Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Machine learning potentials for modeling alloys across compositions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A machine-learning potential trained on a uniform spread of local chemical motifs can model an alloy across its full composition range without retraining.

desk verdict A genuinely useful training-set construction method with strong experimental benchmarking, but the central comparison doesn't cleanly isolate motif diversity from correlated structural changes. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12592 v2 pith:XOCPPOYS submitted 2025-06-14 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Killian Sheriff , Daniel Xiao , Yifan Cao , Lewis R. Owen , Rodrigo Freitas This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords machinelearningpotentialssolidsolutionshigh-entropyalloyschemicalshort-rangeordermotif-basedsamplingphasediagramsalloythermodynamicscompositionaltransferability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the accuracy of machine-learning potentials—models that predict atomic energies from local structure—is set less by model architecture or dataset size than by how well the training set represents local chemical environments. It introduces motif-based sampling, which reshuffles atoms within training configurations so that local coordination motifs, the polyhedral arrangements of neighbors around each atom, appear with roughly uniform frequency. Potentials trained this way keep energy errors low across the full composition range of solid solutions, and across four alloy families—CrCoNi, AuPt, CuAu, and TiTaVW—they reproduce experimental phase diagrams, melting temperatures, short-range order, thermal expansion, heat capacity, and stacking-fault energies without retraining. If true, this makes it practical to build one potential that works across an entire alloy phase space instead of retraining for each composition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local chemical motif—the coordination polyhedron around an atom that encodes its chemical neighborhood—and the motif-based sampling (MBS) procedure built on it. MBS starts from chemically random configurations and performs intracell atomic swaps to drive the distribution of motifs toward uniform, quantified by Jensen–Shannon divergence to a uniform target and by motif packing density, the percentage of distinct motifs sampled. Two auxiliary components complete the training set: phase sampling adds metastable lattices and ordered intermetallics, and thermal perturbations add synthetic vibrations and thermal expansion. The argument is that these three components together cover the chemical, structural, and vibrational subspace an alloy actually occupies.

What would settle it

Train MBS and random-sampling datasets that are matched in composition, thermal noise, short-range order, and interatomic-distance distribution, then compare energy errors on a held-out solid-solution set. If the MBS advantage vanishes once distance statistics are controlled, motif diversity is not the active variable; if it survives, the mechanism is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that chemical motif diversity, not raw data volume, is the key determinant of whether an machine-learning potential can resolve the small energy differences that govern disordered alloys. On the CrCoNi solid solution, universal potentials show errors as large as thousands of meV/atom varying wildly with composition; a motif-based-sampling-trained model reduces and flattens those errors across the ternary triangle. The authors show the improvement is physically meaningful: the typical energy differences associated with chemical short-range order are about 10 meV/atom, the scale that motif-based sampling makes resolvable. Using one model per system, the paper reproduces experimental phase boundaries for CrNi, CrCo, and AuPt, melting temperatures within a few percent for CrCoNi and TaTiVW-derived alloys, Warren–Cowley short-range-order parameters, thermophysical properties, and composition-dependent stacking-fault energies for CrCoNi.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim would collapse if the accuracy gain attributed to greater chemical-motif diversity actually comes from a correlated change—such as an altered distribution of interatomic distances or a bias toward the specific test configurations—rather than from motif diversity itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single MBS-trained potential can replace per-composition retraining, so phase diagrams, melting curves, and ordering tendencies across a composition space become computable from one model.
  • The accuracy gain is concentrated where it matters thermodynamically: near the 10 meV/atom energy scale that separates competing ordered and disordered states.
  • Because MBS works by dataset construction rather than architecture change, it can be added to existing machine-learning-potential training pipelines at negligible cost.
  • The resulting models resolve the energetic biases behind chemical short-range order, making Warren–Cowley parameters and stacking-fault energies accessible from simulation.
  • MBS training sets can serve as a benchmark for testing whether universal potentials actually handle disordered phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By extension, the same motif-diversity principle should apply to other disordered materials—glasses, liquids, irradiated or defective crystals—where the relevant degrees of freedom are local environments rather than lattice periodicity; the paper does not test these cases.
  • A causal test that goes beyond the paper: randomize the pairing between motif identity and atomic coordinates in training data. If energy errors track motif diversity rather than pair-distance statistics, the proposed mechanism is confirmed; if not, the improvement has a different source.
  • The paper's phase-diagram workflow still assumes knowledge of which competing phases to include; combining MBS with generative structure search could close that gap, a direction the authors note but do not pursue.
  • The fixed-dataset-size gains suggest MBS could be folded into active-learning loops to cut first-principles data costs further, but that combination is not demonstrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes motif-based sampling (MBS) to build machine-learning-potential training sets for metallic alloys. Using a local chemical motif decomposition from the authors' earlier work, MBS promotes a more uniform distribution of chemical motifs in the training data via intra-cell atomic swaps. The authors compare MBS with random sampling on CrCoNi and report improved energy accuracy on reverse-Monte-Carlo test sets with controlled short-range order. They then train PACE potentials for CrCoNi, AuPt, CuAu, and TaTiVW, and validate the models against experiments for phase diagrams, melting temperatures, Warren–Cowley short-range-order parameters, thermal expansion, heat capacity, and stacking-fault energies. The central claim is that motif diversity in the training set is a critical determinant of MLP accuracy for solid solutions across composition space.

