Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy is sufficient but not necessary for the likelihood factorization required by Einstein

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1407.6052 v1 pith:XP2OMUCZ submitted 2014-07-22 cond-mat.stat-mech

classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords entropylikelihoodboltzmanneinsteinfactrequirementsubsystemsadditive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

In 1910 Einstein published a crucial aspect of his understanding of Boltzmann entropy. He essentially argued that the likelihood function of any system composed by two probabilistically independent subsystems {\it ought} to be factorizable into the likelihood functions of each of the subsystems. Consistently he was satisfied by the fact that Boltzmann (additive) entropy fulfills this epistemologically fundamental requirement. We show here that entropies (e.g., the $q$-entropy on which nonextensive statistical mechanics is based) which generalize the BG one through violation of its well known additivity can {\it also} fulfill the same requirement. This fact sheds light on the very foundations of the connection between the micro- and macro-scopic worlds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools