084001 [arXiv:1601.07459 [astro-ph.IM]]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Searches for Sterile Neutrinos with the IceCube Detector,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “Searches for Sterile Neutrinos with the IceCube Detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.7, 071801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.071801 [arXiv:1605.01990 [hep-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Searching for eV-scale sterile neutrinos with eight years of atmospheric neutrinos at the IceCube Neutrino Telescope,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “Searching for eV-scale sterile neutrinos with eight years of atmospheric neutrinos at the IceCube Neutrino Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.5, 052009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.052009 [arXiv:2005.12943 [hep-ex]]

    2020

  24. [32]

    A search for an eV-scale sterile neutrino using improved high-energy νµ event reconstruction in IceCube,

    R. Abbasi et al. [IceCube], “A search for an eV-scale sterile neutrino using improved high-energy νµ event reconstruction in IceCube,” [arXiv:2405.08070 [hep-ex]]

  25. [33]

    Methods and stability tests associated with the sterile neutrino search using improved high-energy νµ event reconstruction in IceCube,

    R. Abbasi et al. [IceCube], “Methods and stability tests associated with the sterile neutrino search using improved high-energy νµ event reconstruction in IceCube,” [arXiv:2405.08077 [hep-ex]]

  26. [34]

    Signature of sterile species in atmospheric neutrino data at neutrino telescopes,

    S. Choubey, “Signature of sterile species in atmospheric neutrino data at neutrino telescopes,” JHEP 12 (2007), 014 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/014 [arXiv:0709.1937 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Searching for sterile neutrinos in ice,

    S. Razzaque and A. Y. Smirnov, “Searching for sterile neutrinos in ice,” JHEP 07 (2011), 084 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)084 [arXiv:1104.1390 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Searches for sterile neutrinos with IceCube DeepCore,

    S. Razzaque and A. Y. Smirnov, “Searches for sterile neutrinos with IceCube DeepCore,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 093010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.093010 [arXiv:1203.5406 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Is there evidence for sterile neutrinos in IceCube data?,

    V. Barger, Y. Gao and D. Marfatia, “Is there evidence for sterile neutrinos in IceCube data?,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012), 011302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.011302 [arXiv:1109.5748 [hep-ph]]. – 45 –

    2012 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Constraining Sterile Neutrinos with AMANDA and IceCube Atmospheric Neutrino Data,

    A. Esmaili, F. Halzen and O. L. G. Peres, “Constraining Sterile Neutrinos with AMANDA and IceCube Atmospheric Neutrino Data,” JCAP 11 (2012), 041 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/11/041 [arXiv:1206.6903 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Exploring ντ − νs mixing with cascade events in DeepCore,

    A. Esmaili, F. Halzen and O. L. G. Peres, “Exploring ντ − νs mixing with cascade events in DeepCore,” JCAP 07 (2013), 048 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/07/048 [arXiv:1303.3294 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Restricting the LSND and MiniBooNE sterile neutrinos with the IceCube atmospheric neutrino data,

    A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, “Restricting the LSND and MiniBooNE sterile neutrinos with the IceCube atmospheric neutrino data,” JHEP 12 (2013), 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2013)014 [arXiv:1307.6824 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Probing Non-Standard Interaction of Neutrinos with IceCube and DeepCore,

    A. Esmaili and A. Y. Smirnov, “Probing Non-Standard Interaction of Neutrinos with IceCube and DeepCore,” JHEP 06 (2013), 026 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)026 [arXiv:1304.1042 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Sterile neutrinos in the light of IceCube,

    M. Lindner, W. Rodejohann and X. J. Xu, “Sterile neutrinos in the light of IceCube,” JHEP 01 (2016), 124 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)124 [arXiv:1510.00666 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Cascade appearance signatures of sterile neutrinos at 1–100 TeV,

    B. R. Smithers, B. J. P. Jones, C. A. Arg¨ uelles, J. M. Conrad and A. Diaz, “Cascade appearance signatures of sterile neutrinos at 1–100 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.5, 052001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.052001 [arXiv:2111.08722 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962), 870-880 doi:10.1143/PTP.28.870

    1962 doi

  37. [45]

    Review of particle physics,

    S. Navas et al. [Particle Data Group], “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) no.3, 030001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Standard versus Non-Standard CP Phases in Neutrino Oscillation in Matter with Non-Unitarity,

    I. Martinez-Soler and H. Minakata, “Standard versus Non-Standard CP Phases in Neutrino Oscillation in Matter with Non-Unitarity,” PTEP 2020 (2020) no.6, 063B01 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa062 [arXiv:1806.10152 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,