Significance. The paper has clear strengths: it targets an important practical problem (accurate MLPs for disordered alloys across compositions), it evaluates the method on external held-out DFT data and on extensive experimental comparisons, and it proposes a low-cost modification to existing training pipelines. The experimental validations in Figs. 5–9 are broad and, if the mechanism is sound, demonstrate a practically useful method. The main risk is that the causal attribution to motif diversity rests on one controlled comparison (Fig. 3b), and that comparison does not currently exclude correlated confounds. The Cu3Au short-range-order validation also relies on an underspecified standardization step. These issues are fixable, but they are load-bearing for the paper's central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Motif-based sampling for solid solutions; Fig. 3b] The statement that 'any differences in model performance can be attributed specifically to motif representation' is too strong. MBS is implemented by intra-cell atomic swaps that flatten the motif histogram, and those swaps also change the distribution of DFT energies, pair and angular statistics, and higher-order correlations in the training set. Since the test sets are reverse-Monte-Carlo configurations with controlled SRO, a swap-induced resemblance to high-SRO test configurations could explain the widening MBS advantage in Fig. 3b even if motif diversity were not the operative variable. The paper should report matched diagnostics (energy histograms, pair-correlation functions beyond the first shell, and angular environment distributions) for the MBS and RS training sets, and should add a control experiment in which motif diversity is varied while the energy distribution is held fixed or otherwise decorrelated from the test SRO. Without such a control, the central causal claim that uniform motif sampling drives the improved generalization is not established.
  2. [Chemical short-range order; Fig. 7b] The Cu3Au comparison uses 'standardized' Warren–Cowley parameters, but the standardization procedure is not described and appears to be a post-hoc normalization that removes a systematic bias attributed to the DFT functional. As presented, the reader cannot tell whether the agreement in Fig. 7b reflects a fitted scaling parameter or a parameter-free prediction. The paper should report the raw α values, the exact normalization formula, any fitted parameter values and their uncertainties, and the sensitivity of the conclusion to the normalization. This is important because the quantitative SRO claim for CuAu rests on this panel; the CrNi agreement in Fig. 7a is quantitative and does not rely on such standardization.
  3. [Throughout; methods completeness] The key methodological details on which the paper's claims rest are referenced only as Methods sections: 'Sampling of chemical motifs', 'Training and testing datasets', and 'Warren-Cowley parameters'. The manuscript should include the full MBS acceptance criterion, the exact definitions of motif packing density and Jensen–Shannon divergence used, and the complete SRO standardization procedure, so that the central comparison in Fig. 3b and the Cu3Au validation can be reproduced and independently assessed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3] The text refers to 'fig. 3d', but the figure caption lists only panels (a)–(c); either add the panel or correct the reference.
  2. [Fig. 2a] The reported MatterSim error of 'up to 4,500 meV/atom' and '10,861% variation across compositions' should be checked; the numbers are surprisingly large and the baseline for the percentage variation is not defined.
  3. [Fig. 3b] The 10-model ensemble results would be more informative with error bars or shaded intervals; as plotted, the reader cannot assess the ensemble spread behind the MBS and RS curves.
  4. [Fig. 8a] The maximum deviations of 0.1% and 0.3% for lattice parameters should be accompanied by the temperature range over which they are evaluated and by the experimental uncertainty, so that the reader can interpret the agreement.
  5. [Code and data availability] The paper would be strengthened by a statement on data and code availability, including whether the trained PACE potentials, the MBS and RS training sets, and the test sets are released.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central MBS accuracy claim is tested against held-out DFT and experimental benchmarks, not against the motif objective used to construct the training sets.

full rationale

The paper's central effectiveness claim—that MBS training sets yield MLPs with lower energy errors and faithful property predictions—is judged against held-out DFT test sets (Fig. 3b, Fig. 4) and independent experimental data (Figs. 5-9), not against the motif distribution that MBS is designed to approach. The reported higher motif packing density and reduced Jensen-Shannon divergence for MBS are consequences of the sampling algorithm's stated design goal (uniform motif coverage); they serve as manipulation checks rather than as predictions from which success is inferred. No parameter is fitted to the test-set energies or experimental observations and then renamed a prediction. The chief self-citations (refs [8,14,16]) supply the motif-decomposition vocabulary and the uniform-motif target, but they do not by themselves establish that increasing motif diversity improves accuracy; that load-bearing claim is tested directly by the MBS-versus-RS comparison on externally generated reverse-Monte-Carlo test sets. Even if that comparison does not perfectly isolate motif diversity from correlated changes in pair or angular statistics, this is a potential confound and a correctness concern, not a circular reduction: the outcome variable (energy MAE, experimental properties) is not defined in terms of motif diversity. The paper also acknowledges the DFT accuracy limitation, which is a separate fidelity issue. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular in the sense required by the patterns; the central result has independent external content.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the motif framework from previous papers by the same group, on the assumption that a uniform motif distribution is the correct training target, and on DFT as reference. The paper's central results are externally validated against experiments, so circularity is low, but the inventive step itself builds on self-cited foundations.

