Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Optical spin-orbit interaction induced by magnetic textures

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that reflecting a vortex beam off a magnetic skyrmion changes the orbital angular momentum per photon, with the sign of the change fixed by the beam's circular polarization handedness.

desk verdict A clean analytical prediction of SAM-controlled OAM change on reflection from magnetic textures, whose quantitative Fe numbers rest on a deferred phase relation that the referee should chase. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15232 v1 pith:XMNLDQ2X submitted 2025-06-18 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Martin Luttmann , Mauro Fanciulli , Pietro Carrara , Maurizio Sacchi , Thierry Ruchon This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords opticalspin-orbitinteractionorbitalangularmomentumoflightmagneto-opticalKerreffectskyrmionsmagneticvorticescirculardichroismX-rayvortexbeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that a vortex light beam reflected from a magnetic texture such as a skyrmion or a magnetic vortex changes its orbital angular momentum (OAM) per photon, and that the sign of that change is fixed by the handedness of the incoming circular polarization. This is a magnetically induced optical spin-orbit interaction, in which the spin angular momentum (SAM) of the light controls its OAM rather than the usual structured-optics route. Concretely, at the iron L3 edge the average OAM quantum number shifts by about $\pm 0.3$, and the same mechanism produces a magnetic circular dichroism signal with a localized on-axis component. If the prediction holds, magnetic textures become a reconfigurable, field-controllable medium for shaping the angular momentum of light.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the linear magneto-optical Kerr effect reflectivity matrix, which couples the $p$ and $s$ field components through longitudinal, transverse and polar magnetization terms, combined with an azimuthal Fourier expansion of the magnetization texture. For a vortex or skyrmion only the $\pm 1$ harmonic terms of transverse and longitudinal magnetization survive, so the reflected field is a superposition of OAM modes $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}$, $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}+1$ and $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}-1$. When the incident beam is circularly polarized, the $p$ component contains the interference of transverse and longitudinal MOKE terms weighted by both polarization components, and that interference produces the net OAM shift.

What would settle it

Reflect a circularly polarized vortex beam with $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}=1$ from a Bloch skyrmion at 711 eV and 45\,deg incidence, resolve the far-field $p$-component into OAM modes, and compare $\ell_{\mathrm{out}}$ for the two helicities; the absence of $\Delta\ell\approx \pm 0.3$, or any nonzero $\Delta\ell$ for linear polarization, would refute the prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central result is the identity of Eq. (11): for circularly polarized incident light reflected from a planar magnetic vortex (the model for a Bloch skyrmion), the mean OAM quantum number changes by $\ell_{\mathrm{out}}-\ell_{\mathrm{in}} = s_{\mathrm{in}}\,\frac{W_{\mathrm{in}}}{W_{\mathrm{out}}}\,\frac{|m_0|^2}{2}\,|r_{pp}r_0^t r_{ps}^l|$, where $s_{\mathrm{in}}=\pm 1$ is the incident SAM, $m_0$ is the magnetization scale, and $W_{\mathrm{in}}/W_{\mathrm{out}}$ is the ratio of beam energies. The sign of the OAM variation therefore follows the helicity, while its magnitude depends on the magneto-optical constants of the material. The shift is carried by the $p$-polarized component of the reflected beam, which mixes the $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}\pm 1$ modes, while the $s$ component keeps $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}$. Simulations for a Bloch skyrmion at the Fe L3 edge (711 eV, 45\,deg incidence) give $\Delta\ell\approx \pm 0.3$, and textures with skyrmion charge $N_{\mathrm{Sk}}$ multiply the shift by $N_{\mathrm{Sk}}$.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative prediction assumes that the product of magneto-optical constants $r_{pp}r_0^t r_{ps}^{l*}$ has a positive real part, which holds for iron at the L3 edge because $r_{pp}r_0^t$ and $r_{ps}^l$ share the same complex phase; if that phase relation fails at other wavelengths or materials, the shift would shrink, vanish, or reverse sign for a given helicity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A circularly polarized vortex reflected from a Bloch skyrmion at the Fe L3 edge should acquire $\Delta\ell\approx \pm 0.3$, with the sign set by the incident helicity, and the change should appear in the $p$-polarized component alone.
  • Magnetic circular dichroism images recorded with $\ell_{\mathrm{in}}=\pm 1$ incident vortices should show a localized on-axis signal, up to about 0.93 times the reflected peak intensity, giving an experimentally accessible observable.
  • Textures with skyrmion charge $N_{\mathrm{Sk}}>1$ multiply the induced OAM variation by $N_{\mathrm{Sk}}$, so magnetic topology can control the size of the OAM shift.
  • Linearly polarized input should leave the mean OAM unchanged even though the magneto-optical interaction curves the wavefront, so the effect is strictly spin-controlled.
  • Because the OAM change is not compensated by an opposite SAM change, part of the light's angular momentum is transferred to the sample, implying a mechanical torque on the magnetic texture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase condition that maximizes the effect at iron fails at other wavelengths or materials, the same geometry could produce a smaller, zero, or reversed OAM shift, making the effect a spectroscopic probe of the relative phases of magneto-optical constants.
  • Because the OAM shift is quadratic in magnetization, it cannot by itself distinguish skyrmion helicity; combining it with linear MOKE or dichroic measurements could separate texture chirality from topological charge.
  • In transmission, where a Faraday geometry can preserve rotational symmetry about the beam axis, the same coupling might allow complete SAM-to-OAM conversion rather than the partial, non-conserving transfer seen in reflection; this is a testable extension the paper only gestures toward.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives, within the linear MOKE framework, that the average orbital angular momentum (OAM) per photon of a light beam is modified upon reflection from a magnetic texture with non-uniform in-plane magnetization, and that the sign of the change is set by the incident spin angular momentum (SAM). Starting from a reflectivity matrix with transverse, longitudinal, and polar magneto-optical terms, the authors expand the magnetization in azimuthal Fourier components and obtain expressions for the reflected energy, mean OAM, and mean SAM (Eqs. (5)-(7)). For a planar magnetic vortex approximating a Bloch skyrmion, they obtain Eq. (9) for the OAM change, which for Fe at the L3 edge and circular polarization becomes Eq. (11). Numerical simulations for a Bloch skyrmion at 45\degree incidence reproduce the predicted sign and give \Delta\ell \approx \pm 0.3, and the authors propose magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) with an OAM=1 probe as a test.

