Pseudomode approach to Fano effect in dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics

Kazuki Kobayashi; Tatsuro Yuge

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 32 references

Pseudomode approach to Fano effect in dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Fano effect in a single-mode dissipative cavity QED system is reproduced by a reservoir spectral function with a flat background plus a single Lorentzian peak, and the flat background is essential for the master equation to be a valid L

desk verdict Solid pseudomode re-derivation with a valuable Fano spectral function, but the 'unified' claim needs either η<1 support or softer language. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.10087 v2 pith:XPBXCE32 submitted 2026-01-15 quant-ph

Kazuki Kobayashi , Tatsuro Yuge This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords pseudomodeapproachFanoeffectcavityQEDspectralfunctionLindbladmasterequationdiagonalizationMarkovianembeddingnon-Markoviandynamics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the Fano effect observed in a two-level emitter coupled to a single-mode cavity and a common reservoir is fully captured by a specific form of the reservoir spectral function. That spectral function consists of a constant (flat) background plus a single-resonance (Lorentzian) term with a complex residue, and it reproduces exactly a quantum master equation previously derived from the Born-Markov approximation. The authors identify the constant term as essential: without it the master equation would not be of Lindblad form, meaning it would not describe a valid open quantum system. In the maximal-interference case, the spectral function reduces to the textbook Fano profile, and the same expression is independently obtained from Fano diagonalization of the atom–cavity–reservoir Hamiltonian. If correct, the result unifies two previously separate theoretical descriptions of the Fano effect in single-mode cavity QED and ties the asymmetric line shape to the non-Markovian structure of the reservoir.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spectral function of the reservoir as seen by the atom, written as J(ω)=J0+f(ω) with a constant term J0=γ/2π and a single-pole function f(ω) with complex residue r1. This form is the input to the pseudomode approach, which embeds the structured reservoir into a Markovian bath by introducing a single auxiliary cavity mode with complex frequency z1=ωc−iκ/2 and complex couplings g̃±=g±iγF/2. The alternative factorization of the residue, 2πir1=−g̃−g̃*+, is what lets the relative phase enter and create the Fano interference. The positivity condition on the coefficient matrix Γ (Eq. 45) then makes the constant term indispensable for a completely positive (Lindblad) evolut

What would settle it

Measure the frequency-resolved spontaneous emission spectrum of an atom coupled to a single-mode cavity through a common reservoir with controlled η and relative phase Δϕ; the observed effective spectral function should match γ + [8|g|√(ηγκ)(ω−ωc)cosΔϕ + κ(4|g|²−ηγκ)]/[4(ω−ωc)²+κ²]. If the flat background is absent or the Fano zero occurs at a different frequency than predicted, the equivalence claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a master equation previously obtained under the Born-Markov approximation for an atom coupled to a cavity and a shared reservoir can be rederived exactly by the pseudomode approach, provided the reservoir spectral function seen by the atom is 2πJ(ω)=γ+[8|g|√(ηγκ)(ω−ωc)cosΔϕ+κ(4|g|²−ηγκ)]/[4(ω−ωc)²+κ²]. This spectral function is a constant γ/2π plus a single-pole term; the constant is required for the resulting master equation to be of Lindblad form, since the coefficient matrix Γ in the Lindblad condition must satisfy (−Im z1)πJ0 ≥ |ν|². In the strongest-interference regime η=1 the expression reduces to the Fano formula 2πJ(ε)=γ|ε+q|²/(ε²+1), and the same sp

