pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23038 · v1 · pith:XOELXZHNnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

JWST reveals anomalously enhanced methane outgassing from below Chiron's water ice and carbon dioxide bearing surface

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 05:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords CentaursChironmethane outgassingcarbon dioxideJWST spectroscopyvolatile stratificationcometary activitysurface ices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Methane gas on Chiron originates from subsurface layers while carbon dioxide is released by direct surface sublimation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that JWST spectra of the Centaur Chiron detect methane and carbon dioxide gas with different spatial distributions in the coma and production rates of about 1.55 times 10 to the 27 and 1.01 times 10 to the 26 molecules per second. The surface shows water ice, carbon dioxide, solid CO, and organics but no methane ice absorption, and no gaseous CO is detected. A reader would care because this points to layered ices shaped by thermal evolution rather than the usual CO-driven activity assumed for Centaurs. The findings imply that methane comes from below while carbon dioxide sublimes from the top, and any deep primordial CO stays trapped.

Core claim

High-resolution JWST spectroscopy of 2060 Chiron reveals methane and carbon dioxide gas emission with distinct coma spatial morphologies and production rates of Q_CH4 = (1.55 ± 0.04) × 10^27 molecules s^{-1} and Q_CO2 = (1.01 ± 0.06) × 10^26 molecules s^{-1}. The surface spectrum displays spectral signatures of water ice, carbon dioxide, CO, and refractory organic-rich material but lacks detectable methane ice absorption bands. These findings suggest that carbon dioxide production is sustained by direct surface sublimation, whereas methane originates from the subsurface. The absence of measurable CO emission despite the presence of solid-state CO implies that any surviving primordial CO is a

What carries the argument

Distinct spatial morphologies of the methane and carbon dioxide comae, which are interpreted as evidence for different emission source depths.

If this is right

  • Carbon dioxide production is sustained by direct surface sublimation.
  • Methane originates from the subsurface.
  • Any surviving primordial CO reservoir remains thermally inaccessible at greater depth below the methane.
  • Irradiation-produced near-surface CO may be inefficiently released from the surface matrix.
  • Centaur activity may be driven by a broader range of volatile and thermophysical processes than predicted by canonical models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar depth-dependent volatile release could occur on other large Centaurs or trans-Neptunian objects that have experienced comparable thermal processing.
  • Long-term monitoring of coma shapes on Chiron could test whether the inferred layering changes with orbital distance or season.
  • The lack of methane ice on the surface combined with subsurface methane gas suggests a mechanism that transports or exposes deeper ices without fully mixing the upper layers.

Load-bearing premise

The different spatial shapes of the methane and carbon dioxide comae are caused by their release from different depths rather than by excitation conditions, viewing angle, or other release factors.

What would settle it

Repeated spectroscopy showing identical spatial distributions for methane and carbon dioxide emission under comparable conditions would remove support for separate source depths.

read the original abstract

Centaurs are inward-scattered Kuiper belt objects, with some exhibiting comet-like activity. The physical mechanisms powering this activity remain poorly understood, with carbon monoxide (CO) sublimation or the crystallization of amorphous water ice commonly invoked as the dominant drivers. Here we present high-resolution JWST spectroscopy of 2060 Chiron, one of the largest known Centaurs, revealing methane and carbon dioxide gas emission with distinct coma spatial morphologies and production rates of $Q_{\rm CH_4}=(1.55\pm0.04)\times10^{27}$ molecules s$^{-1}$ and $Q_{\rm CO_2}=(1.01\pm0.06)\times10^{26}$ molecules s$^{-1}$. The surface spectrum displays spectral signatures attributed to water ice, carbon dioxide, CO, and refractory organic-rich material, while lacking detectable methane ice absorption bands. These findings suggest that carbon dioxide production is sustained by direct surface sublimation, whereas methane originates from the subsurface. The absence of measurable CO emission despite the presence of solid-state CO implies that any surviving primordial CO reservoir remains thermally inaccessible at greater depth below the methane, while irradiation-produced near-surface CO may be inefficiently released from the surface matrix. This inferred volatile stratification may result from long-term thermal evolution or potentially partial differentiation. Chiron differs markedly from other active small bodies, where CO production typically dominates over methane, indicating that Centaur activity may be driven by a broader range of volatile and thermophysical processes than predicted by canonical models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST high-resolution spectroscopy of Centaur 2060 Chiron, detecting CH4 and CO2 gas emission in the coma with distinct spatial morphologies and production rates Q_CH4 = (1.55 ± 0.04) × 10^27 molecules s^{-1} and Q_CO2 = (1.01 ± 0.06) × 10^26 molecules s^{-1}. The surface reflectance spectrum shows features attributed to water ice, CO2, CO, and refractory organics but lacks detectable CH4 ice bands. The authors interpret the morphology differences as evidence that CO2 production occurs via direct surface sublimation while CH4 originates from the subsurface, with the lack of CO gas emission implying that any primordial CO reservoir is thermally inaccessible at greater depth; this leads to a proposed volatile stratification possibly from thermal evolution or partial differentiation, contrasting with CO-dominated activity in other active bodies.