Significance. If the predictions are correct, the paper establishes a new magneto-optical spin-orbit interaction in reflection: the SAM of the incident field controls a measurable OAM shift. The effect is derived without fitted parameters and yields a concrete, falsifiable observable (the on-axis MCD signal in Fig. 5). The paper also identifies potential applications in reconfigurable OAM beam shaping and skyrmion readout. The analytical derivation is compact and the numerical simulations support the internal consistency of the approximations, although, as discussed below, the material-specific quantitative prediction relies on a phase relation that is not fully established in the main text.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results, Eqs. (9)-(11)] The step from Eq. (9) to Eq. (11) replaces the real part Re(rpp rt0 rlps*) by the modulus |rpp rt0 rlps|, which is valid only if the two complex constants have exactly the same phase. The manuscript asserts this for Fe at the L3 edge and defers the derivation to Section I of the supplementary material, but Fig. 1 does not show numerical phase values or a phase-difference panel. If the phase difference is \delta, the predicted OAM shift is multiplied by cos(\delta); for \delta near \pi/2 the effect vanishes and for \delta > \pi/2 the sign for a given helicity reverses. Because the headline quantitative prediction \Delta\ell \approx \pm 0.3 and the sign assignments in Figs. 4 and 5 are Fe-specific, this phase relation is load-bearing and should be established in the main text or by a quantitative plot of the phase difference.
  2. [Simulation, Fig. 4] The numerical simulation in this section uses the same magneto-optical constants and the same MOKE reflectivity model as the analytical derivation, so it does not independently certify the Fe L3 phase relation; it tests the approximations of the analytic model (normal incidence, planar vortex, no radial magnetization dependence) against a full-texture simulation. The agreement between Fig. 4 and Eq. (11) is therefore a self-consistency check, not an experimental validation of the material constants. The authors should state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, assess sensitivity by computing \Delta\ell with an artificially dephased rlps to confirm the sign robustness.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Results, Eqs. (7), (9), (12)] The symbols I and R are used for the imaginary and real parts without being defined in the main text; please define them at first occurrence.
  2. [Results, Eq. (9)] The notation r l,*ps is awkward; use (rlps)* consistently throughout the manuscript.
  3. [Fig. 4] The small asymmetry between the CR and CL curves is attributed to numerical errors, but no error bars or convergence tests are provided; a brief analysis of the numerical uncertainty would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Simulation] There is a typo 'perflectly' in the sentence 'Thus, a MCD measurement ... should exhibit a measurable on-axis signal' and 'Thierrry' in the author list; both should be corrected.
  5. [Results, Fig. 1 caption] The phase equality claim for rpp rt0 and rlps would be more convincing if Fig. 1 included a panel showing the phase difference as a function of photon energy.
  6. [Discussion] The sentence containing 'lettes us envision' contains a typo and should read 'lets us envision'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the OAM shift follows algebraically from the MOKE reflectivity matrix and the azimuthal Fourier expansion of the magnetization, with no fitted parameter; self-citations supply an independent framework, not the predicted result.