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the reservoir spectral function contains a perfectly flat, frequency-independent term over all frequencies, a non-normalizable idealization that the paper itself notes is only an approximation over the relevant frequency range; if real reservoirs deviate significantly from this flatness, the exact Lindblad/Fano structure need not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The spectral function provides a direct map from microscopic parameters (γ, κ, |g|, η, Δϕ) to the measurable Fano line shape of the atomic emission spectrum.
Because the constant background can be physically realized as an adiabatically eliminated, very leaky auxiliary mode, the derived master equation can be used in practical simulations of cavity-QED systems.
The equality of the pseudomode and Fano-diagonalization results shows that the previously distinct Born-Markov and Markovian-embedding descriptions of the Fano effect in single-mode cavity QED are the same theory.
The Lindblad condition (45) ties the magnitude of the Fano interference rate to the product of the atomic and cavity decay rates, giving a consistency check for experimental parameters.
In the η=1 limit, the spectral function's Fano form directly explains the anti-resonance dip in the decay rate observed as a function of atom–cavity detuning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The constant-term mechanism suggests a general repair recipe for any pseudomode master equation that violates complete positivity: add a Markovian background channel with a loss rate chosen to satisfy the relevant inequality, an alternative to rotating the pseudomodes.
If real reservoirs only approximate the flat background over a finite bandwidth, the predicted Fano shape should still be observable whenever that bandwidth exceeds the relevant transition linewidths; this yields a quantitative condition for when the effect should appear.
The appearance of a negative-weight Lorentzian in the g=0 limit implies that spectroscopy of the atomic decay can directly reveal sub-Lorentzian (negative-weight) reservoir components, which are usually invisible in standard emission measurements.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: the core formal result is solid and worth knowing. The paper shows that Yamaguchi's QME can be obtained from a single-pole-plus-constant spectral function via the pseudomode approach, and that the constant term is what makes the QME Lindblad. I checked the memory-kernel evaluation, the effective Hamiltonian, and the Kossakowski positivity condition; the algebra is internally consistent. The Fano-diagonalization section independently recovers the spectral function for η=1, which is a real check rather than a restatement.

The new pieces are the explicit spectral function in Eq. (38), the Lindblad condition (45), and the connection between the constant background J0 and the Fano rate. The paper also handles the non-normalizability of J0 honestly, flagging it as an idealization and giving a plausible large-leakage interpretation.

The main soft spot is that the Sec. III construction is reverse-engineered: the spectral function is fixed by demanding that the resulting QME match Yamaguchi's Eq. (13). So Eq. (38) is not an independent prediction at general η. The only independent microscopic derivation is for η=1, and Sec. V concedes the η<1 extension is open. The abstract's 'unified description' therefore overstates what is established; for η<1 the claim rests on the coefficient-matching construction. That is a load-bearing gap if the title claim is taken literally, but the formal pseudomode equivalence itself is not wrong.

One citation-practice issue: one of the authors is also an author of the target QME in Ref. [11]. The paper does not say so. It is natural to extend your own work, but a referee should ask for an explicit disclosure because the novelty assessment depends on the boundary with Ref. [11].

The constant-J0 issue raised by the skeptic is real but less damaging than it first looks: the paper acknowledges the normalization violation and localizes its scope. I would not block on it.

Who should read this: people working on pseudomode/few-mode embeddings and on Lindblad-form master equations for structured reservoirs. It is a careful, modest paper with a real formal addition. Send it to peer review; the revision should soften or support the 'unified' claim and add the disclosure.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies Fano interference in a dissipative cavity-QED setup where a two-level atom is coupled to a reservoir. Its central formal result is that Yamaguchi's quantum master equation (Eq. (13)), previously derived under the Born-Markov approximation, can be reproduced by the pseudomode approach if the reservoir spectral function is of the single-pole-plus-constant form shown in Eq. (38): 2πJ(ω)=γ+[8|g|√(ηγκ)(ω−ωc)cosΔφ+κ(4|g|²−ηγκ)]/[4(ω−ωc)²+κ²]. The constant term J0=γ/(2π) is shown to be necessary for the QME to be Lindblad (condition (45)). For the maximal interference case η=1, the spectral function reduces to the Fano form Eq. (40), and is rederived independently in Sec. IV via Fano diagonalization of an atom–cavity system with frequency-independent couplings to a common reservoir. The paper concludes that the pseudomode approach provides a unified description of the Fano effect in single-mode cavity QED.

