REVIEW 1 cited by
What if ... General Relativity is not the theory?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The nature of gravity is fundamental to understand the scaffolding of the Universe and its evolution. Einstein's general theory of relativity has been scrutinized for over ninety five years and shown to describe accurately all phenomena from the solar system to the Universe. However, this success is achieved in the case of the largest scales provided one admits contributions to energy-momentum tensor involving dark components such as dark energy and dark matter. Moreover, the theory has well known shortcomings, such as the problem of singularities, the cosmological constant problem and the well known initial conditions problems for the cosmological description. Furthermore, general relativity also does not fit the well known procedures that allow for the quantization of the other fundamental interactions. In this discussion we briefly review the experimental bounds on the foundational principles of general relativity, and present three recent proposals to extend general relativity or, at least, to regard it under different perspectives.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Effective Metric Description of 2+1 Dimensional Quantum Black Holes
A framework for writing quantum corrections to the rotating BTZ black hole in coordinate-invariant form, with horizon regularity constraints and a general temperature formula.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.