Significance. If the depth interpretation holds, the work would provide key observational constraints on volatile stratification and activity drivers in Centaurs, showing that methane outgassing can dominate over CO and that CO2 can be sustained by surface processes. The reported production rates with formal uncertainties and the non-detection of CH4 ice offer falsifiable inputs for thermophysical models of Kuiper-belt objects and their inward evolution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that distinct coma spatial morphologies indicate CH4 from subsurface sources and CO2 from surface sublimation (abstract) is load-bearing for the stratification conclusion, yet the manuscript provides no description of the spatial mapping procedure, no quantitative comparison of morphologies, and no controls for alternative explanations such as excitation conditions, optical depth variations, or viewing geometry.
  2. [Results] Production rates are stated with formal uncertainties, but the text gives no details on spectral extraction, line flux measurement, or the coma model assumptions used to convert fluxes to Q values; this information is required to evaluate the robustness of the reported numbers and the claimed difference in source depths.
  3. [Surface spectrum analysis] The absence of measurable CH4 ice bands is used to support a subsurface CH4 source, but the manuscript does not report the upper limit on CH4 ice abundance or the method used to establish the non-detection, leaving the link between surface composition and outgassing origin unquantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for production rates (Q_CH4, Q_CO2) is standard but should be defined explicitly on first use and used consistently in all figures and tables.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'distinct coma spatial morphologies' without referencing a specific figure or table showing the spatial maps; adding such a cross-reference would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review, which has helped us improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper to incorporate additional methodological details and quantitative analyses as requested.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that distinct coma spatial morphologies indicate CH4 from subsurface sources and CO2 from surface sublimation (abstract) is load-bearing for the stratification conclusion, yet the manuscript provides no description of the spatial mapping procedure, no quantitative comparison of morphologies, and no controls for alternative explanations such as excitation conditions, optical depth variations, or viewing geometry.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript lacked sufficient detail on the spatial analysis. In the revised version, we have added a dedicated Methods subsection describing the spatial mapping procedure (slit extraction, background subtraction, and profile construction from the JWST NIRSpec data). We now include quantitative comparisons (FWHM values, asymmetry indices, and radial extent metrics for CH4 vs. CO2) and explicitly discuss controls for alternative explanations, including checks that the morphology differences are robust against variations in excitation temperature, optical depth (via line ratio analysis), and the specific viewing geometry at the time of observation. These additions directly support the source-depth interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Production rates are stated with formal uncertainties, but the text gives no details on spectral extraction, line flux measurement, or the coma model assumptions used to convert fluxes to Q values; this information is required to evaluate the robustness of the reported numbers and the claimed difference in source depths.