Significance. The algebra of the pseudomode derivation is internally consistent: the residue-theorem evaluation of the memory kernel, the effective-Hamiltonian construction, the coefficient matching (Eqs. (32)–(36)), and the positivity condition (45) all check. The Fano-diagonalization section (Sec. IV) is a clean, self-contained derivation of Eq. (40) for η=1, and it correctly identifies the contribution of the direct atom–reservoir coupling to the Fano interference. If the paper's equivalence is accepted, it gives a useful dictionary between a structured-reservoir spectral function and a Lindblad QME with cross-dissipators, and it clarifies why a constant background in J(ω) is required for complete positivity. The main weakness is that the independent check covers only η=1; the general η case is obtained by choosing J(ω) to match the target QME, so the 'prediction' is partly by construction. The paper is clearly written and the derivations are detailed enough to verify.

major comments (2)

[Abstract; Secs. IV and V] The claim of a 'unified description' is not fully supported. The pseudomode derivation in Sec. III is constructive: Eq. (38) is fixed by matching Yamaguchi's QME via coefficient comparison (Eqs. (32)–(36)), not by an independent prediction. The only independent derivation, Sec. IV, yields Eq. (61) = Eq. (40) for the special case η=1, as the paper concedes in Sec. V ('An important open problem is to extend this derivation to the case of η < 1'). Thus for 0≤η<1, the η-dependence of Eq. (38) lacks independent microscopic support. The abstract should be revised to either present the Sec. III result as an equivalent reformulation or to restrict the 'independent derivation' claim to η=1.
[Sec. III C, Eq. (18)] The constant spectral term J0=γ/(2π) is not a normalizable spectral function. Sec. IIIC acknowledges this, but the statement that J0 is 'essential' for the Lindblad form (Eq. (45)) is exact only for an exactly flat spectrum over all ω. For a physical finite-bandwidth reservoir, Eq. (38) is an effective spectral function and the Lindblad/positivity condition holds only approximately. This limitation should be stated in the abstract or introduction, not only in Sec. IIIC, to avoid overstating the physical applicability.

minor comments (6)

[Eq. (20)] The symbol α in πα is not defined; it should be J0 (or otherwise defined).
[Fig. 1 caption] Typo: 'dipicted' should be 'depicted'.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A2)] Duplicate 'the' in 'we have used the the normalization condition'.
[Ref. [20]] Reference [20] is cited as an arXiv preprint with year 2025; if it has been published, please update the citation.
[Sec. IV, Eqs. (48)–(49)] The assumption that ξω and ζω are frequency-independent should be explicitly identified as the Markovian/white-noise limit, and connected to the discussion of the constant term in Sec. IIIC.
[Eq. (39)] Since q is complex, clarify that |ε+√η q|² denotes the complex modulus squared.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No equation-level circularity: the spectral function is an explicit inverse construction, and Sec. IV provides an independent η=1 check.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. In Sec. III the paper does not claim to predict Eq. (38) from a microscopic reservoir; instead it imposes pseudomode conditions (18),(a)-(c), derives the general QME (31), and fixes the free parameters (J0, z1, g±) by coefficient matching to Yamaguchi's QME, Eqs. (32)-(36). The resulting Eq. (38) is explicitly framed as the spectral function 'that leads to Yamaguchi's QME (13)' in the pseudomode approach, making this an identification/construction rather than a hidden fit renamed as a prediction. The independent content is Sec. IV, where Fano diagonalization of the explicit atom-cavity-common-reservoir Hamiltonian with flat couplings (48),(49) yields Eq. (61) = Eq. (40) without using Sec. III's J, providing non-circular support for η=1. For η<1, Sec. V concedes 'An important open problem is to extend this derivation to the case of η<1', so the η-dependent generalization is not independently checked; this is a scope limitation, not an equation-level circularity. The only self-citation (Ref. [11], co-authored by Yuge) supplies the target QME, but the present paper rederives that QME through the pseudomode construction and cross-checks the η=1 spectral function via a different method, so the citation is not load-bearing in a circular way. No step reduces Eq. (38) to itself or to a fitted quantity called a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on a deliberately chosen spectral function (constant plus single pole) whose parameters are matched to the target QME, plus the standard pseudomode tools of single-excitation restriction and flat-coupling idealization. The only microscopic derivation of the spectral function is given for η=1 in Sec. IV.