free parameters (1)
  • Warren-Cowley standardization factor for Cu3Au comparison = not reported, chosen to match experimental trend
    In Fig. 7b and accompanying text, predicted Warren-Cowley parameters are normalized to correct for DFT binding-energy biases; the scale is not derived but chosen so the qualitative trend matches experiment.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT energies are an adequate reference for training and evaluating MLPs for alloy properties
    All training labels and energy-error benchmarks are DFT values; the paper acknowledges known DFT functional biases (refs 64,65) but does not quantify their impact on each property.
  • ad hoc to paper The local chemical motif decomposition from the authors' prior work (refs 8,14) is a sufficient coordinate to characterize chemical complexity in solid solutions
    MBS optimizes motif frequencies toward a uniform distribution based on this decomposition; the validity of the decomposition and the uniform target is assumed from prior papers rather than re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform motif distribution in the training set is the correct objective for maximizing MLP generalization across compositions
    This is the hypothesis tested in the paper; it is supported by the MBS versus random sampling comparison, but it is an assumption about how training set design affects model performance.
  • domain assumption Reverse Monte Carlo test sets with controlled short-range order are representative of the configurational space relevant to alloy thermodynamics
    The benchmarking in Fig. 3b relies on these test sets; they may not cover nonequilibrium or processing-related configurations mentioned in the introduction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Machine learning potentials for modeling alloys across compositions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XOCPPOYS

@misc{pith2026250612592,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Machine learning potentials for modeling alloys across compositions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XOCPPOYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12592}
}
read the original abstract

Materials properties depend strongly on chemical composition, i.e., the relative amounts of each chemical element. Changes in composition lead to entirely different chemical arrangements, which vary in complexity from perfectly ordered (i.e., stoichiometric compounds) to completely disordered (i.e., solid solutions). Accurately capturing this range of chemical arrangements remains a major challenge, limiting the predictive accuracy of machine learning potentials (MLPs) in materials modeling. Here, we combine information theory and machine learning to optimize the sampling of chemical motifs and design MLPs that effectively capture the behavior of metallic alloys across their entire compositional and structural landscape. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated by predicting the compositional dependence of various material properties - including stacking-fault energies, short-range order, heat capacities, and phase diagrams - for the AuPt and CuAu binary alloys, the ternary CrCoNi, and the TiTaVW high-entropy alloy. Extensive comparison against experimental data demonstrates the robustness of this approach in enabling materials modeling with high physical fidelity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12592 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chemical complexity of phases in metallic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Error of universal machine learning poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Impact of motif based sampling (MBS) on the predictive performance of MLPs in solid solutions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy prediction error across the CrCoNi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase diagram predictions for binary alloy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Predicted melting temperatures for high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Short-range order predictions compared with experimental data. a) Temperature-dependence of Warren–Cowley parameters for CrxNi(1−x) alloys compared to diffuse-scattering experimental measurements59–61 across the compositional space. The size of the data points are prop…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Thermophysical properties of CrCoNi and TaTiVW. a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Computationally-aided microstructure de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Distributed Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Large-Scale Electronic Structure Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A distributed equivariant GNN with a neighbor-minimizing graph partitioner scales electronic-structure (Hamiltonian) prediction to 512 GPUs and 190,000 atoms, with an 87% weak-scaling efficiency.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Peter M Anderson, John P Hirth, and Jens Lothe,Theory of dislocations, Cambridge University Press, 2017

    2017

  2. [2]

    Orb: A Fast, Scalable Neural Network Potential

    Mark Neumann, James Gin, Benjamin Rhodes, Steven Bennett, Zhiyi Li, Hitarth Choubisa, Arthur Hussey, and Jonathan Godwin, “Orb: A Fast, Scalable Neural Network Potential” (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    MatterSim: A Deep Learning Atomistic Model Across Elements, Temperatures and Pressures

    Han Yang, Chenxi Hu, Yichi Zhou, Xixian Liu, Yu Shi, Jielan Li, Guanzhi Li, Zekun Chen, Shuizhou Chen, Claudio Zeni, Matthew Horton, Robert Pinsler, Andrew Page 8 of 12 Fowler, Daniel Z¨ ugner, Tian Xie, Jake Smith, Lixin Sun, Qian Wang, Lingyu Kong, Chang Liu, Hongxia Hao, and Ziheng Lu, “MatterSim: A Deep Learning Atomistic Model Across Elements, Temper...

    2024

  4. [4]

    High accuracy neural network interatomic potential for NiTi shape memory al- loy

    Hao Tang, Yin Zhang, Qing-Jie Li, Haowei Xu, Yuchi Wang, Yunzhi Wang, and Ju Li, “High accuracy neural network interatomic potential for NiTi shape memory al- loy”,Acta Materialia(2022),doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.actamat.2022.118217

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Machine learning search for sta- ble binary Sn alloys with Na, Ca, Cu, Pd, and Ag

    Aidan Thorn, Daviti Gochitashvili, Saba Kharabadze, and Aleksey N. Kolmogorov, “Machine learning search for sta- ble binary Sn alloys with Na, Ca, Cu, Pd, and Ag”, en, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics(2023),doi:10 . 1039/D3CP02817H

    2023

  6. [6]

    Yifan Cao, Killian Sheriff, and Rodrigo Freitas,Captur- ing short-range order in high-entropy alloys with machine learning potentials, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Roadmap for the de- velopment of machine learning-based interatomic poten- tials

    Yong-Wei Zhang, Viacheslav Sorkin, Zachary H Aitken, Antonio Politano, Joerg Behler, Aidan Thompson, Tsz Wai Ko, Shyue Ping Ong, Olga Chalykh, Dmitry Koro- god, Evgeny Podryabinkin, Alexander V. Shapeev, Ju Li, Yuri Mishin, Zongrui Pei, Xianglin Liu, Jaesun Kim, Yu- tack Park, Seungwoo Hwang, Seungwu Han, Killian Sher- iff, Yifan Cao, and Rodrigo Freitas,...