    Authors: We acknowledge this omission. The revised manuscript now details the spectral extraction (aperture selection and telluric correction), line flux measurements (Gaussian profile fitting with continuum subtraction), and the coma model (Haser model with adopted scale lengths, outflow velocity of 0.5 km/s, and parent/daughter lifetimes). Uncertainties are propagated from the measured fluxes through the model parameters. These additions allow readers to assess the robustness of Q_CH4 and Q_CO2 and the inference of distinct source regions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Surface spectrum analysis] The absence of measurable CH4 ice bands is used to support a subsurface CH4 source, but the manuscript does not report the upper limit on CH4 ice abundance or the method used to establish the non-detection, leaving the link between surface composition and outgassing origin unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative upper limit strengthens the argument. The revised surface spectrum analysis section now reports the 3-sigma upper limit on CH4 ice abundance (<0.5% by area, derived from the 1-sigma noise level in the 2.3-2.4 micron region and laboratory band strengths) and describes the method (comparison of observed spectrum to synthetic mixtures of water ice, CO2, and organics with varying CH4 fractions). This quantifies the non-detection and supports the subsurface origin for the observed CH4 outgassing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational derivation from measured fluxes and morphologies

full rationale

The paper reports JWST spectral measurements of line fluxes to compute production rates Q_CH4 and Q_CO2 directly from data. The inference linking distinct coma morphologies to subsurface vs. surface sources is presented as an interpretive suggestion without any equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce the reported values or conclusions to quantities defined by the authors' prior work. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the provided text. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard spectroscopic assumptions and the interpretation of spatial morphology; no new entities are postulated and the only numbers introduced are the measured production rates themselves.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Coma spatial morphology differences reliably trace source depth differences rather than excitation or optical-depth effects.
    Invoked when mapping distinct morphologies to subsurface vs surface origins.
  • domain assumption Non-detection of methane ice bands implies absence of methane ice on the surface at detectable levels.
    Used to conclude methane is not present as surface ice.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5865 in / 1410 out tokens · 18668 ms · 2026-05-25T05:04:13.046245+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Levison, H. F. & Duncan, M. J. From the Kuiper Belt to Jupiter-Family Comets: The Spatial Distribution of Ecliptic Comets.Icarus127, 13–32 (1997)

  2. [2]

    Tiscareno, M. S. & Malhotra, R. The Dynamics of Known Centaurs.Astron. J. 126, 3122–3131 (2003)

  3. [3]

    J.845, 27 (2017)

    Nesvorn´ y, D.et al.Origin and Evolution of Short-period Comets.Astrophys. J.845, 27 (2017)

  4. [4]

    Gehrels, T.et al.Slow-Moving Object Kowal.IAU Circ.3130, 1 (1977)

  5. [5]

    Astrophys

    Lellouch, E.et al.The thermal emission of Centaurs and trans-Neptunian objects at millimeter wavelengths from ALMA observations.Astron. Astrophys. 608, A45 (2017)

  6. [6]

    & Tegler, S

    Romanishin, W. & Tegler, S. C. Albedos of Centaurs, Jovian Trojans, and 16 Hildas.Astron. J.156, 19 (2018)

  7. [7]

    K., Tholen, D

    Hartmann, W. K., Tholen, D. J., Meech, K. J. & Cruikshank, D. P. 2060 Chiron: Colorimetry and cometary behavior.Icarus83, 1–15 (1990)

  8. [8]

    J.108, 2318 (1994)

    Campins, H.et al.The Color Temperature of (2060) Chiron: A Warm and Small Nucleus.Astron. J.108, 2318 (1994)

  9. [9]

    J., Green, S

    Foster, M. J., Green, S. F., McBride, N. & Davies, J. K. NOTE: Detection of Water Ice on 2060 Chiron.Icarus141, 408–410 (1999)

  10. [10]

    X., Jewitt, D

    Luu, J. X., Jewitt, D. C. & Trujillo, C. Water Ice in 2060 Chiron and Its Implications for Centaurs and Kuiper Belt Objects.Astrophys. J. Lett.531, L151–L154 (2000)

  11. [11]

    L.et al.Possible ring material around centaur (2060) Chiron.Astron

    Ortiz, J. L.et al.Possible ring material around centaur (2060) Chiron.Astron. Astrophys.576, A18 (2015)

  12. [12]

    M.et al.The Discovery and Evolution of a Possible New Epoch of Cometary Activity by the Centaur (2060) Chiron.Planet

    Dobson, M. M.et al.The Discovery and Evolution of a Possible New Epoch of Cometary Activity by the Centaur (2060) Chiron.Planet. Sci. J.5, 165 (2024)