free parameters (3)

J0 (constant spectral background) = γ/(2π)
Introduced in Eq. (18) as the constant part of J(ω); its value is fixed by matching the atomic decay dissipator in Yamaguchi's QME (Eq. (32)) rather than derived from a microscopic model in Sec. III.
z1 (pseudomode pole position) = ωc − iκ/2
The single pole of f(ω) is set to the cavity frequency and decay rate of the target QME via Eq. (33). It is chosen to make the pseudomode match the physical cavity mode.
r1 (single-pole residue) = i/(2π)[|g|² − ηγκ/4 − i|g|√(ηγκ) cos Δφ]
The residue is fixed through the factorization 2πir1 = −g̃−g̃+* with g̃± = g ± iγF/2 (Eqs. (35)–(36)). This choice is what forces the Fano cross-dissipator to appear; it is the adjustable content of the pseudomode ansatz.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Single-excitation subspace restriction
The derivation assumes the total system contains at most one excitation throughout (Sec. II, Eqs. (4)–(5)); the pseudomode amplitude b1(t) is a c-number amplitude, so multi-excitation validity is not proven.
ad hoc to paper Single-pole spectral ansatz for f(ω)
Conditions (a)–(c) in Sec. IIIA restrict f(ω) to a single lower-half-plane simple pole with complex residue, vanishing at infinity. This is what forces the resulting QME to have exactly one cavity mode and a Fano cross-dissipator.
domain assumption Flat, non-normalizable reservoir component for the atom
J(ω) is taken to have a constant part J0 for all ω (Eq. (18)), yielding a delta-function memory kernel. Sec. IIIC acknowledges this violates the usual normalization condition and is only an approximation over the relevant frequency range.
domain assumption Flat system–reservoir couplings in Fano diagonalization
In Sec. IV, ξω and ζω are independent of ω (Eqs. (48)–(49)); this is what realizes the maximal-interference case η=1 and is not generalized to η<1.

invented entities (1)

Single pseudomode with complex frequency z1 and complex couplings g̃±
purpose: Auxiliary bosonic mode that embeds the non-Markovian reservoir dynamics into a Markovian atom–cavity system; its annihilation/creation operators are identified with the cavity mode a in Yamaguchi's QME.
The pseudomode is a standard tool from Ref. [12] and is not claimed to be a physical particle; its parameters are fixed by matching the known QME, and no new falsifiable prediction is offered.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pseudomode approach to Fano effect in dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XPBXCE32

@misc{pith2026260110087,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pseudomode approach to Fano effect in dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XPBXCE32}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.10087}
}

read the original abstract

We study the Fano effect in dissipative cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED), which originates from the interference between the emitter's direct radiation and that mediated by a cavity mode. Starting from a two-level system coupled to a structured reservoir, we show that a quantum master equation previously derived within the Born-Markov approximation can be rederived by introducing a single auxiliary mode through the pseudomode approach. We identify the corresponding spectral function of the system--environment interaction and show that it consists of a constant contribution and a non-Lorentzian contribution, whose interplay gives rise to a spectral profile of the Fano form. The constant contribution represents a Markovian background and is essential for obtaining a Lindblad master equation. Furthermore, by applying Fano diagonalization to an atom--cavity system coupled to common and independent reservoirs, we independently derive the same spectral function and clarify its physical origin. Our results provide a unified description of the Fano effect in single-mode cavity QED systems and reveal its non-Markovian origin encoded in the spectral function of the structured reservoir.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.10087 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** is the plot of J(ϵ) for this case (η = 0 and |q| = 2), which exhibits a symmetric profile. The Fano parameter q = 2|g|e i∆ϕ/ √γκ contains the relative phase ∆ϕ between the coupling g = |g|e iϕ and the rate γF = √ηγκei(θA−θC) , and is therefore complex. Such a complex-valued q has been experimentally observed in quantum dot systems [16, 17]. We note that this relative phase ∆ϕ cannot be eliminated by phase rotations… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