    2024

  8. [8]

    Quantifying chemical short-range order in metallic alloys

    Killian Sheriff, Yifan Cao, Tess Smidt, and Rodrigo Fre- itas, “Quantifying chemical short-range order in metallic alloys”,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    General-purpose machine-learned potential for 16 elemental metals and their alloys

    Keke Song, Rui Zhao, Jiahui Liu, Yanzhou Wang, Eric Lindgren, Yong Wang, Shunda Chen, Ke Xu, Ting Liang, Penghua Ying, Nan Xu, Zhiqiang Zhao, Jiuyang Shi, Junjie Wang, Shuang Lyu, Zezhu Zeng, Shirong Liang, Haikuan Dong, Ligang Sun, Yue Chen, Zhuhua Zhang, Wanlin Guo, Ping Qia...

    2024

  2. [11]

    Multifunc- tional high-entropy materials

    Liuliu Han, Shuya Zhu, Ziyuan Rao, Christina Scheu, Dirk Ponge, Alfred Ludwig, Hongbin Zhang, Oliver Gutfleisch, Horst Hahn, Zhiming Li, and Dierk Raabe, “Multifunc- tional high-entropy materials”,Nature Reviews Materials (2024),doi:10.1038/s41578-024-00720-y

    2024 doi

  3. [12]

    High-entropy alloys

    Easo P. George, Dierk Raabe, and Robert O. Ritchie, “High-entropy alloys”,Nature Reviews Materials(2019), doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4

    2019 doi

  4. [13]

    High- entropy ceramics

    Corey Oses, Cormac Toher, and Stefano Curtarolo, “High- entropy ceramics”,Nature Reviews Materials(2020),doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0170-8,url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/s41578-019-0170-8

    2020 doi

  5. [15]

    Md Rajib Khan Musa, Yichen Qian, Jie Peng, and David Cereceda,Accelerating the discovery of low-energy struc- ture configurations: a computational approach that inte- grates first-principles calculations, Monte Carlo sampling, and Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  6. [16]

    Nonequilibrium chemical short-range order in metallic alloys

    Mahmudul Islam, Killian Sheriff, Yifan Cao, and Rodrigo Freitas, “Nonequilibrium chemical short-range order in metallic alloys” (2024),url:https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2409.15474

    2024

  7. [17]

    Simultaneous Discovery of Reaction Co- ordinates and Committor Functions Using Equivariant Graph Neural Networks

    Killian Sheriff, Rodrigo Freitas, Amalie Trewartha, and Steven Torrisi, “Simultaneous Discovery of Reaction Co- ordinates and Committor Functions Using Equivariant Graph Neural Networks”,AI for Accelerated Materials De- sign - NeurIPS 2024, 2024,url:https://openreview. net/for...

    2024

  8. [18]

    Scaling deep learning for materials discovery

    Amil Merchant, Simon Batzner, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Muratahan Aykol, Gowoon Cheon, and Ekin Dogus Cubuk, “Scaling deep learning for materials discovery”, Nature(2023),doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9

    2023 doi

  9. [19]

    MLIP-3: Active learning on atomic environments with Moment Tensor Potentials

    Evgeny Podryabinkin, Kamil Garifullin, Alexander Shapeev, and Ivan Novikov, “MLIP-3: Active learning on atomic environments with Moment Tensor Potentials” (2023),url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13144

    2023 arXiv

  10. [20]

    Single- model uncertainty quantification in neural network po- tentials does not consistently outperform model ensem- bles

    Aik Rui Tan, Shingo Urata, Samuel Goldman, Johannes C. B. Dietschreit, and Rafael G´ omez-Bombarelli, “Single- model uncertainty quantification in neural network po- tentials does not consistently outperform model ensem- bles”,npj Computational Materials(2023),doi:10.1038/ s41...

    2023

  11. [21]

    Banerjee,Electronic structure prediction of medium and high entropy alloys across composition space, 2024,url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08294

    Shashank Pathrudkar, Stephanie Taylor, Abhishek Keri- pale, Abhijeet Sadashiv Gangan, Ponkrshnan Thiagara- jan, Shivang Agarwal, Jaime Marian, Susanta Ghosh, and Amartya S. Banerjee,Electronic structure prediction of medium and high entropy alloys across composition space, 202...

    2024

  12. [22]

    Active learning of reac- tive Bayesian force fields applied to heterogeneous catal- ysis dynamics of H/Pt

    Jonathan Vandermause, Yu Xie, Jin Soo Lim, Cameron J. Owen, and Boris Kozinsky, “Active learning of reac- tive Bayesian force fields applied to heterogeneous catal- ysis dynamics of H/Pt”,Nature Communications(2022), doi:10.1038/s41467- 022- 32294- 0,url:http://dx. doi.org/10....

    2022 doi

  13. [23]

    A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry

    Ilyes Batatia, Philipp Benner, Yuan Chiang, Alin M Elena, David P Kovacs, Janosh Riebesell, Xavier R Advincula, Mark Asta, William J Baldwin, Noam Bernstein, Arghya Bhowmik, Samuel M Blau, Vlad Carare, James P Darby, Sandip De, Flaviano Della Pia, Volker L Deringer, Rokas Elij...