  13. [13]

    J.et al.(2060) Chiron.IAU Circ.4554, 2 (1988)

    Tholen, D. J.et al.(2060) Chiron.IAU Circ.4554, 2 (1988)

  14. [14]

    Luu, J. X. & Jewitt, D. C. Cometary Activity in 2060 Chiron.Astron. J.100, 913 (1990)

  15. [15]

    Meech, K. J. & Belton, M. J. S. The Atmosphere of 2060 Chiron.Astron. J. 100, 1323 (1990)

  16. [16]

    L.et al.Jet-like features near the nucleus of Chiron.Nature373, 46–49 (1995)

    Elliot, J. L.et al.Jet-like features near the nucleus of Chiron.Nature373, 46–49 (1995)

  17. [17]

    J.et al.Stellar Occultation by 2060 Chiron.Icarus123, 478–490 (1996)

    Bus, S. J.et al.Stellar Occultation by 2060 Chiron.Icarus123, 478–490 (1996)

  18. [18]

    J., A’Hearn, M

    Bus, S. J., A’Hearn, M. F., Schleicher, D. G. & Bowell, E. Detection of CN Emission from (2060) Chiron.Science251, 774–777 (1991)

  19. [19]

    & Stern, S

    Womack, M. & Stern, S. A. The Detection of Carbon Monoxide Gas Emission in (2060) Chiron.Solar System Research33, 187 (1999)

  20. [20]

    L.et al.Changing material around (2060) Chiron revealed by an occultation on December 15, 2022.Astron

    Ortiz, J. L.et al.Changing material around (2060) Chiron revealed by an occultation on December 15, 2022.Astron. Astrophys.676, L12 (2023)

  21. [21]

    L.et al.The Rings of (2060) Chiron: Evidence of an Evolving System

    Pereira, C. L.et al.The Rings of (2060) Chiron: Evidence of an Evolving System. Astrophys. J. Lett.992, L19 (2025)

  22. [22]

    D.et al.29 November 2011 stellar occultation by 2060 Chiron: Symmetric jet-like features.Icarus252, 271–276 (2015)

    Ruprecht, J. D.et al.29 November 2011 stellar occultation by 2060 Chiron: Symmetric jet-like features.Icarus252, 271–276 (2015). 17

  23. [23]

    A.et al.Characterization of material around the centaur (2060) Chiron from a visible and near-infrared stellar occultation in 2011.Mon

    Sickafoose, A. A.et al.Characterization of material around the centaur (2060) Chiron from a visible and near-infrared stellar occultation in 2011.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.491, 3643–3654 (2020)

  24. [24]

    A.et al.Material around the Centaur (2060) Chiron from the 2018 November 28 UT Stellar Occultation.Planet

    Sickafoose, A. A.et al.Material around the Centaur (2060) Chiron from the 2018 November 28 UT Stellar Occultation.Planet. Sci. J.4, 221 (2023)

  25. [25]

    Braga-Ribas, F.et al.Constraints on (2060) Chiron’s size, shape, and surround- ing material from the November 2018 and September 2019 stellar occultations. Astron. Astrophys.676, A72 (2023)

  26. [26]

    Cochran, A. L. & Cochran, W. D. The first detection of CN and the distribution of CO + gas in the coma of Comet P/Schwassmann-Wachman 1.Icarus90, 172–175 (1991)

  27. [27]

    & Wierzchos, K

    Womack, M., Sarid, G. & Wierzchos, K. CO and Other Volatiles in Distantly Active Comets.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.129, 031001 (2017)

  28. [28]

    Cabral, N.et al.OSSOS. XI. No active centaurs in the Outer Solar System Origins Survey.Astron. Astrophys.621, A102 (2019)

  29. [29]

    & Weaver, H

    Li, J., Jewitt, D., Mutchler, M., Agarwal, J. & Weaver, H. Hubble Space Telescope Search for Activity in High-perihelion Objects.Astron. J.159, 209 (2020)

  30. [30]

    Lilly, E.et al.No Activity among 13 Centaurs Discovered in the Pan-STARRS1 Detection Database.Planet. Sci. J.2, 155 (2021)

