pith. sign in

arxiv: 1502.03169 · v1 · pith:XOJONEWRnew · submitted 2015-02-11 · 📊 stat.AP · cs.CY

Reproducible Research Can Still Be Wrong: Adopting a Prevention Approach

classification 📊 stat.AP cs.CY
keywords researchscientificapproachconsistentmaintainreplicabilityreproducibilityreproducible
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Reproducibility, the ability to recompute results, and replicability, the chances other experimenters will achieve a consistent result, are two foundational characteristics of successful scientific research. Consistent findings from independent investigators are the primary means by which scientific evidence accumulates for or against an hypothesis. And yet, of late there has been a crisis of confidence among researchers worried about the rate at which studies are either reproducible or replicable. In order to maintain the integrity of science research and maintain the public's trust in science, the scientific community must ensure reproducibility and replicability by engaging in a more preventative approach that greatly expands data analysis education and routinely employs software tools.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.