    2023

  14. [24]

    Special quasirandom structures

    Alex Zunger, S. H. Wei, L. G. Ferreira, and James E. Bernard, “Special quasirandom structures”,Physical Re- view Letters(1990),doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353

    1990 doi

  15. [25]

    Efficient stochastic generation of Special Quasirandom Structures

    A. van de Walle, P. Tiwary, M. M. de Jong, D. L. Olm- sted, M. D. Asta, A. Dick, D. Shin, Y. Wang, L.-Q. Chen, and Z.-K. Liu, “Efficient stochastic generation of Special Quasirandom Structures”,Calphad(2013),doi:10.1016/ j.calphad.2013.06.006

    2013

  16. [26]

    Performant imple- mentation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon

    Yury Lysogorskiy, Cas Van Der Oord, Anton Bochkarev, Sarath Menon, Matteo Rinaldi, Thomas Hammerschmidt, Matous Mrovec, Aidan Thompson, G´ abor Cs´ anyi, Christoph Ortner, and Ralf Drautz, “Performant imple- mentation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to c...

    doi

  17. [27]

    Some Alloys for Use at High Temperatures. Part IV

    C.H.M. Jenkins, E.H. Bucknall, C.R. Austin, and G.A. Mellor, “Some Alloys for Use at High Temperatures. Part IV”,Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute(1937)

    1937

  18. [28]

    Characteristics of the Equilibrium Diagram and Processes of Solution and Pre- cipitation in the Cr-Ni System

    V.N. Svechnikov and V.M. Pan, “Characteristics of the Equilibrium Diagram and Processes of Solution and Pre- cipitation in the Cr-Ni System”,Sbornik Nauchnykh Rabot Instituta Metallofiziki, Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR (1962), In Russian

    1962

  19. [29]

    Adiabatic High Temperature Calorimeter for Measurement of Heats of Alloying

    W.A. Dench, “Adiabatic High Temperature Calorimeter for Measurement of Heats of Alloying”,Faraday Society Transactions(1963)

    1963

  20. [30]

    X-Ray Studies on the Nickel-Chromium System

    E.R. Jette, V.H. Nordstrom, B. Queneau, and F. Foote, “X-Ray Studies on the Nickel-Chromium System”,Insti- tute of Metals Division AIME(1934)

    1934

  21. [31]

    The Constitution of Nickel- Rich Alloys of the Ni-Cr-Ti System

    A. Taylor and R.W. Floyd, “The Constitution of Nickel- Rich Alloys of the Ni-Cr-Ti System”,Journal of the Insti- tute of Metals(1951)

    1951

  22. [32]

    Activities and Phase Boundaries in the Cr-Ni System Using a Solid Electrolyte Technique

    L.A. Pugliese and G.R. Fitterer, “Activities and Phase Boundaries in the Cr-Ni System Using a Solid Electrolyte Technique”,Metallurgical Transactions(1970)

    1970

  23. [33]

    Remarks on the Ordering in the Ni-Cr Al- loys in the Vicinity of Ni 2Cr

    L. Karmazin, “Remarks on the Ordering in the Ni-Cr Al- loys in the Vicinity of Ni 2Cr”,Czechoslovak Journal of Physics(1978)

    1978

  24. [34]

    Superstructure and K-State in the Cr-Ni Sys- tem

    H.G. Baer, “Superstructure and K-State in the Cr-Ni Sys- tem”,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Metallkunde(1958), In German

    1958

  25. [35]

    The Cr-Ni (Chromium-Nickel) system

    P. Nash, “The Cr-Ni (Chromium-Nickel) system”,Bul- letin of Alloy Phase Diagrams(1986),doi:10 . 1007 / BF02867812,url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1007 / BF02867812

    1986

  26. [36]

    On the Properties of the Co-Cr Binary System

    F. Wever and U. Hashimoto, “On the Properties of the Co-Cr Binary System”,Mitteilungen aus dem Kaiser- Wilhelm-Institut f¨ ur Eisenforschung(1929), In German

    1929

  27. [37]

    On the Equilibrium Diagram of the Cobalt-Chromium System

    Y. Matsunaga, “On the Equilibrium Diagram of the Cobalt-Chromium System”,Kinzoku-no-Kenkyu(1931), In Japanese

    1931

  28. [38]

    Mobility of Interphase Boundary in Metals

    A. Chiba, “Mobility of Interphase Boundary in Metals”, PhD thesis, Sendai, Japan: Tohoku University, 1971

    1971

  29. [39]

    Co- Cr Binary System: Experimental Re-Determination of the Phase Diagram and Comparison with the Diagram Cal- culated from the Thermodynamic Data

    C. Allibert, C. Bernard, N. Valignat, and M. Dombre, “Co- Cr Binary System: Experimental Re-Determination of the Phase Diagram and Comparison with the Diagram Cal- culated from the Thermodynamic Data”,Journal of the Less-Common Metals(1978)

    1978

  30. [40]

    A Study of the Range of Stability ofσPhase in Some Ternary Systems

    Z. Jin, “A Study of the Range of Stability ofσPhase in Some Ternary Systems”,Scandinavian Journal of Metal- lurgy(1981)

    1981

  31. [41]