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained at the level required for a circularity finding. The incident vortex field (Eq. 1) is propagated through the linear-MOKE reflectivity matrix (Eq. 2), the magnetic texture is expanded in azimuthal Fourier modes (Eq. 3), and the reflected field (Eq. 4) follows by direct multiplication. The energy, OAM, and SAM formulas (Eqs. 5-7) are presented as algebraic consequences with derivations relegated to the supplementary material, and the planar vortex/skyrmion coefficients (Eq. 8) are inserted to obtain the OAM change (Eq. 9). Circular polarization then gives the central prediction (Eq. 11), whose sign is controlled by the incident helicity. No parameter is fitted to the target OAM shift: the magneto-optical constants are computed or taken from prior work (Refs. 25, 36), and the skyrmion ansatz comes from external references (Refs. 42, 43). The self-citations to Refs. 25 and 36 are load-bearing only as a previously established theoretical framework and as simulation parameters; they do not already contain the OAM-variation prediction in the form claimed here, and the MCD observable in Fig. 5 is a falsifiable new prediction. The principal vulnerability, namely the phase relation Re(rpp rt0 rlps*) > 0 used to pass from Eq. 9 to Eq. 11 and deferred to Supplementary Section I, is an unverified material-phase assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Since no step reduces the prediction to its own input by construction, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central prediction is derived from standard linear MOKE with material constants of Fe. The hand-chosen parameters define a realistic skyrmion testbed but do not tune the sign rule. The sign rule survives variations of these parameters as long as the real part of rpp rt0 rlps* is nonzero. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • m0 (normalized magnetization magnitude)
    Overall scale factor in the MOKE expansion; set to 1 for saturated magnetization, not fitted to the target prediction.
  • skyrmion radial size lambda = 100 nm
    Chosen to match typical skyrmion sizes; affects only the magnitude of the simulated OAM shift, not the sign rule.
  • incident beam waist w0 = 100 nm
    Set equal to lambda to maximize overlap with the skyrmion; not fitted to the target result.
  • incidence angle = 45 degrees (Brewster's angle)
    Selected to maximize the MOKE response; the central sign result is angle-dependent through the magneto-optical constants.
  • photon energy = 711.2 eV (Fe L3 edge)
    Chosen to resonate with the Fe L3 edge to enhance magneto-optical constants; not fitted to the prediction.
  • skyrmion charge NSk = 1 (and 2 in a secondary example)
    Topological charge of the texture; the paper claims the OAM change equals NSk for circular input, shown for NSk=2 in Fig. 2(d), but without a full derivation.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The linear-MOKE reflectivity matrix R (Eq. 2) fully describes reflection from the magnetic texture to first order in magnetization.
    Standard MOKE approximation; higher-order magneto-optical effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption The magnetization texture is 2π-periodic in azimuth and, in the analytical derivation, has no radial dependence.
    Stated in the text as a simplification; radial dependence is reintroduced in the simulations via the skyrmion ansatz.
  • domain assumption For Fe at the L3 edge, rpp rt0 and rlps have the same complex phase, and rpps is π out of phase with them.
    Used to pass from Eq. (9) to Eq. (10); derived in supplementary Section I, not shown in the main text.
  • standard math Paraxial vortex-beam description and the local-OAM definition (Eq. S24) are valid for computing the mean OAM per photon.
    Standard in OAM optics; the beam waist (100 nm) is much larger than the wavelength (1.7 nm), so paraxiality holds.
  • domain assumption The skyrmion ansatz (Eq. 13) with radial function (Eq. 14) is a faithful model of a Bloch or Néel skyrmion.
    Taken from micromagnetic literature (Refs. 42,43); it approximates realistic skyrmion profiles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical spin-orbit interaction induced by magnetic textures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XMNLDQ2X