    H. Minakata and S. J. Parke, “Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,” JHEP 01 (2016), 180 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)180 [arXiv:1505.01826 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,

    P. B. Denton, H. Minakata and S. J. Parke, “Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,” JHEP 06 (2016), 051 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)051 [arXiv:1604.08167 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+ using a two-detector fit,

    P. Adamson et al. [MINOS+], “Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+ using a two-detector fit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.9, 091803 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.091803 [arXiv:1710.06488 [hep-ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,

    K. Abe et al. [Super-Kamiokande], “Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with external constraints in Super-Kamiokande I-IV,” Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.7, 072001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.072001 [arXiv:1710.09126 [hep-ex]]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Development of an analysis to probe the neutrino mass ordering with atmospheric neutrinos using three years of IceCube DeepCore data,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “Development of an analysis to probe the neutrino mass ordering with atmospheric neutrinos using three years of IceCube DeepCore data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.1, 9 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7555-0 [arXiv:1902.07771 [hep-ex]]

    2020

  44. [52]

    First joint oscillation analysis of Super-Kamiokande atmospheric and T2K accelerator neutrino data,

    K. Abe et al. [T2K and Super-Kamiokande], “First joint oscillation analysis of Super-Kamiokande atmospheric and T2K accelerator neutrino data,” [arXiv:2405.12488 [hep-ex]]. – 46 –

  45. [53]

    Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment,

    M. A. Acero et al. [NOvA], “Improved measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters by the NOvA experiment,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.3, 032004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.032004 [arXiv:2108.08219 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    New NOvA Results with 10 Years of Data

    Jeremy Wolcott, “New NOvA Results with 10 Years of Data”, Talk at The XXXI International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Neutrino 2024), Milano, Italy, June 16-22, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Current unknowns in the three neutrino framework,

    F. Capozzi, E. Lisi, A. Marrone and A. Palazzo, “Current unknowns in the three neutrino framework,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018), 48-72 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.05.005 [arXiv:1804.09678 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [56]

    2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,

    P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart ´ ınez-Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ ortola and J. W. F. Valle, “2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,” JHEP 02 (2021), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)071 [arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Neutrino mass ordering in light of recent data,

    K. J. Kelly, P. A. N. Machado, S. J. Parke, Y. F. Perez-Gonzalez and R. Z. Funchal, “Neutrino mass ordering in light of recent data,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.1, 013004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.013004 [arXiv:2007.08526 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP 09 (2020), 178 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178 [arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz, “NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” [arXiv:2410.05380 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Symmetry finder: A method for hunting symmetry in neutrino oscillation,

    H. Minakata, “Symmetry finder: A method for hunting symmetry in neutrino oscillation,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.7, 075024 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.075024 [arXiv:2106.11472 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    The Mixing Angles in Matter for Three Generations of Neutrinos and the Msw Mechanism,

    H. W. Zaglauer and K. H. Schwarzer, “The Mixing Angles in Matter for Three Generations of Neutrinos and the Msw Mechanism,” Z. Phys. C 40 (1988), 273 doi:10.1007/BF01555889

    1988 doi

  54. [62]

    Compact Perturbative Expressions for Oscillations with Sterile Neutrinos in Matter,

    S. J. Parke and X. Zhang, “Compact Perturbative Expressions for Oscillations with Sterile Neutrinos in Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.5, 056005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.056005 [arXiv:1905.01356 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [63]

    1-3 leptonic mixing and the neutrino oscillograms of the Earth,

    E. K. Akhmedov, M. Maltoni and A. Y. Smirnov, “1-3 leptonic mixing and the neutrino oscillograms of the Earth,” JHEP 05 (2007), 077 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/077 [arXiv:hep-ph/0612285 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  56. [64]

    CP and T violation test in neutrino oscillation,

    J. Arafune and J. Sato, “CP and T violation test in neutrino oscillation,” Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997), 1653-1658 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.1653 [arXiv:hep-ph/9607437 [hep-ph]]

    1997 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Golden measurements at a neutrino factory,

    A. Cervera, A. Donini, M. B. Gavela, J. J. Gomez Cadenas, P. Hernandez, O. Mena and S. Rigolin, “Golden measurements at a neutrino factory,” Nucl. Phys. B 579 (2000), 17-55 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 593 (2001), 731-732] doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00221-2 [arXiv:hep-ph/0002108 [hep-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Analytic approximations for three neutrino oscillation parameters and probabilities in matter,