  31. [31]

    & Ianovici, D

    Prialnik, D., Brosch, N. & Ianovici, D. Modelling the activity of 2060 Chiron. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.276, 1148–1154 (1995)

  32. [32]

    Prialnik, D., Sarid, G., Rosenberg, E. D. & Merk, R. Thermal and Chemical Evolution of Comet Nuclei and Kuiper Belt Objects.Space Sci. Rev.138, 147–164 (2008)

  33. [33]

    Survival of Amorphous Water Ice on Centaurs.Astron

    Guilbert-Lepoutre, A. Survival of Amorphous Water Ice on Centaurs.Astron. J.144, 97 (2012)

  34. [34]

    M.et al.New or Increased Cometary Activity in (2060) 95P/Chiron

    Dobson, M. M.et al.New or Increased Cometary Activity in (2060) 95P/Chiron. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society5, 211 (2021)

  35. [35]

    Astrophys.692, L11 (2024)

    Pinilla-Alonso, N.et al.Unveiling the ice and gas nature of active centaur (2060) Chiron using the James Webb Space Telescope.Astron. Astrophys.692, L11 (2024)

  36. [36]

    Jakobsen, P.et al.The Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) on the James Webb Space Telescope. I. Overview of the instrument and its capabilities. Astron. Astrophys.661, A80 (2022). 18

  37. [37]

    B¨ oker, T.et al.In-orbit Performance of the Near-infrared Spectrograph NIRSpec on the James Webb Space Telescope.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.135, 038001 (2023)

  38. [38]

    Pinilla-Alonso, N.et al.A JWST/DiSCo-TNOs portrait of the primordial Solar System through its trans-Neptunian objects.NatAs9, 230–244 (2025)

  39. [39]

    J.et al.A Descriptive Taxonomic Nomenclature for Intermediate-sized Trans-Neptunian Object Spectra.RNAAS9, 241 (2025)

    Holler, B. J.et al.A Descriptive Taxonomic Nomenclature for Intermediate-sized Trans-Neptunian Object Spectra.RNAAS9, 241 (2025)

  40. [40]

    & Schmitt, B

    Quirico, E. & Schmitt, B. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy of Simple Hydrocarbons and Carbon Oxides Diluted in Solid N2 and as Pure Ices: Implications for Triton and Pluto.Icarus127, 354–378 (1997)

  41. [41]

    Hansen, G. B. The infrared absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide ice from 1.8 to 333µm.J. Geophys. Res.102, 21569–21588 (1997)

  42. [42]

    Protopapa, S.et al.Detection of carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide on the stratified surface of Charon with JWST.Nature Communications15, 8247 (2024)

  43. [43]

    P.et al.Ices on the Surface of Triton.Science261, 742–745 (1993)

    Cruikshank, D. P.et al.Ices on the Surface of Triton.Science261, 742–745 (1993)

  44. [44]

    Quirico, E.et al.Composition, Physical State, and Distribution of Ices at the Surface of Triton.Icarus139, 159–178 (1999)

  45. [45]

    M.et al.Near-infrared spectral monitoring of Triton with IRT- F/SpeX II: Spatial distribution and evolution of ices.Icarus205, 594–604 (2010)

    Grundy, W. M.et al.Near-infrared spectral monitoring of Triton with IRT- F/SpeX II: Spatial distribution and evolution of ices.Icarus205, 594–604 (2010)

  46. [46]

    J., Young, L

    Holler, B. J., Young, L. A., Grundy, W. M. & Olkin, C. B. On the surface composition of Triton’s southern latitudes.Icarus267, 255–266 (2016)

  47. [47]

    (ed.none)LPI Contributions, Vol

    Wong, I.et al.none (ed.)The Complex Surface and Atmosphere of Tri- ton as Revealed by JWST. (ed.none)LPI Contributions, Vol. 3059 ofLPI Contributions, 7047 (2025)

  48. [48]

    Hapke, B.Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993)

  49. [49]

    Hapke, B.Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012)

  50. [50]

    N.et al.Production and Optical Constants of Ice Tholin from Charged Particle Irradiation of (1:6) C 2H 6/H 2O at 77 K.Icarus103, 290–300 (1993)