@misc{pith2026250615232,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical spin-orbit interaction induced by magnetic textures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XMNLDQ2X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15232}
}
read the original abstract

Contrary to the optical spin angular momentum (SAM), the role played by the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light in magneto-optics remains largely unexplored. However, the SAM and OAM are known to be coupled when light interacts with non-homogeneous and non-isotropic materials. Here we predict that the OAM carried by each photon in a light beam is modified upon reflection on magnetic textures like skyrmions, and that the sign of this variation is governed by the SAM of the incident field. Our predictions can be readily tested by performing circular dichroism measurements, and may provide new routes to shape light's angular momentum with magnetism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.15232 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Amplitude (top) and phase (bottom) of the magneto-optical constants rppr t 0 , r l ps and r p ps at the L-edge of iron, for an angle of incidence of 45°. Funding This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France), project HELIMAG, Grant No. ANR-21-CE30- 0037, and project TORNADO, Grant No. ANR-23-EXLU-0004;Indo-French CEFIPRA Grant Project No.- (7104-I), and by the European Union "Pathfinder" p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial dephasing of the p component of the field upon reflection off a vortex of swirling magnetization. The isosurface color indicates the local phase of the reflected beam, while the bottom images show the transverse magnetization magnitude mx. (a) For an incident p-polarized field, the variation of OAM is null, as the net dephasing along a loop about the optical axis (white line) is null. (b,c) For an incident C… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Analysis of the reflected beam in the far field, for a CL (left column) and CR (right column) incident field with ℓin = 1, impinging on a Bloch skyrmion. (a,b) p-polarization component. (c,d) s-polarization component. The phase is indicated by the color, and the local intensity corresponds to the brightness of the image. 9/10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: OAM variation per photon ∆ℓ upon reflection on a Bloch skyrmion, with respect to the photon energy at Brewster’s angle (a), and with respect to the incidence angle (in degree from normal incidence) at the L-edge of Fe, for incident CR (blue), CL (red) and LP (black) po…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Magnetic circular dichroism images for a h = π/2 Bloch skyrmions (top images), and for an incident OAM ℓin = −1 (a, b) and ℓin = 1 (c,d). (e) Line-outs of the MCD images along the dashed lines of corresponding colors in (a-d). The dichroic signal is given as a fraction…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sandratskii, L. M. Noncollinear magnetism in itinerant-electron systems: Theory and applications.Adv. Phys.47, 91–160, DOI: 10.1080/000187398243573 (1998). 5/10

    work page doi:10.1080/000187398243573 1998

  2. [2]

    Daalderop, G. H. O., Kelly, P. J. & Schuurmans, M. F. H. First-principles calculation of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of iron, cobalt, and nickel.Phys. Rev. B41, 11919–11937, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.11919 (1990)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.11919 1990

  3. [3]

    Bychkov, Y . A. & Rashba, É. I. Properties of a 2d electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy.Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett.39, 78 (1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [4]

    Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures.Phys

    Dresselhaus, G. Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures.Phys. Rev.100, 580–586, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev. 100.580 (1955)

    doi:10.1103/physrev 1955

  5. [5]

    Nagaosa, N., Sinova, J., Onoda, S., MacDonald, A. H. & Ong, N. P. Anomalous hall effect.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539–1592, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539 (2010)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1539 2010

  6. [6]

    O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C

    Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin hall effects.Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213–1260, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213 (2015)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1213 2015

  7. [7]

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045–3067, DOI: 10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Y ., Cheng, Y

    Zhu, Z. Y ., Cheng, Y . C. & Schwingenschlögl, U. Giant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors.Phys. Rev. B84, 153402, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.153402 (2011)

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.153402 2011

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Commun.11, 5042, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-020-18847-1 (2020)

    Zhong, S.et al.Attosecond electron-spin dynamics in Xe 4d photoionization.Nat. Commun.11, 5042, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-020-18847-1 (2020). 2005.12008