    Computer Cal- culation of Phase Diagrams of Co-Cr and Co-Mn Sys- tems

    M. Hasebe, K. Oikawa, and T. Nishizawa, “Computer Cal- culation of Phase Diagrams of Co-Cr and Co-Mn Sys- tems”,Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals(1982), In Japanese

    1982

  32. [42]

    The Co-Cr (Cobalt- Chromium) System

    K. Ishida and T. Nishizawa, “The Co-Cr (Cobalt- Chromium) System”,Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams (1990)

    1990

  33. [43]

    Johansson and J.O

    C.H. Johansson and J.O. Linde, “Crystal Structures, Elec- trical Resistance, Thermal Forces, Heat Conductivity, Magnetic Susceptibility, Hardness, and Tempering Phe- nomena in the System Gold-Platinum in Relation to the Phase Diagram”,Annalen der Physik(1930), In German

    1930

  34. [44]

    X-Ray Examination of Al- loys of the Gold-Platinum System

    W. Stenzel and J. Weerts, “X-Ray Examination of Al- loys of the Gold-Platinum System”,Festschrift zum 50- j¨ ahrigen Bestehen der Platinschmelze, In German, G. Siebert G.m.b.H., 1931

    1931

  35. [45]

    The Gold-Platinum System

    A.S. Darling, R.A. Mintern, and J.C. Chaston, “The Gold-Platinum System”,Journal of the Institute of Metals (1952)

    1952

  36. [46]

    Precipita- tion in Gold-Platinum Alloys

    T.J. Tiedema, J. Bouman, and W.G. Burgers, “Precipita- tion in Gold-Platinum Alloys”,Acta Metallurgica(1957)

    1957

  37. [47]

    The System Gold-Platinum- Rhodium and the Binary Systems of Its Components

    E. Raub and G. Falkenburg, “The System Gold-Platinum- Rhodium and the Binary Systems of Its Components”, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Metallkunde(1964), In German

    1964

  38. [48]

    Two-Phase Boundary of the Au-Pt Sys- tem

    C.G. Wictorin, “Two-Phase Boundary of the Au-Pt Sys- tem”,Arkiv f¨ or Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik(1949)

    1949

  39. [49]

    Separation Curve and Criti- cal Point of the System Gold-Platinum

    A. M¨ unster and K. Sagel, “Separation Curve and Criti- cal Point of the System Gold-Platinum”,Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physikalische Chemie (Frankfurt)(1960), In German

    1960

  40. [50]

    The Au-Pt (Gold- Platinum) System

    H. Okamoto and T.B. Massalski, “The Au-Pt (Gold- Platinum) System”,Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams (1985)

    1985

  41. [51]

    Modelling of Ni-Cr-Mo Based Alloys: Part I - Phase Stability

    P.E.A. Turchi, L. Kaufman, and Z.K. Liu, “Modelling of Ni-Cr-Mo Based Alloys: Part I - Phase Stability”,CAL- PHAD: Computer Coupling of Phase Diagrams and Ther- mochemistry(2006),doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.10. 003

    2006 doi

  42. [52]

    Co-Cr (Cobalt-Chromium)

    H. Okamoto, “Co-Cr (Cobalt-Chromium)”,Jour- nal of Phase Equilibria(2003),doi:10 . 1361 / 105497103770330280

    2003

  43. [53]

    Au-Pt (Gold- Platinum)

    H. Okamoto and T.B. Massalski, “Au-Pt (Gold- Platinum)”,Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, ed. by T.B. Massalski, 2nd, Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1990,isbn: 0-87170-403-X

    1990

  44. [54]

    Multi-cell Monte Carlo method for phase prediction

    Changning Niu, You Rao, Wolfgang Windl, and Maryam Ghazisaeidi, “Multi-cell Monte Carlo method for phase prediction”,npj Computational Materials(2019),doi:10. 1038/s41524-019-0259-z. Page 10 of 12

    2019

  45. [55]

    Melting line of aluminum from simulations of coexist- ing phases

    James R Morris, CZ Wang, KM Ho, and Che Ting Chan, “Melting line of aluminum from simulations of coexist- ing phases”,Physical Review B(1994),doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB.49.3109

    1994

  46. [56]

    Quantitative phase-field model of alloy solidifica- tion

    Blas Echebarria, Roger Folch, Alain Karma, and Mathis Plapp, “Quantitative phase-field model of alloy solidifica- tion”,Physical Review E(2004),doi:10.1103/physreve. 70 . 061604,url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1103 / PhysRevE.70.061604

    2004 doi

  47. [57]

    Temperature dependence of the mechanical properties of equiatomic solid solution alloys with face- centered cubic crystal structures

    Zhenggang Wu, Hongbin Bei, George M Pharr, and Easo P George, “Temperature dependence of the mechanical properties of equiatomic solid solution alloys with face- centered cubic crystal structures”,Acta Materialia(2014), doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.026

    2014 doi

  48. [58]

    Optimization of conflicting properties via en- gineering compositional complexity in refractory high en- tropy alloys

    Il Hwan Kim, Hyun Seok Oh, Kwang Seok Lee, and Eun Soo Park, “Optimization of conflicting properties via en- gineering compositional complexity in refractory high en- tropy alloys”,Scripta Materialia(2021),doi:https : / / doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.113839

    2021

  49. [59]