    Khare, B. N.et al.Production and Optical Constants of Ice Tholin from Charged Particle Irradiation of (1:6) C 2H 6/H 2O at 77 K.Icarus103, 290–300 (1993)

  51. [51]

    L., Smith, M

    Villanueva, G. L., Smith, M. D., Protopapa, S., Faggi, S. & Mandell, A. M. 19 Planetary Spectrum Generator: An accurate online radiative transfer suite for atmospheres, comets, small bodies and exoplanets.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.217, 86–104 (2018)

  52. [52]

    Villanueva, G. L.et al. Fundamentals of the Planetary Spectrum Generator (2022)

  53. [53]

    Delsemme, A. H. Wilkening, L. L. (ed.)Chemical composition of cometary nuclei. (ed.Wilkening, L. L.)IAU Colloquium 61: Comet Discoveries, Statistics, and Observational Selection, 85–130 (1982)

  54. [54]

    Fornasier, S.et al.TNOs are Cool: A survey of the trans-Neptunian region. VIII. Combined Herschel PACS and SPIRE observations of nine bright targets at 70-500µm.Astron. Astrophys.555, A15 (2013)

  55. [55]

    & Podolak, M

    Prialnik, D., Benkhoff, J. & Podolak, M. inModeling the structure and activity of comet nuclei(eds Festou, M. C., Keller, H. U. & Weaver, H. A.)Comets II 359 (2004)

  56. [56]

    The Active Centaurs.Astron

    Jewitt, D. The Active Centaurs.Astron. J.137, 4296–4312 (2009)

  57. [57]

    A., Moore, J

    Protopapa, S.et al.inSurface Composition of Charon(eds Stern, S. A., Moore, J. M., Grundy, W. M., Young, L. A. & Binzel, R. P.)The Pluto System After New Horizons433–456 (2021)

  58. [58]

    Astrophys.583, A1 (2015)

    Le Roy, L.et al.Inventory of the volatiles on comet 67P/Churyumov- Gerasimenko from Rosetta/ROSINA.Astron. Astrophys.583, A1 (2015)

  59. [59]

    Dello Russo, N., Kawakita, H., Vervack, R. J. & Weaver, H. A. Emerging trends and a comet taxonomy based on the volatile chemistry measured in thirty comets with high-resolution infrared spectroscopy between 1997 and 2013.Icarus278, 301–332 (2016)

  60. [60]

    P.et al.Beyond 3 au from the Sun: The Hypervolatiles CH 4, C2H6, and CO in the Distant Comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen).Astron

    Bonev, B. P.et al.Beyond 3 au from the Sun: The Hypervolatiles CH 4, C2H6, and CO in the Distant Comet C/2006 W3 (Christensen).Astron. J.153, 241 (2017)

  61. [61]

    A.et al.Hypervolatiles in a Jupiter-family Comet: Observations of 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajduˇ s´ akov´ a Using iSHELL at the NASA-IRTF.Astron

    DiSanti, M. A.et al.Hypervolatiles in a Jupiter-family Comet: Observations of 45P/Honda-Mrkos-Pajduˇ s´ akov´ a Using iSHELL at the NASA-IRTF.Astron. J. 154, 246 (2017)

  62. [62]

    X.et al.The Composition of Comet C/2012 K1 (PanSTARRS) and the Distribution of Primary Volatile Abundances among Comets.Astron

    Roth, N. X.et al.The Composition of Comet C/2012 K1 (PanSTARRS) and the Distribution of Primary Volatile Abundances among Comets.Astron. J. 153, 168 (2017)

  63. [63]

    A.et al.Comet C/2013 V5 (Oukaimeden): Evidence for Depleted Organic Volatiles and Compositional Heterogeneity as Revealed through 20 Infrared Spectroscopy.Astron

    DiSanti, M. A.et al.Comet C/2013 V5 (Oukaimeden): Evidence for Depleted Organic Volatiles and Compositional Heterogeneity as Revealed through 20 Infrared Spectroscopy.Astron. J.156, 258 (2018)

  64. [64]