    M. Freund, “Analytic approximations for three neutrino oscillation parameters and probabilities in matter,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 053003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.053003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0103300 [hep-ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Series expansions – 47 – for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter,

    E. K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson and T. Schwetz, “Series expansions – 47 – for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter,” JHEP 04 (2004), 078 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/078 [arXiv:hep-ph/0402175 [hep-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Perturbing Neutrino Oscillations Around the Solar Resonance,

    I. Martinez-Soler and H. Minakata, “Perturbing Neutrino Oscillations Around the Solar Resonance,” PTEP 2019 (2019) no.7, 073B07 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptz067 [arXiv:1904.07853 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Analytical approximation of the neutrino oscillation matter effects at large θ13,

    S. K. Agarwalla, Y. Kao and T. Takeuchi, “Analytical approximation of the neutrino oscillation matter effects at large θ13,” JHEP 04 (2014), 047 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)047 [arXiv:1302.6773 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Toward diagnosing neutrino non-unitarity through CP phase correlations,

    H. Minakata, “Toward diagnosing neutrino non-unitarity through CP phase correlations,” PTEP 2022 (2022) no.6, 063B03 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac078 [arXiv:2112.06178 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Neutrino amplitude decomposition, S matrix rephasing invariance, and reparametrization symmetry,

    H. Minakata, “Neutrino amplitude decomposition, S matrix rephasing invariance, and reparametrization symmetry,” JHEP 02 (2024), 036 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)036 [arXiv:2308.14501 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Search for light sterile neutrinos with the T2K far detector Super-Kamiokande at a baseline of 295 km,

    K. Abe et al. [T2K], “Search for light sterile neutrinos with the T2K far detector Super-Kamiokande at a baseline of 295 km,” Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.7, 071103 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.071103 [arXiv:1902.06529 [hep-ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Search for active-sterile neutrino mixing using neutral-current interactions in NOvA,

    P. Adamson et al. [NOvA], “Search for active-sterile neutrino mixing using neutral-current interactions in NOvA,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.7, 072006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.072006 [arXiv:1706.04592 [hep-ex]]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Non-unitary evolution of neutrinos in matter and the leptonic unitarity test,

    C. S. Fong, H. Minakata and H. Nunokawa, “Non-unitary evolution of neutrinos in matter and the leptonic unitarity test,” JHEP 02 (2019), 015 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)015 [arXiv:1712.02798 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Flux of atmospheric neutrinos,

    T. K. Gaisser and M. Honda, “Flux of atmospheric neutrinos,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52 (2002), 153-199 doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.52.050102.090645 [arXiv:hep-ph/0203272 [hep-ph]]

    2002

  68. [76]

    A New calculation of the atmospheric neutrino flux in a 3-dimensional scheme,

    M. Honda, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara and S. Midorikawa, “A New calculation of the atmospheric neutrino flux in a 3-dimensional scheme,” Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), 043008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043008 [arXiv:astro-ph/0404457 [astro-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Resonant Neutrino Flavor Conversion in the Atmosphere,

    C. Sponsler, M. Hostert, I. Martinez-Soler and C. A. Arg¨ uelles, “Resonant Neutrino Flavor Conversion in the Atmosphere,” [arXiv:2405.12140 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Influence of hadronic interaction models and the cosmic ray spectrum on the high energy atmospheric muon and neutrino flux,

    A. Fedynitch, J. Becker Tjus and P. Desiati, “Influence of hadronic interaction models and the cosmic ray spectrum on the high energy atmospheric muon and neutrino flux,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 114024 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.114024 [arXiv:1206.6710 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2012 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Time Reversal Violation in Neutrino Oscillation,

    N. Cabibbo, “Time Reversal Violation in Neutrino Oscillation,” Phys. Lett. B 72 (1978), 333-335 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90132-6

    1978 doi

  72. [80]

    Model-Independent Test of T Violation in Neutrino Oscillations,

    T. Schwetz and A. Segarra, “Model-Independent Test of T Violation in Neutrino Oscillations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) no.9, 091801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.091801 [arXiv:2106.16099 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Exact formulas and simple CP dependence of neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter with constant density,

    K. Kimura, A. Takamura and H. Yokomakura, “Exact formulas and simple CP dependence of neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter with constant density,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002), 073005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.66.073005 [arXiv:hep-ph/0205295 [hep-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Rotations Versus Perturbative Expansions for Calculating Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,

    P. B. Denton, S. J. Parke and X. Zhang, “Rotations Versus Perturbative Expansions for Calculating Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.3, 033001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.033001 [arXiv:1806.01277 [hep-ph]]. – 48 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.