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Y ., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F

    Bliokh, K. Y ., Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. J., Nori, F. & Zayats, A. V . Spin-orbit interactions of light.Nat. Photonics9, 796–808, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.201 (2015)

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    & Paparo, D

    Marrucci, L., Manzo, C. & Paparo, D. Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 163905, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 (2006)

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    & Santamato, E

    Karimi, E., Piccirillo, B., Nagali, E., Marrucci, L. & Santamato, E. Efficient generation and sorting of orbital angular momentum eigenmodes of light by thermally tuned q-plates.Appl. Phys. Lett.94, 231124, DOI: 10.1063/1.3154549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3154549

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    & Zhang, X

    Yin, X., Ye, Z., Rho, J., Wang, Y . & Zhang, X. Photonic spin hall effect at metasurfaces.Science339, 1405–1407, DOI: 10.1126/science.1231758 (2013). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1231758

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    C., Ambrosio, A., Rubin, N

    Devlin, R. C., Ambrosio, A., Rubin, N. A., Mueller, J. P. B. & Capasso, F. Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light.Science358, 896–901, DOI: 10.1126/science.aao5392 (2017). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10. 1126/science.aao5392

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    & Hasman, E

    Bomzon, Z., Biener, G., Kleiner, V . & Hasman, E. Space-variant pancharatnam–berry phase optical elements with computer-generated subwavelength gratings.Opt. Lett.27, 1141–1143, DOI: 10.1364/OL.27.001141 (2002)

    2002 doi

  8. [16]

    & Juodkazis, S

    Brasselet, E., Murazawa, N., Misawa, H. & Juodkazis, S. Optical vortices from liquid crystal droplets.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 103903, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.103903 (2009)

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    Schatz, P. N. & McCaffery, A. J. The faraday effect.Q. Rev. Chem. Soc.23, 552–584, DOI: 10.1039/QR9692300552 (1969)

    1969 doi

  10. [18]

    Magneto-optical effects in transition metal systems.Reports on Prog

    Ebert, H. Magneto-optical effects in transition metal systems.Reports on Prog. Phys.59, 1665–1735, DOI: 10.1088/ 0034-4885/59/12/003 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    A., Riego, P

    Arregi, J. A., Riego, P. & Berger, A. What is the longitudinal magneto-optical kerr effect?J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.50, 03LT01, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa4ea6 (2016)

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Stephens, P. J. Magnetic circular dichroism.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.25, 201–232, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pc.25.100174. 001221 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.25.100174.001221

    1974

  13. [21]

    J., Wang, H

    Funk, T., Deb, A., George, S. J., Wang, H. & Cramer, S. P. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism—a high energy probe of magnetic properties.Coord. Chem. Rev.249, 3–30, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.05.017 (2005). Synchrotron Radiation in Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    & Sato, M

    Fujita, H. & Sato, M. Encoding orbital angular momentum of light in magnets.Phys. Rev. B96, 060407, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.060407 (2017)

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    & Yan, P

    Yang, W., Yang, H., Cao, Y . & Yan, P. Photonic orbital angular momentum transfer and magnetic skyrmion rotation.Opt. Express26, 8778–8790, DOI: 10.1364/OE.26.008778 (2018)

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    A.et al.Terahertz vortex beam as a spectroscopic probe of magnetic excitations.Phys

    Sirenko, A. A.et al.Terahertz vortex beam as a spectroscopic probe of magnetic excitations.Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 237401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.237401 (2019). 6/10

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Fanciulli, M.et al.Observation of magnetic helicoidal dichroism with extreme ultraviolet light vortices.Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 077401, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.077401 (2022)

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Fanciulli, M.et al.Magnetic vortex dynamics probed by time-resolved magnetic helicoidal dichroism.Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 156701, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.156701 (2025)

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    & Karki, D

    Levy, M. & Karki, D. Nonreciprocal Transverse Photonic Spin and Magnetization-Induced Electromagnetic Spin-Orbit Coupling.Sci. Reports7, 39972, DOI: 10.1038/srep39972 (2017). 1606.08334

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    & Zayats, A

    Lei, X., Du, L., Yuan, X. & Zayats, A. V . Optical spin–orbit coupling in the presence of magnetization: photonic skyrmion interaction with magnetic domains.Nanophotonics10, 3667–3675, DOI: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2021-0201 (2021)