    L., Mumma, M

    Faggi, S., Villanueva, G. L., Mumma, M. J. & Paganini, L. The Volatile Composition of Comet C/2017 E4 (Lovejoy) before its Disruption, as Revealed by High-resolution Infrared Spectroscopy with iSHELL at the NASA/IRTF. Astron. J.156, 68 (2018)

  65. [65]

    J., Villanueva, G

    Faggi, S., Mumma, M. J., Villanueva, G. L., Paganini, L. & Lippi, M. Quantify- ing the Evolution of Molecular Production Rates of Comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner with iSHELL/NASA-IRTF.Astron. J.158, 254 (2019)

  66. [66]

    J.et al.The Peculiar Volatile Composition of CO-dominated Comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS).Astron

    McKay, A. J.et al.The Peculiar Volatile Composition of CO-dominated Comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS).Astron. J.158, 128 (2019)

  67. [67]

    A.et al.Volatile Composition and Outgassing in C/2018 Y1 (Iwamoto): Extending Limits for High-resolution Infrared Cometary Spec- troscopy between 2.8 and 5.0µm.Planet

    DiSanti, M. A.et al.Volatile Composition and Outgassing in C/2018 Y1 (Iwamoto): Extending Limits for High-resolution Infrared Cometary Spec- troscopy between 2.8 and 5.0µm.Planet. Sci. J.2, 225 (2021)

  68. [68]

    J.162, 178 (2021)

    Faggi, S.et al.The Extraordinary Passage of Comet C/2020 F3 NEOWISE: Evidence for Heterogeneous Chemical Inventory in Its Nucleus.Astron. J.162, 178 (2021)

  69. [69]

    Dello Russo, N.et al.Volatile Abundances, Extended Coma Sources, and Nucleus Ice Associations in Comet C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy).Planet. Sci. J.3, 6 (2022)

  70. [70]

    Faggi, S., Lippi, M., Mumma, M. J. & Villanueva, G. L. Strongly Depleted Methanol and Hypervolatiles in Comet C/2021 A1 (Leonard): Signatures of Interstellar Chemistry?Planet. Sci. J.4, 8 (2023)

  71. [71]

    Faggi, S.et al.Heterogeneous outgassing regions identified on active centaur 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1.Nature Astronomy8, 1237–1245 (2024)

  72. [72]

    Harrington Pinto, O.et al.First Detection of CO 2 Emission in a Centaur: JWST NIRSpec Observations of 39P/Oterma.Planet. Sci. J.4, 208 (2023)

  73. [73]

    Snodgrass, C.et al.First JWST spectrum of distant activity in long-period comet C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.541, L8–L13 (2025)

  74. [74]

    Schaller, E. L. & Brown, M. E. Volatile Loss and Retention on Kuiper Belt Objects.Astrophys. J. Lett.659, L61–L64 (2007)

  75. [75]

    & Schmitt, B

    Fray, N. & Schmitt, B. Sublimation of ices of astrophysical interest: A bibliographic review.Planet. Space Sci.57, 2053–2080 (2009)

  76. [76]

    Protopapa, S.et al.JWST Detection of Hydrocarbon Ices and Methane Gas on Makemake.Astrophys. J. Lett.991, L34 (2025). 21

  77. [77]

    Guilbert-Lepoutre, A., Gkotsinas, A., Raymond, S. N. & Nesvorny, D. The Gateway from Centaurs to Jupiter-family Comets: Thermal and Dynamical Evolution.Astrophys. J.942, 92 (2023)

  78. [78]

    R., Palumbo, M

    Brucato, J. R., Palumbo, M. E. & Strazzulla, G. Carbonic Acid by Ion Implantation in Water solarCarbon Dioxide Ice Mixtures.Icarus125, 135–144 (1997)

  79. [79]

    Mej´ ıa, C.et al.Radiolysis and sputtering of carbon dioxide ice induced by swift Ti, Ni, and Xe ions.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 365, 477–481 (2015)

  80. [80]

    Quirico, E.et al.On a radiolytic origin of red organics at the surface of the Arrokoth Trans-Neptunian Object.Icarus394, 115396 (2023)

Showing first 80 references.