    Short-Range Order and Atomic Displacements in Ni–20 at% Cr Single Crystals

    B. Sch¨ onfeld, L. Reinhard, G. Kostorz, and W. B¨ uhrer, “Short-Range Order and Atomic Displacements in Ni–20 at% Cr Single Crystals”,physica status solidi (b)(1988), doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221480203

    1988 doi

  50. [60]

    X-ray study of diffuse scat- tering in Ni–20 at% Cr

    B. Sch¨ onfeld, G. E. Ice, C. J. Sparks, H.-G. Haubold, W. Schweika, and L. B. Shaffer, “X-ray study of diffuse scat- tering in Ni–20 at% Cr”,physica status solidi (b)(1994), doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221830105

    1994 doi

  51. [61]

    In situdiffuse scattering of neu- trons in alloys and application to phase diagram determi- nation

    R. Caudron, M. Sarfati, M. Barrachin, A. Finel, F. Ducastelle, and F. Solal, “In situdiffuse scattering of neu- trons in alloys and application to phase diagram determi- nation”,Journal de Physique I(1992),doi:10.1051/jp1: 1992202

    1992 doi

  52. [62]

    Analysis of short-range order in Cu3Au using X-ray pair distribution functions

    L.R. Owen, H.Y. Playford, H.J. Stone, and M.G. Tucker, “Analysis of short-range order in Cu3Au using X-ray pair distribution functions”,Acta Materialia(2017),doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.048

    2017 doi

  53. [63]

    Non- local First-Principles Calculations in Cu-Au and Other In- termetallic Alloys

    Yongsheng Zhang, Georg Kresse, and C. Wolverton, “Non- local First-Principles Calculations in Cu-Au and Other In- termetallic Alloys”,Physical Review Letters(2014),doi: 10 . 1103 / physrevlett . 112 . 075502,url:http : / / dx . doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.075502

    2014 doi

  54. [64]

    Density functional theory is straying from the path toward the exact functional

    Michael G. Medvedev, Ivan S. Bushmarinov, Jianwei Sun, John P. Perdew, and Konstantin A. Lyssenko, “Density functional theory is straying from the path toward the exact functional”,Science(2017),doi:10.1126/science. aah5975,url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. aah5975

    2017 doi

  55. [65]

    Assessing the performance of recent density functionals for bulk solids

    G´ abor I. Csonka, John P. Perdew, Adrienn Ruzsinszky, Pier H. T. Philipsen, S´ ebastien Leb` egue, Joachim Paier, Oleg A. Vydrov, and J´ anos G. ´Angy´ an, “Assessing the performance of recent density functionals for bulk solids”, Physical Review B(2009),doi:10.1103/physrevb....

    2009 doi

  56. [66]

    Thermophysical properties of Ni-containing single-phase concentrated solid solution al- loys

    K. Jin, S. Mu, K. An, W.D. Porter, G.D. Samolyuk, G.M. Stocks, and H. Bei, “Thermophysical properties of Ni-containing single-phase concentrated solid solution al- loys”,Materials & Design(2017),doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.079

    2017 doi

  57. [67]

    M Chase,NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th Edi- tion, en, American Institute of Physics, -1, 1998

    1998

  58. [68]

    An Approximate Theory of Order in Al- loys

    J. M. Cowley, “An Approximate Theory of Order in Al- loys”,Physical Review(1950), Publisher: American Phys- ical Society,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.77.669

    1950 doi

  59. [69]

    Data-driven simulation and charac- terisation of gold nanoparticle melting

    Claudio Zeni, Kevin Rossi, Theodore Pavloudis, Joseph Kioseoglou, Stefano de Gironcoli, Richard E. Palmer, and Francesca Baletto, “Data-driven simulation and charac- terisation of gold nanoparticle melting”,Nature Commu- nications(2021),doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26199-7

    2021 doi

  60. [70]

    Composition-dependent transformation-induced plastic- ity in Co-based complex concentrated alloys

    Hyun Seok Oh, Michael Xu, Shaolou Wei, Felicity F. Worsnop, James M. LeBeau, and C. Cem Tasan, “Composition-dependent transformation-induced plastic- ity in Co-based complex concentrated alloys”,Acta Ma- terialia(2024),doi:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / j . actamat.2023.119349

    2024

  61. [71]

    Exceptional fracture toughness of CrCoNi-based medium- and high- entropy alloys at 20 kelvin

    Dong Liu, Qin Yu, Saurabh Kabra, Ming Jiang, Paul Forna-Kreutzer, Ruopeng Zhang, Madelyn Payne, Flynn Walsh, Bernd Gludovatz, Mark Asta, Andrew M. Mi- nor, Easo P. George, and Robert O. Ritchie, “Exceptional fracture toughness of CrCoNi-based medium- and high- entropy alloys a...