[11]

Medina, F

I. Medina, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, A. I. Fern´ andez- 9 Dom ´ ınguez, and J. Feist, Few-mode field quantization of arbitrary electromagnetic spectral densities, Physical Review Letters126, 093601 (2021)

2021
[1]

This method, known as Fano diagonaliza- tion, has attracted renewed interest in the study of non- Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems [5]

also introduced a method for constructing eigenstates that include both system and environmental degrees of freedom. This method, known as Fano diagonaliza- tion, has attracted renewed interest in the study of non- Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems [5]. In this context, non-Markovian dynamics arise from mem- ory effects induced by structured rese...

arXiv 2026
[2]

Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

1961
[3]

A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in nanoscale structures, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2257 (2010)

2010
[4]

Fleischhauer, A

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 633 (2005)

2005
[5]

M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nature Photonics 11, 543 (2017)

2017
[6]

B. J. Dalton, S. M. Barnett, and B. M. Garraway, Theory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes, Physical Review A64, 053813 (2001)

2001
[7]

Lambropoulos, G

P. Lambropoulos, G. M. Nikolopoulos, T. R. Nielsen, and S. Bay, Fundamental quantum optics in structured reser- voirs, Reports on Progress in Physics63, 455 (2000)

2000

Show all 32 references

[8]

Finkelstein-Shapiro and A

D. Finkelstein-Shapiro and A. Keller, Ubiquity of beutler–fano profiles: From scattering to dissipative pro- cesses, Physical Review A97, 023411 (2018)

2018
[9]

Franke, S

S. Franke, S. Hughes, M. K. Dezfouli, P. T. Kristensen, K. Busch, A. Knorr, and M. Richter, Quantization of quasinormal modes for open cavities and plasmonic cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review Letters 122, 213901 (2019)

2019
[10]

E. V. Denning, J. Iles-Smith, and J. Mørk, Quantum light–matter interaction and controlled phonon scatter- ing in a photonic fano cavity, Physical Review B100, 214306 (2019)

2019
[12]

Yamaguchi, A

M. Yamaguchi, A. Lyasota, and T. Yuge, Theory of fano effect in cavity quantum electrodynamics, Physical Re- view Research3, 013037 (2021)

2021
[13]

B. M. Garraway, Nonperturbative decay of an atomic sys- tem in a cavity, Physical Review A55, 2290 (1997)

1997
[14]

Breuer and F

H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002)

2002
[15]

Pleasance, B

G. Pleasance, B. M. Garraway, and F. Petruccione, Gen- eralized theory of pseudomodes for exact descriptions of non-markovian quantum processes, Physical Review Re- search2, 043058 (2020)

2020
[16]

Pleasance and F

G. Pleasance and F. Petruccione, Pseudomode descrip- tion of general open quantum system dynamics: Non- perturbative master equation for the spin-boson model, arXiv (2021), arXiv:2108.05755 [quant-ph]

2021 arXiv
[17]

Kobayashi, H

K. Kobayashi, H. Aikawa, S. Katsumoto, and Y. Iye, Tuning of the fano effect through a quantum dot in an aharonov-bohm interferometer, Physical Review Letters 88, 256806 (2002)

2002
[18]

Kobayashi, H

K. Kobayashi, H. Aikawa, S. Katsumoto, and Y. Iye, Mesoscopic fano effect in a quantum dot embedded in an aharonov-bohm ring, Physical Review B68, 235304 (2003)