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Skyrme, T. H. R. A Non-Linear Field Theory.Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. A260, 127–138, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1961.0018 (1961)

    1961

  22. [30]

    vortices

    Bogdanov, A. N. & Yablonskii, D. A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets.Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys.68, 101 (1989)

    1989

  23. [31]

    https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1166767

    Mühlbauer, S.et al.Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet.Science323, 915–919, DOI: 10.1126/science.1166767 (2009). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1166767

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    Mater.16, 898–904, DOI: 10.1038/nmat4934 (2017)

    Soumyanarayanan, A.et al.Tunable room-temperature magnetic skyrmions in Ir/Fe/Co/Pt multilayers.Nat. Mater.16, 898–904, DOI: 10.1038/nmat4934 (2017). 1606.06034

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    & Tretiakov, O

    Göbel, B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles. Phys. Reports895, 1–28, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.001 (2021). Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasi...

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Commun.7, 12583, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12583 (2016)

    Géneaux, R.et al.Synthesis and characterization of attosecond light vortices in the extreme ultraviolet.Nat. Commun.7, 12583, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12583 (2016). 1509.07396

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Commun.8, 14970, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14970 (2017)

    Kong, F.et al.Controlling the orbital angular momentum of high harmonic vortices.Nat. Commun.8, 14970, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14970 (2017)

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    Fanciulli, M.et al.Electromagnetic theory of helicoidal dichroism in reflection from magnetic structures.Phys. Rev. A 103, 013501, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.013501 (2021)

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    W., Spreeuw, R

    Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C. & Woerdman, J. P. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes.Phys. Rev. A45, 8185–8189, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 (1992)

    1992 doi

  30. [38]

    & Rocca, F

    Coullet, P., Gil, L. & Rocca, F. Optical vortices.Opt. Commun.73, 403–408, DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(89)90180-6 (1989)

    1989 doi

  31. [39]

    Padgett, M. J. Orbital angular momentum 25 years on [invited].Opt. Express25, 11265–11274, DOI: 10.1364/OE.25. 011265 (2017)

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    & Bader, S

    Qiu, Z. & Bader, S. Surface magneto-optic kerr effect (smoke).J. Magn. Magn. Mater.200, 664–678, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00311-X (1999)

    1999 doi

  33. [41]

    Ultrafast laser induced dynamics in ferromagnets: Towards the control of the spin order from the femtosecond to the sub-nanosecond time scale.Ph.D

    Piovera, C. Ultrafast laser induced dynamics in ferromagnets: Towards the control of the spin order from the femtosecond to the sub-nanosecond time scale.Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano(2013)

    2013

  34. [42]

    & Hesjedal, T

    Brearton, R., van der Laan, G. & Hesjedal, T. Magnetic skyrmion interactions in the micromagnetic framework.Phys. Rev. B101, 134422, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.134422 (2020)

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    O.et al.The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films.New J

    Leonov, A. O.et al.The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films.New J. Phys.18, 065003, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/6/065003 (2016)

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    P., Gonoskov, I

    Polyakov, O. P., Gonoskov, I. A., Stepanyuk, V . S. & Gross, E. K. U. Generation of magnetic skyrmions by focused vortex laser pulses.J. Appl. Phys.127, 073904, DOI: 10.1063/1.5140673 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5140673

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    H.et al.Optically controlled ultrafast dynamics of skyrmion in antiferromagnets.Phys

    Guan, S. H.et al.Optically controlled ultrafast dynamics of skyrmion in antiferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B107, 214429, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.214429 (2023)

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    & Deng, H

    Huang, N. & Deng, H. Generating x-rays with orbital angular momentum in a free-electron laser oscillator.Optica8, 1020–1023, DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.428341 (2021)

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Commun.8, 14971, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14971 (2017)

    Gauthier, D.et al.Tunable orbital angular momentum in high-harmonic generation.Nat. Commun.8, 14971, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14971 (2017)

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    Pathfinder

    Luttmann, M.et al.Nonlinear up-conversion of a polarization möbius strip with half-integer optical angular momentum. Sci. Adv.9, eadf3486, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf3486 (2023). https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.adf3486. 7/10 Figure 1.Amplitude (top) and phase (botto...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.