    2022

  62. [72]

    Stacking fault energy in concentrated al- loys

    Mulaine Shih, Jiashi Miao, Michael Mills, and Maryam Ghazisaeidi, “Stacking fault energy in concentrated al- loys”,Nature Communications(2021),doi:10 . 1038 / s41467-021-23860-z

    2021

  63. [73]

    Tunable stacking fault energies by tailoring local chem- ical order in CrCoNi medium-entropy alloys

    Jun Ding, Qin Yu, Mark Asta, and Robert O. Ritchie, “Tunable stacking fault energies by tailoring local chem- ical order in CrCoNi medium-entropy alloys”,Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences(2018),doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808660115

    2018 doi

  64. [74]

    Complex Strengthening Mechanisms in the NbMoTaW Multi-Principal Element Alloy

    Xiang-Guo Li, Chi Chen, Hui Zheng, Yunxing Zuo, and Shyue Ping Ong, “Complex Strengthening Mechanisms in the NbMoTaW Multi-Principal Element Alloy”,npj Com- putational Materials(2020),doi:10.1038/s41524- 020- 0339-0

    2020 doi

  65. [75]

    Multi-scale investigation of short- range order and dislocation glide in MoNbTi and TaNbTi multi-principal element alloys

    Hui Zheng, Lauren T. W. Fey, Xiang-Guo Li, Yong-Jie Hu, Liang Qi, Chi Chen, Shuozhi Xu, Irene J. Beyerlein, and Shyue Ping Ong, “Multi-scale investigation of short- range order and dislocation glide in MoNbTi and TaNbTi multi-principal element alloys”,npj Computational Mate- r...

    2023 doi

  66. [76]

    Atomistic Simulations of Dislocation Mobility in Refractory High-Entropy Alloys and the Effect of Chemical Short-Range Order

    Sheng Yin, Yunxing Zuo, Anas Abu-Odeh, Hui Zheng, Xiang-Guo Li, Jun Ding, Shyue Ping Ong, Mark Asta, and Robert O. Ritchie, “Atomistic Simulations of Dislocation Mobility in Refractory High-Entropy Alloys and the Effect of Chemical Short-Range Order”,Nature Communications (202...

    2021 doi

  67. [77]

    Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Models

    Luis Barroso-Luque, Muhammed Shuaibi, Xiang Fu, Brandon M. Wood, Misko Dzamba, Meng Gao, Ammar Rizvi, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Zachary W. Ulissi, “Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Models” (2024)

    2024

  68. [78]

    Page 11 of 12

    Fei Shuang, Zixiong Wei, Kai Liu, Wei Gao, and Pou- lumi Dey,Universal machine learning interatomic poten- tials poised to supplant DFT in modeling general defects in metals and random alloys, 2025. Page 11 of 12

    2025

  69. [79]

    Accelerating CALPHAD-based phase diagram predic- tions in complex alloys using universal machine learning potentials: Opportunities and challenges

    Siya Zhu, Do˘ guhan Sarıt¨ urk, and Raymundo Arr´ oyave, “Accelerating CALPHAD-based phase diagram predic- tions in complex alloys using universal machine learning potentials: Opportunities and challenges”,Acta Materi- alia(2025),doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat. 2025.120747

    2025

  70. [80]

    Levine, Muhammed Shuaibi, Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith, Michael G

    Daniel S. Levine, Muhammed Shuaibi, Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith, Michael G. Taylor, Muhammad R. Hasyim, Kyle Michel, Ilyes Batatia, G´ abor Cs´ anyi, Misko Dzamba, Peter Eastman, Nathan C. Frey, Xiang Fu, Vahe Gharakhanyan, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan, Joshua A. Rackers, Sanjeev...

    2025

  71. [81]

    A generative model for inorganic materials design

    Claudio Zeni, Robert Pinsler, Daniel Z¨ ugner, Andrew Fowler, Matthew Horton, Xiang Fu, Zilong Wang, Aliak- sandra Shysheya, Jonathan Crabb´ e, Shoko Ueda, Roberto Sordillo, Lixin Sun, Jake Smith, Bichlien Nguyen, Hannes Schulz, Sarah Lewis, Chin-Wei Huang, Ziheng Lu, Yichi Zh...

    2025 doi

  72. [82]

    Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approxima- tion

    James W. Furness, Aaron D. Kaplan, Jinliang Ning, John P. Perdew, and Jianwei Sun, “Accurate and Numerically Efficient r2SCAN Meta-Generalized Gradient Approxima- tion”,The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters(2020), PMID: 32876454,doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405

    2020 doi

  73. [83]

    CIDER: An Expres- sive, Nonlocal Feature Set for Machine Learning Density Functionals with Exact Constraints

    Kyle Bystrom and Boris Kozinsky, “CIDER: An Expres- sive, Nonlocal Feature Set for Machine Learning Density Functionals with Exact Constraints”,Journal of Chem- ical Theory and Computation(2022), PMID: 35235322, doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00904

    2022 doi

  74. [84]

    Training Machine-Learned Density Functionals on Band Gaps

    Kyle Bystrom, Stefano Falletta, and Boris Kozinsky, “Training Machine-Learned Density Functionals on Band Gaps”,Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2024), PMID: 39178337,doi:10 . 1021 / acs . jctc . 4c00999

    2024

  75. [85]

    Ryosuke Akashi, Mihira Sogal, and Kieron Burke,Can machines learn density functionals? Past, present, and fu- ture of ML in DFT, 2025,url:https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2503.01709

    2025 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Data-Efficient Machine Learning Potentials from Transfer Learning of Periodic Correlated Electronic Struc- ture Methods: Liquid Water at AFQMC, CCSD, and CCSD(T) Accuracy

    Michael S. Chen, Joonho Lee, Hong-Zhou Ye, Timothy C. Berkelbach, David R. Reichman, and Thomas E. Mark- land, “Data-Efficient Machine Learning Potentials from Transfer Learning of Periodic Correlated Electronic Struc- ture Methods: Liquid Water at AFQMC, CCSD, and CCSD(T) Acc...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.