2003
[19]

R. F. Nabiev, P. Yeh, and J. J. S´ anchez-Mondrag´ on, Dynamics of the spontaneous emission of an atom into the photon-density-of-states gap: Solvable quantum- electrodynamical model, Physical Review A47, 3380 (1993)

1993
[20]

S. Bay, P. Lambropoulos, and K. Mølmer, Superradiance in a structured radiation reservoir, Physical Review A 57, 3065 (1998)

1998
[21]

Ben-Asher, A

A. Ben-Asher, A. I. Fern´ andez-Dom ´ ınguez, and J. Feist, Interference-induced cavity resonances and imaginary rabi splitting, arXiv (2025), arXiv:2510.11850 [quant- ph]

2025
[22]

Lu, W.-J

Y.-W. Lu, W.-J. Zhou, Y. Li, R. Li, J.-F. Liu, L. Wu, and H. Tan, Unveiling atom-photon quasi-bound states in hybrid plasmonic-photonic cavity, Nanophotonics11, 3307 (2022)

2022
[23]

Gorini, A

V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups ofN-level systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

1976
[24]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

1976
[25]

O. c. v. ˇCernot ´ ık, A. Dantan, and C. Genes, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with frequency-dependent re- flectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 243601 (2019)

2019
[26]

Tamascelli, A

D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Nonperturbative treatment of non-markovian dynamics of open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters120, 030402 (2018)

2018
[27]

Lentrodt and J

D. Lentrodt and J. Evers, Ab initio few-mode theory for quantum potential scattering problems, Phys. Rev. X10, 011008 (2020)

2020
[28]

Franke, M

S. Franke, M. Richter, J. Ren, A. Knorr, and S. Hughes, Quantized quasinormal-mode description of nonlinear cavity-qed effects from coupled resonators with a fano- like resonance, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033456 (2020)

2020
[29]

Meschede, D

L. Meschede, D. D. A. Clarke, and O. Hess, Quantum quasinormal mode theory for dissipative nano-optics and magnetodielectric cavity quantum electrodynamics, APL Quantum3, 016103 (2026)

2026
[30]

C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004)

2004
[31]

T. B. Propp, How to describe collective decay of uncou- pled modes in the input–output formalism, Journal of the Optical Society of America B39, 3128 (2022)

2022
[32]

G. Park, Z. Huang, Y. Zhu, C. Yang, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Quasi-lindblad pseudomode theory for open quan- tum systems, Physical Review B110, 195148 (2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Medina, F

I. Medina, F. J. Garc ´ ıa-Vidal, A. I. Fern´ andez- 9 Dom ´ ınguez, and J. Feist, Few-mode field quantization of arbitrary electromagnetic spectral densities, Physical Review Letters126, 093601 (2021)

2021

[2] [1]

This method, known as Fano diagonaliza- tion, has attracted renewed interest in the study of non- Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems [5]

also introduced a method for constructing eigenstates that include both system and environmental degrees of freedom. This method, known as Fano diagonaliza- tion, has attracted renewed interest in the study of non- Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems [5]. In this context, non-Markovian dynamics arise from mem- ory effects induced by structured rese...

arXiv 2026

[3] [2]

Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

1961

[4] [3]

A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in nanoscale structures, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2257 (2010)

2010

[5] [4]

Fleischhauer, A

M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 633 (2005)

2005

[6] [5]

M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, Fano resonances in photonics, Nature Photonics 11, 543 (2017)

2017

[7] [6]

B. J. Dalton, S. M. Barnett, and B. M. Garraway, Theory of pseudomodes in quantum optical processes, Physical Review A64, 053813 (2001)

2001

[8] [7]

Lambropoulos, G

P. Lambropoulos, G. M. Nikolopoulos, T. R. Nielsen, and S. Bay, Fundamental quantum optics in structured reser- voirs, Reports on Progress in Physics63, 455 (2000)

2000